1 resultado para decision support tool
em Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (11)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (48)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (11)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (27)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (43)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (12)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- CUNY Academic Works (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (12)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (21)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (15)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (40)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (34)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (280)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (6)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (26)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (16)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (19)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: The writing of prescriptions is an important aspect of medical practice. This activity presents some specific problems given a danger of misinterpretation and dispensing errors in community pharmacies. The objective of this study was to determine the evolution of the prescription practice and writing quality in the outpatient clinics of our paediatric university hospital.¦METHODS: Copies of prescriptions written by physicians were collected from community pharmacies in the region of our hospital for a two-month period in 2005 and 2010. They were analysed according to standard criteria, including both formal and pharmaceutical aspects.¦RESULTS: A total of 597 handwritten prescriptions were reviewed in 2005 and 633 in 2010. They contained 1,456 drug prescriptions in 2005 and 1,348 in 2010. Fifteen drugs accounted for 80% of all prescriptions and the most common drugs were paracetamol and ibuprofen. A higher proportion of drugs were prescribed as International Nonproprietary Names (INN) or generics in 2010 (24.7%) compared with 2005 (20.9%). Of the drug prescriptions examined, 55.5% were incomplete in 2005 and 69.2% in 2010. Moreover in 2005, 3.2% were legible only with difficulty, 22.9% were ambiguous, and 3.0% contained an error. These proportions rose respectively to 5.2%, 27.8%, and 6.8% in 2010.¦CONCLUSION: This study showed that fifteen different drugs represented the majority of prescriptions, and a quarter of them were prescribed as INN or generics in 2010; and that handwritten prescriptions contained numerous omissions and preventable errors. In our hospital computerised prescribing coupled with advanced decision support is eagerly awaited.