26 resultados para Spodoptera-littoralis
em Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Resumo:
In response to insect herbivory, Arabidopsis plants activate the synthesis of the phytohor- mone jasmonate-isoleucine, which binds to a complex consisting of the receptor COI1 and JAZ repressors. Upon proteasome-mediated JAZ degradation, basic helix-loop-helix tran- scription factors (TFs) MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 become activated and this results in the expression of defense genes. Although the jasmonate (JA) pathway is known to be essen- tial for the massive transcriptional reprogramming that follows herbivory, there is however little information on other TFs that are required for defense against herbivores and whether they contribute significantly to JA-dependent defense gene expression. By transcriptome profiling, we identified 41TFs that were induced in response to herbivory by the generalist Spodoptera littoralis. Among them, nine genes, including WRKY18, WRKY40, ANAC019, ANAC055, ZAT10, ZAT12, AZF2, ERF13, and RRTF1, were found to play a significant role in resistance to S. littoralis herbivory. Compared to the triple mutant myc234 that is as sensitive as coi1-1 to herbivory, knockout lines of these nine TFs were only partially more sensitive to S. littoralis but, however, some displayed distinct gene expression changes at the whole-genome level. Data thus reveal that MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 are master regu- lators of Arabidopsis resistance to a generalist herbivore and identify new genes involved in insect defense.
Resumo:
Summary Plants often respond to pathogen or insect attack by inducing the synthesis of toxic compounds such as phytoalexins and glucosinolates (GS). The Arabidopsis mutant pad2-1 has reduced levels of the phytoalexin camalexin and is known for its increased susceptibility to fungal and bacterial pathogens. We found that pad2-1 is also more susceptible to the generalist insect Spodoptera littoralis but not to the specialist Pieris brassicae. The PAD2 gene encodes a gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase that is involved in glutathione (GSH) synthesis, and consequently the pad2-1 mutant contains about 20% of the GSH found in wild-type plants. Lower GSH levels of pad2-1 were correlated with reduced accumulation of the two major indole and aliphatic GSs of Arabidopsis, indolyl-3-methyl-GS and 4-methylsulfinylbutyl-GS, in response to insect feeding. This effect was specific to GSH, was not complemented by treatment of pad2-1 with the strong reducing agent dithiothreitol, and was not observed with the ascorbate-deficient mutant vtc1-1. In contrast to the jasmonate-insensitive mutant coi1-1, expression of insect-regulated and GS biosynthesis genes was not affected in pad2-1. Our data suggest a crucial role for GSH in GS biosynthesis and insect resistance.
Resumo:
Plants activate direct and indirect defences in response to insect egg deposition. However, whether eggs can manipulate plant defence is unknown. In Arabidopsis thaliana, oviposition by the butterfly Pieris brassicae triggers cellular and molecular changes that are similar to the changes caused by biotrophic pathogens. In the present study, we found that the plant defence signal salicylic acid (SA) accumulates at the site of oviposition. This is unexpected, as the SA pathway controls defence against fungal and bacterial pathogens and negatively interacts with the jasmonic acid (JA) pathway, which is crucial for the defence against herbivores. Application of P. brassicae or Spodoptera littoralis egg extract onto leaves reduced the induction of insect-responsive genes after challenge with caterpillars, suggesting that egg-derived elicitors suppress plant defence. Consequently, larval growth of the generalist herbivore S. littoralis, but not of the specialist P. brassicae, was significantly higher on plants treated with egg extract than on control plants. In contrast, suppression of gene induction and enhanced S. littoralis performance were not seen in the SA-deficient mutant sid2-1, indicating that it is SA that mediates this phenomenon. These data reveal an intriguing facet of the cross-talk between SA and JA signalling pathways, and suggest that insects have evolved a way to suppress the induction of defence genes by laying eggs that release elicitors. We show here that egg-induced SA accumulation negatively interferes with the JA pathway, and provides an advantage for generalist herbivores.
