4 resultados para Categories and Indicators
em Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland
Resumo:
The cross-departmental strategy to reduce the harm related to substance misuse in Northern Ireland, known as the New Strategic Direction for Alcohol and Drugs (NSD) Phase 2, was launched in 2012. This is the third annual report of progress against the outcomes and indicators set out in that document. For the first time, this annual report also includes progress against the medium and long term outcomes included in the NSD Phase 2. This should help focus action over the next two years of the strategy’s delivery. (*the first two update reports are also available online: http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/pdf_version_-_nsd_phase_2_update_report-_marc... and http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/nsd-phase-2-2nd-annual-report-june-2014.pdf). The report is structured as follows: • Chapter 1 sets out the background to the development of the strategy; • Chapter 2 summarises the revised approach taken in the NSD Phase 2; • Chapter 3 provides an update on the key indicators available since the last report; • Chapter 4 shows progress on the outcomes in the NSD Phase 2; and • Chapter 5 provides a summary and concluding comments
Resumo:
This second annual report provides an update of progress against the outcomes and indicators set out in NSD Phase 2.
Resumo:
IPH responded to the consultation on potential new indicators for the 2013/14 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in the UK. The 20 potential new indicators relate to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, coronary heart disease, diabetes, depression, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma and cancer. The consultation asked people to consider whether there were any barriers to the implementation of the care described by any of the indicators; whether there were potential unintended consequences to the implementation of any of the indicators; whether there was potential for differential impact (in respect of age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation); and whether the indicators may have an adverse impact in different groups in the community.”
Resumo:
Classification and selection of ethnic disparity health indicators in New Zealand