Venture capital financing : screening and contracting under assymetric information

Structure of the Thesis This thesis consists of 5 sections. Section 1 starts with the problem definition and the presentation of the objectives of this thesis. Section 2 introduces a presentation of the theoretical foundations of Venture financing and a review of the main theories developed on Venture investing. It includes a taxonomy of contracting clauses relevant in venture contracting, the conflicts they address, and presents some general observations on contractual clauses. Section 3 presents the research findings on the analysis of a European VC's deal flow and investment screening linked to the prevailing market conditions. Section 4 focuses an empirical study of a European VC's investment process, the criteria it uses to make its investments. It presents empirical findings on the investment criteria over time, business cycles, and investment types. It also links these criteria to the VC's subsequent performance. Finally, section 5 presents an empirical research on the comparison of the legal contracts signed between European and United States Venture Capitalists and the companies they finance. This research highlights some of the contracting practices in Europe and the United States.

Three essays in control, entrepreneurship and innovation

One of the key emphases of these three essays is to provide practical managerial insight. However, good practical insight, can only be created by grounding it firmly on theoretical and empirical research. Practical experience-based understanding without theoretical grounding remains tacit and cannot be easily disseminated. Theoretical understanding without links to real life remains sterile. My studies aim to increase the understanding of how radical innovation could be generated at large established firms and how it can have an impact on business performance as most businesses pursue innovation with one prime objective: value creation. My studies focus on large established firms with sales revenue exceeding USD $ 1 billion. Usually large established firms cannot rely on informal ways of management, as these firms tend to be multinational businesses operating with subsidiaries, offices, or production facilities in more than one country. I. Internal and External Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Investment The goal of this chapter is to focus on CVC as one of the mechanisms available for established firms to source new ideas that can be exploited. We explore the internal and external determinants under which established firms engage in CVC to source new knowledge through investment in startups. We attempt to make scholars and managers aware of the forces that influence CVC activity by providing findings and insights to facilitate the strategic management of CVC. There are research opportunities to further understand the CVC phenomenon. Why do companies engage in CVC? What motivates them to continue "playing the game" and keep their active CVC investment status. The study examines CVC investment activity, and the importance of understanding the influential factors that make a firm decide to engage in CVC. The main question is: How do established firms' CVC programs adapt to changing internal conditions and external environments. Adaptation typically involves learning from exploratory endeavors, which enable companies to transform the ways they compete (Guth & Ginsberg, 1990). Our study extends the current stream of research on CVC. It aims to contribute to the literature by providing an extensive comparison of internal and external determinants leading to CVC investment activity. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the influence of internal and external determinants on CVC activity throughout specific expansion and contraction periods determined by structural breaks occurring between 1985 to 2008. Our econometric analysis indicates a strong and significant positive association between CVC activity and R&D, cash flow availability and environmental financial market conditions, as well as a significant negative association between sales growth and the decision to engage into CVC. The analysis of this study reveals that CVC investment is highly volatile, as demonstrated by dramatic fluctuations in CVC investment activity over the past decades. When analyzing the overall cyclical CVC period from 1985 to 2008 the results of our study suggest that CVC activity has a pattern influenced by financial factors such as the level of R&D, free cash flow, lack of sales growth, and external conditions of the economy, with the NASDAQ price index as the most significant variable influencing CVC during this period. II. Contribution of CVC and its Interaction with R&D to Value Creation The second essay takes into account the demands of corporate executives and shareholders regarding business performance and value creation justifications for investments in innovation. Billions of dollars are invested in CVC and R&D. However there is little evidence that CVC and its interaction with R&D create value. Firms operating in dynamic business sectors seek to