Incremento de la participación de Atención Primaria en la asistencia al virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana: opinan los profesionales de las unidades hospitalarias.

AIM To determine the opinions of infectious diseases professionals on the possibilities of monitoring patients with HIV in Primary Care. DESIGN Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. LOCATION Infectious Diseases Unit in the University Hospital "Virgen de la Victoria" in Málaga. PARTICIPANTS Health professionals with more than one year experience working in infectious diseases. A total of 25 respondents: 5 doctors, 15 nurses and 5 nursing assistants. METHOD Convenience sample. Semi-structured interviews were used that were later transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was performed according to the Taylor and Bogdan approach with computer support. Validation of information was made through additional analysis, expert participation, and feedback of part of the results to the participants. RESULTS Hospital care professionals considered the disease-related complexity of HIV, treatment and social aspects that may have an effect on the organizational level of care. Professionals highlighted the benefits of specialized care, although opinions differed between doctors and nurses as regards follow up in Primary Care. Some concerns emerged about the level of training, confidentiality and workload in Primary Care, although they mentioned potential advantages related to accessibility of patients. CONCLUSIONS Physicians perceive difficulties in following up HIV patients in Primary Care, even for those patients with a good control of their disease. Nurses and nursing assistants are more open to this possibility due to the proximity to home and health promotion in Primary Care.

Guía de buenas prácticas para mejorar la facturación por la asistencia sanitaria a ciudadanos de la UE en el SSPA

Esta guía ha sido elaborada y editada como parte de las actividades del proyecto de investigación “Como mejorar la recuperación de costes derivados de la asistencia sanitaria a ciudadanos de la Unión Europea en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía”. Inés García-Sánchez, editora

Aspectos éticos de las comunicaciones cientificas

Artículo especial. Este texto está basado en el trabajo final del Master de Bioética y Humanización de la Asistencia realizado en la Escuela de Bioética de San Juan de Dios (Sevilla), Facultad de Teología de Granada, Universidad de Comillas durante los cursos 2006-07 y 2007-08.

Núm 6, diciembre de 2013

Artículos destacados: Buenas prácticas en gestión clínica: Plan de prevención y atención a la parada cardiorrespiratoria en el Hospital Materno-Infantil de Málaga. Modelo de atención socio sanitaria: optimización de recursos y coordianción de la asistencia a pacientes institucionalizados en la residencia Manuel Ridruejo. Aplicación para la dispensación de medicamentos biológicos para el tratamiento de los pacientes con psoriasis (ADISBIO). Análisis de las prescripciones farmacológicas potencialmente inapropiadas en pacientes mayores en Atención Primaria. Boletín informativo sobre prácticas clínicas basadas en la mejor evidencia científica. Atención integral al paciente en situación terminal. Sala de acompañamiento.

Guía de Biovigilancia de Órganos, Células y Tejidos de Andalucía

Coordinación Autonómica de Trasplantes. Dirección General de Asistencia Sanitaria. Servicio Andaluz de Salud

Impacto de la crisis económica en la salud

Equipo de trabajo EASP: Guadalupe Carmona López, Luis Andrés López Fernández, Oscar Javier Mendoza García, Ignacio Oleaga de Usategui. No contiene fecha de edición.

Salud pública en MERCOSUR

AUTORES Informe Uruguay DPTO. DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA Y SOCIAL UDELAR Prof. Dra. Marisa Buglioli Prof. Agda. Dra. Ima León Prof. Adj. Dra. Cecilia Severi Asist. Dr. Miguel Alegretti Asist. Dr. Mario Romero Doc. Colaboradora: Dra. Lucia Alonso Informe Argentina UNIVERSIDAD ISALUD Prof. Martín Langsam Informe Paraguay Prof. Natalia Meza Prof. María Noce Prof. Julia Pineda Informe Brasil UNIVERSIDADE SÃO PAULO FACULTADE SAÚDE PUBLICA CEPEDOC Prof. Daniele Sacardo Nigro Prof. Juan Carlos Aneiros Fernandez Introducción a la Salud Internacional Prof. Martin Langsam Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública COORDINACIÓN Prof. Luis Andrés López Fernández Prof. Juan Ignacio Martínez Millán ASISTENCIA TÉCNICA Y LOGÍSTICA Elisabeth María Ilidio Paulo

Oral and general health-related quality of life in patients treated for oral cancer compared to control group.

BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is gaining importance as a valuable outcome measure in oral cancer area. The aim of this study was to assess the general and oral HRQoL of oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients 6 or more months after treatment and compare them with a population free from this disease. METHODS A cross-sectional study was carried out with patients treated for oral cancer at least 6 months post-treatment and a gender and age group matched control group. HRQoL was measured with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12); oral HRQoL (OHRQoL) was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP). Multivariable regression models assessed the association between the outcomes (SF-12, OHIP-14 and OIDP) and the exposure (patients versus controls), adjusting for sex, age, social class, functional tooth units and presence of illness. RESULTS For patients (n = 142) and controls (n = 142), 64.1% were males. The mean age was 65.2 (standard deviation (sd): 12.9) years in patients and 67.5 (sd: 13.7) years in controls. Patients had worse SF-12 Physical Component Summary scores than controls even in fully the adjusted model [β-coefficient = -0.11 (95% CI: -5.12-(-0.16)]. The differences in SF-12 Mental Component Summary were not statistically significant. Regarding OHRQoL patients had 11.63 (95% CI: 6.77-20.01) higher odds for the OHIP-14 and 21.26 (95% CI: 11.54-39.13) higher odds for OIDP of being in a worse category of OHRQoL compared to controls in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSION At least 6 months after treatment, oral cancer patients had worse OHRQoL, worse physical HRQoL and similar psychological HRQoL than the general population.