A proline-rich TGF-beta-responsive transcriptional activator interacts with histone H3.

The molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of gene expression by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) have been analyzed. We show that TGF-beta specifically induces the activity of the proline-rich trans-activation domain of CTF-1, a member of the CTF/NF-I family of transcription factors. A TGF-beta-responsive domain (TRD) in the proline-rich transcriptional activation sequence of CTF-1 was shown to mediate TGF-beta induction in NIH-3T3 cells. Mutagenesis studies indicated that this domain is not the primary target of regulatory phosphorylations, suggesting that the growth factor may regulate a CTF-1-interacting protein. A two-hybrid screening assay identified a nucleosome component, histone H3, as a specific CTF-1-interacting protein in yeast. Furthermore, the CTF-1 trans-activation domain was shown to interact with histone H3 in both transiently and stably transfected mammalian cells. This interaction requires the TRD, and it appears to be upregulated by TGF-beta in vivo. Moreover, point mutations in the TRD that inhibit TGF-beta induction also reduce interaction with histone H3. In vitro, the trans-activation domain of CTF-1 specifically contacts histone H3 and oligomers of histones H3 and H4, and full-length CTF-1 was shown to alter the interaction of reconstituted nucleosomal cores with DNA. Thus, the growth factor-regulated trans-activation domain of CTF-1 can interact with chromatin components through histone H3. These findings suggest that such interactions may regulate chromatin dynamics in response to growth factor signaling.

Epigenetic regulation of histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation status by HCF-1 proteins in C. elegans and mammalian cells.

BACKGROUND: The human herpes simplex virus (HSV) host cell factor HCF-1 is a transcriptional coregulator that associates with both histone methyl- and acetyltransferases, and a histone deacetylase and regulates cell proliferation and division. In HSV-infected cells, HCF-1 associates with the viral protein VP16 to promote formation of a multiprotein-DNA transcriptional activator complex. The ability of HCF proteins to stabilize this VP16-induced complex has been conserved in diverse animal species including Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans suggesting that VP16 targets a conserved cellular function of HCF-1. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the role of HCF proteins in animal development, we have characterized the effects of loss of the HCF-1 homolog in C. elegans, called Ce HCF-1. Two large hcf-1 deletion mutants (pk924 and ok559) are viable but display reduced fertility. Loss of Ce HCF-1 protein at reduced temperatures (e.g., 12 degrees C), however, leads to a high incidence of embryonic lethality and early embryonic mitotic and cytokinetic defects reminiscent of mammalian cell-division defects upon loss of HCF-1 function. Even when viable, however, at normal temperature, mutant embryos display reduced levels of phospho-histone H3 serine 10 (H3S10P), a modification implicated in both transcriptional and mitotic regulation. Mammalian cells with defective HCF-1 also display defects in mitotic H3S10P status. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that HCF-1 proteins possess conserved roles in the regulation of cell division and mitotic histone phosphorylation.

Coordination between zinc and phosphate homeostasis involves the transcription factor PHR1, the phosphate exporter PHO1, and its homologue PHO1;H3 in Arabidopsis.

Interactions between zinc (Zn) and phosphate (Pi) nutrition in plants have long been recognized, but little information is available on their molecular bases and biological significance. This work aimed at examining the effects of Zn deficiency on Pi accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana and uncovering genes involved in the Zn-Pi synergy. Wild-type plants as well as mutants affected in Pi signalling and transport genes, namely the transcription factor PHR1, the E2-conjugase PHO2, and the Pi exporter PHO1, were examined. Zn deficiency caused an increase in shoot Pi content in the wild type as well as in the pho2 mutant, but not in the phr1 or pho1 mutants. This indicated that PHR1 and PHO1 participate in the coregulation of Zn and Pi homeostasis. Zn deprivation had a very limited effect on transcript levels of Pi-starvation-responsive genes such as AT4, IPS1, and microRNA399, or on of members of the high-affinity Pi transporter family PHT1. Interestingly, one of the PHO1 homologues, PHO1;H3, was upregulated in response to Zn deficiency. The expression pattern of PHO1 and PHO1;H3 were similar, both being expressed in cells of the root vascular cylinder and both localized to the Golgi when expressed transiently in tobacco cells. When grown in Zn-free medium, pho1;h3 mutant plants displayed higher Pi contents in the shoots than wild-type plants. This was, however, not observed in a pho1 pho1;h3 double mutant, suggesting that PHO1;H3 restricts root-to-shoot Pi transfer requiring PHO1 function for Pi homeostasis in response to Zn deficiency.