innovate to create the value demanded by changing market conditions, consumer preferences, and competitive offerings. Consequently, firms operating in such business sectors put a premium on finding new, sustainable and competitive value propositions. CVC and R&D can help them in this challenge. Dushnitsky and Lenox (2006) presented evidence that CVC investment is associated with value creation. However, studies have shown that the most innovative firms do not necessarily benefit from innovation. For instance Oyon (2007) indicated that between 1995 and 2005 the most innovative automotive companies did not obtain adequate rewards for shareholders. The interaction between CVC and R&D has generated much debate in the CVC literature. Some researchers see them as substitutes suggesting that firms have to choose between CVC and R&D (Hellmann, 2002), while others expect them to be complementary (Chesbrough & Tucci, 2004). This study explores the interaction that CVC and R&D have on value creation. This essay examines the impact of CVC and R&D on value creation over sixteen years across six business sectors and different geographical regions. Our findings suggest that the effect of CVC and its interaction with R&D on value creation is positive and significant. In dynamic business sectors technologies rapidly relinquish obsolete, consequently firms operating in such business sectors need to continuously develop new sources of value creation (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Qualls, Olshavsky, & Michaels, 1981). We conclude that in order to impact value creation, firms operating in business sectors such as Engineering & Business Services, and Information Communication & Technology ought to consider CVC as a vital element of their innovation strategy. Moreover, regarding the CVC and R&D interaction effect, our findings suggest that R&D and CVC are complementary to value creation hence firms in certain business sectors can be better off supporting both R&D and CVC simultaneously to increase the probability of generating value creation. III. MCS and Organizational Structures for Radical Innovation Incremental innovation is necessary for continuous improvement but it does not provide a sustainable permanent source of competitiveness (Cooper, 2003). On the other hand, radical innovation pursuing new technologies and new market frontiers can generate new platforms for growth providing firms with competitive advantages and high economic margin rents (Duchesneau et al., 1979; Markides & Geroski, 2005; O'Connor & DeMartino, 2006; Utterback, 1994). Interestingly, not all companies distinguish between incremental and radical innovation, and more importantly firms that manage innovation through a one-sizefits- all process can almost guarantee a sub-optimization of certain systems and resources (Davila et al., 2006). Moreover, we conducted research on the utilization of MCS along with radical innovation and flexible organizational structures as these have been associated with firm growth (Cooper, 2003; Davila & Foster, 2005, 2007; Markides & Geroski, 2005; O'Connor & DeMartino, 2006). Davila et al. (2009) identified research opportunities for innovation management and provided a list of pending issues: How do companies manage the process of radical and incremental innovation? What are the performance measures companies use to manage radical ideas and how do they select them? The fundamental objective of this paper is to address the following research question: What are the processes, MCS, and organizational structures for generating radical innovation? Moreover, in recent years, research on innovation management has been conducted mainly at either the firm level (Birkinshaw, Hamel, & Mol, 2008a) or at the project level examining appropriate management techniques associated with high levels of uncertainty (Burgelman & Sayles, 1988; Dougherty & Heller, 1994; Jelinek & Schoonhoven, 1993; Kanter, North, Bernstein, & Williamson, 1990; Leifer et al., 2000). Therefore, we embarked on a novel process-related research framework to observe the process stages, MCS, and organizational structures that can generate radical innovation. This article is based on a case study at Alcan Engineered Products, a division of a multinational company provider of lightweight material solutions. Our observations suggest that incremental and radical innovation should be managed through different processes, MCS and organizational structures that ought to be activated and adapted contingent to the type of innovation that is being pursued (i.e. incremental or radical innovation). More importantly, we conclude that radical can be generated in a systematic way through enablers such as processes, MCS, and organizational structures. This is in line with the findings of Jelinek and Schoonhoven (1993) and Davila et al. (2006; 2007) who show that innovative firms have institutionalized mechanisms, arguing that radical innovation cannot occur in an organic environment where flexibility and consensus are the main managerial mechanisms. They rather argue that radical innovation requires a clear organizational structure and formal MCS.

