U.S. National Parks and "The Tragedy of the Commons" : A contribution to the characterization of U.S. mountain guides' professional practice

This paper aims at presenting the stakes related to the access to protected land in the United States and to its conservation, through the analysis of the professional practice of U.S. mountain guides. From a methodological standpoint, this research is based both on a theoretical analysis grounded in the field of environmental economics and on an empirical study. The authors' starting point is Garrett Hardin's paper, "The Tragedy of the Commons" (Science, 1968), even if it introduces some confusion on the notion of common goods. So as to avoid this confusion, the authors use two theoretical tools pertaining to a typology of common goods and the different property rights that can be applied in National Parks. Finally, they apply this framework to the observations made on the field in Colorado in July 2009.

Discours économique et évolution institutionnelle, les apports de J. R. Commons

John Roger Commons est, de manière quasi systématique, considéré comme l'un des pères fondateurs de l'ancien institutionnalisme américain. On souligne tout aussi couramment l'influence que la philosophie pragmatiste a pu avoir sur ses travaux, du moins en ce qui concerne son ouvrage de 1934. Plus rares sont les commentateurs soulignant le rôle qu'a le langage, a fortiori le langage de l'économiste, dans l'analyse qu'il fait de l'évolution institutionnelle. Notre but sera de souligner ce fait : pour Commons, dire c'est faire, dans la lignée de la linguistique performativiste, dire c'est agir sur l'évolution institutionnelle. Abstract : John Roger Commons is well known as one of the founders of old institutionnalism. It is current to emphazise his philosophical roots : the american pragmatism, at least in his masterpiece of 1934. On the other hand, it is less frequent to point out the important role that the langage, and a fortiori economics' langage, has in his understanding of institutional evolution. Our aim will be to spotlight this point : for Commons, we can do things with words, on the way of performativist linguistic, when we use words, we influence institutional evolution.