Dépistage du syndrome des apnées du sommeil [Screening for sleep apnea syndrome]

Sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) consists of nocturnal snoring interrupted by obstructive apnea and of diurnal symptoms like hypersomnolence as a consequence of sleep fragmentation. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with this syndrome justify early detection and appropriate treatment. Polysomnography is still a frequently used method for early detection; however, several disadvantages like duration, discomfort and expense led to a search for alternatives. Since the beginning of the eighties, oximetry allows recording of nocturnal oxygen saturation of hemoglobin even at home. Nocturnal oximetry reveals O2-desaturation associated with apnea and thus permits often to diagnose or exclude SAS. Diagnosis of SAS is made when at least 20 desaturations per hour with an amplitude of at least 4% are recorded. On the other hand, normal nocturnal oximetry nearly excludes SAS. In those cases where nocturnal oximetry is not diagnostic, polysomnography remains the method of choice. Departing from published work, a model for SAS detection, based mainly on nocturnal oximetry, is proposed.

Oximetry alone versus portable polygraphy for sleep apnea screening before bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Screening for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is recommended as part of the preoperative assessment of obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of oximetry alone versus portable polygraphy in the preoperative screening for OSA. METHODS: Polygraphy (type III portable monitor) and oximetry data recorded as part of the preoperative assessment before bariatric surgery from 68 consecutive patients were reviewed. We compared the sensitivity of 3% or 4% desaturation index (oximetry alone) with the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; polygraphy) to diagnose OSA and classify the patients as normal (<10 events per hour), mild to moderate (10-30 events per hour), or severe (>30 events per hour). RESULTS: Using AHI, the prevalence of OSA (AHI > 10 per hour) was 57.4%: 16.2% of the patients were classified as severe, 41.2% as mild to moderate, and 42.6% as normal. Using 3% desaturation index, 22.1% were classified as severe, 47.1% as mild to moderate, and 30.9% as normal. With 4% desaturation index, 17.6% were classified as severe, 32.4% as mild, and 50% as normal. Overall, 3% desaturation index compared to AHI yielded a 95% negative predictive value to rule out OSA (AHI > 10 per hour) and a 100% sensitivity (0.73 positive predictive value) to detect severe OSA (AHI > 30 per hour). CONCLUSIONS: Using oximetry with 3% desaturation index as a screening tool for OSA could allow us to rule out significant OSA in almost a third of the patients and to detect patients with severe OSA. This cheap and widely available technique could accelerate preoperative work-up of these patients.

Hypertension artérielle réfractaire au traitement due au syndrome d'apnées du sommeil et à la prise de médicaments [Obstructive sleep apnea and drugs as causes of treatment-resistant hypertension].

Treatment-resistant hypertension is still common despite the availability of several types of antihypertensive agents acting by different mechanisms. The existence of refractory hypertension should lead to rule out "white-coat hypertension", poor adherence to prescribed drugs as well as classical causes of secondary hypertension such as renal artery stenosis, primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and renal disease. It is also important to consider the possible existence of obstructive sleep apnea or the regular intake of vasopressive drugs or substances.

Papilledema and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pathogenesis and clinical features of optic disc edema associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). METHODS: A series of 4 patients with SAS and papilledema (PE) underwent complete neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation and lumbar puncture. In 1 patient, continuous 24-hour intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was also performed. RESULTS: All 4 patients had bilateral PE that was asymmetric in 2. Three patients had optic nerve dysfunction, asymmetric in 1, unilateral in 2. Daytime cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurements were within normal range. Nocturnal monitoring performed in one patient, however, demonstrated repeated episodes of marked ICP elevation associated with apnea and arterial oxygen desaturation. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that PE in SAS is due to episodic nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercarbia resulting in increased ICP secondary to cerebral vasodilation. In these individuals, intermittent ICP elevation is sufficient to cause persistent disc edema. These patients may be at increased risk for developing visual loss secondary to PE compared with patients with obesity-related pseudotumor cerebri because of associated hypoxemia. The diagnosis of SAS PE may not be appreciated because daytime cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurements are normal and because patients tend to present with visual loss rather than with symptoms of increased ICP.

