Problems of allometric scaling analysis: examples from mammalian reproductive biology.

Biological scaling analyses employing the widely used bivariate allometric model are beset by at least four interacting problems: (1) choice of an appropriate best-fit line with due attention to the influence of outliers; (2) objective recognition of divergent subsets in the data (allometric grades); (3) potential restrictions on statistical independence resulting from phylogenetic inertia; and (4) the need for extreme caution in inferring causation from correlation. A new non-parametric line-fitting technique has been developed that eliminates requirements for normality of distribution, greatly reduces the influence of outliers and permits objective recognition of grade shifts in substantial datasets. This technique is applied in scaling analyses of mammalian gestation periods and of neonatal body mass in primates. These analyses feed into a re-examination, conducted with partial correlation analysis, of the maternal energy hypothesis relating to mammalian brain evolution, which suggests links between body size and brain size in neonates and adults, gestation period and basal metabolic rate. Much has been made of the potential problem of phylogenetic inertia as a confounding factor in scaling analyses. However, this problem may be less severe than suspected earlier because nested analyses of variance conducted on residual variation (rather than on raw values) reveals that there is considerable variance at low taxonomic levels. In fact, limited divergence in body size between closely related species is one of the prime examples of phylogenetic inertia. One common approach to eliminating perceived problems of phylogenetic inertia in allometric analyses has been calculation of 'independent contrast values'. It is demonstrated that the reasoning behind this approach is flawed in several ways. Calculation of contrast values for closely related species of similar body size is, in fact, highly questionable, particularly when there are major deviations from the best-fit line for the scaling relationship under scrutiny.

Targeting the undruggable: immunotherapy meets personalized oncology in the genomic era.

Owing to recent advances in genomic technologies, personalized oncology is poised to fundamentally alter cancer therapy. In this paradigm, the mutational and transcriptional profiles of tumors are assessed, and personalized treatments are designed based on the specific molecular abnormalities relevant to each patient's cancer. To date, such approaches have yielded impressive clinical responses in some patients. However, a major limitation of this strategy has also been revealed: the vast majority of tumor mutations are not targetable by current pharmacological approaches. Immunotherapy offers a promising alternative to exploit tumor mutations as targets for clinical intervention. Mutated proteins can give rise to novel antigens (called neoantigens) that are recognized with high specificity by patient T cells. Indeed, neoantigen-specific T cells have been shown to underlie clinical responses to many standard treatments and immunotherapeutic interventions. Moreover, studies in mouse models targeting neoantigens, and early results from clinical trials, have established proof of concept for personalized immunotherapies targeting next-generation sequencing identified neoantigens. Here, we review basic immunological principles related to T-cell recognition of neoantigens, and we examine recent studies that use genomic data to design personalized immunotherapies. We discuss the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead on the road to improving patient outcomes by incorporating immunotherapy into the paradigm of personalized oncology.

Internet au service du patrimoine. Cartographie dynamique de l'inventaire des géotopes d'importance nationale

L'inventaire des géotopes d'importance nationale, aujourd'hui proche de son état final, est le fruit d'un long travail de sélection, de documentation ainsi que de définition et de numérisation des périmètres des sites initié dans les années 1990 par le groupe de travail pour la protection des géotopes en Suisse (Strasser et al. 1995, Berger et al. 2008). Il représente un outil au service de la diffusion et à la promotion du géopatrimoine suisse, auprès de la population en général et des professionnels des géosciences en particulier, dans un but de valorisation patrimoniale et de protection et par une sensibilisation à la valeur particulière et à la vulnérabilité des géotopes.¦C'est dans cet objectif qu'a été développée une interface cartographique rendant accessible sur Internet le contenu de cet inventaire. L'outil de web mapping utilisé - GoogleMaps API - permet en effet d'enrichir une interface de navigation intuitive de diverses fonctions additionnelles offertes par la cartographie sur internet (Kraak 2004, Plewe 2007). La carte n'est donc pas seulement une représentation de la réalité permettant la localisation de différents objets, mais également un outil de recherche thématique et spatiale ainsi qu'un index reliant chaque objet cartographié à diverses informations.¦Porte d'accès aux données des site à une échelle individuelle ou globale, mais aussi outil d'exploration, cette interface propose plusieurs niveaux d'utilisation, correspondant aux diverses interactions possibles avec ces données : naviguer et découvrir les sites, réaliser des sélections multiples, comparer les géotopes à d'autres données, comme l'inventaire fédéral des paysages. L'utilisateur peut ainsi produire à chaque fois la carte qui répond à ses besoins et à ses questions. En donnant à tous accès au contexte et aux particularités de chaque site par delà la globalité abstraite de l'inventaire, cette application se veut avant tout un outil au service de la médiation du géopatrimoine.