Del artículo de revisión a la recomendación profesional: La uniformación y material de protección individual para los equipos del ámbito prehospitalario de urgencias y emergencias

The Spanish Society of Nursing Emergency (SEEUE) has several lines documentaries that can be consulted on its web page and that have been spread through various publications: Statutes, scientific recommendations, professional recommendations, statements and allegations, grounds for nursing emergency, guarantees and rules, documents of interest and legislation. Set this that composed the regulatory environment, legal and recommendations which society poses to the collective nurse from the area of the emergency, as well as the rest of actors associated with urgent assistance (institutional and administratively) and through what has been the work of conceptualization and definition in our area the past few years. Part of this documentation offer possibilities for scientific endorsement and professional and invites to continue building knowledge and evidence. It is in this sense in which this work can and should be defined from a literature review approach and under the scheme of "review article". The working Group in Primary Care (PC) of the SEEUE, decided to build a Professional Recommendation (PR) in one of the areas of "uncertainty/variability" in the employment context and historical demand of nurses and other emergency care team on security issues: "The uniform and personal protective equipment for professional teams on prehospital emergency areas”.

Modelo de atención socio sanitaria: optimización de recurso

Sección "Buenas prácticas en gestión clínica"

Estudio comparativo del aloinjerto hth vs autoinjerto de isquiotibiales en la reparación del LCA. Presentacion de resultados de nuestra serie

Objective: To present and compare the functional outcomes and degree of satisfaction of patients operated on in the Knee Unit of our hospital, using bank BTB or Hamstring Autograft. Material and Methods: There were 96 patients included in the study who were operated on between 2001 and 2009 using bank BTB, and 104 patients operated on between 2007 and 2009 using Hamstring Autograft. All of them completed the IKDC questionnaire by telephone. Results: No significant differences were found between both groups regarding the onset of pain, inflammation, or instability of the knee. A large majority of patients in both groups were satisfied or very satisfied with the results obtained (81% of the BTB, and 90 % of the hamstring group). Conclusions: There are no sound reasons to proscribe either of the two techniques; the surgeon must decide the most appropriate intervention depending on the case, personal experience, the economic situation and especially the needs of the patient.