7 resultados para cancer of cervix
em Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have explored the relation between coffee and tea intake and head and neck cancers, with inconsistent results. METHODS: We pooled individual-level data from nine case-control studies of head and neck cancers, including 5,139 cases and 9,028 controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Caffeinated coffee intake was inversely related with the risk of cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx: the ORs were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) for an increment of 1 cup per day and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47-0.80) in drinkers of >4 cups per day versus nondrinkers. This latter estimate was consistent for different anatomic sites (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71 for oral cavity; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82 for oropharynx/hypopharynx; and OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-1.01 for oral cavity/pharynx not otherwise specified) and across strata of selected covariates. No association of caffeinated coffee drinking was found with laryngeal cancer (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.64-1.45 in drinkers of >4 cups per day versus nondrinkers). Data on decaffeinated coffee were too sparse for detailed analysis, but indicated no increased risk. Tea intake was not associated with head and neck cancer risk (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11 for drinkers versus nondrinkers). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of case-control studies supports the hypothesis of an inverse association between caffeinated coffee drinking and risk of cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx. IMPACT: Given widespread use of coffee and the relatively high incidence and low survival of head and neck cancers, the observed inverse association may have appreciable public health relevance.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: The magnitude of risk conferred by the interaction between tobacco and alcohol use on the risk of head and neck cancers is not clear because studies have used various methods to quantify the excess head and neck cancer burden. METHODS: We analyzed individual-level pooled data from 17 European and American case-control studies (11,221 cases and 16,168 controls) participating in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology consortium. We estimated the multiplicative interaction parameter (psi) and population attributable risks (PAR). RESULTS: A greater than multiplicative joint effect between ever tobacco and alcohol use was observed for head and neck cancer risk (psi = 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-3.04). The PAR for tobacco or alcohol was 72% (95% confidence interval, 61-79%) for head and neck cancer, of which 4% was due to alcohol alone, 33% was due to tobacco alone, and 35% was due to tobacco and alcohol combined. The total PAR differed by subsite (64% for oral cavity cancer, 72% for pharyngeal cancer, 89% for laryngeal cancer), by sex (74% for men, 57% for women), by age (33% for cases <45 years, 73% for cases >60 years), and by region (84% in Europe, 51% in North America, 83% in Latin America). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the joint effect between tobacco and alcohol use is greater than multiplicative on head and neck cancer risk. However, a substantial proportion of head and neck cancers cannot be attributed to tobacco or alcohol use, particularly for oral cavity cancer and for head and neck cancer among women and among young-onset cases.
Resumo:
Standard chest radiographs have been shown to be insensitive for the diagnosis of morphologic abnormalities of airways. Computed tomography is the most sensitive and specific investigation to diagnose emphysema. However, as emphysema may be missed on computed tomography, this investigation cannot be used to definitely rule out the diagnosis. Computed tomography may contribute to the investigation of bronchiolitis, and it is now considered as the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Imaging may contribute to identify complications such as bronchopulmonary infection, pulmonary hypertension, pneumothorax, cancer of the lung, compressive bullae, and pulmonary embolism.
Resumo:
To make a diagnostic of cancer in a young adult (15-30 years of age) has important physical, psychological and social implications. The most frequent cancers seen at this age are cancer of the thyroid, testicular germ cell tumours, 'melanoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukaemia, cerebral tumours and sarcomas. Even if the prognostic of most of these cancers is excellent, treatments are difficult and often associated with long-term side effects. A multidisciplinary approach of these patients is essential. A long-term follow-up by a general practicioner or an oncologist is indispensable.
