Estudio de las subpoblaciones linfocitarias y secreción intratecal en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple defnida

Multiple sclerosis is an infammatory demyelinating autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord. The aim of the study was to quantify lym-phocyte subpopulations in cerebrospinal fuid and blood of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and in patients whit degenerative diseases not (control) in order to fnd some relationships between them that make it possible to differentiate the immune status of patients in each group. This work was jointly carried out with Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena in Seville during 2008, 2009 and 2010. It is a descriptive, transversal and cohort study. The selected population is composed of 142 subjects who were subjected to lumbar puncture and a blood sample. Group 1 (n=70), control, Group 2 (n=53), patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, Group 3 (n=5), patients with primary type progressive multiple sclerosis, and Group 4 (n=14) patients with isolated neurological syndrome. The results show an increase in CSF B cells in MS patients suggesting an increase in focal infammatory activity in the CNS. Regarding NKCD8, reduced total levels of NK and NKCD8 regard-ing controls were observed, and it showed an increased IgG index value in patients with RRMS.

Effectiveness of glatiramer acetate compared to other multiple sclerosis therapies.

OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of glatiramer acetate (GA) compared to other multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Observational cohort study carried out in MS patients treated with GA (GA cohort) or other MS therapies -switched from GA- (non-GA cohort). Study data were obtained through review of our MS patient database. The primary endpoint was the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores reached at the end of treatment/last check-up. RESULTS A total of 180 patients were included: GA cohort n = 120, non-GA cohort n = 60. Patients in the GA cohort showed better EDSS scores at the end of treatment/last check-up (mean ± SD, 2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.2; P = 0.001) and were 1.65 times more likely to show better EDSS scores compared to the non-GA cohort (odds ratio, 0.606; 95%CI, 0.436-0.843; P = 0.003). Patients in the GA cohort showed longer mean time to reach EDSS scores of 6 (209.1 [95%CI, 187.6-230.6] vs. 164.3 [95% CI, 137.0-191.6] months; P = 0.004) and slower disability progression (hazard ratio, 0.415 [95%CI, 0.286-0.603]; P < 0.001). The annualized relapse rate was lower in the GA cohort (mean ± SD, 0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5; P = 0.001) and patients' quality of life was improved in this study cohort compared to the non-GA cohort (mean ± SD, 0.7 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS GA may slow down the progression of EDSS scores to a greater extent than other MS therapies, as well as achieving a greater reduction in relapses and a greater improvement in patients' quality of life. Switching from GA to other MS therapies has not proved to entail a better response to treatment.