Oximetry alone versus portable polygraphy for sleep apnea screening before bariatric surger

Rapport de SynthèseIntroductionLa recherche des apnées du sommeil est recommandée dans la prise en charge préopératoire des patients obèses chez qui une chirurgie bariatrique est envisagée. Toutefois le type d'examen nécessaire pour la détection des apnées dans cette population reste encore discuté. L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer la sensibilité de l'oxymétrie par rapport à la polygraphie lors du screening préopératoire de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil.MéthodeNous avons analysé rétrospectivement les données d'enregistrement de la polygraphie (moniteur portable de type III) et de l'oxymétrie de 68 patients consécutifs adressés au Centre du sommeil dans le cadre de leur bilan avant chirurgie bariatrique.Nous avons comparé la sensibilité de l'index de désaturation 3% ou 4% (à partir de l'oxymétrie seule) avec l'index d'apnée-hypopnée (à partir de la polygraphie) pour diagnostiquer l'apnée obstructive du sommeil. Les patients ont été réparti en 3 groupes selon la sévérité de leur atteinte: normale (< 10 événements/heure), faible à moyenne (10-30 événements/heure), sévère (>30 événements/heure).RésultatsSi l'on considère l'index d'apnée-hypopnée (polygraphie), la prévalence de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil avec un index d'apnée-hypopnée supérieur à 10 événements par heure était de 57,4% : 16,2% des patients étaient classés comme sévèrement atteints, 41,2% comme faiblement à moyennement atteints et 42.6% comme normaux.Si l'on considère l'index de désaturation 3%, 22,1% des patients étaient classés commes sévères , 47,1% comme faiblement à moyennement atteints et 30,9% comme normaux.Avec un index de désaturation de 4%, 17,6% étaient classés comme sévères, 32,4 % comme faiblement à moyennement atteints et 50% comme normaux.En comparant l'index de désaturation 3% à l'index d'apnée-hypopnée (>10 événements/heure), nous avons obtenu une valeur prédictive négative de 95% pour exclure une apnée obstructive du sommeil et une sensibilité de 100% dans la détection des cas sévères d'apnées obstructives du sommeil (index apnée-hypopnée >30 événements/heure). Le coefficient de concordance entre l'index d'apnée-hypopnée et l'index de désaturation 3% était de 0,759 alors qu'il était de 0,856 entre l'index d'apnée-hypopnée et l'index de désaturation de 4%.

Hypertension artérielle réfractaire au traitement due au syndrome d'apnées du sommeil et à la prise de médicaments [Obstructive sleep apnea and drugs as causes of treatment-resistant hypertension].

Treatment-resistant hypertension is still common despite the availability of several types of antihypertensive agents acting by different mechanisms. The existence of refractory hypertension should lead to rule out "white-coat hypertension", poor adherence to prescribed drugs as well as classical causes of secondary hypertension such as renal artery stenosis, primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and renal disease. It is also important to consider the possible existence of obstructive sleep apnea or the regular intake of vasopressive drugs or substances.

Endothelial dependant coronary vasoreactivity measured by 82Rb cardiac PET in obstructive sleep apnea patients before and after CPAP treatment

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Endothelial dysfunction is believed to be one of the pathophysiological mechanism underlying this association. Our aim was to compare endothelial dependent coronary vasoreactivity in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients and controls by quantifying myocardial blood flow (MBF) response to cold pressure testing (CPT) with 82Rb cardiac PET/CT. Methods: Twenty-four OSA patients (2W/22M, mean age 58 yo, mean BMI 28.6 kg/m2) with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >30/h and 9 healthy volunteers (AHI <10/h) underwent a full night sleep recording (PSG) and a dynamic 82 Rb cardiac PET/CT scan at rest, during CPT and adenosine stress. In OSA patients the same measurements (PSG and PET/CT) were respeated 6 weeks after initiating continuous positive airway pressure (autoCPAP) treatment. To reflect differences in baseline cardiac work, values were normalized according to ratepressure product (RPP). Results: At baseline, untreated OSA patients had a mean AHI of 48.8/h and showed a lower MBF response to CPT than controls (1.1 ± 0.2 mL/min/g vs. 1.3 ± 0.4 mL/min/g, P = 0.048). When treated with CPAP, CPT-MBF was not different between controls and well-treated OSA patients (1.2 ± 0.3 mL/min/g vs 1.3 ± 0.4 mL/min/g, P = 0.68), but it was significantly lower for insufficiently treated patients (n = 10) with a residual AHI >10/h (0.9 ± 0.2 mL/min/g vs 1.3 ± 0.4 mL/min/g, P = 0.03). There was also a trend toward a difference in CPT-MBF between insufficiently and well-treated OSA patients (1.2 ± 0.3 mL/min/g vs 0.9 ± 0.2 mL/min/g, P = 0.15). Conclusion: Untreated OSA patients have an impaired coronary endothelial function as measured by MBF response to CPT compared to control subjects. This difference disappears after 6 weeks of autoCPAP therapy but only in OSA patients showing a good response to CPAP (AHI <10/h). Further studies are needed to determine by which mechanism OSA and CPAP treatment influence coronary vasoreactivity.

Troubles du sommeil chez des patients présentant une insuffisance rénale chronique [Sleep disorders in patients with chronic renal insufficiency].

