Copy number variation and chromatin structure

The functional consequences of structural variation in the human genome range from adaptation, to phenotypic variation, to predisposition to diseases. Copy number variation (CNV) was shown to influence the phenotype by modifying, in a somewhat dose-dependent manner, the expression of genes that map within them, as well as that of genes located on their flanks. To assess the possible mechanism(s) behind this neighboring effect, we compared histone modification status of cell lines from patients affected by Williams-Beuren, Williams-Beuren region duplication, Smith-Magenis or DiGeorge Syndrome and control individuals using a high-throughput version of chromatin immuno-precipitation method (ChIP), called ChlP-seq. We monitored monomethylation of lysine K20 on histone H4 and trimethylation of lysine K27 on histone H3, as proxies for open and condensed chromatin, respectively. Consistent with the changes in expression levels observed for multiple genes mapping on the entire length of chromosomes affected by structural variants, we also detected regions with modified histone status between samples, up- and downstream from the critical regions, up to the end of the rearranged chromosome. We also gauged the intrachromosomal interactions of these cell lines utilizing chromosome conformation capture (4C-seq) technique. We observed that a set of genes flanking the Williams-Beuren Syndrome critical region (WBSCR) were often looping together, possibly forming an interacting cluster with each other and the WBSCR. Deletion of the WBSCR disrupts the expression of this group of flanking genes, as well as long-range interactions between them and the rearranged interval. We conclude, that large genomic rearrangements can lead to changes in the state of the chromatin spreading far away from the critical region, thus possibly affecting expression globally and as a result modifying the phenotype of the patients. - Les conséquences fonctionnelles des variations structurelles dans le génome humain sont vastes, allant de l'adaptation, en passant par les variations phénotypiques, aux prédispositions à certaines maladies. Il a été démontré que les variations du nombre de copies (CNV) influencent le phénotype en modifiant, d'une manière plus ou moins dose-dépendante, l'expression des gènes se situant à l'intérieur de ces régions, mais également celle des gènes se trouvant dans les régions flanquantes. Afin d'étudier les mécanismes possibles sous-jacents à cet effet de voisinage, nous avons comparé les états de modification des histones dans des lignées cellulaires dérivées de patients atteints du syndrome de Williams-Beuren, de la duplication de la région Williams-Beuren, du syndrome de Smith-Magenis ou du syndrome de Di- George et d'individus contrôles en utilisant une version haut-débit de la méthode d'immunoprécipitation de la chromatine (ChIP), appelée ChIP-seq. Nous avons suivi la mono-méthylation de la lysine K20 sur l'histone H4 et la tri-méthylation de la lysine K27 sur l'histone H3, marqueurs respectifs de la chromatine ouverte et fermée. En accord avec les changements de niveaux d'expression observés pour de multiples gènes tout le long des chromosomes affectés par les CNVs, nous avons aussi détecté des régions présentant des modifications d'histones entre les échantillons, situées de part et d'autre des régions critiques, jusqu'aux extrémités du chromosome réarrangé. Nous avons aussi évalué les interactions intra-chromosomiques ayant lieu dans ces cellules par l'utilisation de la technique de capture de conformation des chromosomes (4C-seq). Nous avons observé qu'un groupe de gènes flanquants la région critique du syndrome de Williams-Beuren (WBSCR) forment souvent une boucle, constituant un groupe d'interactions privilégiées entre ces gènes et la WBSCR. La délétion de la WBSCR perturbe l'expression de ce groupe de gènes flanquants, mais également les interactions à grande échelle entre eux et la région réarrangée. Nous en concluons que les larges réarrangements génomiques peuvent aboutir à des changements de l'état de la chromatine pouvant s'étendre bien plus loin que la région critique, affectant donc potentiellement l'expression de manière globale et ainsi modifiant le phénotype des patients.

Coordinated effects of sequence variation on DNA binding, chromatin structure, and transcription.

DNA sequence variation has been associated with quantitative changes in molecular phenotypes such as gene expression, but its impact on chromatin states is poorly characterized. To understand the interplay between chromatin and genetic control of gene regulation, we quantified allelic variability in transcription factor binding, histone modifications, and gene expression within humans. We found abundant allelic specificity in chromatin and extensive local, short-range, and long-range allelic coordination among the studied molecular phenotypes. We observed genetic influence on most of these phenotypes, with histone modifications exhibiting strong context-dependent behavior. Our results implicate transcription factors as primary mediators of sequence-specific regulation of gene expression programs, with histone modifications frequently reflecting the primary regulatory event.

