Un horizon infini. Explorateurs et voyageurs français au Tibet (1846-1912)

Peu reconnus par la critique postcoloniale, souvent assimilés sans nuances aux enjeux géopolitiques du Grand Jeu en Asie centrale à la même période, les récits des explorateurs français du Tibet manifestent pourtant des traits culturels spécifiques dont on se propose ici de mener l'archéologie. Missionnaires, aventuriers, nobles bannis, scientifiques républicains, diplomates, officiers coloniaux, intellectuels et orientalistes éclairés indiquent tous que la culture de l'exploration dont, de 1846 à 1912, ils sont les représentants se conçoit intrinsèquement comme une culture paysagère. Aussi révèlent-ils une évolution originale des savoirs sur le Tibet et des représentations du paysage tibétain qui se découvre progressivement à eux. La description du paysage participe ainsi globalement d'une histoire des sensibilités et d'une histoire des sciences, ce que l'on peut appeler une géosensibilité. Mais la description scientifique du paysage, liée à la pratique du voyage et à une confrontation à l'ailleurs, ne doit pas masquer le primat expérientiel qui lui donne sens. C'est ainsi que le paysage, en tant qu'expérience vécue, en vient à jouer le rôle d'une médiation interculturelle invitant à un renouvellement des questionnaires des explorateurs. Par ailleurs, la description scientifique participe tout autant de différents orientalismes, de différentes perceptions d'un Tibet associé par les voyageurs à un « paysage sacré ». La diversité dont ceux-ci témoignent, mais aussi les croisements de représentations issues d'autres cultures de l'exploration du Tibet - la tradition anglo-saxonne en premier lieu -, nous plongent aux origines de l'« image du Tibet » qui, au loin de la rencontre vivante des explorateurs - la Première Guerre, la Convention de Simla et l'avènement du Guomindang marquent le terme de la culture française de l'exploration du Tibet -, se cristallisera et s'unifiera dans l'imaginaire occidental du XXe siècle.

Vulgariser les sciences sans l'appui des savants. Jean Lanteires et le Journal de Lausanne (1786-1792)

Popularizing science without the support of scholars. Jean Lanteires and the Journal de Lausanne (1786-1792). - Founded in 1786 by Jean Lanteires, the Journal de Lausanne is a widespread, weekly journal with the express aim of disseminating scientific knowledge among the lower and middle classes. Its articles are easily comprehensible and cover a wide range of topics from literature to agriculture, from natural sciences to charity. Considerable space is given to reader's questions and comments. The journal can be situated somewhere between an almanac and a scientific journal. Lanteires' attempt to solicit contributions from scholars of medicine and natural sciences received a dismissive response. Of the few articles written by specialists, the majority deal with agriculture and charity. Lanteires' difficult relationship with the scholarly community is reflected in the journal's content. This makes the Journal de Lausanne a privileged observatory for studying the social context of the vulgarization process in late-eighteenth-century Switzerland and Europe.

Non-Risk-Adapted Surveillance in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: The Princess Margaret Hospital's Experience.

BACKGROUND: Since 1981 Princess Margaret Hospital has used initial active surveillance (AS) with delayed treatment at relapse as the preferred management for all patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to report our overall AS experience and compare outcomes over different periods using this non-risk-adapted approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and seventy-one patients with stage I NSGCT were managed by AS from 1981 to 2005. For analysis by time period, patients were divided into two cohorts by diagnosis date: initial cohort, 1981-1992 (n=157), and recent cohort, 1993-2005 (n=214). INTERVENTION: Patients were followed at regular intervals, and treatment was only given for relapse. MEASUREMENTS: Recurrence rates, time to relapse, risk factors for recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: With a median follow-up of 6.3 yr, 104 patients (28%) relapsed: 53 of 157 (33.8%) in the initial group and 51 of 214 (23.8%) in the recent group. Median time to relapse was 7 mo. Lymphovascular invasion (p<0.0001) and pure embryonal carcinoma (p=0.02) were independent predictors of recurrence; 125 patients (33.7%) were designated as high risk based on the presence of one or both factors. In the initial cohort, 66 of 157 patients (42.0%) were high risk and 36 of 66 patients (54.5%) relapsed versus 17 of 91 low-risk patients (18.7%) (p<0.0001). In the recent cohort, 59 of 214 patients (27.6%) were high risk and 29 of 59 had a recurrence (49.2%) versus 22 of 155 low-risk patients (14.2%) (p<0.0001). Three patients (0.8%) died from testis cancer. The estimated 5-yr disease-specific survival was 99.3% in the initial group and 98.9% in the recent one. CONCLUSIONS: Non-risk-adapted surveillance is an effective, simple strategy for the management of all stage I NSGCT.