Directed integration of new insulated lentiviral vectors to heterochromatin towards safer gene transfer to stem cells

The need for better gene transfer systems towards improved risk=benefit balance for patients remains a major challenge in the clinical translation of gene therapy (GT). We have investigated the improvement of integrating vectors safety in combining (i) new short synthetic genetic insulator elements (GIE) and (ii) directing genetic integration to heterochromatin. We have designed SIN-insulated retrovectors with two candidate GIEs and could identify a specific combination of insulator 2 repeats which translates into best functional activity, high titers and boundary effect in both gammaretro (p20) and lentivectors (DCaro4) (see Duros et al, abstract ibid). Since GIEs are believed to shield the transgenic cassette from inhibitory effects and silencing, DCaro4 has been further tested with chimeric HIV-1 derived integrases which comprise C-ter chromodomains targeting heterochromatin through either histone H3 (ML6chimera) or methylatedCpGislands (ML10). With DCaro4 only and both chimeras, a homogeneous expression is evidenced in over 20% of the cells which is sustained over time. With control lentivectors, less than 2% of cells express GFP as compared to background using a control double-mutant in both catalytic and ledgf binding-sites; in addition, a two-times increase of expression can be induced with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Our approach could significantly reduce integration into open chromatin sensitive sites in stem cells at the time of transduction, a feature which might significantly decrease subsequent genotoxicity, according to X-SCIDs patients data.Work performed with the support of EC-DG research within the FP6-Network of Excellence, CLINIGENE: LSHB-CT-2006-018933

CTCF-T, a paralogue of CTCF, directs sequence specific DNA methylation of the imprinting control region of Igf2/H19

