Redondances. Paul Ricoeur et ses sutures théologico-politiques

Paul Ricoeur construit la philosophie comme une hétérotopie, en la soumettant à l'ordre, juridique et théologique, d'un «aveu». En soustrayant la pensée à la compétence première de la philosophie pour l'accorder à l'ordre d'un récit, Ricoeur fait de l'exercice de la philosophie une «empirique de la volonté serve». Ce primat donné à un ordre de médiation, par le biais d'un récit, dépouille ainsi la philosophie de toute tâche inaugurale. Dans ses Valences of the Dialectic, le philosophe américain Jameson est revenu de façon critique sur ce montage, soulignant le paradoxe qui oblige Ricoeur à ôter la pensée du temps des tâches premières de la phénoménologie. Cet article vise à en exposer les conséquences (notamment le basculement vers une herméneutique), pour interroger les effets théologico-politiques de ce vaste projet. --- Paul Ricoeur has built up philosophy as a heterotopy by submitting it to the juridical and theological order of a "confession". By taking away thought as the primus competence of philosophy, and attributing it to narration, Ricoeur transforms philosophy into an "empirics of the serve-will". This priority given to mediation through narration deprives philosophy from any inaugural task. In his Valences of the Dialectic, the American philosopher Jameson has critically questioned this construction, underlining the paradox that forces Ricoeur to take away thought of time from the primus tasks of phenomenology. This paper intends to expose the consequences of such a deal (among others the swing to hermeneutics), and to inquire about the theologico-political effects of such a vast project.

Improved growth with bioabsorbable sutures in both high- and low-pressure zones.

BACKGROUND: Compromised growth after operation remains a significant problem in the cardiovascular field. Some benefit of absorbable suture materials has been demonstrated for arterial anastomoses. However, for the low-pressure zone, few data are available. METHODS: To assess growth in high- versus low-pressure zones we transected the abdominal aorta (high-pressure zone) as well as the inferior vena cava (low-pressure zone) in 10 young mongrel dogs using for reanastomosis 7-0 nonabsorbable versus absorbable running sutures in random order. RESULTS: All animals survived and were evaluated over 12 months including body weight (gain, 212% +/- 45% for nonabsorbable versus 218% +/- 8% for absorbable; not significant), angiography, and, after elective sacrifice, detailed studies of aorta and vena cava. Systematic complication of angiographic data at 12 months showed at the suture level an area of 13.8 mm2 for nonabsorbable versus 24.3 +/- 14.4 mm2 for absorbable sutures in the high-pressure zone as compared with 12.9 +/- 4.9 mm2 for nonabsorbable versus 25.3 +/- 15.4 mm2 for absorbable sutures in the low-pressure zone. Residual lumen, calculated as a function of the area above and below the suture, accounted for 35% +/- 10% for nonabsorbable versus 92% +/- 12% for absorbable sutures (p < 0.001) in the high-pressure zone as compared with 37% +/- 13% for nonabsorbable versus 75% +/- 15% for absorbable sutures (p < 0.003) in the low-pressure zone (high versus low, not significant). Poststenotic dilatation accounted for 199% +/- 22% for nonabsorbable versus 126% +/- 43% for absorbable sutures (p < 0.01) in the high-pressure zone. In the low-pressure zone, poststenotic dilatation remained below the inflow area, and the residual poststenotic lumen accounted for 52% +/- 14% for nonabsorbable versus 77% +/- 16% for absorbable sutures (p < 0.004). Macroscopic, light, and scanning electron microscopic studies confirmed different growth patterns in high- versus low-pressure zones. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic narrowing resulted in poststenotic dilatation and unrestricted outflow path (hourglass-type stenosis). Caval narrowing was followed by restriction of poststenotic outflow path (funnel-type stenosis). Absorbable suture material allows for superior growth in both high- and low-pressure zones.

A new classification of the Turkish terranes and sutures and its implication for the paleotectonic history of the region

The Turkish part of the Tethyan realm is represented by a series of terranes juxtaposed through Alpine convergent movements and separated by complex suture zones. Different terranes can be defined and characterized by their dominant geological background. The Pontides domain represents a segment of the former active margin of Eurasia, where back-arc basins opened in the Triassic and separated the Sakarya terrane from neighbouring regions. Sakarya was re-accreted to Laurasia through the Balkanic mid-Cretaceous orogenic event that also affected the Rhodope and Strandja zones. The whole region from the Balkans to the Caucasus was then affected by a reversal of subduction and creation of a Late Cretaceous arc before collision with the Anatolian domain in the Eocene. If the Anatolian terrane underwent an evolution similar to Sakarya during the Late Paleozoic and Early Triassic times, both terranes had a diverging history during and after the Eo-Cimmerian collision. North of Sakarya, the Küre back-arc was closed during the Jurassic, whereas north of the Anatolian domain, the back-arc type oceans did not close before the Late Cretaceous. During the Cretaceous, both domains were affected by ophiolite obduction, but in very different ways: north directed diachronous Middle to Late Cretaceous mélange obduction on the Jurassic Sakarya passive margin; Senonian synchronous southward obduction on the Triassic passive margin of Anatolia. From this, it appears that the Izmir-Ankara suture, currently separating both terranes, is composite, and that the passive margin of Sakarya is not the conjugate margin of Anatolia. To the south, the Cimmerian Taurus domain together with the Beydağları domain (part of the larger Greater Apulian terrane), were detached from north Gondwana in the Permian during the opening of the Neotethys (East-Mediterranean basin). The drifting Cimmerian blocks entered into a soft collision with the Anatolian and related terranes in the Eo-Cimmerian orogenic phase (Late Triassic), thus suturing the Paleotethys. At that time, the Taurus plate developed foreland-type basins, filled with flysch-molasse deposits that locally overstepped the lower plate Taurus terrane and were deposited in the opening Neotethys to the south. These olistostromal deposits are characterized by pelagic Carboniferous and Permian material from the Paleotethys suture zone found in the Mersin mélange. The latter, as well as the Antalya and Mamonia domains are represented by a series of exotic units now found south of the main Taurus range. Part of the Mersin exotic material was clearly derived from the former north Anatolian passive margin (Huğlu-type series) and re-displaced during the Paleogene. This led us to propose a plate tectonic model where the Anatolian ophiolitic front is linked up with the Samail/Baër-Bassit obduction front found along the Arabian margin. The obduction front was indented by the Anatolian promontory whose eastern end was partially subducted. Continued slab roll-back of the Neotethys allowed Anatolian exotics to continue their course southwestward until their emplacement along the Taurus southern margin (Mersin) and up to the Beydağları promontory (Antaya-Mamonia) in the latest Cretaceous-Paleocene. The supra-subduction ocean opening at the back of the obduction front (Troodos-type Ocean) was finally closed by Eocene north-south shortening between Africa and Eurasia. This brought close to each other Cretaceous ophiolites derived from the north of Anatolia and those obducted on the Arabian promontory. The latter were sealed by a Maastrichtian platform, and locally never affected by Alpine tectonism, whereas those located on the eastern Anatolian plate are strongly deformed and metamorphosed, and affected by Eocene arc magmatism. These observations help to reconstruct the larger frame of the central Tethyan realm geodynamic evolution.