Discours économique et évolution institutionnelle, les apports de J. R. Commons

John Roger Commons est, de manière quasi systématique, considéré comme l'un des pères fondateurs de l'ancien institutionnalisme américain. On souligne tout aussi couramment l'influence que la philosophie pragmatiste a pu avoir sur ses travaux, du moins en ce qui concerne son ouvrage de 1934. Plus rares sont les commentateurs soulignant le rôle qu'a le langage, a fortiori le langage de l'économiste, dans l'analyse qu'il fait de l'évolution institutionnelle. Notre but sera de souligner ce fait : pour Commons, dire c'est faire, dans la lignée de la linguistique performativiste, dire c'est agir sur l'évolution institutionnelle. Abstract : John Roger Commons is well known as one of the founders of old institutionnalism. It is current to emphazise his philosophical roots : the american pragmatism, at least in his masterpiece of 1934. On the other hand, it is less frequent to point out the important role that the langage, and a fortiori economics' langage, has in his understanding of institutional evolution. Our aim will be to spotlight this point : for Commons, we can do things with words, on the way of performativist linguistic, when we use words, we influence institutional evolution.

A Pragmatic Intellectual: Dutch Fabians, Boekman, and Cultural Policy in the Netherlands, 1890-1940

Around 1900, the notion of community art (gemeenschapskunst) served to crystallize Dutch social democratic thinking about the role of the arts in society. Drawing on the pragmatism of leading social democrats like Wibaut, and drawing on his formal education in economics and statistics, the self‐made social democrat Emanuel Boekman redressed the utopian meaning of community art to signify the dissemination of "good" culture over all layers of society in his influential 1939 dissertation on the relation of the state to the arts. Being about facts rather than opinions, Boekman set the boundaries of his work to exclude a substantial discussion of the meaning of "good" culture. On the one hand, this pragmatism helped Boekman to gain support for government intervention for the arts over most of the political spectrum. On the other hand, Boekman thus pre‐empted discussions about the tension between "quality" and "accessibility" of the arts that haunts cultural policy in the Netherlands to this day.