Cultured epithelial autografts in the management of burn injuries: a review of the literature

Introduction. The management of large burn victims has significantly improved in the last decades. Specifically autologous cultured keratinocytes (CEA) overcame the problem of limited donor sites in severely burned patients. Several studies testing CEA's in their burn centers give mixed results on the general outcomes of burn patients. Methods. A review of publications with a minimum of 15 patients per study using CEA for the management of severe burn injury from 1989 until 2011 were recruited by using an online database including Medline, Pub Med and the archives of the medical library of the CHUV in Lausanne. Results. 18 studies with a total of 977 patients were included into this review. Most of the studies did not specify if CEA's were grafted alone or in combination with split thickness skin grafts (STSG) although most of the patients seemed to have received both methodologies in reviewed studies. The mean TBSA per study ranged from 33% to 78% in patients that were grafted with CEA's. Here no common minimum TBSA making a patient eligible for CEA grafting could be found. The definition of the "take rate" is not standardized and varied largely from 26% to 73%. Mortality and hospitalization time could not be shown to correlate with CEA use in all of the studies. As late complications, some authors described the fragility of the CEA regenerated skin. Conclusion. Since the healing of large burn victims demands for a variety of different surgical and non-surgical treatment strategies and the final outcome mainly depends on the burned surface as well as the general health condition of the patient, no definitive conclusion could be drawn from the use of CEA's of reviewed studies. From our own experience, we know that selected patients significantly profit from CEA grafts although cost efficiency or the reduction of mortality cannot be demonstrated on this particular cases.

Résumés actualisés de l'évaluation systématique de l'efficacité d'interventions médicales. [Up-to-date résumés of the systematic evaluation of efficacy of medical interventions]

La Cochrane Library (www.thecochranelibrary.com) est une bibliothèque en ligne répertoriant à ce jour plus de 3000 revues systématiques. Ces revues systématiques sont issues de l'activité continue de plus de 50 groupes de revues de la Collaboration Cochrane (www.cochrane.org ), une organisation à laquelle participent plus de 20 000 personnes dans le monde entier et dont le financement est indépendant de sources pouvant créer un conflit d'intérêt. Le public cible est constitué par les professionnels de la santé, les décideurs en matière sanitaire et le public (patients, consommateurs). En sus de la production et de la diffusion de revues systématiques, la Collaboration Cochrane propose également des activités de formation aux méthodes de la médecine factuelle et des revues systématiques. En Francophonie, de telles formations sont proposées par des partenaires du Réseau francophone Cochrane (www.res_franco.cochrane.org ), dont la coordination est assurée depuis Lausanne par une petite équipe basée à l'Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive (IUMSP). [Extrait]