6 resultados para 330-U1375B
Resumo:
BACKGROUND Illiteracy, a universal problem, limits the utilization of the most widely used short cognitive tests. Our objective was to assess and compare the effectiveness and cost for cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia (DEM) screening of three short cognitive tests applicable to illiterates. METHODS Phase III diagnostic test evaluation study was performed during one year in four Primary Care centers, prospectively including individuals with suspicion of CI or DEM. All underwent the Eurotest, Memory Alteration Test (M@T), and Phototest, applied in a balanced manner. Clinical, functional, and cognitive studies were independently performed in a blinded fashion in a Cognitive Behavioral Neurology Unit, and the gold standard diagnosis was established by consensus of expert neurologists on the basis of these results. Effectiveness of tests was assessed as the proportion of correct diagnoses (diagnostic accuracy [DA]) and the kappa index of concordance (k) with respect to gold standard diagnoses. Costs were based on public prices at the time and hospital accounts. RESULTS The study included 139 individuals: 47 with DEM, 36 with CI, and 56 without CI. No significant differences in effectiveness were found among the tests. For DEM screening: Eurotest (k = 0.71 [0.59-0.83], DA = 0.87 [0.80-0.92]), M@T (k = 0.72 [0.60-0.84], DA = 0.87 [0.80-0.92]), Phototest (k = 0.70 [0.57-0.82], DA = 0.86 [0.79-0.91]). For CI screening: Eurotest (k = 0.67 [0.55-0.79]; DA = 0.83 [0.76-0.89]), M@T (k = 0.52 [0.37-0.67]; DA = 0.80 [0.72-0.86]), Phototest (k = 0.59 [0.46-0.72]; DA = 0.79 [0.71-0.86]). There were no differences in the cost of DEM screening, but the cost of CI screening was significantly higher with M@T (330.7 ± 177.1 €, mean ± sd) than with Eurotest (294.1 ± 195.0 €) or Phototest (296.0 ± 196. 5 €). Application time was shorter with Phototest (2.8 ± 0.8 min) than with Eurotest (7.1 ± 1.8 min) or M@T (6.8 ± 2.2 min). CONCLUSIONS Eurotest, M@T, and Phototest are equally effective. Eurotest and Phototest are both less expensive options but Phototest is the most efficient, requiring the shortest application time.
Resumo:
Programa de Salud Infantil y Adolescente de Andalucía (http://www.repositoriosalud.es/handle/10668/1741)
Resumo:
Sesiones grupales: 01. ‘Una vida familiar’; 02. ‘Adaptación y vínculo de apego’; 03. ‘Cómo estimular el desarrollo infantil’; 04. ‘El arte de educar’; 05. ‘Adolescencia’. Programa de Salud Infantil y Adolescente de Andalucía (http://www.repositoriosalud.es/handle/10668/1741)
Resumo:
Contiene: Guías para las visitas del PSIA-A individual; Guías específicas para familias; y Consejos específicos para adolescentes. En Guías específicas para familias: Bebé a bordo: una nueva vida familiar; Desarrollo psicológico y evolutivo saludable. Consejos para familias; La estimulación del desarrollo; El logro de la autonomía; El arte de educar; Aprender y divertirse al salir de clase; Llegó la adolescencia; Educación sexual; Consejos para prevenir la violencia de género; Consejos para prevenir el tabaquismo pasivo y el inicio del consumo de tabaco; ¿Qué deben saber acerca de las drogas o el alcohol?; Guía para acompañar a un menor en la pérdida de un ser querido; Consejos para fomentar la autoestima; Recomendaciones de actuación en caso de acoso escolar o bullying; Uso responsable de las nuevas tecnologías: Internet; Bebés con necesidades especiales; Familias en proceso de separación o divorcio. En Consejos específicos para adolescentes: Uso responsable de las nuevas tecnologías: Internet Programa de Salud Infantil y Adolescente de Andalucía; Consejos sobre el consumo de alcohol; ¿Qué debes saber acerca de las drogas?; Consejos para prevenir la violencia de género; Consejos sobre el consumo de tabaco. Programa de Salud Infantil y Adolescente de Andalucía (http://www.repositoriosalud.es/handle/10668/1741)
Resumo:
Programa de Salud Infantil y Adolescente de Andalucía (http://www.repositoriosalud.es/handle/10668/1741)
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE To assess Spanish and Portuguese patients' and physicians' preferences regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatments and the monthly willingness to pay (WTP) to gain benefits or avoid side effects. METHODS An observational, multicenter, exploratory study focused on routine clinical practice in Spain and Portugal. Physicians were recruited from multiple hospitals and outpatient clinics, while patients were recruited from eleven centers operating in the public health care system in different autonomous communities in Spain and Portugal. Preferences were measured via a discrete choice experiment by rating multiple T2DM medication attributes. Data were analyzed using the conditional logit model. RESULTS Three-hundred and thirty (n=330) patients (49.7% female; mean age 62.4 [SD: 10.3] years, mean T2DM duration 13.9 [8.2] years, mean body mass index 32.5 [6.8] kg/m(2), 41.8% received oral + injected medication, 40.3% received oral, and 17.6% injected treatments) and 221 physicians from Spain and Portugal (62% female; mean age 41.9 [SD: 10.5] years, 33.5% endocrinologists, 66.5% primary-care doctors) participated. Patients valued avoiding a gain in bodyweight of 3 kg/6 months (WTP: €68.14 [95% confidence interval: 54.55-85.08]) the most, followed by avoiding one hypoglycemic event/month (WTP: €54.80 [23.29-82.26]). Physicians valued avoiding one hypoglycemia/week (WTP: €287.18 [95% confidence interval: 160.31-1,387.21]) the most, followed by avoiding a 3 kg/6 months gain in bodyweight and decreasing cardiovascular risk (WTP: €166.87 [88.63-843.09] and €154.30 [98.13-434.19], respectively). Physicians and patients were willing to pay €125.92 (73.30-622.75) and €24.28 (18.41-30.31), respectively, to avoid a 1% increase in glycated hemoglobin, and €143.30 (73.39-543.62) and €42.74 (23.89-61.77) to avoid nausea. CONCLUSION Both patients and physicians in Spain and Portugal are willing to pay for the health benefits associated with improved diabetes treatment, the most important being to avoid hypoglycemia and gaining weight. Decreased cardiovascular risk and weight reduction became the third most valued attributes for physicians and patients, respectively.