Resumo:
Résumé : Les jasmonates (JA), une famille d'hor1none végétale, jouent un rôle central dans la réponse à la blessure, et aux attaques d'insectes et de pathogènes. Les JA sont principalement dérivés d'un acide gras, l'acide linolénique. L'addition par une lipoxygénase d'une molécule d'oxygène à l'acide linolénique initie la synthèse de JA. Cependant les mécanismes régulant l'activation de la biosynthèse de JA ne sont pas encore connus. C'est pour cette raison que dans ce travail, nous avons caractérisé chez Arabidopsis thaliana (l'Arabette des Dames) un mutant fou2 dont l'activité lipoxygénase est plus élevée que celle d'une plante sauvage. Les niveaux de JA sont constitutivement plus élevés et l'activation de la synthèse de JA après blessure est fortement plus induite chez fou2 que chez le type sauvage. En outre, fou2 est plus résistant au pathogène Botrytis cinerea et à la chenille Spodoptera littoralis. Afin de comprendre quel mécanisme chez fou2 génére ce phénotype, nous avons cloné le gène responsable du phénotype de fou2. Le mutant fou2 porte une mutation dans le gène d'un canal à deux pores transportant probablement du potassium, du lumen de la vacuole végétale vers le compartiment cytosolique. L'analyse du protéome de fou2 a permis d'identifier une expression plus élevée de sept protéines régulées par les JA ou le stress. La découverte de l'implication d'un canal dans le phénotype de fou2 renforce l'hypothèse que les flux de cations pourraient être impliqués dans les étapes précoces de la synthèse des JA. Nous avons également étudié le protéome et la physiologie d'une feuille blessée, Pour évaluer les changements d'expression protéique en réponse à la blessure et contrôlés par les JA, nous avons quantifié l'expression de 5937 protéines chez une plante d'Arabidopsis sauvage et chez un mutant incapable de synthétiser des JA. Parmi ces 5937 protéines, nous avons identifié 99 protéines régulées par la blessure chez le type sauvage. Nous avons observé pour 65% des protéines dont l'expression protéique changeait après blessure une bonne corrélation entre la quantité de transcrits et de protéines. Plusieurs enzymes de la voie des chorismates impliquées dans la biosynthèse des acides aminés phénoliques étaient induites par les JA après blessure. Une quantification des acides aminés a montré que les niveaux d'acides aminés phénoliques augmentaient significativement après blessure. La blessure induisait aussi des changements dans l'expression de protéines impliquées dans la réponse au stress et particulièrement au stress oxydatif. Nous avons quantifié l'état réduit et oxydé du glutathion, un tripeptide qui, sous sa forme réduite, est l'antioxydant majeur des cellules. Nous avons trouvé une quantité significativement plus élevée de glutathion oxydé chez le type sauvage blessé que chez la plante aus blessée. Ce résultat suggère que la génération d'un stress oxydatif et la proportion relative de glutathions réduits et oxydés sont contrôlés par les JA après blessure. Abstract : Plants possess a family of potent fatty acid-derived wound-response and developmental regulators: the jasmonates. These compounds are derived from the tri?unsaturated fatty acid a-linolenic-acid (18:3). Addition of an oxygen molecule to 18:3 by 13-lipoxygenases (13-LOX) initiates JA biosynthesis. Actually components regulating the activation of JA biosynthesis are poorly defined. Therefore we characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana the fatty acid Qxygenation upregulated 2 (fou2) mutant, which was previously isolated in a screen for mutants with an enhanced 13-LOX activity. As a consequence of this increased 13-LOX activity, JA levels in fou2 are higher than in wild type (WT) and wounding strongly increased JA biosynthesis compared to WT. fou2 was more resistant to the fungus Botrytis cinerea and the generalist caterpillar Spodaptera littomlis, The fou2 mutant carries a missense mutation in the Two Pore Channel 1 gene (TPCJ), which encodes a vacuolar cation channel transporting probably K* into the cytosol. Patchclamp analysis of fou2 vacuolar membranes showed faster time-dependent conductivity and activation of the mutated channel at lower membrane potentials than wild-type. Proteomic analysis of fou2 leaves identified increased levels of seven biotic stress- and JA- inducible proteins. The discovery of the implication of a channel in the fou2 phenotype strenghtens the hypothesis that cation fluxes might be implicated in early steps of JA synthesis. We further concentrated on the proteome and leaf physiology in the region proximal to wounds in Arabidopsis using the WT and the aos JA-biosynthesis deficient mutant in order to find JA- induced proteins changes. We used two successive proteomic methods to assess protein changes in response to wounding Arabidopsis leaves, two dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) and linear trap quadrupole ion-trap mass spectrometry. In total 5937 proteins were quantified. We identified 99 wound-regulated proteins in the WT. Most these proteins were also wound-regulated at the transcript level showing a good correlation between transcript and protein abundance. We identified several wound-regulated enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis and confirmed this result by amino acid quantification. Proteins involved in stress reponses were upregulated, particularly in redox species regulation. We found a significantly higher quantity of oxidized glutathione in wounded WT relative to wounded aos leaves. This result suggests that levels of reduced glutathione are controlled by JA after wounding.