Analysis of a boundary protein delimiting chromatin domains in yeast

SUMMARY The expression state of a eukaryotic gene depends in part on its location in the chromosome. This position effect results from the organization of eukaryotic genomes into discrete functional domains, defined by local differences in chromatin structure. The expression of genes within each domain appears to be defined and maintained by the concerted action of regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, silencers and locus control regions. Individual domains may be bordered by boundary elements that separate regions of permissive and silent chromatin. When located next to chromosomal elements such as telomeres, genes can be subjected to epigenetic silencing. In yeast, this is mediated by the propagation of the SIR proteins from telomeres towards more centromeric regions. Particular transcription factors can protect downstream genes from silencing when tethered between the gene and the telomere, and they may thus act as chromatin domain boundaries. Here we have studied one of these transcription factors, CTF-1, that binds directly histone H3. A deletion mutagenesis localized the barrier activity to CTF-1 histone-binding domain. A saturating point mutagenesis of this domain identified several amino-acid substitutions that similarly inhibited the boundary and histone-binding activities. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the barrier protein efficiently prevents the spreading of SIR proteins, and that it separates domains of hypoacetylated and hyperacetylated histones. Together, these results suggest a mechanism by which proteins such as CTF-1 may interact directly with histone H3 to prevent the propagation of a silent chromatin structure, thereby defining boundaries of permissive and silent chromatin domains. RESUME L'expression des gènes eucaryotes dépend en partie de leur localisation sur les chromosomes. Cet effet de position résulte de l'organisation des génomes eucaryotes en domaines fonctionnels, définis par des changements locaux au niveau de la structure de la chromatine. Dans chacun de ces domaines, l'expression des gènes est définie et maintenue par l'action concertée de différents éléments régulateurs tels que les promoteurs, les amplificateurs, les silenceurs et les locus control régions. Ces domaines peuvent être entourés par des éléments barrière, séparant les régions de chromatine répressive des régions permissive pour l'expression des gènes. Lorsqu'ils se situent à proximité d'éléments chromosomiques comme les telomères, les gènes peuvent être réprimés de manière épigénétique. Chez la levure, cette répression est établie par la propagation des protéines SIR depuis les télomères vers les régions centromériques. Certains facteurs de transcription peuvent empêcher la répression d'un gène, lorsqu'ils sont placés entre ce gène et le télomère. Nous avons étudié un de ces facteurs, CTF-1, qui a la particularité de lier directement l'histone H3. La délétion de certaines parties de CTF-1 a permis de déterminer que la région responsable de l'activité barrière correspond au domaine d'interaction avec H3. Plusieurs mutations points effectuées dans ce domaine inhibent à la fois l'activité barrière et la capacité de lier H3. Des expériences d'immuno-précipitation de la chromatine indiquent que la protéine barrière CTF-1 prévient efficacement la propagation des protéines SIR et sépare des domaines contenant des histones hypo-acétylées de ceux constitués d'histones hyper-acétylées. Ces résultats suggèrent que CTF-1 interagit directement avec l'histone H3 pour empêcher la propagation de la chromatine répressive, délimitant ainsi des domaines de chromatine permissive et des domaines de chromatine silencieuse.

Chromatin domain boundaries delimited by a histone-binding protein in yeast.

When located next to chromosomal elements such as telomeres, genes can be subjected to epigenetic silencing. In yeast, this is mediated by the propagation of the SIR proteins from telomeres toward more centromeric regions. Particular transcription factors can protect downstream genes from silencing when tethered between the gene and the telomere, and they may thus act as chromatin domain boundaries. Here we have studied one such transcription factor, CTF-1, that binds directly histone H3. A deletion mutagenesis localized the barrier activity to the CTF-1 histone-binding domain. A saturating point mutagenesis of this domain identified several amino acid substitutions that similarly inhibited the boundary and histone binding activities. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the barrier protein efficiently prevents the spreading of SIR proteins, and that it separates domains of hypoacetylated and hyperacetylated histones. Together, these results suggest a mechanism by which proteins such as CTF-1 may interact directly with histone H3 to prevent the propagation of a silent chromatin structure, thereby defining boundaries of permissive and silent chromatin domains.