How central and connected am I in my family? Bridging and bonding social capital in family configurations of young adults with psychiatric disorders

AIMS: This article explores the structures of relational resources that individuals with psychiatric disorders get from their family configurations using the concept of social capital. METHODS: The research is based on a sample of 54 individuals with psychiatric disorders and behavioural problems, and a comparison sample of 54 individuals without a clinical record matched to the clinical respondents for age and sex. Standard measures of social capital from social network methods are applied on family configurations of individuals from both samples. Differences are tested by variance analysis. RESULTS: Structures of family resources available to individuals with psychiatric disorders are distinct. Individuals with psychiatric disorders perceive themselves as less central in their family configurations and less connected to their family members. Their significant family members are perceived as less connected with each other. As a whole, their family configurations are smaller and do not include spouses or partners. Therefore bridging and bonding social capitals are not readily available for them. CONCLUSION: As family configurations of individuals with psychiatric disorders provide fewer relational resources than other families, they are not able to deal with social integration of individuals with psychiatric disorders on their own.

Managing Climate Insecurity by Ensuring Continuous Capital Accumulation : 'Climate Refugees' and 'Climate Migrants'

Numerous recent reports by non-governmental organisations (NGOs), academics and international organisations have focused on so-called 'climate refugees'. This article examines the turn from a discourse of 'climate refugees', in which organisations perceive migration as a failure of both mitigation and adaptation to climate change, to one of 'climate migration', in which organisations promote migration as a strategy of adaptation. Its focus is the promotion of climate migration management, and it explores the trend of these discourses through two sections. First, it provides an empirical account of the two discourses, emphasising the differentiation between them. It then focuses on the discourse of climate migration, its origins, extent and content, and the associated practices of 'migration management'. The second part argues that the turn to the promotion of 'climate migration' should be understood as a way to manage the insecurity created by climate change. However, international organisations enacts this management within the forms of neoliberal capitalism, including the framework of governance. Therefore, the promotion of 'climate migration' as a strategy of adaptation to climate change is located within the tendencies of neoliberalism and the reconfiguration of southern states' sovereignty through governance.

Bonding and Bridging Social Capital in Step- and First-Time Families and the Issue of Family Boundaries

Divorce and remarriage usually imply a redefinition of family boundaries, with consequences for the production and availability of social capital. This research shows that bonding and bridging social capitals are differentially made available by families. It first hypothesizes that bridging social capital is more likely to be developed in stepfamilies, and bonding social capital in first-time families. Second, the boundaries of family configurations are expected to vary within stepfamilies and within first-time families creating a diversity of family configurations within both structures. Third, in both cases, social capital is expected to depend on the ways in which their family boundaries are set up by individuals by including or excluding ex-partners, new partner's children, siblings, and other family ties. The study is based on a sample of 300 female respondents who have at least one child of their own between 5 and 13 years, 150 from a stepfamily structure and 150 from a first-time family structure. Social capital is empirically operationalized as perceived emotional support in family networks. The results show that individuals in first-time families more often develop bonding social capital and individuals in stepfamilies bridging social capital. In both cases, however, individuals in family configurations based on close blood and conjugal ties more frequently develop bonding social capital, whereas individuals in family configurations based on in-law, stepfamily or friendship ties are more likely to develop bridging social capital.

Cosmopolitan Capital and the Internationalization of the Field of Business Elites: Evidence from the Swiss Case

The aim of this contribution is to explore how the recent internationalization and the increasing importance of 'cosmopolitan capital' has impacted on the structure and character of the field of the Swiss business elite. For this purpose we will develop the notion of cosmopolitan capital and comparatively investigate the field of the Swiss business elite in 1980, 2000 and 2010 with multiple correspondence analysis. We can show that in this period international managers with transnational careers and networks not only grow in number, but come to conquer the apex of the biggest and highest capitalized Swiss firms. At the same time, national forms of capital decline in importance and Swiss managers themselves are differentiated increasingly into national and international fractions.