Resumo:
Damage-inducible defenses in plants are controlled in part by jasmonates, fatty acid-derived regulators that start to accumulate within 30 s of wounding a leaf. Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, we sought to identify the 13-lipoxygenases (13-LOXs) that initiate wound-induced jasmonate synthesis within a 190-s timeframe in Arabidopsis thaliana in 19 single, double, triple and quadruple mutant combinations derived from the four 13-LOX genes in this plant. All four 13-LOXs were found to contribute to jasmonate synthesis in wounded leaves: among them LOX6 showed a unique behavior. The relative contribution of LOX6 to jasmonate synthesis increased with distance from a leaf tip wound, and LOX6 was the only 13-LOX necessary for the initiation of early jasmonate synthesis in leaves distal to the wounded leaf. Herbivory assays that compared Spodoptera littoralis feeding on the lox2-1 lox3B lox4A lox6A quadruple mutant and the lox2-1 lox3B lox4A triple mutant revealed a role for LOX6 in defense of the shoot apical meristem. Consistent with this, we found that LOX6 promoter activity was strong in the apical region of rosettes. The LOX6 promoter was active in and near developing xylem cells and in expression domains we term subtrichomal mounds.
Resumo:
Afin de pouvoir se défendre contre les insectes nuisibles, les plantes ont développé plusieurs stratégies leur permettant de maximiser leurs chances de survie et de reproduction. Parmi elles, les plantes sont souvent pourvues de barrières physiques telles que les poils urticants, les épines et la cuticule. En plus, les plantes sont capables de produire des protéines anti-digestives et des métabolites secondaires insecticides tels que la nicotine, les tannins ou les glucosinolates (GS). La mise en place de ces barrières physiques et chimiques comporte un coût énergétique au détriment de la croissance et de la reproduction. Par conséquent, en absence d'insectes, la plante investit la majeure partie de son énergie dans le développement et la croissance. A l'inverse, une blessure causée par un insecte provoquera une croissance ralentie, une augmentation de la densité de poils urticants ainsi que la synthèse de défenses chimiques. Au niveau moléculaire, cette défense inductible est régulée par l'hormone végétale acide jamsonique (AJ). En réponse à l'attaque d'un insecte, la plante produit cette hormone en grande quantité, ce qui se traduira par une forte expression de gènes de défense. Pendant ma thèse, j'ai essayé de découvrir quels étaient les facteurs de transcription (FT) responsables de l'expression des gènes de défense dans Arabidopsis thaliana. J'ai ainsi pu démontrer que des plantes mutées dans les FTs comme MYC2, MYC3, MYC4, ZAT10, ZAT12, AZF2, WRKY18, WRKY40, WRKY6, ANAC019, ANAC55, ERF13 et RRTF1 deviennent plus sensibles aux insects de l'espèce Spodoptera littoralis. Par la suite, j'ai également pu montrer que MYC2, MYC3 et MYC4 sont probablement la cible principale de la voie de signalisation du AJ et qu'ils sont nécessaires pour l'expression de la majorité des gènes de défense dont la plupart sont essentiels à la biosynthèse des GS. Une plante mutée simultanément dans ces trois protéines est par conséquent incapable de synthétiser des GS et devient hypersensible aux insectes. J'ai également pu démontrer que les GS sont uniquement efficaces contre les insectes généralistes tels S. littoralis et Heliothis virescens alors que les insectes spécialisés sur les Brassicaceae comme Pieris brassicae et Plutella xylostella se sont adaptés en développant des mécanismes de détoxification. - In response to herbivore insects, plants have evolved several defence strategies to maximize their survival and reproduction. For example, plants are often endowed with trichomes, spines and a thick cuticule. In addition, plants can produce anti-digestive proteins and toxic secondary metabolites like nicotine, tannins and glucosinolates (GS). These physical and chemical barriers have an energetic cost to the detriment of growth and reproduction. As a consequence, in absence of insects, plants allocate their energy to development and growth. On the contrary, an attack by herbivore insects will affect plant growth, increase trichome density and induce the production of anti-digestive proteins and secondary metabolites. At the molecular level, this inducible defence is regulated by the phytohormone jasmonic acid (JA). Thus, an attack by herbivores will be followed by a burst of JA that will induce the expression of defence genes. The aim of my thesis was to characterize which transcription factors (TF) regulate the expression of these defence genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. I could show that plants mutated in various TFs