The forensic radiographer: a new member in the medicolegal team.

Multidetector computed tomography is becoming more widespread in forensic medicine. In most services, autopsy assistants perform the radiological examination. We introduced professional radiographers into the legal medicine service and hypothesized they would also be able to take over duties currently reserved for other specialists. The aims of this study were to evaluate if radiographers could be trained as "forensic radiographers" by (1) integrating graduated medical radiographers into the legal medicine service, (2) investigating the advantages of this collaboration, and (3) defining the duties of the forensic radiographers.The study was performed prospectively on a group of 8 recruited radiographers who underwent a testing period with special training. They learned the basics of medicolegal case treatment, the autonomous execution of postmortem computed tomography angiography, and postprocessing of data. Seven of 8 radiographers finished the training and were integrated into our service. Although all radiographers were able to fulfill the duties demanded after the training period, some radiographers could not enter or complete the program because they were unable to work with dead bodies.Our study presents the advantages of integrating radiographers into the medicolegal team and proposes how to train the forensic radiographers. In addition, the duties and responsibilities of these new specialists are defined.

Reliability of the image evaluation system PGMI

Purpose: Many countries used the PGMI (P=perfect, G=good, M=moderate, I=inadequate) classification system for assessing the quality of mammograms. Limits inherent to the subjectivity of this classification have been shown. Prior to introducing this system in Switzerland, we wanted to better understand the origin of this subjectivity in order to minimize it. Our study aimed at identifying the main determinants of the variability of the PGMI system and which criteria are the most subjected to subjectivity. Methods and Materials: A focus group composed of 2 experienced radiographers and 2 radiologists specified each PGMI criterion. Ten raters (6 radiographers and 4 radiologists) evaluated twice a panel of 40 randomly selected mammograms (20 analogic and 20 digital) according to these specified PGMI criteria. The PGMI classification was assessed and the intra- and inter-rater reliability was tested for each professional group (radiographer vs radiologist), image technology (analogic vs digital) and PGMI criterion. Results: Some 3,200 images were assessed. The intra-rater reliability appears to be weak, particularly in respect to inter-rater variability. Subjectivity appears to be largely independent of the professional group and image technology. Aspects of the PGMI classification criteria most subjected to variability were identified. Conclusion: Post-test discussions enabled to specify more precisely some criteria. This should reduce subjectivity when applying the PGMI classification system. A concomitant, important effort in training radiographers is also necessary.

Forensic imaging: New challenges for radiographers : B-588

Purpose: Cross-sectional imaging techniques have pioneered forensic medicine. The involvement of a radiographer and formation of "forensic radiographers" allows an improvement of the quality of radiological examinations and facilitates the implementation of techniques, such as sample collections, and the performance of post-mortem angiography. Methods and Materials: During a period of three months, five radiographers with clinical experience have undergone a special training in order to learn procedures dedicated to forensic imaging. These procedures involved: I). acquisition of MDCT data, II). sample collection for toxicological or histological analyses by performing CT-guided biopsies and liquid sampling, III). post-mortem angiography and IV). post-processing of all data acquired. To perform the post-mortem angiography, radiographers were in charge of the preparation of the perfusion device and the investigated body. Therefore, cannulas were inserted into the femoral vessels and connected to the machine. For angiography, the radiographers had to synchronize the perfusion with the CT-acquisitions. Results: All five radiographers have acquired new skills to become "forensic radiographers". They were able to perform post-mortem MDCT, sample collection, post-mortem angiography and post-processing of the acquired data all by themselves. Most problems have been observed concerning the preparation of the body for post-mortem angiography. Conclusion: Our experience shows that radiographers are able to perform high quality examinations after a short period of training. Their collaboration is well accepted by the forensic team and regarding the increase of radiological exams in forensic department, it would be nonsense to exclude radiographers from the forensic-radiological team.