Functional significance of first metatarso-phalangeal joint arthrodesis : FM101

Introduction: Indications for arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) are commonly arthrosis (hallux rigidus), rheumatoid arthritis, failed hallux valgus surgery, severe hallux valgus, infectious arthritis, fractures and neuroarthropathies. Many reports focus on technical and radiological issues but few studies emphasize the functional outcome considering daily activities, sports and expectation of the patient. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent MTP1-arthrodesis from 2002 to 2005 in our institution. Clinical and radiological results were assessed but we specially focussed on the functional outcome. Scoring systems used were the SF-12, EQ-5D, PASI, FFI and AOFAS (10 points given to MTP1 mobility) scales. Results: 61 of 64 consecutive patients were evaluated. Female to male ratio was 49:15, mean age at surgery was 67 years, the average follow up was 29 month. Even if radiological consolidation was incomplete in 18 patients, all patients had a clinically stable and rigid arthrodesis. Mean AOFAS score was 87 (24-100) points at follow up. The FFI was 5.91% (0-66%). Patient satisfaction was excellent in 37 patients (60%), good in 18 (30%), fair in 5(8%) and poor in1 (2%). EQ- 5D was 0.7 (0.4-1).40 patients (66%) estimated their cosmetic result as excellent, 15 (25%) as good, 4(6%) as fair and 2 (3%)as poor. 10 patients (16%) had no shoe wear limitation , 48 (79%) had to wear comfortable shoes and 3 (5%) needed orthopaedic wearing. Professionally 34 patients (56%) had better performances, 18 (26%) had no change and 9 (18%) had aggravation of their capacities but this was due to other health reasons. In sports, 16 patients (26%) had better performances, 35 patients (57%) no change and 10 (17%) were worse as consequence of other health problems for 7. Finally, 56 patients (92%) would recommend the operation and 5 (8%) would not. Conclusion: Experience of clinical practice suggests that the idea of fusing the first MTP joint is initially frequently disregarded by the patients because they fear to be limited by a rigid forefoot. Our results show, in fact, that this procedure can be proposed for numerous pathological situations with the perspective of good to excellent outcome in terms of function and quality of life in the majority of cases.

A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient-specific quality of life indices show great potential, but certain conceptual and methodological concerns have yet to be fully addressed. The present study reviewed nine patient-specific instruments used in musculoskeletal disorders: the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Juvenile Arthritis Quality of life Questionnaire (JAQQ), McMaster-Toronto Arthritis questionnaire (MACTAR), Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP), Patient-Specific Index (PASI) for total hip arthroplasty, Problem Elicitation Technique (PET), Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life, Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Each tool was evaluated for purpose, content validity, face validity, feasibility, psychometric properties, and responsiveness. RESULTS: This critical appraisal revealed important differences in terms of the concept underlying these indices, the domains covered, the item-generation techniques and the scoring (response scale, methods) in each scale. The nine indices would generate different responses and likely scores for the same patient, despite the fact that they all include patient-generated items. CONCLUSION: Although the value of these indices in treatment planning and monitoring at an individual level is strong, more studies are needed to improve our understanding of how to interpret the numeric scores of patient-specific indices at both an individual and a group level.