like MYC2, MYC3, MYC4, ZAT10, ZAT12, AZF2, WRKY18, WRKY40, WRKY6, ANAC019, ANAC55, ERF 13 and RRTFl were more susceptible to the herbivore Spodoptera littoralis. Furthermore, I could demonstrate that MYC2, MYC3 and MYC4 are probably the main target of the JA-signalling pathway and that they are necessary for the insect-mediated induction of most defence genes including genes involved in the biosynthesis of GS. A triple mutant myc2myc3myc4 is depleted of GS and consequently hypersensitive to insects. Moreover, I showed that GS are only efficient against generalist herbivores like S. littoralis and Heliothis virescens whereas specialized insects like Pieris brassicae and Plutella xylostella have evolved detoxification mechanisms against GS.
Resumo:
Abstract: Plants cannot run away to escape attacking herbivores, but they defend themselves by producing anti-digestive proteins and toxic compounds (for example glucosinolates). The first goal of this thesis was to study changes in gene expression after insect attack using microarrays. The responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to feeding by the specialist Pieris rapae and the generalist Spodoptera liffora is were compared. We found that the transcript profiles after feeding by the two chewing insects were remarkably similar, although the generalist induced a slightly stronger response. The second goal was to evaluate the implication of the four signals jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), ethylene (ET), and abscisic acid (ABA) in the control of insect-regulated gene expression. Using signaling mutants, we observed that JA was the predominant signal and that ABA modulated defense gene expression. In contrast, SA and ET appeared to control slightly gene expression, but only after feeding by S. litforalis. The third goal was to establish whether plant responses are really effective against insects. In accordance with the transcript profile, both insects were affected by the JA-dependent defenses, as they performed better on the JA-insensitive mutant. S. littoralis also performed better on ABA-deficient mutants, providing evidence for the role of ABA in defense against insects. When testing indole or aliphatic glucosinolate deficient mutants, we found that they were also more susceptible to insect feeding, providing some of the first genetic evidence for the defensive role of glucosinolates in planta. Finally, a glutathione-deficient mutant, pad2-1, was also more susceptible to insect feeding and we could attribute this phenotype to a lowered accumulation of the major indole glucosinolate. In this thesis, we provide a comprehensive list of insect-regulated genes, including many transcription factors that constitute interesting candidate genes for the further study of insect-induced expression changes. Understanding how the plant responses to insects are regulated will provide tools for a better management of insect pest in the field. Résumé: Les plantes ne peuvent s'échapper pour fuir les insectes qui les attaquent, mais elles se défendent en produisant des protéines anti-digestives et des composés toxiques (par exemple des glucosinolates). Le premier but de cette thèse était d'étudier les changements de l'expression génétique lors d'attaque par des insectes en utilisant des puces à ADN. Nous avons comparé la réponse d'Arabidopsis thaliana à deux espèces d'insectes avec des habitudes alimentaires différentes : le spécialiste Pieris rapae et le généraliste Spodoptera littoralis. Nous avons trouvé que les profils de transcription après l'attaque par les deux insectes sont remarquablement similaires, bien que le généraliste induise une réponse légèrement plus forte. Le deuxième but était de déterminer l'implication de quatre signaux dans le contrôle de la réponse :l'acide jasmonique (JA), l'acide salicylique (SA), l'éthylène (ET), et l'acide abscissique (ABA). En utilisant de mutants de signalisation, nous avons montré que l'acide jasmonique était le signal prédominant et que l'acide abscissique modulait l'expression génétique. D'autre part, l'acide salicylique et l'éthylène contrôlent à un degré moindre l'expression génétique, mais seulement après l'attaque par S. littoralís. Le troisième but était d'établir si les réponses des plantes sont efficaces contre les insectes. En accord avec le profil de transcription, les deux espèces d'insectes se sont mieux développées sur un mutant insensible au JA, indiquant que les défenses contrôlées par ce signal sont cruciales pour la plante. De plus, les larves de S. littorales se sont mieux développées sur des mutants déficients en ABA, ce qui fournit une preuve du rôle de l'acide abscissique dans la défense contre les insectes. En testant des mutants déficients en glucosinolates