32 resultados para hindfoot arthrodesis
em Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Resumo:
Based on a high percentage of good results, retrospective studies strongly suggest that isolated talonavicular arthrodesis provides efficient pain relief and functional improvement in case of talonavicular arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis, primary or posttraumatic arthritis, flexible acquired flatfoot deformity, residual dorsolateral subluxation of the talonavicular joint after surgical treatment of clubfoot, and some neurologic disorders. However, prospective trials with rigorous methodology are required to establish evidence of efficacy for this procedure. Well-designed biomechanical studies have demonstrated the key role of the talonavicular joint in the complex hindfoot motion and may serve as baseline for further prospective studies.
Resumo:
This study aimed to investigate the influence of ankle osteoarthritis (AOA) treatments, i.e., ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle replacement (TAR), on the kinematics of multi-segment foot and ankle complex during relatively long-distance gait. Forty-five subjects in four groups (AOA, AA, TAR, and control) were equipped with a wearable system consisting of inertial sensors installed on the tibia, calcaneus, and medial metatarsals. The subjects walked 50-m twice while the system measured the kinematic parameters of their multi-segment foot: the range of motion of joints between tibia, calcaneus, and medial metatarsals in three anatomical planes, and the peaks of angular velocity of these segments in the sagittal plane. These parameters were then compared among the four groups. It was observed that the range of motion and peak of angular velocities generally improved after TAR and were similar to the control subjects. However, unlike AOA and TAR, AA imposed impairments in the range of motion in the coronal plane for both the tibia-calcaneus and tibia-metatarsals joints. In general, the kinematic parameters showed significant correlation with established clinical scales (FFI and AOFAS), which shows their convergent validity. Based on the kinematic parameters of multi-segment foot during 50-m gait, this study showed significant improvements in foot mobility after TAR, but several significant impairments remained after AA.
Resumo:
Introduction: Ankle arthropathy is associated with a decreased motion of the ankle-hindfoot during ambulation. Ankle arthrodesis was shown to result in degeneration of the neighbour joints of the foot. Inversely, total ankle arthroplasty conceptually preserves the adjacent joints because of the residual mobility of the ankle but this has not been demonstrated yet in vivo. It has also been reported that degenerative ankle diseases, and even arthrodesis, do not result in alteration of the knee and hip joints. We present the preliminary results of a new approach of this problem based on ambulatory gait analysis. Patients and Methods: Motion analysis of the lower limbs was performed using a Physilog® (BioAGM, CH) system consisting of three-dimensional (3D) accelerometer and gyroscope, coupled to a magnetic system (Liberty©, Polhemus, USA). Both systems have been validated. Three groups of two patients were included into this pilot study and compared to healthy subjects (controls) during level walking: patients with ankle osteoarthritis (group 1), patients treated by ankle arthrodesis (group 2), patients treated by total ankle prosthesis (group 3). Results: Motion patterns of all analyzed joints over more than 20 gait cycles in each subject were highly repeatable. Motion amplitude of the ankle-hindfoot in control patients was similar to recently reported results. Ankle arthrodesis limited the motion of the ankle-hindfoot in the sagittal and horizontal planes. The prosthetic ankle allowed a more physiologic movement in the sagittal plane only. Ankle arthritis and its treatments did not influence the range of motion of the knee and hip joint during stance phase, excepted for a slight decrease of the hip flexion in groups 1 and 2. Conclusion: The reliability of the system was shown by the repeatability of the consecutive measurements. The results of this preliminary study were similar to those obtained through laboratory gait analysis. However, our system has the advantage to allow ambulatory analysis of 3D kinematics of the lower limbs outside of a gait laboratory and in real life conditions. To our knowledge this is a new concept in the analysis of ankle arthropathy and its treatments. Therefore, there is a potential to address specific questions like the difficult comparison of the benefits of ankle arthroplasty versus arthrodesis. The encouraging results of this pilot study offer the perspective to analyze the consequences of ankle arthropathy and its treatments on the biomechanics of the lower limbs ambulatory, in vivo and in daily life conditions.
