1 resultado para Private four-year colleges and universities
em Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (5)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (16)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (16)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (25)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (72)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (6)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (6)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (40)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (5)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (6)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (100)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (29)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (80)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (20)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (273)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (5)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Even if a large proportion of physiotherapists work in the private sector worldwide, very little is known of the organizations within which they practice. Such knowledge is important to help understand contexts of practice and how they influence the quality of services and patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to: 1) describe characteristics of organizations where physiotherapists practice in the private sector, and 2) explore the existence of a taxonomy of organizational models. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional quantitative survey of 236 randomly-selected physiotherapists. Participants completed a purpose-designed questionnaire online or by telephone, covering organizational vision, resources, structures and practices. Organizational characteristics were analyzed descriptively, while organizational models were identified by multiple correspondence analyses. RESULTS: Most organizations were for-profit (93.2%), located in urban areas (91.5%), and within buildings containing multiple businesses/organizations (76.7%). The majority included multiple providers (89.8%) from diverse professions, mainly physiotherapy assistants (68.7%), massage therapists (67.3%) and osteopaths (50.2%). Four organizational models were identified: 1) solo practice, 2) middle-scale multiprovider, 3) large-scale multiprovider and 4) mixed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a detailed description of the organizations where physiotherapists practice, and highlight the importance of human resources in differentiating organizational models. Further research examining the influences of these organizational characteristics and models on outcomes such as physiotherapists' professional practices and patient outcomes are needed.