de type indole ou aliphatique, nous avons trouvé qu'ils étaient plus sensibles aux insectes, démontrant ainsi le rôle défensif des glucosinolates in planta. Finalement, le mutant déficient en glutathion pad2-1 était aussi plus sensible à l'attaque des insectes, et nous avons pu attribuer ce phénotype à une plus faible augmentation d'un indole glucosinolate dans ce mutant. Dans cette thèse, nous avons mis en évidence un nombre important de gènes contrôlés par les insectes, comprenant de nombreux facteurs de transcription qui constituent des candidats intéressants pour`étudier plus en détail les changements d'expression génétique induits par les insectes. Une meilleure compréhension de la réponse des plantes contre l'attaque des insectes devrait nous permettre de développer de nouvelles stratégies pour mieux gérer les ravageurs des cultures.
Resumo:
Transcript patterns elicited in response to attack reveal, at the molecular level, how plants respond to aggressors. These patterns are fashioned both by inflicted physical damage as well as by biological components displayed or released by the attacker. Different types of attacking organisms might therefore be expected to elicit different transcription programs in the host. Using a large-scale DNA microarray, we characterized gene expression in damaged as well as in distal Arabidopsis thaliana leaves in response to the specialist insect, Pieris rapae. More than 100 insect-responsive genes potentially involved in defense were identified, including genes involved in pathogenesis, indole glucosinolate metabolism, detoxification and cell survival, and signal transduction. Of these 114 genes, 111 were induced in Pieris feeding, and only three were repressed. Expression patterns in distal leaves were markedly similar to those of local leaves. Analysis of wild-type and jasmonate mutant plants, coupled with jasmonate treatment, showed that between 67 and 84% of Pieris-regulated gene expression was controlled, totally or in part, by the jasmonate pathway. This was correlated with increased larval performance on the coronatine insensitive1 glabrous1 (coi1-1 gl1) mutant. Independent mutations in COI1 and GL1 led to a faster larval weight gain, but the gl1 mutation had relatively little effect on the expression of the insect-responsive genes examined. Finally, we compared transcript patterns in Arabidopis in response to larvae of the specialist P. rapae and to a generalist insect, Spodoptera littoralis. Surprisingly, given the complex nature of insect salivary components and reported differences between species, almost identical transcript profiles were observed. This study also provides a robustly characterized gene set for the further investigation of plant-insect interaction.
Resumo:
1. Accumulating evidence indicates that plant resistance against above-ground herbivores can be affected by the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in association with the host plant. Little is known, however, about how AMF composition can influence herbivore choice to feed on a particular plant. 2. Unravelling the preference-performance hypothesis in a multitrophic context is needed to expand our knowledge of complex multitrophic interactions in natural systems. If given mycorrhizal fungal genotypes increase attractiveness for a herbivore (reduced plant resistance), then the benefits of increased unpalatability provided by the mycorrhizal fungi (increased plant resistance) might be outweighed by the increased herbivore recruitment. 3. This was addressed by designing three experiments to test the effects of different AMF genotypes, inoculated either alone or in combination, to measure intraspecific AMF effects on plant resistance and insect herbivore preference. Using strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.) plants that were colonised by eight different combinations of Rhizophagus irregularis isolates, we measured effects on plant growth, insect growth and survival, as well as feeding preferences of a generalist herbivore caterpillar (Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval). 4. Overall, it was found that: (i) AMF influenced plant resistance in an AMF genotype-specific manner; (ii) some AMF inoculations decreased insect performance; (iii) insects preferentially chose to feed more on leaves originating from non-mycorrhizal plants; but also that (iv) in a whole plant bioassay, insects preferentially chose the biggest plant, regardless of their mycorrhizal status. 5. Therefore, AMF-mediated trade-offs between growth and resistance against herbivores have been shown. Such trade-offs, particularly driven by plant attractiveness to herbivores, buffer the positive effects of the mycorrhizal symbiosis on enhanced plant growth.
