Hegel, Heidegger : pensée absolue, pensée abyssale (Heidegger lit Hegel)

Cette thèse de doctorat porte sur l'endurant travail d'interprétation auquel Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) s'est livré à propos de la pensée de Hegel (1770-1831), l'un des représentants de ce que l'on appelle « l'idéalisme allemand ». Ce travail d'interprétation résulte et prend place dans ce que Heidegger entend par le mot allemand Aus-einander-setzung : non pas la recherche de points communs entre deux pensées, par-delà des différences particulières qu'il s'agirait dès lors dépasser, mais au contraire la mise en évidence de leurs différends au sein même d'une appartenance commune à la pensée européo-occidentale. Notre présent travail s'est donné trois tâches : reconstruire l'explication de Heidegger avec Hegel qui se déroule sur près de quarante ans et qui se trouve éparpillée dans une multitude de textes d'époques et de statuts fort divers ; réfléchir et exposer le sens et les enjeux d'une telle explication ; indiquer et mettre à l'épreuve, par une étude immanente de plusieurs textes du corpus hégélien, l'apport de la phénoménologie herméneutique heideggerienne à l'intelligibilité actuelle de la pensée hégélienne. La pensée occidentale, qui a pour nom la philosophie, s'interroge toujours d'une manière ou d'une autre à propos de l'être. Et cela, à partir de Platon, dans un mouvement métaphysique qui va de ce qui est ou de l'étant à son être, ce dernier étant lui-même compris comme le genre commun de l'étant, soit comme « étantité (ousía, Seiendheit) ». Chez Hegel, cette manière bimillénaire de s'enquérir ainsi de l'être de l'étant parvient à son aboutissement, dans une compréhension dialectico-spéculative de l'être en tant que ce processus d'autocompréhension et d'autoproduction que Hegel nomme « l'esprit absolu ». À partir de cet aboutissement, de l'être, il n'en sera plus rien pour la pensée occidentale - « dernière fumée d'une réalité s'évaporant » dira Nietzsche. C'est ce phénomène, nommé par Heidegger « l'oubli de l'être (die Seinsvergessenheit) », qui constituera pour lui la motivation centrale de sa tentative de commencer autrement à penser l'être : dans un mouvement qui ne va plus de l'étant à l'être en tant qu'étantité, mais de l'être (Sein ou Seyn) à l'étant : où cela, qui d'ores et déjà se refuse (sich verweigert) à être un étant, ouvre par là même la possibilité à l'étant d'être ce qu'il est en propre. L'être est alors pensé en tant qu'Ereignis, cela qui advient en appropriant, c'est-à-dire en conduisant l'homme et l'étant à leur propre. Notre travail distingue, dans la lecture heideggerienne de Hegel, deux grandes périodes. Cellesci sont solidaires des deux manières non-métaphysiques d'élaborer la question de l'être qui rythment le chemin de pensée de Heidegger (la première ayant abouti à une impasse) : 1°) l'élaboration horizontaletranscendantale de la question de l'être, centrée sur le premier Hauptwerk de Heidegger de 1927, Être et temps, où la question de l'être est considérée primordialement à partir de ce phénomène qu'est l'entente qu'a l'homme de son être et de son destin qui est celui d'être l'espace ouvert, le là pour l'être en général (Dasein) ; 2°) l'élaboration destinale (seynsgeschichtliche) de la question de l'être, centrée sur le deuxième Hauptwerk de Heidegger que sont les Apports à la philosophie (Beiträge zur Philosophie) (1936- 1938), où la question de l'être est considérée cette fois à partir de l'être lui-même en tant qu'Ereignis. Dans l'interprétation horizontale-transcendantale de Hegel, Heidegger oppose à l'être hégélien en tant qu'esprit absolu, éternel et infini, la transcendance finie du rapport temporel de l'homme à l'être. L'explication se concentre ainsi sur les notions de finitude (chapitre II de notre thèse), de transcendance (chapitre III) et de temporalité (chapitre IV), dans laquelle Heidegger fait jouer son interprétation de Kant contre Hegel. Dans l'interprétation destinale de Hegel, qui est l'interprétation décisive, Hegel est compris, dans la perspective de l'histoire-destinée de l'estre (die Geschichte des Seyns), comme celui qui accomplit ce qui se trouve au coeur même de cette histoire-destinée, dès Héraclite et Parménide : le refus qu'a l'homme occidental de prendre en garde la nihilité (Nichthaftigkeit) de l'être. Hegel serait ainsi celui qui accomplit l'occidental refus du refus (Verweigerung) de l'être. Heidegger repère le site de cet accomplissement hégélien dans la conception dialectico-spéculative de la négativité, laquelle en tant que « négativité absolue (absolute Negativität) » constitue le coeur et l'âme de l'être qu'est le processus de l'esprit absolu (chapitre V). L'enjeu de l'interprétation heideggerienne de Hegel devient dès lors de montrer qu'une négativité plus originaire que la négativité absolue se trouve à l'oeuvre en l'être, une négativité non dialectique que nous avons nommé la « négativité abyssale » (chapitre VII). C'est de la compréhension et l'élaboration de cette dernière que dépend la possibilité pour la pensée occidentale de surmonter une bonne fois le nihilisme - gisant au coeur de la métaphysique - tel qu'il se déchaîne actuellement dans la civilisation technique devenue aujourd'hui planétaire (chapitre VI). Tels sont selon nous le sens et l'enjeu derniers de l'explication de Heidegger avec Hegel.