Resumo:
SummaryEwing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFT) are the second most frequent cancer of bone in adolescents and young adults. ESFT are characterized by a chromosomal translocation that involves the 5' segment of the EWSR1 gene and the 3' segment of an ets transcription factor family member gene. In 85% of cases the chromosomal translocation generates the fusion protein EWSR1-FLI-1. Recent work from our laboratory identified mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) as the putative cell of origin of ESFT and characterized a CD133+ subpopulation of ESFT cells with tumor initating and self-renewal capacity, known as cancer stem cells (CSC). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA that regulate protein expression at the post-transcriptional level by either repressing translation or destabilizing mRNA. MiRNAs participate in several biological processes including cell proliferation and differentiation. We used miRNA expression profile comparison between MSC and ESFT cell lines and CD133+ ESFT cells and CD133" ESFT cells to investigate the role of miRNAs in ESFT pathogenesis. MiRNA expression profile comparison of MSC and ESFT cell lines identified 35 differentially expressed miRNAs. Among these was down-regulation of let-7a which results, in part, by the direct repression of let-7a-l promoter by EWSR1-FLI-1. Overexpression of let-7a in ESFT cells blocked ESFT tumorigenesis through an High-motility group AT-hook2 (HMGA2)-mediated mechanism.MiRNA profiling of CD133+ ESFT and CD 133" ESFT cells revealed a broad repression of miRNAs in CD133+ ESFT mediated by down-regulation of TARBP2, a central regulator of the miRNA maturation pathway. Down-regulation of TARBP2 in ESFT cell lines results in a miRNA expression profile reminescent of that observed in CD133+ ESFT and associated with increased tumorigenicity. Enhancement of TARBP2 activity using the antibiotic enoxacin or overexpression of miRNA-143 or miRNA-145, two targets of TARBP2, impaired ESFT CSC self-renewal and block ESFT tumorigenicity. Moreover in vivo administration of synthetic let- 7a, miRNA-143 or miRNA-145 blocks ESFT tumor growth.Thus, dysregulation of miRNA expression is a key feature in ESFT pathogenesis and restoration of their expressions might be used as a new therapeutic tool.RésuméLe sarcome d'Ewing est la deuxième tumeur osseuse la plus fréquente chez l'enfant et le jeune adolescent. Le sarcome d'Ewing est caractérisé par une translocation chromosomique qui produit une protéine de fusion EWSR1-FLI-1. Des récents travaux ont identifié les cellules mésenchymateuses souches (MSC) comme étant les cellules à l'origine du sarcome d'Ewing ainsi qu'une sous-population de cellules exprimant le marqueur CD 133, dans le sarcome d'Ewing connu comme les cellules cancéreuses souches (CSC). Ces cellules ont la capacité d'initier la croissance tumorale et possèdent des propriétés d'auto-renouvellement. Les microRNAs (miRNAs) sont de petits ARN qui ne codent pas pour des protéines et qui contrôlent l'expression des protéines en bloquant la traduction ou en dégradant l'ARNm. Les miRNAs participent à différents processus biologiques comme la prolifération et la différenciation cellulaires.Le but de ce travail est d'étudier le rôle des miRNAs dans le sarcome d'Ewing. Un profil d'expression de miRNAs entre les MSC et des lignées cellulaires de sarcome d'Ewing a mis en évidence 35 miRNAs différemment exprimés. Parmi ceux-ci, la répression de let-7a est liée à la répression directe du promoteur de let-7a-l par EWSR-FLI-1. La sur-expression de let-7a dans des lignées cellulaires de sarcome d'Ewing inhibe leur croissance tumorale. Cette inhibition de croissance tumorale est régulée par la protéine high-motility group AT-hook2 (HMGA2).Un profil d'expression de miRNAs entre les cellules du sarcome d'Ewing CD133+ et CD133" montre une sous-expression d'un grand nombre de miRNAs dans les cellules CD133+ par rapport aux cellules CD133". Cette différence d'expression de miRNAs est due à la répression du gène TARBP2 qui participe à la maturation des miRNAs. La suppression de TARBP2 dans des cellules d'Ewing induit un profil d'expression de miRNAs similaire aux cellules CD133+ du sarcome d'Ewing et augmente la tumorigenèse des lignées cellulaires. De plus l'utilisation d'enoxacin, une molécule qui augmente l'activité de TARBP2 ou la sur- expression des miRNA143 ou miRNA-145 dans les CSC du sarcome d'Ewing bloque l'auto- renouvellement des cellules et la croissance tumorale. Finalement, l'administration de let-7a, miRNA-143 ou miRNA-145, dans des souris bloque la croissance du sarcome d'Ewing. Ces résultats indiquent que la dysrégulation des miRNAs participe à la pathogenèse du sarcome d'Ewing et que les miRNAs peuvent être utilisés comme des agents thérapeutiques.
