43 resultados para Unidades de información


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

En la cub.: Respuestas sencillas a las preguntas más frecuentes sobre la intervención. Publicado en la página web de la Consejería de Salud: www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud (Consejería de Salud / Ciudadanía / Nuestro Compromiso por la Calidad / Guías de información para pacientes / Guías de información para pacientes)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Publicado en la página web de la Consejería de Igualdad, Salud y Políticas Sociales: www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud (Consejería de Igualdad, Salud y Políticas Sociales / Profesionales / Salud Pública / Promoción de la Salud / Material Publicado para Inmigrantes)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Boletín semanal para profesionales sanitarios de la Secretaría General de Calidad, Innovación y Salud Pública de la Consejería de Igualdad, Salud y Políticas Sociales

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Trabajo realizado con cargo al proyecto HUM 2007-62203 de la Secretaría de Estado e Investigación (Dirección General de Investigación. Gestión Nacional del Plan Nacional de I+D+i) del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

AIM To determine the opinions of infectious diseases professionals on the possibilities of monitoring patients with HIV in Primary Care. DESIGN Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. LOCATION Infectious Diseases Unit in the University Hospital "Virgen de la Victoria" in Málaga. PARTICIPANTS Health professionals with more than one year experience working in infectious diseases. A total of 25 respondents: 5 doctors, 15 nurses and 5 nursing assistants. METHOD Convenience sample. Semi-structured interviews were used that were later transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was performed according to the Taylor and Bogdan approach with computer support. Validation of information was made through additional analysis, expert participation, and feedback of part of the results to the participants. RESULTS Hospital care professionals considered the disease-related complexity of HIV, treatment and social aspects that may have an effect on the organizational level of care. Professionals highlighted the benefits of specialized care, although opinions differed between doctors and nurses as regards follow up in Primary Care. Some concerns emerged about the level of training, confidentiality and workload in Primary Care, although they mentioned potential advantages related to accessibility of patients. CONCLUSIONS Physicians perceive difficulties in following up HIV patients in Primary Care, even for those patients with a good control of their disease. Nurses and nursing assistants are more open to this possibility due to the proximity to home and health promotion in Primary Care.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G17+1 está integrado por: Elena Primo (Biblioteca Nacional de Ciencias de la Salud), Verónica Juan (BV Andalucía), Montserrat Salas (BV Aragón), Mercedes Corrales y Raquel Lavandera (BV Asturias), Virgili Paéz (BV Baleares), Beatriz Duque (BV Canarias), Fanny Ribes (BV Cantabria), Marisa Alonso (BV Castilla-La Mancha), Pilar Díaz Ruiz (BV Castilla y León), Pilar Roqué (BV Cataluña), Francisco Javier Moreno (BV Extremadura), Teresa Mejuto (BV Galicia), Mayra García Berges y José Manuel Estrada (BV Madrid), Enrique Aguinaga y Juan Antonio Sánchez Sánchez (BV Murcia), Idoia Gaminde (BV Navarra) y Ricardo Aróstegui y Mª Asunción García Martín (BV País Vasco).

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND Job satisfaction of nurses is a determinant factor in the quality and organizational adaptation of clinical management models in the current socio-economic context. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a questionnaire to measure job satisfaction of nurses in the Clinical Management Units in the Andalusian Public Health System. METHODS Clinimetric and cross-sectional study with a sample of 314 nurses of two university hospitals from Seville. Nurses were surveyed in 2011, from March to June. We used the Font Roja questionnaire adapted to our study variables. We performed analyses of correlations, reliability and construct validity, using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the a priori model. RESULTS The end questionnaire consists of 10 items, whose internal consistency was 0.75, with a percentage of variance explaining of 63.67%. CFA confirmed 4 dimensions (work environment, work relationships, motivation, and recognition): significant χ2 (p < .001); χ2/gl = 2.013; GFI= 0.958, RMR = 0.055 y RMSEA = 0.057; AGFI = 0.927, NFI = 0.878, TLI = 0.902, CFI =0.933 e IFI = 0.935; AIC = 132.486 y ECVI = 0.423. CONCLUSION This new questionnaire (G_Clinic) improves clinimetric values of the Font Roja questionnaire, because it reduces the number of items, improves the reliability of the dimensions, increases the value of variance explained, and allows knowing job satisfaction of nurses in clinical managementt.