Sleep disorders, especially insomnia, daytime sleepiness, sleep apnea syndrome and restless legs syndrome are very frequently encountered in patients with chronic renal failure whether or not they undergo renal replacement therapy. The causes of sleep disorders are multifactorial and not only linked to the renal disease itself, but also to its treatment and its associated psychosocial factors. This article discusses the prevalence and physiopathology of the most frequently encountered sleep disorders in chronic renal failure patients, and highlights the actually available therapeutic options.

HypnoLaus: le sommeil sous la loupe [HypnoLaus sleep cohort study].

Normal sleep patterns and prevalence of sleep disorders in the general population are largely unknown. The aim of HypnoLaus cohort study is to record sleep and analyze sleep characteristics in a large population-based sample, which had undergone comprehensive genetic, somatic, and psychiatric investigations. Full polysomnography has already been performed in more than 1100 middle aged men and women randomly selected from Lausanne general population (goal 2000-3000 sleep recordings). Over 4000 additional subjects from the same population have filled various questionnaires on their sleep habits and complaints. These results combined with genetic, cardiovascular, metabolic, and psychiatric data provide a unique opportunity to determine the interaction between sleep, its genetic determinants and cardiovascular, psychiatric, or metabolic diseases.

Syndrome d'apnées du sommeil: un risque pour l'anesthésie générale [Obstructive sleep apnea: a risk for general anesthesia?]

There are many case reports of serious complications and death among obstructive sleep apnea patients (OSA) during general anesthesia or postoperative analgesia. Sedatives and anesthetic agents, pharyngeal anatomy of these patients, opiates given for analgesia, and post operative REM sleep rebound represent potential hazards for general anesthesia in OSA patients. Ideally these patients should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during premedication, directly after extubation and during postoperative analgesia. Unfortunately, only about 20% of these patients are diagnosed before surgery. A special attention should be given to the symptoms and signs suggestive of OSA during preoperative visits. Screening tests should be performed in patients with suspected OSA and, if positive, a treatment should be initiated.

Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: an objective measurement of patients' usage and efficacy at home.

BACKGROUND: Positional therapy that prevents patients from sleeping supine has been used for many years to manage positional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, patients' usage at home and the long term efficacy of this therapy have never been objectively assessed.¦METHODS: Sixteen patients with positional OSA who refused or could not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were enrolled after a test night study (T0) to test the efficacy of the positional therapy device. The patients who had a successful test night were instructed to use the device every night for three months. Nightly usage was monitored by an actigraphic recorder placed inside the positional device. A follow-up night study (T3) was performed after three months of positional therapy.¦RESULTS: Patients used the device on average 73.7 ± 29.3% (mean ± SD) of the nights for 8.0 ± 2.0 h/night. 10/16 patients used the device more than 80% of the nights. Compared to the baseline (diagnostic) night, mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) decreased from 26.7 ± 17.5 to 6.0 ± 3.4 with the positional device (p<0.0001) during T0 night. Oxygen desaturation (3%) index also fell from 18.4 ± 11.1 to 7.1 ± 5.7 (p = 0.001). Time spent supine fell from 42.8 ± 26.2% to 5.8 ± 7.2% (p < 0.0001). At three months (T3), the benefits persisted with no difference in AHI (p = 0.58) or in time spent supine (p = 0.98) compared to T0 night. The Epworth sleepiness scale showed a significant decrease from 9.4 ± 4.5 to 6.6 ± 4.7 (p = 0.02) after three months.¦CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with positional OSA can be effectively treated by a positional therapy with an objective compliance of 73.7% of the nights and a persistent efficacy after three months.

Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: an objective measurement of patients' usage and efficacy at home.

