Donors/recipients representations about living-kidney donation : P-527

Living-kidney donation offers an option to patients awaiting renal transplantation. Representations about giving-receiving are explored retrospectively in a qualitative study. Questionnaires with open questions were sent to thirty donor-recipient dyads. Interviews were also conducted, during which participants were invited to propose an image representing donation. Thematic analysis was performed on the questionnaires (twenty-nine donors; twenty-five recipients), and on the comments of ten images selected by five donors and five recipients. Percentages are given regarding each part (donors; recipients). In the questionnaires, life (34.5%; 12%), love (27.6%; 40%), quality of life (27.6%; 8%) and generosity (6.9%; 24%) are common grounds regarding giving-a-kidney. Obviousness, hope, personal benefits or duty are expressed by donors. Recipients explain donation through emphatic sentences, qualify it as a gift or refer to the donor's courage or risk-taking. Regarding receiving-a-kidney, life (31%; 60%), gift (10.3%; 28%) and debt (3.4%; 4%) are common grounds. Donors refer to generosity or love. Quality of life, donor's risk-taking or emphatic sentences are characteristic of recipients, who highlight that nobody had to die. Preliminary data on the comments of the images underline that live-donation represents life and love. Mutual help, sharing-act, obviousness and personal benefits are expressed by donors. Recipients use emphatic sentences or refer to quality of life, gift or the difficulty to accept donation. Life and love are common grounds in live-donation. Improvement in quality of life is underlined by recipients, who stress the donor's courage or risk-taking. Donors describe donation as obvious, sometimes accompanied by personal benefits. Feelings of duty (donors) and of debt (recipients) are less discussed. Representations about giving and receiving differ between donors and recipients. These data show the specificity of each perspective. This analysis provides valuable information in order to adapt individual or dyad psychological support in live-donation.

Approche interdisciplinaire de la decision de don d'organes: l'experience lausannoise [An interdisciplinary approach of the organ donation decision: the Lausanne's experience].

Since 2007, the Interdisciplinary Ethics Platform (Ethos) of the University of Lausanne is leading an interdisciplinary reflection on the organ donation decision. On this basis, the project "Organ transplantation between the rhetoric of the gift and a biomedical view of the body" studies the logics at stake in the organ donation decision-making process. Results highlight many tensions within practices and public discourses in the field of organ donation and transplantation and suggest lines of inquiry for future adjustments.

Giving or Receiving Something for Sex: A Cross-Sectional Study of Transactional Sex among Ugandan University Students.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the prevalence of transactional sex among university students in Uganda and to assess the possible relationship between transactional sex and sexual coercion, physical violence, mental health, and alcohol use. METHODS: In 2010, 1954 undergraduate students at a Ugandan university responded to a self-administered questionnaire that assessed mental health, substance use, physical violence and sexual behaviors including sexual coercion and transactional sex. The prevalence of transactional sex was assessed and logistic regression analysis was performed to measure the associations between various risk factors and reporting transactional sex. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of the study sample reported having taken part in transactional sex, with more women reporting having accepted money, gifts or some compensation for sex, while more men reporting having paid, given a gift or otherwise compensated for sex. Sexual coercion in men and women was significantly associated with having accepted money, gifts or some compensation for sex. Men who were victims of physical violence in the last 12 months had higher probability of having accepted money, gifts or some compensation for sex than other men. Women who were victims of sexual coercion reported greater likelihood of having paid, given a gift or otherwise compensated for sex. Respondents who had been victims of physical violence in last 12 months, engaged in heavy episodic drinking and had poor mental health status were more likely to have paid, given a gift or otherwise compensated for sex. CONCLUSIONS: University students in Uganda are at high risk of transactional sex. Young men and women may be equally vulnerable to the risks and consequences of transactional sex and should be included in program initiatives to prevent transactional sex. The role of sexual coercion, physical violence, mental health, and alcohol use should be considered when designing interventions for countering transactional sex.