Transcription factor CTF1 acts as a chromatin domain boundary that shields human telomeric genes from silencing.

Telomeres are associated with chromatin-mediated silencing of genes in their vicinity. However, how epigenetic markers mediate mammalian telomeric silencing and whether specific proteins may counteract this effect are not known. We evaluated the ability of CTF1, a DNA- and histone-binding transcription factor, to prevent transgene silencing at human telomeres. CTF1 was found to protect a gene from silencing when its DNA-binding sites were interposed between the gene and the telomeric extremity, while it did not affect a gene adjacent to the telomere. Protein fusions containing the CTF1 histone-binding domain displayed similar activities, while mutants impaired in their ability to interact with the histone did not. Chromatin immunoprecipitation indicated the propagation of a hypoacetylated histone structure to various extents depending on the telomere. The CTF1 fusion protein was found to recruit the H2A.Z histone variant at the telomeric locus and to restore high histone acetylation levels to the insulated telomeric transgene. Histone lysine trimethylations were also increased on the insulated transgene, indicating that these modifications may mediate expression rather than silencing at human telomeres. Overall, these results indicate that transcription factors can act to delimit chromatin domain boundaries at mammalian telomeres, thereby blocking the propagation of a silent chromatin structure.

Determinants of vitellogenin B1 promoter architecture. HNF3 and estrogen responsive transcription within chromatin.

The liver-specific vitellogenin B1 promoter is efficiently activated by estrogen within a nucleosomal environment after microinjection into Xenopus laevis oocytes, consistent with the hypothesis that significant nucleosome remodeling over this promoter is not a prerequisite for the activation by the estrogen receptor (ERalpha). This observation lead us to investigate determinants other than ERalpha of chromatin structure and transcriptional activation of the vitellogenin B1 promoter in this system and in vitro. We find that the liver-enriched transcription factor HNF3 has an important organizational role for chromatin structure as demonstrated by DNase I-hypersensitive site mapping. Both HNF3 and the estrogen receptor activate transcription synergistically and are able to interact with chromatin reconstituted in vitro with three positioned nucleosomes. We propose that HNF3 is the cellular determinant which establishes a promoter environment favorable to a rapid transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor.

Drosophila melanogaster dHCF Interacts with both PcG and TrxG Epigenetic Regulators.

Repression and activation of gene transcription involves multiprotein complexes that modify chromatin structure. The integration of these complexes at regulatory sites can be assisted by co-factors that link them to DNA-bound transcriptional regulators. In humans, one such co-factor is the herpes simplex virus host-cell factor 1 (HCF-1), which is implicated in both activation and repression of transcription. We show here that disruption of the gene encoding the Drosophila melanogaster homolog of HCF-1, dHCF, leads to a pleiotropic phenotype involving lethality, sterility, small size, apoptosis, and morphological defects. In Drosophila, repressed and activated transcriptional states of cell fate-determining genes are maintained throughout development by Polycomb Group (PcG) and Trithorax Group (TrxG) genes, respectively. dHCF mutant flies display morphological phenotypes typical of TrxG mutants and dHCF interacts genetically with both PcG and TrxG genes. Thus, dHCF inactivation enhances the mutant phenotypes of the Pc PcG as well as brm and mor TrxG genes, suggesting that dHCF possesses Enhancer of TrxG and PcG (ETP) properties. Additionally, dHCF interacts with the previously established ETP gene skd. These pleiotropic phenotypes are consistent with broad roles for dHCF in both activation and repression of transcription during fly development.

Reversal of the silencing of tetracycline-controlled genes requires the coordinate action of distinctly acting transcription factors.

