Effects of motive-oriented therapeutic relationship in a ten-session general psychiatric treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Motive-oriented therapeutic relationship (MOTR) was postulated to be a particularly helpful therapeutic ingredient in the early treatment phase of patients with personality disorders, in particular with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The present randomized controlled study using an add-on design is the first study to test this assumption in a 10-session general psychiatric treatment with patients presenting with BPD on symptom reduction and therapeutic alliance. Methods: A total of 85 patients were randomized. They were either allocated to a manual-based short variant of the general psychiatric management (GPM) treatment (in 10 sessions) or to the same treatment where MOTR was deliberately added to the treatment. Treatment attrition and integrity analyses yielded satisfactory results. Results: The results of the intent-to-treat analyses suggested a global efficacy of MOTR, in the sense of an additional reduction of general problems, i.e. symptoms, interpersonal and social problems (F1, 73 = 7.25, p < 0.05). However, they also showed that MOTR did not yield an additional reduction of specific borderline symptoms. It was also shown that a stronger therapeutic alliance, as assessed by the therapist, developed in MOTR treatments compared to GPM (Z55 = 0.99, p < 0.04). Conclusions: These results suggest that adding MOTR to psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatments of BPD is promising. Moreover, the findings shed additional light on the perspective of shortening treatments for patients presenting with BPD. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Zeichentheorie und BWL : Zur Anwendung semiotischer Erkentnisse im wirtschaftlichen Diskurs

Semiotics is hardly known in German business literature and management practice, despite the fact that its methodological approaches to discourse analysis have already been broadly absorbed by management theory in France and the United States. The present contribution points out why the general echo of semiotic theory and its numerous applications to business administration has remained limited so far, especially when compared with its potential for describing and explaining management problems. It is important, then, to show what the object of semiotic research is, independent of any semiotic orientation or school. What tools have been developed so far, and which discourses in business administration were chosen to apply these tools? The problems limiting a broader use of semiotic instruments in business administration are explained in detail, and the research perspectives are illustrated. Die in der deutschsprachigen Betriebswirtschaftslehre (BWL) noch wenig bekannte Semiotik und die in ihrem Rahmen entwickelten methodologischen Ansätze zur Analyse von Diskursen haben insbesondere in Frankreich und in den USA schon eine weite Verbreitung gefunden. Das Echo, auf welches die Semiotik trifft, bleibt im Vergleich zum Beitrag, den sie hinsichtlich der Beschreibung und Erklärung betriebswirtschaftlicher Tatbestände leisten könnte, noch sehr beschränkt - und dies, obwohl ihre grundsätzliche wissenschaftliche Leistungsfähigkeit inzwischen an Hand zahlreicher Beispiele aus dem betriebswirtschaftlichen Bereich belegt werden konnte. Es ist deshalb wichtig und interessant zu zeigen, was der Forschungsgegenstand der Semiotik ist - und zwar unabhängig von den verschiedenen Schulen der Semiotik. Welche Instrumente hat sie entwickelt? Auf welche betriebswirtschaftlichen Diskurse sind diese Instrumente bereits angewandt worden? Zum Schluss werden die Probleme dargestellt, die einen breiteren Einsatz semiotischer Instrumente in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre behindern und dabei auch die verschiedenen Forschungsrichtungen erläutert.