Resumo:
Insect attack triggers changes in transcript level in plants that are mediated predominantly by jasmonic acid (JA). The implication of ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), and other signals in this response is less understood and was monitored with a microarray containing insect- and defense-regulated genes. Arabidopsis thaliana mutants coi1-1, ein2-1, and sid2-1 impaired in JA, ET, and SA signaling pathways were challenged with the specialist small cabbage white (Pieris rapae) and the generalist Egyptian cotton worm (Spodoptera littoralis). JA was shown to be a major signal controlling the upregulation of defense genes in response to either insect but was found to suppress changes in transcript level only in response to P. rapae. Larval growth was affected by the JA-dependent defenses, but S. littoralis gained much more weight on coi1-1 than P. rapae. ET and SA mutants had an altered transcript profile after S. littoralis herbivory but not after P. rapae herbivory. In contrast, both insects yielded similar transcript signatures in the abscisic acid (ABA)-biosynthetic mutants aba2-1 and aba3-1, and ABA controlled transcript levels both negatively and positively in insect-attacked plants. In accordance with the transcript signature, S. littoralis larvae performed better on aba2-1 mutants. This study reveals a new role for ABA in defense against insects in Arabidopsis and identifies some components important for plant resistance to herbivory.
Resumo:
The induction of plant defences and their subsequent suppression by insects is thought to be an important factor in the evolutionary arms race between plants and herbivores. Although insect oral secretions (OS) contain elicitors that trigger plant immunity, little is known about the suppressors of plant defences. The Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome was analysed in response to wounding and OS treatment. The expression of several wound-inducible genes was suppressed after the application of OS from two lepidopteran herbivores, Pieris brassicae and Spodoptera littoralis. This inhibition was correlated with enhanced S. littoralis larval growth, pointing to an effective role of insect OS in suppressing plant defences. Two genes, an ERF/AP2 transcription factor and a proteinase inhibitor, were then studied in more detail. OS-induced suppression lasted for at least 48 h, was independent of the jasmonate or salicylate pathways, and was not due to known elicitors. Interestingly, insect OS attenuated leaf water loss, suggesting that insects have evolved mechanisms to interfere with the induction of water-stress-related defences.
Resumo:
Biocontrol pseudomonads are most known to protect plants from fungal diseases and to increase plant yield, while intriguing aspects on insecticidal activity have been discovered only recently. Here, we demonstrate that Fit toxin producing pseudomonads, in contrast to a naturally Fit-deficient strain, exhibit potent oral activity against larvae of Spodoptera littoralis, Heliothis virescens and Plutella xylostella, all major insect pests of agricultural crops. Spraying plant leaves with suspensions containing only 1000 Pseudomonas cells per ml was sufficient to kill 70-80% of Spodoptera and Heliothis larvae. Monitoring survival kinetics and bacterial titres in parallel, we demonstrate that Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391, two bacteria harbouring the Fit gene cluster colonize and kill insects via oral infection. Using Fit mutants of CHA0 and PCL1391, we show that production of the Fit toxin contributes substantially to oral insecticidal activity. Furthermore, the global regulator GacA is required for full insecticidal activity. Our findings demonstrate the lethal oral activity of two root-colonizing pseudomonads so far known as potent antagonists of fungal plant pathogens. This adds insecticidal activity to the existing biocontrol repertoire of these bacteria and opens new perspectives for applications in crop pest control and in research on their ecological behaviour.