Sociétés anonymes de famille : structure, maintien et optimisation de la détention du capital

Introduction générale : D'après une étude réalisée en Suisse en 2004, les entreprises de famille représentent 88,14% des entreprises, dont 80,2% sont constitués en sociétés anonymes. Les chiffres parlent d'eux-mêmes : les sociétés anonymes de famille occupent une place considérable dans le paysage des entreprises suisses. Les sociétés anonymes de famille correspondent donc à une réalité pratique. Juridiquement, la notion de société de famille n'apparaît pas dans le Code des obligations ; les sociétés anonymes de famille revêtent la forme juridique de la société anonyme, qui représente l'entreprise commerciale la plus courante en pratique. Le Code des obligations, à ses art. 620 ss, se limite à donner un cadre général de réglementation, ce qui a notamment pour conséquence que la forme juridique de la société anonyme s'adapte à des entités très variées, dans toutes sortes de secteurs d'activité, que ce soient des petites et moyennes entreprises ou de grandes multinationales, des sociétés capitalistes et impersonnelles ou des sociétés purement privées. Selon la conception générale de la forme juridique de la société anonyme, celle-ci revêt en principe un caractère capitaliste. L'intérêt de l'actionnaire pour la société anonyme est normalement de nature financière. Le fait que la qualité d'actionnaire soit matérialisée dans un titre, l'action, implique tant une certaine liquidité de l'actionnariat qu'une dépersonnalisation des rapports entre les membres qui composent la société anonyme. A l'opposé, la famille repose sur des liens personnels particuliers, étroits, avec notamment des dimensions psychologiques, affectives, émotives. Au premier abord, société anonyme et famille semblent donc antinomiques. Cette dichotomie présente un intérêt dogmatique. Elle correspond en outre à l'un des principaux enjeux : comment tenir compte des intérêts d'une entité fortement personnalisée - la famille - dans une structure impersonnelle et de type capitaliste - la société anonyme ? Le fait que le Code des obligations se limite à donner un cadre général de réglementation prend alors ici toute son importance ; la marge de manoeuvre et la liberté d'aménagement que le législateur accorde aux sociétés anonymes r vont permettre - ou alors empêcher - d'adapter la forme juridique de la société anonyme aux besoins d'une entité personnalisée comme la famille. Cette liberté n'est donc pas sans limites et les membres de la famille devront peut-être aussi assumer les conséquences du choix de cette forme de société. Partant, le but de notre travail est d'étudier les raisons d'être, l'organisation et la pérennité des sociétés anonymes de famille, spécifiquement sous l'angle du maintien du caractère familial de la société. Nous nous concentrerons sur la détention du capital, mais aussi sur sa structure, son maintien et son optimisation ; nous aborderons ainsi notamment les questions relatives à la transmissibilité des actions. Au regard de l'ampleur du sujet, nous avons dû procéder à certains choix, parfois arbitraires, notamment en raison des implications presque infinies des règles avec d'autres domaines. Nous nous limiterons ainsi, dans la première partie, à exposer les notions de base employées dans la suite de notre travail et nous focaliserons sur l'élaboration des définitions d'entreprise, société et société anonyme de famille, prémisses non seulement essentielles sous l'angle théorique, mais aussi fondamentales pour nos développements ultérieurs. S'agissant ensuite de l'analyse des possibilités d'aménagement d'une société anonyme dans le cadre du maintien du caractère familial de la société, nous nous concentrerons sur les règles relatives à la société anonyme et étudierons les limites qu'elles imposent et la liberté qu'elles offrent aux actionnaires familiaux. Nous laisserons en revanche de côté les problématiques particulières de la protection des actionnaires minoritaires et des organes. Enfin, si nous traitons toutes les notions théoriques nécessaires à la compréhension de chaque thématique présentée, seules celles primordiales et déterminantes sous l'angle de la conservation de l'hégémonie familiale seront approfondies. Nous avons structuré notre étude en quatre titres. Dans un premier titre, nous développerons les notions et principes élémentaires de notre sujet. Nous rappellerons ainsi la définition et les