Resumo:
Introduction: Posttraumatic painful osteoarthritis of the ankle joint after fracture-dislocation often has to be treated with arthrodesis. In the presence of major soft tissue lesions and important bone loss the technique to achieve arthrodesis has to be well chosen in order to prevent hardware failure, infection of bulky implants or non-union. Methods: We present the case of a 53 year-old biker suffering of a fracture-dislocation of the ankle associated with a mayor degloving injury of the heel. After initial immobilization of the lesion by external fixation in Spain the patient was transferred to our hospital for further treatment. The degloving injury of the heel with MRSA infection was initially treated by repeated débridement, changing of the configuration of the Ex Fix and antibiotic therapy with favourable outcome. Because of the bony lesions reconstruction of the ankle-joint was juged not to be an option and arthrodesis was planned. Due to bad soft-tissue situation standard open fixtion with plate and/or screws was not wanted but an option for intramedullary nailing was taken. However the use of a standard retrograde arthrodesis nail comes with two problems: 1) Risk of infection of the heel-part of the calaneus/nail in an unstable soft tissue situation with protruding nail. And 2) talo-calcaneal arthrodesis of an initially healthy subtalar joint. Given the situation of an unstable plantar/heel flap it was decided to perform anklearthrodesis by means of an anterograde nail with static fixation in the talus and in the proximal tibia. Results:This operation was performed with minimal opening at the ankle-site in order to remove the remaining cartilage and improve direct bone to bone contact. Arthrodesis was achieved by means of an anterograde T2 Stryker tibial nail.One year after the anterograde nailing the patient walks without pain for up to 4 hours with a heel of good quality and arthrodesis is achieved. Conclusion: Tibiotalar arthrodesis in the presence of mayor soft tissue lesions and bone loss can be successfully achieved with antegrade nailing.
Resumo:
Introduction: Indications for arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) are commonly arthrosis (hallux rigidus), rheumatoid arthritis, failed hallux valgus surgery, severe hallux valgus, infectious arthritis, fractures and neuroarthropathies. Many reports focus on technical and radiological issues but few studies emphasize the functional outcome considering daily activities, sports and expectation of the patient. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent MTP1-arthrodesis from 2002 to 2005 in our institution. Clinical and radiological results were assessed but we specially focussed on the functional outcome. Scoring systems used were the SF-12, EQ-5D, PASI, FFI and AOFAS (10 points given to MTP1 mobility) scales. Results: 61 of 64 consecutive patients were evaluated. Female to male ratio was 49:15, mean age at surgery was 67 years, the average follow up was 29 month. Even if radiological consolidation was incomplete in 18 patients, all patients had a clinically stable and rigid arthrodesis. Mean AOFAS score was 87 (24-100) points at follow up. The FFI was 5.91% (0-66%). Patient satisfaction was excellent in 37 patients (60%), good in 18 (30%), fair in 5(8%) and poor in1 (2%). EQ- 5D was 0.7 (0.4-1).40 patients (66%) estimated their cosmetic result as excellent, 15 (25%) as good, 4(6%) as fair and 2 (3%)as poor. 10 patients (16%) had no shoe wear limitation , 48 (79%) had to wear comfortable shoes and 3 (5%) needed orthopaedic wearing. Professionally 34 patients (56%) had better performances, 18 (26%) had no change and 9 (18%) had aggravation of their capacities but this was due to other health reasons. In sports, 16 patients (26%) had better performances, 35 patients (57%) no change and 10 (17%) were worse as consequence of other health problems for 7. Finally, 56 patients (92%) would recommend the operation and 5 (8%) would not. Conclusion: Experience of clinical practice suggests that the idea of fusing the first MTP joint is initially frequently disregarded by the patients because they fear to be limited by a rigid forefoot. Our results show, in fact, that this procedure can be proposed for numerous pathological situations with the perspective of good to excellent outcome in terms of function and quality of life in the majority of cases.
Resumo:
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that may affect multiple joints, both small and large, and leads to numerous complications. The standard surgical treatment for a rheumatoid arthritic ankle has been an arthrodesis. The ideal candidate for an ankle replacement in a rheumatoid patient is one who is moderately active, has a well-aligned ankle and heel, and a fair range of motion in the ankle joint. Good surgical technique and correction of any hindfoot deformity will result in satisfactory alignment of the ankle with regard to the mechanical axis, and this will lead to increased prosthetic longevity.
Resumo:
Background: Arthrodesis of the knee by intramedullary fixation hasbeen reported to have a higher rate of success than external fixationor compression plating. Antegrade nailing however can lead to complicationsdue to the different diameters of the medullary canals, fracturesduring insertion, poor rotational stability, breakage of the IM-nailand insufficient compression at the fusion site.Method: This retrospective study reports all knee fusions performedby the same orthopaedic surgeon with the Wichita (Stryker) fusion nail(WFN) from 2004 to 2010. The Wichita nail is a short nail with a deviceat the knee which allows for coupling of differently sized and interlockedfemoral and tibial components and at the same time for compression.Results: We report of 18 patients with a mean follow up of 28 months(range 3-71 months). Infected TKA was the most common indicationfor arthrodesis in 9 cases. The remaining reasons included asepticfailed TKA in 3 cases, 2 patients after fracture, 1 patient with neurologicalinstability after knee dislocation, 1 patient after tumoral resectionand 1 non union after failed arthrodesis with long antegrade nail.Finally 1 patient with bilateral congenital knee dislocation operated onboth sides. As expected, patients receiving the WFN had undergonea large number of previous knee surgeries with a mean of 3.8 (range0-8) procedures per patient. The complication rate was 27% (5 of 18).Two patients had persistent pain requiring revision surgery to increasestability with plating. One case of periprosthetic fracture needed openreduction and internal fixation. 2 patients with superficial hematomawere treated one with open drainage and the other with physiotherapy.Infection was erradicated in all septic cases, we found no new infectionand the fusion rate was 100%.Conclusion: The results in these often difficult cases are satisfyingand we think that this technique is a valid alternative to the otherknown techniques of knee fusion in patients with a poor bone stockand fragile soft tissues.