Apocrypha Hiberniae. I. Evangelia infantiae

In 1927 M. R. James published Latin Infancy Gospels, identified by him in two related but not identical manuscripts (one the British Library Arundel 404; the other from Hereford), together with a parallel text from the Irish manuscript known as the Leabhar Breac. Later researches brought to light more manuscripts of this Latin work, and also of the Irish text. James recognized that his apocryphal Latin Infancy text was compiled from a combination of the Protevangelium of James and a hitherto unknown text which he named "The Source". Recent research has identified a full Latin translation of the Protevangelium of James. A hitherto unrecognized Irish Infancy Narrative has also been identified in the Dublin manuscript known as the Liber Flavus Fergusiorum. A deep study of this related tradition was called for. This has been carried out over the past ten years by an Irish team in conjunction with Professor Daniel Kaestli and AELAC. The fruits of this labour are published in these two volumes. Volume 13 has a general introduction with a historical sketch of New Testament apocrypha in Ireland and a history of research on the subject. This is followed by a comparison of the Infancy Narratives in the Leabhar Breac and the Liber Flavus Fergusiorum. There are special introductions to these Infancy texts, followed by critical editions of the Irish texts, accompanied by English translations and rich annotation. Next there is similar treatment of the Irish versified Narrative (from ca. 700) of the Childhood Deeds of Jesus (commonly known as the Infancy Narrative (or Gospel) of Thomas. There is then (in volume 14, but with continuous pagination) the edition and translation of an Irish thirteenth-century poem with elements from Infancy Narratives, and both Latin and Irish texts on the wonders at Christ's birth, accompanied by translations and notes. The edition of the Irish material is followed by a critical edition of the full Arundel and Hereford forms of the Infancy Narrative (here referred to as the "J Compilation"), together with a detailed study of all the questions relating to this work. The volume concludes with a critical edition (by Rita Beyers) of the Latin text of the Protevangelium of James, accompanied by a detailed study of the work.. The work contains a detailed study of the Latin translations of the Protevangelium of James and the transmission of this work in the West. The "J Compilation" (a combination of the Protevangelium and texts of Pseudo-Matthew) can be traced back in manuscript transmission to ca. 800,and must have originated some time earlier. Behind it stands an earlier "I ("I" for Irish) Compilation" without influence from Pseudo-Matthew, the form found in the Irish witnesses. It is argued that M. R. James's "Source" may be of Judaeo-Christian origin and may really be the Gospel of the Nazoreans. Among the indexes there is a list of all the Irish words found in the texts. This edition of the Irish and related Latin texts is a major contribution to the study of the apocryphal Infancy Narratives. It should also be of particular interest to Celtic scholars, to students of Irish ecclesiastical learning, and in general to all medievalists.

Als Marie Bonaparte sich taub stellte ...

Between 1927 and 1931 Marie Bonaparte had herself operated upon her clitoris three times. She did so against Freud's advice with whom she was in analysis. Among psychoanalysts these operations are still often regarded as "errors" or aberrations. But for Marie Bonaparte, who was in various ways familiar with physics and a somatic approach, surgery was the first choice, psychoanalysis only a possible alternative. She was not impressed by the skepticism of her colleagues, and adhered even more emphatically to her own strategy