SUMMARY Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism of transcriptional regulation that ensures restriction of expression of a subset of mammalian genes to a single parental allele. The best studied example of imprinted gene regulation is the Igf2/H19 locus, which is also the most commonly altered by loss of imprinting (LOT) in cancer. LOT is associated with numerous hereditary diseases and several childhood, and adult cancers. Differential expression of reciprocal H19 and 1gf2 alleles in somatic cells depends on the methylation status of the imprinting control region (ICR) which regulates binding of CTCF, an ubiquitously expressed 11-zinc finger protein that binds specifically to non-methylated maternal ICR and thereby attenuates expression of Igf2, while it does not bind to methylated paternal ICR, which enables Igf2 expression. Initial ICR methylation occurs during gametogenesis by an as yet unknown mechanism. The accepted hypothesis is that the event of differential maternal and paternal DNA methylation depends on germ-line specific proteins. Our Laboratory identified a novel 11-zinc-finger protein CTCF-T (also known as CTCFL and BORIS) that is uniquely expressed in the male germ-line and is highly homologous within its zinc-finger region with CTCF. The amino-acid sequences flanking the zinc-finger regions of CTCF and CTCF-T have widely diverged, suggesting that though they could bind to the same DNA targets (ICRs) they are likely to have different functions. Interestingly, expression of CTCF-T and CTCF is mutually exclusive; CTCF-T-positive (CTCF-negative) cells occur in the stage of spermatogenesis that coincides with epigenetic reprogramming, including de novo DNA methylation. In our study we demonstrate the role that CTCF-T plays in genomic imprinting. Here we show that CTCF-T binds in vivo to the ICRs of Igf2/H19 and Dlk/Gt12 imprinted genes. In addition, we identified two novel proteins interacting with CTCF-T: a protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT7 and an arginine-rich histone H2A variant that we named trH2A. These interactions were confirmed and show that the two proteins interact with the amino-teiminal region of CTCF-T. Additionally, we show interaction of the amino- terminal region of CTCF-T with histones H1, H2A and H3. These results suggest that CTCF-T is a sequence-specific DNA (ICR) binding protein that associates with histones and recruits PRMT7. Interestingly, PRMT7 has a histone-methyltransferase activity. It has been shown that histone methylation can mark chromatin regions thereby directing DNA-methylation; thus, our hypothesis is that the CTCF-T protein-scaffold directs PRMT7 to methylate histone(s) assembled on ICRs, which marks chromatin for the recruitment of the de novo DNA methyltransferases to methylate DNA. To test this hypothesis, we developed an in vivo DNA-methylation assay using Xenopus laevis' oocytes, where H19 ICR and different expression cDNAs, including CTCF-T, PRMT7 and the de novo DNA methyltransferases (Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3L) are microinjected into the nucleus. The methylation status of CpGs within the H19 ICR was analysed 48 or 72 hours after injection. Here we demonstrate that CpGs in the ICR are methylated in the presence of both CTCF-T and PRMT7, while control oocytes injected only with ICR did not show any methylation. Additionally, we showed for the first time that Dnmt3L is crucial for the establishment of the imprinting marks on H19 ICR. Moreover, we confirmed that Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b activities are complementary. Our data indicate that all three Dnmt3s are important for efficient de novo DNA methylation. In conclusion, we propose a mechanism for the establishment of de novo imprinting marks during spermatogenesis: the CTCF-T/PRMT7 protein complex directs histone methylation leading to sequence-specific de novo DNA methylation of H19 ICR. RESUME L'empreinte génomique parentale est un mécanisme épigénétique de régulation transcriptionelle qui se traduit par une expression différentielle des deux allèles de certains gènes, en fonction de leur origine parentale. L'exemple le mieux caractérisé de gènes soumis à l'empreinte génomique parentale est le locus Igf2/H19, qui est aussi le plus fréquemment altéré par relaxation d'empreinte (en anglais: loss of imprinting, LOI) dans les cancers. Cette relaxation d'empreinte est aussi associée à de nombreuses maladies héréditaires, ainsi qu'à de nombreux cancers chez l'enfant et l'adulte. Dans les cellules somatiques, les différences d'expression des allèles réciproques H19 et Ig12 est sous le contrôle d'une région ICR (Imprinting Control Region). La méthylation de cette région ICR régule l'ancrage de la protéine à douze doigts de zinc CTCF, qui se lie spécifiquement à l'ICR maternel non-méthylé, atténuant ainsi l'expression de Igf2, alors qu'elle ne s'ancre pas à l'ICR paternel méthyle. Le mécanisme qui accompagne la méthylation initiale de la région ICR durant la gamétogenèse n'a toujours pas été élucidé. L'hypothèse actuelle propose que la différence de méthylation entre l'ADN maternel et paternel résulte de l'expression de protéines propres aux zones germinales. Notre laboratoire a récemment identifié une nouvelle protéine à douze doigts de zinc, CTCF-T (aussi dénommée CTCFL et BORRIS), qui est exprimée uniquement dans les cellules germinales mâles, dont la partie à douze doigts de zinc est fortement homologue à la protéine CTCF. La séquence d'acides aminés de part et d'autre de cette région est quant à elle très divergente, ce qui implique que CTCF-T se lie sans doute au même ADN cible que CTCF, mais possède des fonctions différentes. De plus, l'expression de CTCF-T et de CTCF s'oppose mutuellement; l'expression de la protéine CTCF-T (cellules CTCF-T positives, CTCF negatives) qui a lieu pendant la spermatogenèse coïncide avec la reprogrammation épigénétique, notamment la méthylation de novo de l'ADN. La présente étude démontre le rôle essentiel joué par la protéine CTCF-T dans l'acquisition de l'empreinte génomique parentale. Nous montrons ici que CTCF-T s'associe in vivo avec les régions ICR des loci Igf2/H19 et Dlk/Gt12. Nous avons également identifié deux nouvelles protéines qui interagissent avec CTCF-T : une protéine arginine méthyl transférase PRMT7, et un variant de l'histone H2A, riche en arginine, que nous avons dénommé trH2A. Ces interactions ont été analysées plus en détail, et confinnent que ces deux protéines s'associent avec la région N-terminale de CTCF-T. Aussi, nous présentons une interaction de la région N-terminale de CTCF-T avec les histones H1, H2, et H3. Ces résultats suggèrent que CTCF-T est une protéine qui se lie spécifiquement aux régions ICR, qui s'associe avec différents histones et qui recrute PRMT7. PRMT7 possède une activité méthyl-tansférase envers les histones. Il a été montré que la méthylation des histones marque certains endroits de la chromatine, dirigeant ainsi la méthylation de l'ADN. Notre hypothèse est donc la suivante : la protéine CTCF-T sert de base qui dirige la méthylation des histones par PRMT7 dans les régions ICR, ce qui contribue à marquer la chromatine pour le recrutement de nouvelles méthyl transférases pour méthyler l'ADN. Afin de valider cette hypothèse, nous avons développé un système de méthylation de l'ADN in vivo, dans des oeufs de Xenopus laevis, dans le noyau desquels nous avons mico-injecté la région ICR du locus H19, ainsi que différents vecteurs d'expression pour CTCF-T, PRMT7, et les de novo méthyl transférases (Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b et Dnmt3L). Les CpGs méthyles de la région ICR du locus H19 ont été analysé 48 et 72 heures après l'injection. Cette technique nous a permis de démontrer que les CpGs de la région ICR sont méthyles en présence de CTCF-T et de PRMT7, tandis que les contrôles injectés seulement avec la région ICR ne présentent aucun signe de méthylation. De plus, nous démontrons pour la première fois que la protéine méthyl transférase Dnmt3L est déterminant pour l'établissement de l'empreinte génomique parentale au niveau de la région ICR du locus H19. Aussi, nous confirmons que les activités méthyl transférases de Dnmt3a et Dnmt3b sont complémentaires. Nos données indiquent que les trois protéines Dnmt3 sont impliquées dans la méthylation de l'ADN. En conclusion, nous proposons un mécanisme responsable de la mise en place de nouvelles empreintes génomiques pendant la spermatogenèse : le complexe protéique CTCF-T/PRMT7 dirige la méthylation des histones aboutissant à la méthylation de novo de l'ADN au locus H19.

