First episode schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: A psychiatric nosology

A nosological issue that has yet to be resolved relates to the diagnostic and clinical overlap of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare, within a treated epidemiological cohort of first episode patients, the clinical characteristics of patients with schizophrenia (FES) or schizoaffective disorder (FESA). Medical fi le audit methodology was employed to collect information on 704 first episode psychosis patients (FEP), among which 283 patients had a fi nal diagnosis of FES and 64 patients with a fi nal diagnosis of FESA. These patients were treated at the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC), Melbourne, Australia. Patients with FES were signifi cantly more likely to have a longer prodrome (P = .020), longer duration of untreated psychosis (P < .001), and earlier age of onset (P = .004) compared to FESA. At service entry, FESA patients had more severe levels of psychopathology (P = .020), which was due to the presence of manic symptoms (P < .001); consequently, requiring a greater number of inpatient admissions (P = .017). At discharge, depressive symptoms were more severe in those with FESA (P = .011). There are signifi cant differences in the phenomenology of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder during early illness course; supporting the notion that these are two discernable disorders.

Differences between first episode schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic and clinical overlap between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder is an important nosological issue in psychiatry that is yet to be resolved. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional characteristics of an epidemiological treated cohort of first episode patients with an 18-month discharge diagnosis of schizophrenia (FES) or schizoaffective disorder (FESA). METHODS: This study was part of the larger First Episode Psychosis Outcome Study (FEPOS) which involved a medical file audit study of all 786 patients treated at the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre between 1998 and 2000. Of this cohort, 283 patients had an 18-month discharge diagnosis of FES and 64 had a diagnosis of FESA. DSM-IV diagnoses and clinical and functional ratings were derived and validated by two consultant psychiatrists. RESULTS: Compared to FES patients, those with FESA were significantly more likely to have a later age of onset (p=.004), longer prodrome (p=.020), and a longer duration of untreated psychosis (p<.001). At service entry, FESA patients presented with a higher illness severity (p=.020), largely due to the presence of more severe manic symptoms (p<.001). FESA patients also had a greater number of subsequent inpatient admissions (p=.017), had more severe depressive symptoms (p=.011), and higher levels of functioning at discharge. DISCUSSION: The findings support the notion that these might be considered two discernable disorders; however, further research is required to ascertain the ways and extent to which these disorders are discriminable at presentation and over time.