particularités de la société anonyme en général, y compris les sources et les modifications législatives, et les conditions de la cotation en bourse. Au stade des notions introductives, nous devrons également définir la société anonyme de famille, en particulier en établissant les éléments de la définition. Qu'entend-on par famille ? Quels critères permettent de qualifier une société anonyme de « société anonyme de famille » ? La définition de la société anonyme de famille devra être à la fois suffisamment précise, afin que cette notion puisse être appréhendée de manière adéquate pour la suite de notre travail, et suffisamment large, pour qu'elle englobe toute la variété des sociétés anonymes de famille. Nous présenterons aussi les raisons du choix de la forme juridique de la société anonyme pour une société de famille. Nous terminerons nos développements introductifs par un exposé relatif à la notion d'action et à son transfert en sa qualité de papier-valeur, préalables nécessaires à nos développements sur la transmissibilité des actions. Nous mettrons ainsi en évidence les conditions de transfert des actions, en tenant compte de la tendance à la dématérialisation des titres. Une fois ces éléments mis en place, qui nous donneront une première idée de la structure du capital d'une société anonyme de famille, nous devrons préciser la manière dont le capital doit être structuré. Nous chercherons comment il peut être maintenu en mains de la famille et si d'autres moyens n'ayant pas directement trait au capital peuvent être mis en oeuvre. Ainsi, dans un deuxième titre, nous analyserons les dispositions statutaires relatives à la structure du capital et à son maintien en mains familiales, en particulier les restrictions au transfert des actions nominatives. Les dispositions statutaires constituent-elles un moyen adéquat pour maintenir le caractère familial de la société ? Quelles sont les conditions pour limiter le transfert des actions ? Le caractère familial de la société peut-il être utilisé afin de restreindre le transfert des actions ? Les solutions sont-elles différentes si les actions sont, en tout ou en partie, cotées en bourse ? Nous traiterons aussi, dans ce même titre, les modalités du droit de vote et déterminerons si des dispositions statutaires peuvent être aménagées afin de donner plus de voix aux actions des membres de la famille et ainsi d'optimiser la détention du capital. Nous examinerons, dans notre troisième titre, un acte qui a trait à la fois au droit des contrats et au droit de la société anonyme, la convention d'actionnaires. En quoi consistent ces contrats ? Quels engagements les actionnaires familiaux peuvent-ils et doivent-ils prendre ? Quelle est l'utilité de ces contrats dans les sociétés anonymes de famille ? Quelles en sont les limites ? Les clauses conventionnelles peuvent-elles être intégrées dans les statuts ? Comment combiner les différentes clauses de la convention entre elles ? Dans ce même titre, nous étudierons également la concrétisation et la mise en application des dispositions statutaires et des clauses conventionnelles, afin de déterminer si, combinées, elles constituent des moyens adéquats pour assurer la structure, le maintien et l'optimisation de la détention du capital. Enfin, dans le quatrième et dernier titre, qui est davantage conçu comme un excursus, nous nous éloignerons du domaine strict du droit des sociétés (et des contrats) pour envisager certains aspects matrimoniaux et d'ordre successoral. En effet, puisque la famille est à la base de la société, il convient de relever l'importance des règles matrimoniales et successorales pour les sociétés anonymes de famille et leur incidence sur la détention des actions et le maintien du caractère familial de la société. Nous examinerons en particulier comment ces instruments doivent être utilisés pour qu'ils n'annihilent pas les efforts entrepris pour conserver la société en mains familiales. Notre travail a pour but et pour innovation de présenter une analyse transversale aussi complète que possible du droit de la société anonyme et des instruments connexes en étudiant les moyens à disposition des actionnaires d'une société anonyme de type personnel, la société anonyme de famille. Il tentera ainsi d'apporter une approche théorique nouvelle de ces questions, de présenter certains aspects de manière pragmatique, d'analyser la mise en oeuvre des différents moyens étudiés et de discuter leur opportunité.