BACKGROUND: Regulation of genes transferred to eukaryotic organisms is often limited by the lack of consistent expression levels in all transduced cells, which may result in part from epigenetic gene silencing effects. This reduces the efficacy of ligand-controlled gene switches designed for somatic gene transfers such as gene therapy. METHODS: A doxycycline-controlled transgene was stably introduced in human cells, and clones were screened for epigenetic silencing of the transgene. Various regulatory proteins were targeted to the silent transgene, to identify those that would mediate regulation by doxycycline. RESULTS: A doxycycline-controlled minimal promoter was found to be prone to gene silencing, which prevents activation by a fusion of the bacterial TetR DNA-binding domain with the VP16 activator. DNA modification studies indicated that the silenced transgene adopts a poorly accessible chromatin structure. Several cellular transcriptional activators were found to restore an accessible DNA structure when targeted to the silent transgene, and they cooperated with Tet-VP16 to mediate regulation by doxycycline. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of the silencing of a tetracycline-regulated minimal promoter requires a chromatin-remodeling activity for subsequent promoter activation by the Tet-VP16 fusion protein. Thus, distinct regulatory elements may be combined to obtain long-term regulation and persistent expression of exogenous genes in eukaryotic cells.

Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project.

We report the generation and analysis of functional data from multiple, diverse experiments performed on a targeted 1% of the human genome as part of the pilot phase of the ENCODE Project. These data have been further integrated and augmented by a number of evolutionary and computational analyses. Together, our results advance the collective knowledge about human genome function in several major areas. First, our studies provide convincing evidence that the genome is pervasively transcribed, such that the majority of its bases can be found in primary transcripts, including non-protein-coding transcripts, and those that extensively overlap one another. Second, systematic examination of transcriptional regulation has yielded new understanding about transcription start sites, including their relationship to specific regulatory sequences and features of chromatin accessibility and histone modification. Third, a more sophisticated view of chromatin structure has emerged, including its inter-relationship with DNA replication and transcriptional regulation. Finally, integration of these new sources of information, in particular with respect to mammalian evolution based on inter- and intra-species sequence comparisons, has yielded new mechanistic and evolutionary insights concerning the functional landscape of the human genome. Together, these studies are defining a path for pursuit of a more comprehensive characterization of human genome function.