Resumo:
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Plants are sessile and therefore have to perceive and adjust to changes in their environment. The presence of neighbours leads to a competitive situation where resources and space will be limited. Complex adaptive responses to such situation are poorly understood at the molecular level. RESULTS: Using microarrays, we analysed whole-genome expression changes in Arabidopsis thaliana plants subjected to intraspecific competition. The leaf and root transcriptome was strongly altered by competition. Differentially expressed genes were enriched in genes involved in nutrient deficiency (mainly N, P, K), perception of light quality, and responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. Interestingly, performance of the generalist insect Spodoptera littoralis on densely grown plants was significantly reduced, suggesting that plants under competition display enhanced resistance to herbivory. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive list of genes whose expression is affected by intraspecific competition in Arabidopsis. The outcome is a unique response that involves genes related to light, nutrient deficiency, abiotic stress, and defence responses.
Resumo:
Plants activate direct and indirect defenses in response to insect egg deposition. In Arabidopsis thaliana, oviposition by the butterfly Pieris brassicae triggers cellular and molecular changes that are similar to the changes caused by biotrophic pathogens. Even though this innate immune response did not affect egg survival in Arabidopsis, we could show that different insect eggs elicit specific gene expression changes. Additionally, egg- induced necrosis could be observed in a variety of plants from different families ranging from dicotyledonous plants to monocots, suggesting that insect-egg detection by plants is a widespread mechanism and that different insect species contain elicitors of immune responses. Extracts from caterpillars and eggs contain elicitors that co-purified over several extraction steps. Chemical fractionation of caterpillar extracts lead to the characterisation of an active compound that was determined to be a triglyceride by NMR analysis. The exact structure of the side chains as well as the elicitor's presence in insect eggs have yet to be confirmed.We also found that the plant defense signal salicylic acid (SA) accumulates at the site of oviposition. This is unexpected, as the SA pathway controls the defense against fungal and bacterial pathogens whereas it negatively interacts with the jasmonic acid (JA) pathway, which is crucial for the defense against herbivores. Application of P. brassicae or Spodoptera littoralis egg extract onto leaves reduced the induction of insect-responsive genes after challenge with caterpillars, suggesting that egg-derived elicitors suppress plant defense. Consequently, larval growth of the generalist herbivore S. littoralis, but not of the specialist P. brassicae, was significantly higher on plants treated with egg extract than on control plants. In contrast, suppression of gene induction and enhanced S. littoralis performance were not found in the SA-deficient mutant sid2-l, indicating that SA mediates this phenomenon. These data reveal an intriguing facet of the crosstalk between SA- and JA-signalling pathways and suggest that insects have evolved a way to suppress the induction of defense genes by laying eggs that release elicitors. Additionally, we demonstrated that mutants of known crosstalk regulators, including nprl-1, tga2356, ein2-l and wrky70-l, are not affected in egg-induced suppression of herbivore defenses. JA treatment was not able to alleviate this SA/JA negative crosstalk, suggesting that this suppression operates through a novel mechanism downstream of JA biosynthesis.
Resumo:
Arabidopsis thaliana plants fend off insect attack by constitutive and inducible production of toxic metabolites, such as glucosinolates (GSs). A triple mutant lacking MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4, three basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that are known to additively control jasmonate-related defense responses, was shown to have a highly reduced expression of GS biosynthesis genes. The myc2 myc3 myc4 (myc234) triple mutant was almost completely devoid of GS and was extremely susceptible to the generalist herbivore Spodoptera littoralis. On the contrary, the specialist Pieris brassicae was unaffected by the presence of GS and preferred to feed on wild-type plants. In addition, lack of GS in myc234 drastically modified S. littoralis feeding behavior. Surprisingly, the expression of MYB factors known to regulate GS biosynthesis genes was not altered in myc234, suggesting that MYC2/MYC3/MYC4 are necessary for direct transcriptional activation of GS biosynthesis genes. To support this, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that MYC2 binds directly to the promoter of several GS biosynthesis genes in vivo. Furthermore, yeast two-hybrid and pull-down experiments indicated that MYC2/MYC3/MYC4 interact directly with GS-related MYBs. This specific MYC-MYB interaction plays a crucial role in the regulation of defense secondary metabolite production and underlines the importance of GS in shaping plant interactions with adapted and nonadapted herbivores.