Concilier l'inconciliable ? Le rapport des femmes à la notion de 'conciliation travail-famille' dans les professions libérales en France

A partir de l'exemple des femmes médecins et avocates en France, cet article propose de prendre le discours de ces femmes très diplômées à propos de la « conciliation famille-travail » comme indicateur de leur positionnement - objectif et subjectif - vis-à-vis du système dominant des rapports sociaux de sexe dans la société française actuelle. L'article laisse penser que les tensions entre le développement d'une carrière professionnelle et la prise en charge du travail domestique et éducatif peuvent être résolues de manière différenciée au sein de ces professions. Les femmes diplômées sont ainsi en mesure d'adopter de multiples positionnements face à leur assignation prioritaire à la (re)production domestique.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99-02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy and accelerated radiotherapy independently improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of these approaches. METHODS: In our open-label phase 3 randomised trial, we enrolled patients with locally advanced, stage III and IV (non-metastatic) HNSCC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. We randomly allocated patients centrally with a computer program (with centre, T stage, N stage, and localisation as minimisation factors) in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive conventional chemoradiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks plus three cycles of 4 days' concomitant carboplatin-fluorouracil), accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy (70 Gy in 6 weeks plus two cycles of 5 days' concomitant carboplatin-fluorouracil), or very accelerated radiotherapy alone (64·8 Gy [1·8 Gy twice daily] in 3·5 weeks). The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was assessed in all enrolled patients. This trial is completed. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00828386. FINDINGS: Between Feb 29, 2000, and May 9, 2007, we randomly allocated 279 patients to receive conventional chemoradiotherapy, 280 to accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy, and 281 to very accelerated radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 5·2 years (IQR 4·9-6·2); rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy compliance were good in all groups. Accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy offered no PFS benefit compared with conventional chemoradiotherapy (HR 1·02, 95% CI 0·84-1·23; p=0·88) or very accelerated radiotherapy (0·83, 0·69-1·01; p=0·060); conventional chemoradiotherapy improved PFS compared with very accelerated radiotherapy (0·82, 0·67-0·99; p=0·041). 3-year PFS was 37·6% (95% CI 32·1-43·4) after conventional chemoradiotherapy, 34·1% (28·7-39·8) after accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy, and 32·2% (27·0-37·9) after very accelerated radiotherapy. More patients in the very accelerated radiotherapy group had RTOG grade 3-4 acute mucosal toxicity (226 [84%] of 268 patients) compared with accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy (205 [76%] of 271 patients) or conventional chemoradiotherapy (180 [69%] of 262; p=0·0001). 158 (60%) of 265 patients in the conventional chemoradiotherapy group, 176 (64%) of 276 patients in the accelerated radiotherapy-chemotherapy group, and 190 (70%) of 272 patients in the very accelerated radiotherapy group were intubated with feeding tubes during treatment (p=0·045). INTERPRETATION: Chemotherapy has a substantial treatment effect given concomitantly with radiotherapy and acceleration of radiotherapy cannot compensate for the absence of chemotherapy. We noted the most favourable outcomes for conventional chemoradiotherapy, suggesting that acceleration of radiotherapy is probably not beneficial in concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.

Do PES Improve the Governance of Forest Restoration?

Payments for Environmental Services (PES) are praised as innovative policy instruments and they influence the governance of forest restoration efforts in two major ways. The first is the establishment of multi-stakeholder agencies as intermediary bodies between funders and planters to manage the funds and to distribute incentives to planters. The second implication is that specific contracts assign objectives to land users in the form of conditions for payments that are believed to increase the chances for sustained impacts on the ground. These implications are important in the assessment of the potential of PES to operate as new and effective funding schemes for forest restoration. They are analyzed by looking at two prominent payments for watershed service programs in Indonesia-Cidanau (Banten province in Java) and West Lombok (Eastern Indonesia)-with combined economic and political science approaches. We derive lessons for the governance of funding efforts (e.g., multi-stakeholder agencies are not a guarantee of success; mixed results are obtained from a reliance on mandatory funding with ad hoc regulations, as opposed to voluntary contributions by the service beneficiary) and for the governance of financial expenditure (e.g., absolute need for evaluation procedures for the internal governance of farmer groups). Furthermore, we observe that these governance features provide no guarantee that restoration plots with the highest relevance for ecosystem services are targeted by the PES

Féminisation du corps médical et dynamiques professionnelles dans le champ de la santé

Si la féminisation du corps médical est désormais un phénomène massif dans tous les pays occidentaux, elle suscite des analyses quelque peu contradictoires. La plupart des études oscillent entre une posture « universaliste », supposant que les femmes médecins adopteront, à terme, les mêmes pratiques professionnelles que les générations précédentes, composées essentiellement d'hommes et une perspective d'inspiration « essentialiste », mettant largement l'accent sur les « spécificités » de l'exercice médical au féminin. Ici, nous montrons que les femmes médecins tendent effectivement à adopter des pratiques spécifiques, notamment en matière de gestion de l'interface vie familiale et vie professionnelle. Toutefois, ces soi-disant « spécificités féminines » sont de plus en plus souvent adoptées par des médecins hommes aussi. En effet, à partir du moment où ces hommes se trouvent en couple avec des femmes diplômées qui tiennent à rentabiliser leurs études sur le marché de l'emploi, il leur est tout aussi difficile de se conformer aux principes de « l'ethos » de la disponibilité permanente à l'égard des patients qui a longtemps prévalu dans cette profession en France. Si les hommes continuent de dominer les échelons supérieurs de la profession, ils n'échappent pas pour autant aux exigences de modification de leurs rapports à l'exercice médical et à la sphère domestique et familiale. L'analyse des dynamiques professionnelles exige donc une attention particulière à la dynamique du genre comme principe d'organisation de l'exercice médical