The role of CTCFL/BORIS in Meiosis

The complexity of mammalian genome organization demands a complex interplay of DNA and proteins to orchestrate proper gene regulation. CTCF, a highly conserved, ubiquitously expressed protein has been postulated as a primary organizer of genome architecture because of its roles in transcriptional activation/repression, insulation and imprinting. Diverse regulatory functions are exerted through genome wide binding via a central eleven zinc finger DNA binding domain and an array of diverse protein-protein interactions through N- and C- terminal domains. CTCFL has been identified as a paralog of CTCF expressed only in spermatogenic cells of the testis. CTCF and CTCFL have a highly homologous DNA-binding domain, while the flanking amino acid sequences exhibit no significant similarity. Genome- wide mapping of CTCF binding sites has been carried out in many cell types, but no data exist for CTCFL apart from a few identified loci. The lack of high quality antibodies prompted us to generate an endogenously flag-tagged CTCFL mouse model using BAC recombination. IHC staining using anti-flag antibodies confirmed CTCFL localization to type Β spermatogonia and preleptotene spermatocytes and a mutually exclusive pattern of expression with CTCF. ChIP followed by high-throughput sequencing identified 10,382 binding sites showing 70% overlap but representing only 20% of CTCF sites. Consensus sequence analysis identified a significantly longer binding motif with prominently less ambiguity of base calling at every position. The significant difference between CTCF and CTCFL genomic binding patterns proposes that their binding to DNA is differentially regulated. Analysis of CTCFL binding to methylated regions on a genome wide scale identified approximately 1,000 loci. Methylation-independent binding of CTCFL might be at least one of the mechanisms that ensures distinct binding patterns of CTCF and CTCFL since CTCF binding is methylation- sensitive. Co-localization of CTCF with cohesin has been well established and analysis of CTCFL and SMC3 overlap identified around 3,300 binding sites from which two related but distinct consensus sequence motifs were derived. Because virtually all data for cohesin binding originate from mitotically proliferating cells, the anticipated overlap is expected to be considerably higher in meiotic cells. Meiosis-specific cohesin subunit Rec8 is specific for spermatocytes and 6 out of the 12 identified binding sites are also bound by CTCFL. In conclusion, this was the first genome-wide mapping of CTCFL binding sites in spermatocytes, the only cell type where CTCF is not expressed. CTCFL has a unique binding site repertoire distinct from CTCF, binds to methylated sequences and shows a significant overlap with cohesin binding sites. Future efforts will be oriented towards deciphering the role CTCFL plays in conversion of chromatin structure and function from mitotic to meiotic chromosomes. - La complexité de l'organisation du génome des mammifères exige une interaction particulière entre ADN et protéines pour orchestrer une régulation appropriée de l'expression des gènes. CTCFL, une protéine ubiquitaire très conservée, serait le principal organisateur de l'architecture du génome de par son rôle dans l'activation / la répression de la transcription, la protection et la localisation des gènes. Diverses régulations sont opérées, d'une part au travers d'interactions à différents endroits du génome par le biais d'un domaine protéique central de liaison à l'ADN à onze doigts de zinc, et d'autre part par des interactions protéine-protéine variées au niveau de leur domaine N- et C-terminal. CTCFL a été identifié comme un paralogue de CTCF exprimé uniquement dans les cellules spermatiques du testicule. CTCFL et CTCF ont un domaine de liaison à l'ADN très homologue, tandis que les séquences d'acides aminés situées de part et d'autre de ce domaine ne présentent aucune similitude. Une cartographie générale des sites de liaison au CTCF a été réalisée pour de nombreux types cellulaires, mais il n'existe aucune donnée pour CTCFL à l'exception de l'identification de quelques loci. L'absence d'anticorps de bonne qualité nous a conduit à générer un modèle murin portant un CTCFL endogène taggué grâce à un procédé de recombinaison BAC. Une coloration IHC à l'aide d'anticorps anti-FLAG a confirmé la présence de CTCFL au niveau des spermatogonies de type Β et des spermatocytes au stade préleptotène, et une distribution mutuellement exclusive avec CTCF. Une méthode de Chromatine Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) suivie d'un séquençage à haut débit a permis d'identifier 10.382 sites de liaison montrant 70% d'homologie mais ne représentant que 20% des sites CTCF. L'analyse de la séquence consensus révèle un motif de fixation à l'ADN nettement plus long et qui comporte bien moins de bases aléatoires à chaque position nucléotidique. La différence significative entre les séquences génomiques des sites de liaison au CTCF et CTCFL suggère que leur fixation à l'ADN est régulée différemment. Appliquée à l'échelle du génome, l'étude de l'interaction de CTCFL avec des régions méthylées de l'ADN a permis d'identifier environ 1.000 loci. Contrairement à CTCFL, la liaison de CTCF dépend de l'état de méthylation de l'ADN ; cette modification épigénétique constitue donc au moins un des mécanismes de régulation expliquant une localisation de CTCF et CTCFL à des sites distincts du génome. La co- localisation de CTCF avec la cohésine étant établie, l'analyse de la superposition des séquences de CTCFL avec la sous-unité SMC3 identifie environ 3.300 sites de liaison parmi lesquels deux mêmes motifs consensus distincts par leur séquence sont mis en évidence. La presque quasi-totalité des données sur la cohésine ayant été établie à partir de cellules en prolifération mitotique, il est probable que la similitude au sein des séquences consensus soit encore plus grande dans le cas des cellules en méiose. La sous-unité Rec8 de la cohésine propre à l'état de méiose est spécifiquement exprimée dans les spermatocytes. Or 6 des 12 sites de liaison identifiés sont également utilisés par CTCFL. Pour conclure, ce travail constitue la première cartographie à l'échelle du génome des sites de liaison de CTCFL dans les spermatocytes, seul type cellulaire où CTCFL n'est pas exprimé. CTCFL possède un répertoire unique de sites de fixation à l'ADN distinct de CTCF, se lie à des séquences méthylées et présente un nombre important de sites de liaison communs avec la cohésine. Les perspectives futures sont d'élucider le rôle de CTCFL dans le remodelage de la structure de la chromatine et de définir sa fonction dans le processus de méiose.

Linking epigenetics to lipid metabolism: focus on histone deacetylases.

A number of recent studies revealed that epigenetic modifications play a central role in the regulation of lipid and of other metabolic pathways such as cholesterol homeostasis, bile acid synthesis, glucose and energy metabolism. Epigenetics refers to aspects of genome functions regulated in a DNA sequence-independent fashion. Chromatin structure is controlled by epigenetic mechanisms through DNA methylation and histone modifications. The main modifications are histone acetylation and deacetylation on specific lysine residues operated by two different classes of enzymes: Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), respectively. The interaction between these enzymes and histones can activate or repress gene transcription: Histone acetylation opens and activates chromatin, while deacetylation of histones and DNA methylation compact chromatin making it transcriptionally silent. The new evidences on the importance of HDACs in the regulation of lipid and other metabolic pathways will open new perspectives in the comprehension of the pathophysiology of metabolic disorders.

