19 resultados para Equipo de trabajo
Resumo:
An overview was conducted of work-person adjustments engaged in workers classified as especially sensitive for certain occupational risks in health sector. The purpose of this research was to provide workplace accommodations featuring because of some disability or health limitation associated with impairments from the tasks performance. During 2012 in the community health centers of a primary care district, 46 workers were catalogued especially sensitive that received an average of 3,2 adjustment measure in workplace. The findings showed a wide variety of accommodations including modifications in working arrangement, in the way to performance of the tasks, and in a lesser extent, changes in near environmental factors to the workplace and/or workstation. All prevention efforts were setting on provide to maintain continuity of working life inside compatible-limits with health and safety of workers. Our results offer a first approach to the knowledge of health limitations management that hamper responsiveness to demand of tasks.
Resumo:
Publicado en la página Web de la Consejería de Igualdad, Salud y Políticas Sociales: www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud (Ciudadanía / Nuestra Salud / Vida sana / Promoción de la Salud en el Lugar de Trabajo / Entornos)
Resumo:
Esta Estrategia andaluza fue reconocida en 2013 con el Premio Nacional en el Ámbito Laboral en la sexta edición de la estrategia NAOS que organiza el Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Publicado en la página Web de la Consejería de Salud (Ciudadanía / Inicio / Nuestra Salud / Vida sana / Promoción de la Salud en el Lugar de Trabajo / Salud en el trabajo +info)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND In the actual context of population ageing and extension of working age, programs for health promotion at the workplace are a key and necessary tool to promote an active and healthy ageing. This work presents the methodological process followed to elaborate a checklist tool, within the framework of the European project Progress, that contributes to orientate planning, implementation and evaluation of good practices in this field, to be applicable to a variety of programs, countries and workplaces. METHODS A Delphi technique has been applied in three rounds in which experts in the area from five European countries participated. A questionnaire created from a list of criteria and indicators was adapted throughout the rounds, with the use of webmail, to the evaluation of interventions in the field of interest. Through processes of assessment and consensus, criteria and indicators most relevant were prioritized. RESULTS From the nine starting criteria and after the implementation of the technique, four key criteria were prioritized: relevance: 62, adequacy to objective: 57, innovation: 50 and guarantee of quality: 41. Using this group of criteria and indicators, a checklist was designed containing the key information that should be collected for planning, implementation and evaluation of good practices in interventions in this field. CONCLUSIONS The checklist tool helps to systematize the global methodology for the implementation of interventions which could be very useful for persons responsible of programmes to promote active and healthy ageing in the workplace.