Resumo:
Introduction: Ankle arthrodesis (AD) and total ankle replacement (TAR) are typical treatments for ankle osteoarthritis (AO). Despite clinical interest, there is a lack of their outcome evaluation using objective criteria. Gait analysis and plantar pressure assessment are appropriate to detect pathologies in orthopaedics but they are mostly used in lab with few gait cycles. In this study, we propose an ambulatory device based on inertial and plantar pressure sensors to compare the gait during long-distance trials between healthy subjects (H) and patients with AO or treated by AD and TAR. Methods: Our study included four groups: 11 patients with AO, 9 treated by TAR, 7 treated by AD and 6 control subjects. An ambulatory system (Physilog®, CH) was used for gait analysis; plantar pressure measurements were done using a portable insole (Pedar®-X, DE). The subjects were asked to walk 50 meters in two trials. Mean value and coefficient of variation of spatio-temporal gait parameters were calculated for each trial. Pressure distribution was analyzed in ten subregions of foot. All parameters were compared among the four groups using multi-level model-based statistical analysis. Results: Significant difference (p <0.05) with control was noticed for AO patients in maximum force in medial hindfoot and forefoot and in central forefoot. These differences were no longer significant in TAR and AD groups. Cadence and speed of all pathologic groups showed significant difference with control. Both treatments showed a significant improvement in double support and stance. TAR decreased variability in speed, stride length and knee ROM. Conclusions: In spite of a small sample size, this study showed that ankle function after AO treatments can be evaluated objectively based on plantar pressure and spatio-temporal gait parameters measured during unconstrained walking outside the lab. The combination of these two ambulatory techniques provides a promising way to evaluate foot function in clinics.
Resumo:
Controversy exists about the best method to achieve bone fusion in four-corner arthrodesis. Thirty-five patients who underwent this procedure by our technique were included in the study. Surgical indications were stage II-III SLAC wrist, stage II SNAC wrist and severe traumatic midcarpal joint injury. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years. Mean active flexion and extension were 34 degrees and 30 degrees respectively; grip strength recovery was 79%. Radiological consolidation was achieved in all cases. The mean DASH score was 23 and the postoperative pain improvement by visual analogue scale was statistically significant. Return to work was possible at 4 months for the average patient. Complications were a capitate fracture in one patient and the need for hardware removal in four cases. Four-corner bone wrist arthrodesis by dorsal rectangular plating achieves an acceptable preservation of range of motion with good pain relief, an excellent consolidation rate and minimal complications.
Resumo:
Previous studies assessed the outcome of ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle replacement (TAR) surgeries; however, the extent of postoperative recovery towards bilateral gait mechanics (BGM) is unknown. We evaluated the outcome of the two surgeries at least 2 years post rehabilitation, focusing on BGM. 36 participants, including 12 AA patients, 12 TAR patients, and 12 controls were included. Gait assessment over 50 m distance was performed utilizing pressure insoles and 3D inertial sensors, following which an intraindividual comparison was performed. Most spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters in the TAR group were indicative of good gait symmetry, while the AA group presented significant differences. Plantar pressure symmetry among the AA group was also significantly distorted. Abnormality in biomechanical behavior of the AA unoperated, contralateral foot was observed. In summary, our results indicate an altered BGM in AA patients, whereas a relatively fully recovered BGM is observed in TAR patients, despite the quantitative differences in several parameters when compared to a healthy population. Our study supports a biomechanical assessment and rehabilitation of both operated and unoperated sides after major surgeries for ankle osteoarthrosis.