Apoptotic markers in protozoan parasites.

ABSTRACT: The execution of the apoptotic death program in metazoans is characterized by a sequence of morphological and biochemical changes that include cell shrinkage, presentation of phosphatidylserine at the cell surface, mitochondrial alterations, chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, membrane blebbing and the formation of apoptotic bodies. Methodologies for measuring apoptosis are based on these markers. Except for membrane blebbing and formation of apoptotic bodies, all other events have been observed in most protozoan parasites undergoing cell death. However, while techniques exist to detect these markers, they are often optimised for metazoan cells and therefore may not pick up subtle differences between the events occurring in unicellular organisms and multi-cellular organisms.In this review we discuss the markers most frequently used to analyze cell death in protozoan parasites, paying special attention to changes in cell morphology, mitochondrial activity, chromatin structure and plasma membrane structure/permeability. Regarding classical regulators/executors of apoptosis, we have reviewed the present knowledge of caspase-like and nuclease activities.

Effects of epigenetic regulatory elements on telomeric gene expression

Transgene expression in eukaryotic cells strongly depends on the locus of integration in the host genome and often results in limited transcription level because of unfavorable chromatin structure at the integration site. Epigenetic regulators are DNA sequences which are believed to act on the chromatin structure and may protect transgenes from this so-called position effect. Despite being extensively used to increase transgene expression, the mechanism of action of many of these elements remains largely unknown. Here we evaluated different epigenetic regulatory DNA elements for their ability to protect transgene transcription at telomeres, a defined chromatin environment associated to low or inconsistent expression caused by the Telomere Position Effect (TPE). For the assessment of the effects of epigenetic regulators at telomeres, a novel dual reporter system had to be designed. Telomeric integration of the newly-developed dual reporter system carrying different epigenetic regulators showed that MARs (Matrix Attachment Regions), a UCOE (Ubiquitous Chromatin-Opening Element) or the chicken cHS4 insulator have strong barrier activity which prevented TPE from spreading toward the centromere, resulting in stable and in some cases increased expression of a telomeric-distal reporter gene. In addition, MARs and STAR element 40 resulted in an increase of cells expressing the telomeric-proximal reporter gene, suggesting also an anti-silencing effect. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that at telomeres MARs actively promote the deposition of euchromatic histone marks, especially acetylation of both histone H3 and H4, which might be involved in MARs' barrier and transcriptional activator activities. Differently, the chromatin in proximity of the UCOE element was depleted of several repressive chromatin marks, such as trimethylated lysine 9 and lysine 27 on histone H3 and trimethylated lysine 20 of histone H4, possibly favoring the preservation of an open chromatin structure at the integration site. We conclude that epigenetic regulatory elements that may be used to enhance and sustain transgene expression have all a specific epigenetic signature which might be at the basis of their mechanism of action, and that a combination of different classes of epigenetic regulators might be advantageous when high levels of protein expression are required. - L'expression des transgènes dans les cellules eucaryotes est fortement influencée par leur site d'intégration dans le génome. En effet, une structure chromatinienne défavorable au niveau du site d'intégration peut fortement limiter le degré d'expression d'un transgène. Il existe toutefois des séquences d'ADN qui, en agissant sur la structure de la chromatine, permettent de limiter cet effet de position et, par conséquent, de promouvoir l'expression soutenue d'un transgène. Ces éléments génomiques, connus comme régulateurs épigénétiques, sont largement utilisés dans plusieurs domaines où une expression élevée et soutenue est requise, malgré un mode de fonctionnement parfois méconnu. Dans cette étude, j'ai évalué la capacité de différents régulateurs épigénétiques à protéger la transcription de transgènes au niveau des télomères, régions chromatiniennes bien définies qui ont été associées à un fort effet de silençage, connu comme «effet de position télomérique». Pour cela, un nouveau système à deux gènes rapporteurs a été développé. Lorsque des MARs (Matrix Attachment Regions, séquences d'ADN pouvant s'associer à la matrice nucléaire), un UCOE (Ubiquitous Chromatin-Opening Element, élément pouvant ouvrir la chromatine) ou l'isolateur génétique cHS4 (dérivé du locus de la β-globine de poulet) sont placés entre les deux gènes rapporteurs, une forte activité barrière bloquant la propagation de la chromatine répressive télomérique est observée, résultant en un plus grand nombre de cellules exprimant le gène télomérique-distal. D'autre part, une augmentation du nombre de cellules exprimant le gène télomérique-proximal, observée en présence des éléments MAR et STAR 40 (Stabilizing Anti-Repressor element 40, un élément pouvant prévenir la répression génique), suggère aussi un faible effet anti-silençage pour ces éléments. Des expériences d'immunoprécipitation de la chromatine démontrent qu'au télomère, les MARs favorisent l'assemblage de marqueurs de la chromatine active, surtout l'acétylation des histones H3 et H4, qui pourraient être à la base de l'activité barrière et de celle d'activateur transcriptionel. Différemment, la chromatine à proximité de l'élément UCOE est particulièrement pauvre en marqueurs de la chromatine silencieuse, comme la trimethylation des lysines 9 et 27 de l'histone H3, ainsi que la trimethylation de la lysine 20 de l'histone H4. Cela suggère que UCOE pourrait préserver une structure chromatinienne ouverte au site d'intégration, favorisant l'expression des gènes à sa proximité. En conclusion, les régulateurs épigénétiques analysés lors de cette étude ont tous montré une signature épigénétique spécifique qui pourrait être à la base de leurs mécanismes de fonctionnement, suggérant aussi qu'une utilisation d'éléments épigénétiques de classe différente dans un même vecteur d'expression pourrait être avantageuse lorsque de hauts et soutenus niveaux d'expression sont nécessaires.