Resumo:
Odds ratios for head and neck cancer increase with greater cigarette and alcohol use and lower body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height(2) (m(2))). Using data from the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium, the authors conducted a formal analysis of BMI as a modifier of smoking- and alcohol-related effects. Analysis of never and current smokers included 6,333 cases, while analysis of never drinkers and consumers of < or =10 drinks/day included 8,452 cases. There were 8,000 or more controls, depending on the analysis. Odds ratios for all sites increased with lower BMI, greater smoking, and greater drinking. In polytomous regression, odds ratios for BMI (P = 0.65), smoking (P = 0.52), and drinking (P = 0.73) were homogeneous for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers. Odds ratios for BMI and drinking were greater for oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer (P < 0.01), while smoking odds ratios were greater for laryngeal cancer (P < 0.01). Lower BMI enhanced smoking- and drinking-related odds ratios for oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer (P < 0.01), while BMI did not modify smoking and drinking odds ratios for laryngeal cancer. The increased odds ratios for all sites with low BMI may suggest related carcinogenic mechanisms; however, BMI modification of smoking and drinking odds ratios for cancer of the oral cavity/pharynx but not larynx cancer suggests additional factors specific to oral cavity/pharynx cancer.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Worldwide data for cancer survival are scarce. We aimed to initiate worldwide surveillance of cancer survival by central analysis of population-based registry data, as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems, and to inform global policy on cancer control. METHODS: Individual tumour records were submitted by 279 population-based cancer registries in 67 countries for 25·7 million adults (age 15-99 years) and 75 000 children (age 0-14 years) diagnosed with cancer during 1995-2009 and followed up to Dec 31, 2009, or later. We looked at cancers of the stomach, colon, rectum, liver, lung, breast (women), cervix, ovary, and prostate in adults, and adult and childhood leukaemia. Standardised quality control procedures were applied; errors were corrected by the registry concerned. We estimated 5-year net survival, adjusted for background mortality in every country or region by age (single year), sex, and calendar year, and by race or ethnic origin in some countries. Estimates were age-standardised with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. FINDINGS: 5-year survival from colon, rectal, and breast cancers has increased steadily in most developed countries. For patients diagnosed during 2005-09, survival for colon and rectal cancer reached 60% or more in 22 countries around the world; for breast cancer, 5-year survival rose to 85% or higher in 17 countries worldwide. Liver and lung cancer remain lethal in all nations: for both cancers, 5-year survival is below 20% everywhere in Europe, in the range 15-19% in North America, and as low as 7-9% in Mongolia and Thailand. Striking rises in 5-year survival from prostate cancer have occurred in many countries: survival rose by 10-20% between 1995-99 and 2005-09 in 22 countries in South America, Asia, and Europe, but survival still varies widely around the world, from less than 60% in Bulgaria and Thailand to 95% or more in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the USA. For cervical cancer, national estimates of 5-year survival range from less than 50% to more than 70%; regional variations are much wider, and improvements between 1995-99 and 2005-09 have generally been slight. For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005-09, 5-year survival was 40% or higher only in Ecuador, the USA, and 17 countries in Asia and Europe. 5-year survival for stomach cancer in 2005-09 was high (54-58%) in Japan and South Korea, compared with less than 40% in other countries. By contrast, 5-year survival from adult leukaemia in Japan and South Korea (18-23%) is lower than in most other countries. 5-year survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is less than 60% in several countries, but as high as 90% in Canada and four European countries, which suggests major deficiencies in the management of a largely curable disease. INTERPRETATION: International comparison of survival trends reveals very wide differences that are likely to be attributable to differences in access to early diagnosis and optimum treatment. Continuous worldwide surveillance of cancer survival should become an indispensable source of information for cancer patients and researchers and a stimulus for politicians to improve health policy and health-care systems. FUNDING: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Toronto, Canada), Cancer Focus Northern Ireland (Belfast, UK), Cancer Institute New South Wales (Sydney, Australia), Cancer Research UK (London, UK), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA), Swiss Re (London, UK), Swiss Cancer Research foundation (Bern, Switzerland), Swiss Cancer League (Bern, Switzerland), and University of Kentucky (Lexington, KY, USA).