E2F1 mediates DNA damage and apoptosis through HCF-1 and the MLL family of histone methyltransferases.

E2F1 is a key positive regulator of human cell proliferation and its activity is altered in essentially all human cancers. Deregulation of E2F1 leads to oncogenic DNA damage and anti-oncogenic apoptosis. The molecular mechanisms by which E2F1 mediates these two processes are poorly understood but are important for understanding cancer progression. During the G1-to-S phase transition, E2F1 associates through a short DHQY sequence with the cell-cycle regulator HCF-1 together with the mixed-lineage leukaemia (MLL) family of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferases. We show here that the DHQY HCF-1-binding sequence permits E2F1 to stimulate both DNA damage and apoptosis, and that HCF-1 and the MLL family of H3K4 methyltransferases have important functions in these processes. Thus, HCF-1 has a broader role in E2F1 function than appreciated earlier. Indeed, sequence changes in the E2F1 HCF-1-binding site can modulate both up and down the ability of E2F1 to induce apoptosis indicating that HCF-1 association with E2F1 is a regulator of E2F1-induced apoptosis.

E2F activation of S phase promoters via association with HCF-1 and the MLL family of histone H3K4 methyltransferases.

E2F transcriptional regulators control human-cell proliferation by repressing and activating the transcription of genes required for cell-cycle progression, particularly the S phase. E2F proteins repress transcription in association with retinoblastoma pocket proteins, but less is known about how they activate transcription. Here, we show that the human G1 phase regulator HCF-1 associates with both activator (E2F1 and E2F3a) and repressor (E2F4) E2F proteins, properties that are conserved in insect cells. Human HCF-1-E2F interactions are versatile: their associations and binding to E2F-responsive promoters are cell-cycle selective, and HCF-1 displays coactivator properties when bound to the E2F1 activator and corepressor properties when bound to the E2F4 repressor. During the G1-to-S phase transition, HCF-1 recruits the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) and Set-1 histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferases to E2F-responsive promoters and induces histone methylation and transcriptional activation. These results suggest that HCF-1 induces cell-cycle-specific transcriptional activation by E2F proteins to promote cell proliferation.