The Irish Infancy Narratives and their Relationship with Latin Sources

(Résumé de l'ouvrage) In 1927 M. R. James published Latin Infancy Gospels, identified by him in two related but not identical manuscripts (one the British Library Arundel 404; the other from Hereford), together with a parallel text from the Irish manuscript known as the Leabhar Breac. Later researches brought to light more manuscripts of this Latin work, and also of the Irish text. James recognized that his apocryphal Latin Infancy text was compiled from a combination of the Protevangelium of James and a hitherto unknown text which he named "The Source". Recent research has identified a full Latin translation of the Protevangelium of James. A hitherto unrecognized Irish Infancy Narrative has also been identified in the Dublin manuscript known as the Liber Flavus Fergusiorum. A deep study of this related tradition was called for. This has been carried out over the past ten years by an Irish team in conjunction with Professor Daniel Kaestli and AELAC. The fruits of this labour are published in these two volumes. Volume 13 has a general introduction with a historical sketch of New Testament apocrypha in Ireland and a history of research on the subject. This is followed by a comparison of the Infancy Narratives in the Leabhar Breac and the Liber Flavus Fergusiorum. There are special introductions to these Infancy texts, followed by critical editions of the Irish texts, accompanied by English translations and rich annotation. Next there is similar treatment of the Irish versified Narrative (from ca. 700) of the Childhood Deeds of Jesus (commonly known as the Infancy Narrative (or Gospel) of Thomas. There is then (in volume 14, but with continuous pagination) the edition and translation of an Irish thirteenth-century poem with elements from Infancy Narratives, and both Latin and Irish texts on the wonders at Christ's birth, accompanied by translations and notes. The edition of the Irish material is followed by a critical edition of the full Arundel and Hereford forms of the Infancy Narrative (here referred to as the "J Compilation"), together with a detailed study of all the questions relating to this work. The volume concludes with a critical edition (by Rita Beyers) of the Latin text of the Protevangelium of James, accompanied by a detailed study of the work.. The work contains a detailed study of the Latin translations of the Protevangelium of James and the transmission of this work in the West. The "J Compilation" (a combination of the Protevangelium and texts of Pseudo-Matthew) can be traced back in manuscript transmission to ca. 800,and must have originated some time earlier. Behind it stands an earlier "I ("I" for Irish) Compilation" without influence from Pseudo-Matthew, the form found in the Irish witnesses. It is argued that M. R. James's "Source" may be of Judaeo-Christian origin and may really be the Gospel of the Nazoreans. Among the indexes there is a list of all the Irish words found in the texts. This edition of the Irish and related Latin texts is a major contribution to the study of the apocryphal Infancy Narratives. It should also be of particular interest to Celtic scholars, to students of Irish ecclesiastical learning, and in general to all medievalists.

Latin Infancy Gospels: The J Compilation. Introduction and Edition

(Résumé de l'ouvrage) In 1927 M. R. James published Latin Infancy Gospels, identified by him in two related but not identical manuscripts (one the British Library Arundel 404; the other from Hereford), together with a parallel text from the Irish manuscript known as the Leabhar Breac. Later researches brought to light more manuscripts of this Latin work, and also of the Irish text. James recognized that his apocryphal Latin Infancy text was compiled from a combination of the Protevangelium of James and a hitherto unknown text which he named "The Source". Recent research has identified a full Latin translation of the Protevangelium of James. A hitherto unrecognized Irish Infancy Narrative has also been identified in the Dublin manuscript known as the Liber Flavus Fergusiorum. A deep study of this related tradition was called for. This has been carried out over the past ten years by an Irish team in conjunction with Professor Daniel Kaestli and AELAC. The fruits of this labour are published in these two volumes. Volume 13 has a general introduction with a historical sketch of New Testament apocrypha in Ireland and a history of research on the subject. This is followed by a comparison of the Infancy Narratives in the Leabhar Breac and the Liber Flavus Fergusiorum. There are special introductions to these Infancy texts, followed by critical editions of the Irish texts, accompanied by English translations and rich annotation. Next there is similar treatment of the Irish versified Narrative (from ca. 700) of the Childhood Deeds of Jesus (commonly known as the Infancy Narrative (or Gospel) of Thomas. There is then (in volume 14, but with continuous pagination) the edition and translation of an Irish thirteenth-century poem with elements from Infancy Narratives, and both Latin and Irish texts on the wonders at Christ's birth, accompanied by translations and notes. The edition of the Irish material is followed by a critical edition of the full Arundel and Hereford forms of the Infancy Narrative (here referred to as the "J Compilation"), together with a detailed study of all the questions relating to this work. The volume concludes with a critical edition (by Rita Beyers) of the Latin text of the Protevangelium of James, accompanied by a detailed study of the work.. The work contains a detailed study of the Latin translations of the Protevangelium of James and the transmission of this work in the West. The "J Compilation" (a combination of the Protevangelium and texts of Pseudo-Matthew) can be traced back in manuscript transmission to ca. 800,and must have originated some time earlier. Behind it stands an earlier "I ("I" for Irish) Compilation" without influence from Pseudo-Matthew, the form found in the Irish witnesses. It is argued that M. R. James's "Source" may be of Judaeo-Christian origin and may really be the Gospel of the Nazoreans. Among the indexes there is a list of all the Irish words found in the texts. This edition of the Irish and related Latin texts is a major contribution to the study of the apocryphal Infancy Narratives. It should also be of particular interest to Celtic scholars, to students of Irish ecclesiastical learning, and in general to all medievalists.