BACKGROUND: Positional therapy that prevents patients from sleeping supine has been used for many years to manage positional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, patients' usage at home and the long term efficacy of this therapy have never been objectively assessed. METHODS: Sixteen patients with positional OSA who refused or could not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were enrolled after a test night study (T0) to test the efficacy of the positional therapy device. The patients who had a successful test night were instructed to use the device every night for three months. Nightly usage was monitored by an actigraphic recorder placed inside the positional device. A follow-up night study (T3) was performed after three months of positional therapy. RESULTS: Patients used the device on average 73.7 ± 29.3% (mean ± SD) of the nights for 8.0 ± 2.0 h/night. 10/16 patients used the device more than 80% of the nights. Compared to the baseline (diagnostic) night, mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) decreased from 26.7 ± 17.5 to 6.0 ± 3.4 with the positional device (p<0.0001) during T0 night. Oxygen desaturation (3%) index also fell from 18.4 ± 11.1 to 7.1 ± 5.7 (p = 0.001). Time spent supine fell from 42.8 ± 26.2% to 5.8 ± 7.2% (p < 0.0001). At three months (T3), the benefits persisted with no difference in AHI (p = 0.58) or in time spent supine (p = 0.98) compared to T0 night. The Epworth sleepiness scale showed a significant decrease from 9.4 ± 4.5 to 6.6 ± 4.7 (p = 0.02) after three months. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with positional OSA can be effectively treated by a positional therapy with an objective compliance of 73.7% of the nights and a persistent efficacy after three months.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity and Overnight Body Fluid Shift before and after Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with significantly increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Fluid overload may promote obstructive sleep apnea in patients with ESRD through an overnight fluid shift from the legs to the neck soft tissues. Body fluid shift and severity of obstructive sleep apnea before and after hemodialysis were compared in patients with ESRD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Seventeen patients with hemodialysis and moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea were included. Polysomnographies were performed the night before and after hemodialysis to assess obstructive sleep apnea, and bioimpedance was used to measure fluid overload and leg fluid volume. RESULTS: The mean overnight rostral fluid shift was 1.27±0.41 L prehemodialysis; it correlated positively with fluid overload volume (r=0.39; P=0.02) and was significantly lower posthemodialysis (0.78±0.38 L; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean obstructive apnea-hypopnea index before and after hemodialysis (46.8±22.0 versus 42.1±18.6 per hour; P=0.21), but obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was significantly lower posthemodialysis (-10.1±10.8 per hour) in the group of 12 patients, with a concomitant reduction of fluid overload compared with participants without change in fluid overload (obstructive apnea-hypopnea index +8.2±16.1 per hour; P<0.01). A lower fluid overload after hemodialysis was significantly correlated (r=0.49; P=0.04) with a lower obstructive apnea-hypopnea index. Fluid overload-assessed by bioimpedance-was the best predictor of the change in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index observed after hemodialysis (standardized r=-0.68; P=0.01) in multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid overload influences overnight rostral fluid shift and obstructive sleep apnea severity in patients with ESRD undergoing intermittent hemodialysis. Although no benefit of hemodialysis on obstructive sleep apnea severity was observed in the whole group, the change in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was significantly correlated with the change in fluid overload after hemodialysis. Moreover, the subgroup with lower fluid overload posthemodialysis showed a significantly lower obstructive sleep apnea severity, which provides a strong incentive to further study whether optimizing fluid status in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and ESRD will improve the obstructive apnea-hypopnea index.

Prevalence and Diagnostic Approach to Sleep Apnea in Hemodialysis Patients: A Population Study.

Background. Previous observations found a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the hemodialysis population, but the best diagnostic approach remains undefined. We assessed OSA prevalence and performance of available screening tools to propose a specific diagnostic algorithm. Methods. 104 patients from 6 Swiss hemodialysis centers underwent polygraphy and completed 3 OSA screening scores: STOP-BANG, Berlin's Questionnaire, and Adjusted Neck Circumference. The OSA predictors were identified on a derivation population and used to develop the diagnostic algorithm, which was validated on an independent population. Results. We found 56% OSA prevalence (AHI ≥ 15/h), which was largely underdiagnosed. Screening scores showed poor performance for OSA screening (ROC areas 0.538 [SE 0.093] to 0.655 [SE 0.083]). Age, neck circumference, and time on renal replacement therapy were the best predictors of OSA and were used to develop a screening algorithm, with higher discriminatory performance than classical screening tools (ROC area 0.831 [0.066]). Conclusions. Our study confirms the high OSA prevalence and highlights the low diagnosis rate of this treatable cardiovascular risk factor in the hemodialysis population. Considering the poor performance of OSA screening tools, we propose and validate a specific algorithm to identify hemodialysis patients at risk for OSA for whom further sleep investigations should be considered.

Prevalence and Diagnostic Approach to Sleep Apnea in Hemodialysis Patients: A Population Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous observations found a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the hemodialysis population, but the best diagnostic approach remains undefined. We assessed OSA prevalence and performance of available screening tools to propose a specific diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: 104 patients from 6 Swiss hemodialysis centers underwent polygraphy and completed 3 OSA screening scores: STOP-BANG, Berlin's Questionnaire, and Adjusted Neck Circumference. The OSA predictors were identified on a derivation population and used to develop the diagnostic algorithm, which was validated on an independent population. RESULTS: We found 56% OSA prevalence (AHI ≥ 15/h), which was largely underdiagnosed. Screening scores showed poor performance for OSA screening (ROC areas 0.538 [SE 0.093] to 0.655 [SE 0.083]). Age, neck circumference, and time on renal replacement therapy were the best predictors of OSA and were used to develop a screening algorithm, with higher discriminatory performance than classical screening tools (ROC area 0.831 [0.066]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the high OSA prevalence and highlights the low diagnosis rate of this treatable cardiovascular risk factor in the hemodialysis population. Considering the poor performance of OSA screening tools, we propose and validate a specific algorithm to identify hemodialysis patients at risk for OSA for whom further sleep investigations should be considered.