Impact of Sirtuin 2 knockout on innate immune responses

Purpose/Objective: Histone deacetylases (HDACs) deacetylate histones and transcriptional regulators thereby affecting numerous biological functions. Seven mammalian sirtuins (SIRT1-7) constitute the NAD-dependent class III subfamily of HDACs. Sirtuins are the center of great interest due to their regulatory role in the control of metabolism, ageing and age-related diseases. Up to now, little is known about the influence of sirtuins on immune responses, and nothing about the role of SIRT2. The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of SIRT2 knockout on immune cell development and innate immune responses in vitro and in vivo. Materials and methods: SIRT2 germline knockout were produced on a C57BL/6J background. The cellularity of thymus and spleen was assessed by flow cytometry (n = 3). Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) and dendritic cells (BMDCs) and splenocytes were stimulated with LPS, Pam3CSK4 lipopeptide, CpG ODN, E. coli, S. aureus, TSST-1, SEB, anti-CD3+ CD28 and concanavalin A (n = 3_8). TNF, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12p40 and IFNc production, SIRT1_7 and CD40 expression, and proliferation were quantified by real time-PCR, ELISA, flow cytometry and H3-thymidine incorporation. Mice (n = 6_16) were challenged with LPS, TNF/D-galactosamine, E. coli and K. pneumonia titrated to cause either mild or severe infections or shock. Blood was collected to quantify cytokines and bacteria. Mortality was checked regularly. Results: SIRT2 is the most expressed sirtuin in macrophages and myeloid DCs. To test whether SIRT2 impacts on innate immune responses, we generated SIRT2 germline knockout mice. SIRT2-/- mice born at the expected Mendelian ratio and develop normally. The proportions and absolute numbers of DN1-4, DP and SP thymocytes, and of T-cells (DN and SP, naı¨ve and memory), B-cells (immature and mature), DCs (cDCs and pDCs) and granulocytes in the spleen are similar in SIRT2+/+ and SIRT2-/- mice. SIRT2+/+ and SIRT2-/- BMDMs, BMDCs and splenocytes produce cytokines (RNA and protein), upregulate CD40, and proliferate to the same extent. SIRT2+/+ and SIRT2-/- mice respond similarly (cytokine blood levels, bacterial counts and mortality) to non-severe and lethal endotoxemia, E. coli peritonitis, K. pneumonia pneumonia and TNF-induced shock. Conclusions: SIRT2 knockout has no dramatic impact on the development of immune cells and on innate immune responses in vitro and in vivo. Considering that SIRT2 may participate to control metabolic homeostasis, we are currently assessing the impact of SIRT2 deficiency on innate immune responses under metabolic stress.

Copy number variation and chromatin structure

The functional consequences of structural variation in the human genome range from adaptation, to phenotypic variation, to predisposition to diseases. Copy number variation (CNV) was shown to influence the phenotype by modifying, in a somewhat dose-dependent manner, the expression of genes that map within them, as well as that of genes located on their flanks. To assess the possible mechanism(s) behind this neighboring effect, we compared histone modification status of cell lines from patients affected by Williams-Beuren, Williams-Beuren region duplication, Smith-Magenis or DiGeorge Syndrome and control individuals using a high-throughput version of chromatin immuno-precipitation method (ChIP), called ChlP-seq. We monitored monomethylation of lysine K20 on histone H4 and trimethylation of lysine K27 on histone H3, as proxies for open and condensed chromatin, respectively. Consistent with the changes in expression levels observed for multiple genes mapping on the entire length of chromosomes affected by structural variants, we also detected regions with modified histone status between samples, up- and downstream from the critical regions, up to the end of the rearranged chromosome. We also gauged the intrachromosomal interactions of these cell lines utilizing chromosome conformation capture (4C-seq) technique. We observed that a set of genes flanking the Williams-Beuren Syndrome critical region (WBSCR) were often looping together, possibly forming an interacting cluster with each other and the WBSCR. Deletion of the WBSCR disrupts the expression of this group of flanking genes, as well as long-range interactions between them and the rearranged interval. We conclude, that large genomic rearrangements can lead to changes in the state of the chromatin spreading far away from the critical region, thus possibly affecting expression globally and as a result modifying the phenotype of the patients. - Les conséquences fonctionnelles des variations structurelles dans le génome humain sont vastes, allant de l'adaptation, en passant par les variations phénotypiques, aux prédispositions à certaines maladies. Il a été démontré que les variations du nombre de copies (CNV) influencent le phénotype en modifiant, d'une manière plus ou moins dose-dépendante, l'expression des gènes se situant à l'intérieur de ces régions, mais également celle des gènes se trouvant dans les régions flanquantes. Afin d'étudier les mécanismes possibles sous-jacents à cet effet de voisinage, nous avons comparé les états de modification des histones dans des lignées cellulaires dérivées de patients atteints du syndrome de Williams-Beuren, de la duplication de la région Williams-Beuren, du syndrome de Smith-Magenis ou du syndrome de Di- George et d'individus contrôles en utilisant une version haut-débit de la méthode d'immunoprécipitation de la chromatine (ChIP), appelée ChIP-seq. Nous avons suivi la mono-méthylation de la lysine K20 sur l'histone H4 et la tri-méthylation de la lysine K27 sur l'histone H3, marqueurs respectifs de la chromatine ouverte et fermée. En accord avec les changements de niveaux d'expression observés pour de multiples gènes tout le long des chromosomes affectés par les CNVs, nous avons aussi détecté des régions présentant des modifications d'histones entre les échantillons, situées de part et d'autre des régions critiques, jusqu'aux extrémités du chromosome réarrangé. Nous avons aussi évalué les interactions intra-chromosomiques ayant lieu dans ces cellules par l'utilisation de la technique de capture de conformation des chromosomes (4C-seq). Nous avons observé qu'un groupe de gènes flanquants la région critique du syndrome de Williams-Beuren (WBSCR) forment souvent une boucle, constituant un groupe d'interactions privilégiées entre ces gènes et la WBSCR. La délétion de la WBSCR perturbe l'expression de ce groupe de gènes flanquants, mais également les interactions à grande échelle entre eux et la région réarrangée. Nous en concluons que les larges réarrangements génomiques peuvent aboutir à des changements de l'état de la chromatine pouvant s'étendre bien plus loin que la région critique, affectant donc potentiellement l'expression de manière globale et ainsi modifiant le phénotype des patients.