Resumo:
Introduction: Les résultats d'une chirurgie du pied et de la cheville peuvent être évalués par des scores spécifiques à la région anatomique ainsi que par des scores spécifiques à la pathologie. Beaucoup de scores existent rendant la comparaison entre les études difficile. La présente étude se focalise sur une pathologie fréquente du pied et de la cheville et compare les résultats obtenu par deux scores spécifiques à la région et deux scores spécifiques à la pathologie. Méthode: Nous avons revu 41 patients ayant bénéficié d'une plastie ligamentaire externe de la cheville. Quatre scores ont été administrés simultanément: the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) et the Chronic Ankle Instability Scale (CAIS), spécifiques à la pathologie, the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale et the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure comprenant deux parties (FAAM1 et FAAM2), spécifiques à la région anatomique. Le degré de corrélation entre les scores a été évalué par le coefficient de corrélation de Pearson. L'analyse graphique des variances a été utilisée pour le choix de tests paramétriques versus non paramétriques. Des tests non paramétriques, le Kruskal-Wallis pour éliminer l'hypothèse nulle et le Mann-Whitney pour la comparaison entre les scores deux à deux, ont été utilisés. Résultats: Une différence significative (p<.005) a été démontrée entre le CAIS et l'AOFAS (p=.0002), entre le CAIS et le FAAM1 (p=.0001) et entre le CAIT et l'AOFAS (p=.0003) Conclusions: Cette étude compare les performances de quatre scores dont deux spécifiques à la région anatomique et deux spécifiques à la pathologie. Nous avons démontré une bonne corrélation entre les scores ainsi que des différences significatives entre les résultats obtenus par chacun d'eux. Les résultats obtenus par les scores spécifiques à la pathologie semblent être plus précis que ceux obtenus par les scores spécifiques à la région anatomique. De plus, nous avons mis en évidence une forte corrélation entre l'AOFAS et les autres scores. Le FAAM semble être un bon compromis car il offre la possibilité, du fait de ses deux parties, d'évaluer le résultat en fonction de la demande fonctionnelle du patient. Perspectives: Un algorithme est proposé qui permet d'évaluer la littérature spécifique de manière plus critique et peut s'adapter également à la recherche et à la clinique relative à d'autres pathologies du pied et de la cheville
Resumo:
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate 18 consecutive cases of peritalar dislocations referred to our department during a period of 25 years and to delineate the factors influencing long-term prognosis. There were 13 (73%) medial and 5 (27%) lateral dislocations. Six patients (33%) suffered an open injury, including 2 of 13 (15%) medial and 4 of 5 (80%) lateral dislocations. Associated fractures involving the hindfoot or forefoot were noted in 7 feet, including 3 of 5 lateral dislocation cases. Reduction was accomplished under general anesthesia; in no case was open reduction necessary. In 4 of 6 open injuries with associated fractures, temporary fixation with Kirschner wires was performed. Patients were immobilized in a plaster cast for 4 weeks, or for 6 weeks in the presence of fracture, followed by weightbearing as tolerated. At a mean follow-up of 10.2 years (range, 4 to 26 years), 10 patients (56%) showed excellent results; all had sustained a closed medial low-energy dislocation. There were 3 cases (17%) with fair results and 5 cases (28%) with poor results. Forty-five percent of patients showed a restriction of activity, a reduction of subtalar range of motion, and moderate or severe radiographic signs of hindfoot degenerative arthritis. There were no cases of talar avascular necrosis, and in no case was secondary surgery necessary. Lateral dislocation and open medial dislocations with concomitant fractures showed a greater potential for poor prognosis. The results were independent from period of cast immobilization, suggesting that 4 to 6 weeks of immobilization provides acceptable long-term results.
Resumo:
The joint angles of multi-segment foot models have been primarily described using two mathematical methods: the joint coordinate system and the attitude vector. This study aimed to determine whether the angles obtained through these two descriptors are comparable, and whether these descriptors have similar sensitivity to experimental errors. Six subjects walked eight times on an instrumented walkway while the joint angles among shank, hindfoot, medial forefoot, and lateral forefoot were measured. The angles obtained using both descriptors and their sensitivity to experimental errors were compared. There was no overall significant difference between the ranges of motion obtained using both descriptors. However, median differences of more than 6° were noticed for the medial-lateral forefoot joint. For all joints and rotation planes, both descriptors provided highly similar angle patterns (median correlation coefficient: R>0.90), except for the medial-lateral forefoot angle in the transverse plane (median R=0.77). The joint coordinate system was significantly more sensitive to anatomical landmarks misplacement errors. However, the absolute differences of sensitivity were small relative to the joints ranges of motion. In conclusion, the angles obtained using these two descriptors were not identical, but were similar for at least the shank-hindfoot and hindfoot-medial forefoot joints. Therefore, the angle comparison across descriptors is possible for these two joints. Comparison should be done more carefully for the medial-lateral forefoot joint. Moreover, despite different sensitivities to experimental errors, the effects of the experimental errors on the angles were small for both descriptors suggesting that both descriptors can be considered for multi-segment foot models.