Characterization of insulators and barrier elements for gene therapy

Gene transfer that relies on integrating vectors often suffers from epigenetic or regulatory effects that influence the expression of the therapeutic gene and=or of cellular genes located near the vector integration site in the chromosome. Insulator elements act to block gene activation by enhancers, while chromatin domain boundary or barrier sequences prevent gene-silencing effects. At present, the modes of action of insulator and barriers are poorly understood, and their use in the context of gene therapies remains to be documented. Using combinations of reporter genes coding for indicator fluorescent proteins, we constructed assay systems that allow the quantification of the insulator or barrier activities of genetic elements in individual cells. This presentation will illustrate how these assay systems were used to identify short DNA elements that insulate nearby genes from activation by viral vector elements, and=or that block the propagation of a silent chromatin structure that leads to gene silencing. We will show that some barrier elements do not merely block repressive effects, but that they can act to stabilize and sustain transgene expression. We will illustrate that this may be beneficial when transgenes are introduced into stem or precursor cells using non-viral vectors, where later differentiation may lead to the silencing of the therapeutic gene. We will show that these elements can be used to maintain efficient transgene expression upon the differentiation of murine precursor cells towards myofibers, in a model of cell therapy for muscle dystrophies.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors impair innate immune responses to Toll-like receptor agonists and to infection.

Regulated by histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases (HDACs), histone acetylation is a key epigenetic mechanism controlling chromatin structure, DNA accessibility, and gene expression. HDAC inhibitors induce growth arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis of tumor cells and are used as anticancer agents. Here we describe the effects of HDAC inhibitors on microbial sensing by macrophages and dendritic cells in vitro and host defenses against infection in vivo. HDAC inhibitors down-regulated the expression of numerous host defense genes, including pattern recognition receptors, kinases, transcription regulators, cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and costimulatory molecules as assessed by genome-wide microarray analyses or innate immune responses of macrophages and dendritic cells stimulated with Toll-like receptor agonists. HDAC inhibitors induced the expression of Mi-2β and enhanced the DNA-binding activity of the Mi-2/NuRD complex that acts as a transcriptional repressor of macrophage cytokine production. In vivo, HDAC inhibitors increased the susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infections but conferred protection against toxic and septic shock. Thus, these data identify an essential role for HDAC inhibitors in the regulation of the expression of innate immune genes and host defenses against microbial pathogens.