Analysis of a boundary protein delimiting chromatin domains in yeast

SUMMARY The expression state of a eukaryotic gene depends in part on its location in the chromosome. This position effect results from the organization of eukaryotic genomes into discrete functional domains, defined by local differences in chromatin structure. The expression of genes within each domain appears to be defined and maintained by the concerted action of regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, silencers and locus control regions. Individual domains may be bordered by boundary elements that separate regions of permissive and silent chromatin. When located next to chromosomal elements such as telomeres, genes can be subjected to epigenetic silencing. In yeast, this is mediated by the propagation of the SIR proteins from telomeres towards more centromeric regions. Particular transcription factors can protect downstream genes from silencing when tethered between the gene and the telomere, and they may thus act as chromatin domain boundaries. Here we have studied one of these transcription factors, CTF-1, that binds directly histone H3. A deletion mutagenesis localized the barrier activity to CTF-1 histone-binding domain. A saturating point mutagenesis of this domain identified several amino-acid substitutions that similarly inhibited the boundary and histone-binding activities. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the barrier protein efficiently prevents the spreading of SIR proteins, and that it separates domains of hypoacetylated and hyperacetylated histones. Together, these results suggest a mechanism by which proteins such as CTF-1 may interact directly with histone H3 to prevent the propagation of a silent chromatin structure, thereby defining boundaries of permissive and silent chromatin domains. RESUME L'expression des gènes eucaryotes dépend en partie de leur localisation sur les chromosomes. Cet effet de position résulte de l'organisation des génomes eucaryotes en domaines fonctionnels, définis par des changements locaux au niveau de la structure de la chromatine. Dans chacun de ces domaines, l'expression des gènes est définie et maintenue par l'action concertée de différents éléments régulateurs tels que les promoteurs, les amplificateurs, les silenceurs et les locus control régions. Ces domaines peuvent être entourés par des éléments barrière, séparant les régions de chromatine répressive des régions permissive pour l'expression des gènes. Lorsqu'ils se situent à proximité d'éléments chromosomiques comme les telomères, les gènes peuvent être réprimés de manière épigénétique. Chez la levure, cette répression est établie par la propagation des protéines SIR depuis les télomères vers les régions centromériques. Certains facteurs de transcription peuvent empêcher la répression d'un gène, lorsqu'ils sont placés entre ce gène et le télomère. Nous avons étudié un de ces facteurs, CTF-1, qui a la particularité de lier directement l'histone H3. La délétion de certaines parties de CTF-1 a permis de déterminer que la région responsable de l'activité barrière correspond au domaine d'interaction avec H3. Plusieurs mutations points effectuées dans ce domaine inhibent à la fois l'activité barrière et la capacité de lier H3. Des expériences d'immuno-précipitation de la chromatine indiquent que la protéine barrière CTF-1 prévient efficacement la propagation des protéines SIR et sépare des domaines contenant des histones hypo-acétylées de ceux constitués d'histones hyper-acétylées. Ces résultats suggèrent que CTF-1 interagit directement avec l'histone H3 pour empêcher la propagation de la chromatine répressive, délimitant ainsi des domaines de chromatine permissive et des domaines de chromatine silencieuse.

CHD8 associates with human Staf and contributes to efficient U6 RNA polymerase III transcription.

Chromatin remodeling and histone modification are essential for eukaryotic transcription regulation, but little is known about chromatin-modifying activities acting on RNA polymerase III (Pol III)-transcribed genes. The human U6 small nuclear RNA promoter, located 5' of the transcription start site, consists of a core region directing basal transcription and an activating region that recruits the transcription factors Oct-1 and Staf (ZNF143). Oct-1 activates transcription in part by helping recruit core binding factors, but nothing is known about the mechanisms of transcription activation by Staf. We show that Staf activates U6 transcription from a preassembled chromatin template in vitro and associates with several proteins linked to chromatin modification, among them chromodomain-helicase-DNA binding protein 8 (CHD8). CHD8 binds to histone H3 di- and trimethylated on lysine 4. It resides on the human U6 promoter as well as the mRNA IRF3 promoter in vivo and contributes to efficient transcription from both these promoters. Thus, Pol III transcription from type 3 promoters uses some of the same factors used for chromatin remodeling at Pol II promoters.

Chromatin domain boundaries delimited by a histone-binding protein in yeast.

When located next to chromosomal elements such as telomeres, genes can be subjected to epigenetic silencing. In yeast, this is mediated by the propagation of the SIR proteins from telomeres toward more centromeric regions. Particular transcription factors can protect downstream genes from silencing when tethered between the gene and the telomere, and they may thus act as chromatin domain boundaries. Here we have studied one such transcription factor, CTF-1, that binds directly histone H3. A deletion mutagenesis localized the barrier activity to the CTF-1 histone-binding domain. A saturating point mutagenesis of this domain identified several amino acid substitutions that similarly inhibited the boundary and histone binding activities. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the barrier protein efficiently prevents the spreading of SIR proteins, and that it separates domains of hypoacetylated and hyperacetylated histones. Together, these results suggest a mechanism by which proteins such as CTF-1 may interact directly with histone H3 to prevent the propagation of a silent chromatin structure, thereby defining boundaries of permissive and silent chromatin domains.

Effects of epigenetic regulatory elements on telomeric gene expression

Transgene expression in eukaryotic cells strongly depends on the locus of integration in the host genome and often results in limited transcription level because of unfavorable chromatin structure at the integration site. Epigenetic regulators are DNA sequences which are believed to act on the chromatin structure and may protect transgenes from this so-called position effect. Despite being extensively used to increase transgene expression, the mechanism of action of many of these elements remains largely unknown. Here we evaluated different epigenetic regulatory DNA elements for their ability to protect transgene transcription at telomeres, a defined chromatin environment associated to low or inconsistent expression caused by the Telomere Position Effect (TPE). For the assessment of the effects of epigenetic regulators at telomeres, a novel dual reporter system had to be designed. Telomeric integration of the newly-developed dual reporter system carrying different epigenetic regulators showed that MARs (Matrix Attachment Regions), a UCOE (Ubiquitous Chromatin-Opening Element) or the chicken cHS4 insulator have strong barrier activity which prevented TPE from spreading toward the centromere, resulting in stable and in some cases increased expression of a telomeric-distal reporter gene. In addition, MARs and STAR element 40 resulted in an increase of cells expressing the telomeric-proximal reporter gene, suggesting also an anti-silencing effect. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that at telomeres MARs actively promote the deposition of euchromatic histone marks, especially acetylation of both histone H3 and H4, which might be involved in MARs' barrier and transcriptional activator activities. Differently, the chromatin in proximity of the UCOE element was depleted of several repressive chromatin marks, such as trimethylated lysine 9 and lysine 27 on histone H3 and trimethylated lysine 20 of histone H4, possibly favoring the preservation of an open chromatin structure at the integration site. We conclude that epigenetic regulatory elements that may be used to enhance and sustain transgene expression have all a specific epigenetic signature which might be at the basis of their mechanism of action, and that a combination of different classes of epigenetic regulators might be advantageous when high levels of protein expression are required. - L'expression des transgènes dans les cellules eucaryotes est fortement influencée par leur site d'intégration dans le génome. En effet, une structure chromatinienne défavorable au niveau du site d'intégration peut fortement limiter le degré d'expression d'un transgène. Il existe toutefois des séquences d'ADN qui, en agissant sur la structure de la chromatine, permettent de limiter cet effet de position et, par conséquent, de promouvoir l'expression soutenue d'un transgène. Ces éléments génomiques, connus comme régulateurs épigénétiques, sont largement utilisés dans plusieurs domaines où une expression élevée et soutenue est requise, malgré un mode de fonctionnement parfois méconnu. Dans cette étude, j'ai évalué la capacité de différents régulateurs épigénétiques à protéger la transcription de transgènes au niveau des télomères, régions chromatiniennes bien définies qui ont été associées à un fort effet de silençage, connu comme «effet de position télomérique». Pour cela, un nouveau système à deux gènes rapporteurs a été développé. Lorsque des MARs (Matrix Attachment Regions, séquences d'ADN pouvant s'associer à la matrice nucléaire), un UCOE (Ubiquitous Chromatin-Opening Element, élément pouvant ouvrir la chromatine) ou l'isolateur génétique cHS4 (dérivé du locus de la β-globine de poulet) sont placés entre les deux gènes rapporteurs, une forte activité barrière bloquant la propagation de la chromatine répressive télomérique est observée, résultant en un plus grand nombre de cellules exprimant le gène télomérique-distal. D'autre part, une augmentation du nombre de cellules exprimant le gène télomérique-proximal, observée en présence des éléments MAR et STAR 40 (Stabilizing Anti-Repressor element 40, un élément pouvant prévenir la répression génique), suggère aussi un faible effet anti-silençage pour ces éléments. Des expériences d'immunoprécipitation de la chromatine démontrent qu'au télomère, les MARs favorisent l'assemblage de marqueurs de la chromatine active, surtout l'acétylation des histones H3 et H4, qui pourraient être à la base de l'activité barrière et de celle d'activateur transcriptionel. Différemment, la chromatine à proximité de l'élément UCOE est particulièrement pauvre en marqueurs de la chromatine silencieuse, comme la trimethylation des lysines 9 et 27 de l'histone H3, ainsi que la trimethylation de la lysine 20 de l'histone H4. Cela suggère que UCOE pourrait préserver une structure chromatinienne ouverte au site d'intégration, favorisant l'expression des gènes à sa proximité. En conclusion, les régulateurs épigénétiques analysés lors de cette étude ont tous montré une signature épigénétique spécifique qui pourrait être à la base de leurs mécanismes de fonctionnement, suggérant aussi qu'une utilisation d'éléments épigénétiques de classe différente dans un même vecteur d'expression pourrait être avantageuse lorsque de hauts et soutenus niveaux d'expression sont nécessaires.

The TPTE gene family: cellular expression, subcellular localization and alternative splicing.

The human TPTE (Transmembrane Phosphatase with TEnsin homology) gene family encodes a PTEN-related tyrosine phosphatase with four potential transmembrane domains. Chromosomal mapping revealed multiple copies of the TPTE gene on chromosomes 13, 15, 21, 22 and Y. Human chromosomes 13 and 21 copies encode two functional proteins, TPIP (TPTE and PTEN homologous Inositol lipid Phosphatase) and TPTE, respectively, whereas only one copy of the gene exists in the mouse genome. In the present study, we show that TPTE and TPIP proteins are expressed in secondary spermatocytes and/or prespermatids. In addition, we report the existence of several novel alternatively spliced isoforms of these two proteins with variable number of transmembrane domains. The latter has no influence on the subcellular localization of these different peptides as shown by co-immunofluorescence experiments. Finally, we identify another expressed TPTE copy, mapping to human chromosome 22, whose transcription appears to be under the control of the LTR of human endogenous retrovirus RTVL-H3.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors repress macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression by targeting MIF gene transcription through a local chromatin deacetylation.

The cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor plays a central role in inflammation, cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Moreover, macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels correlate with tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Histone deacetylase inhibitors are potent antitumor agents recently introduced in the clinic. Therefore, we hypothesized that macrophage migration inhibitory factor would represent a target of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Confirming our hypothesis, we report that histone deacetylase inhibitors of various chemical classes strongly inhibited macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in a broad range of cell lines, in primary cells and in vivo. Nuclear run on, transient transfection with macrophage migration inhibitory factor promoter reporter constructs and transduction with macrophage migration inhibitory factor expressing adenovirus demonstrated that trichostatin A (a prototypical histone deacetylase inhibitor) inhibited endogenous, but not episomal, MIF gene transcription. Interestingly, trichostatin A induced a local and specific deacetylation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor promoter-associated H3 and H4 histones which did not affect chromatin accessibility but was associated with an impaired recruitment of RNA polymerase II and Sp1 and CREB transcription factors required for basal MIF gene transcription. Altogether, this study describes a new molecular mechanism by which histone deacetylase inhibitors inhibit MIF gene expression, and suggests that macrophage migration inhibitory factor inhibition by histone deacetylase inhibitors may contribute to the antitumorigenic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors.