Robust discrimination between EEG responses to categories of environmental sounds in early coma.

Humans can recognize categories of environmental sounds, including vocalizations produced by humans and animals and the sounds of man-made objects. Most neuroimaging investigations of environmental sound discrimination have studied subjects while consciously perceiving and often explicitly recognizing the stimuli. Consequently, it remains unclear to what extent auditory object processing occurs independently of task demands and consciousness. Studies in animal models have shown that environmental sound discrimination at a neural level persists even in anesthetized preparations, whereas data from anesthetized humans has thus far provided null results. Here, we studied comatose patients as a model of environmental sound discrimination capacities during unconsciousness. We included 19 comatose patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) during the first 2 days of coma, while recording nineteen-channel electroencephalography (EEG). At the level of each individual patient, we applied a decoding algorithm to quantify the differential EEG responses to human vs. animal vocalizations as well as to sounds of living vocalizations vs. man-made objects. Discrimination between vocalization types was accurate in 11 patients and discrimination between sounds from living and man-made sources in 10 patients. At the group level, the results were significant only for the comparison between vocalization types. These results lay the groundwork for disentangling truly preferential activations in response to auditory categories, and the contribution of awareness to auditory category discrimination.

Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the theoretical and practical knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) by trained Air-rescue physicians in Switzerland. METHODS: Prospective anonymous observational study with a specially designed questionnaire. General knowledge of the GCS and its use in a clinical case were assessed. RESULTS: From 130 questionnaires send out, 103 were returned (response rate of 79.2%) and analyzed. Theoretical knowledge of the GCS was consistent for registrars, fellows, consultants and private practitioners active in physician-staffed helicopters. The clinical case was wrongly scored by 38 participants (36.9%). Wrong evaluation of the motor component occurred in 28 questionnaires (27.2%), and 19 errors were made for the verbal score (18.5%). Errors were made most frequently by registrars (47.5%, p = 0.09), followed by fellows (31.6%, p = 0.67) and private practitioners (18.4%, p = 1.00). Consultants made significantly less errors than the rest of the participating physicians (0%, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were shown between anesthetists, general practitioners, internal medicine trainees or others. CONCLUSION: Although the theoretical knowledge of the GCS by out-of-hospital physicians is correct, significant errors were made in scoring a clinical case. Less experienced physicians had a higher rate of errors. Further emphasis on teaching the GCS is mandatory.

Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians

Rapport de synthèse Introduction : Le Glasgow coma score (GCS) est un outil reconnu permettant l'évaluation des patients après avoir subi un traumatisme crânien. Il est réputé pour sa simplicité et sa reproductibilité permettant ainsi aux soignants une évaluation appropriée et continue du status neurologique des patients. Le GCS est composé de trois catégories évaluant la réponse oculaire, verbale et motrice. En Suisse, les soins préhospitaliers aux patients victimes d'un trauma crânien sévère sont effectués par des médecins, essdntiellement à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés. Avant une anesthésie générale nécessaire à ces patients, une évaluation du GCS est essentielle indiquant au personnel hospitalier la gravité des lésions cérébrales. Afin d'évaluer la connaissance du GCS par les médecins à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés en Suisse, nous avons élaboré un questionnaire, contenant dans une première partie des questions sur les connaissances générales du GCS suivi d'un cas clinique. Objectif : Evaluation des connaissances pratiques et théoriques du GCS par les médecins travaillant à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés en Suisse. Méthode : Etude observationnelle prospective et anonymisée à l'aide d'un questionnaire. Evaluation des connaissances générales du GCS et de son utilisation clinique lors de la présentation d'un cas. Résultats : 16 des 18 bases d'hélicoptères médicalisés suisses ont participé à notre étude. 130 questionnaires ont été envoyés et le taux de réponse a été de 79.2%. Les connaissances théoriques du GCS étaient comparables pour tous les médecins indépendamment de leur niveau de formation. Des erreurs dans l'appréciation du cas clinique étaient présentes chez 36.9% des participants. 27.2% ont commis des erreurs dans le score moteur et 18.5% dans le score verbal. Les erreurs ont été répertoriées le plus fréquemment chez les médecins assistants (47.5%, p=0.09), suivi par les chefs de clinique (31.6%, p=0.67) et les médecins installés en cabinet (18.4%, p=1.00). Les médecins cadres ont fait significativement moins d'erreurs que les autres participants (0%, p<0.05). Aucune différence significative n'à été observée entre les différentes spécialités (anesthésie, médecine interne, médecine général et «autres »). Conclusion Même si les connaissances théoriques du GCS sont adéquates parmi les médecins travaillant à bord des hélicoptères médicalisés, des erreurs dans son application clinique sont présentes dans plus d'un tiers des cas. Les médecins avec le moins d'expériences professionnelle font le plus d'erreurs. Au vu de l'importance de l'évaluation correcte du score de Glasgow initial, une amélioration des connaissances est indispensable.

Pronostic du coma après lésion cérébrale aiguë chez l'homme

Contexte: L'ensemble des phénomènes aigus suivant un arrêt cardio-respiratoire (ACR) est décrit sous le nom de maladie de post-réanimation (MPR) (post-resuscitation disease). Celle- ci est la conséquence du syndrome de reperfusion et est caractérisée par une réponse inflammatoire systémique intense, d'allure septique. La procalcitonine (PCT) est un marqueur aigu de la réponse inflammatoire systémique, qui a été beaucoup étudiée aux soins intensifs (SI) dans le contexte du sepsis, et constitue un outil diagnostic et pronostique important. Toutefois la PCT n'est pas un marqueur spécifique pour le sepsis mais peut également augmenter lors de réponse inflammatoire systémique d'origine non infectieuse. Objectifs: 1) Evaluer s'il existe une corrélation entre la valeur plasmatique de PCT et la MPR ; 2) examiner la relation entre le taux au pic de PCT et le pronostic des patients avec coma post-ACR ; 3) comparer la valeur pronostique de la PCT à celle d'un marqueur pronostic connu du coma post-anoxique tel que la neuron specific enolase (NSE). Méthodologie: Analyse d'une base de données prospective comprenant des patients admis aux SI du centre hospitalier universitaire vaudoise (CHUV) entre décembre 2009 et juillet 2011 en raison d'un ACR et traités par hypothermie thérapeutique (33 - 34 °C pendant 24h), selon notre protocole standard de prise en charge. La concentration plasmatique de PCT est mesurée à 24-72h après ACR, la valeur maximale (PCTmax) étant incluse dans l'analyse. La durée de l'arrêt circulatoire et le score de SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) sont utilisés pour quantifier la sévérité de la MPR. Le pronostic est composé de la mortalité hospitalière, ainsi que la mortalité et la récupération neurologique à trois mois, mesurée avec le score de « Cerebral Performance Categories » (CPC), dichotomisé en bonne récupération (CPC 1 = pas de handicap ; CPC 2 = handicap modéré) et mauvaise récupération (CPC 3 = handicap sévère ; CPC 4 = état végétatif ; CPC 5 = décès). Résultats: 68 patients consécutifs (âge médian 65 ans, durée médiane totale de l'arrêt circulatoire [time to ROSC] 20.5 min) ont été étudiés. La PCTmax corrélait avec la durée de l'arrêt circulatoire (p = 0.001) ainsi qu'avec les scores de SOFA à l'admission et aux jours 1 et 2 (p<0.001 pour les trois associations). Une association significative a été observée entre la PCTmax et la survie hospitalière (médiane 3.9 [écart interquartile (EI) 1.0 - 16.8] chez les non-survivants vs. 1.4 [EI 0.6 - 6.2] ng/ml chez les survivants, p=0.032) et à trois mois (médiane 3.8 ([EI 1.0 - 15.6] vs. 1.4 [EI 0.5 - 6.0] ng/ml, p=0.034). La PCTmax était aussi plus basse chez les patients avec bonne récupération neurologique à trois mois (p=0.064). En comparaison avec la NSEmax, la PCTmax avait une valeur prédictive supérieure pour la sévérité de la maladie de post-réanimation et inférieure pour le pronostic. Conclusions: La valeur plasmatique maximale de PCT corrèle avec la sévérité de la MPR et est associé à la mortalité et à l'état neurologique à trois mois après coma post-anoxique. Ces données suggèrent que la PCT peut être un marqueur utile dans la prise en charge des patients comateux après ACR et hypothermie thérapeutique. Des études à plus large échelle sont en cours pour confirmer ces résultats.

Progression of auditory discrimination based on neural decoding predicts awakening from coma.

Auditory evoked potentials are informative of intact cortical functions of comatose patients. The integrity of auditory functions evaluated using mismatch negativity paradigms has been associated with their chances of survival. However, because auditory discrimination is assessed at various delays after coma onset, it is still unclear whether this impairment depends on the time of the recording. We hypothesized that impairment in auditory discrimination capabilities is indicative of coma progression, rather than of the comatose state itself and that rudimentary auditory discrimination remains intact during acute stages of coma. We studied 30 post-anoxic comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest and five healthy, age-matched controls. Using a mismatch negativity paradigm, we performed two electroencephalography recordings with a standard 19-channel clinical montage: the first within 24 h after coma onset and under mild therapeutic hypothermia, and the second after 1 day and under normothermic conditions. We analysed electroencephalography responses based on a multivariate decoding algorithm that automatically quantifies neural discrimination at the single patient level. Results showed high average decoding accuracy in discriminating sounds both for control subjects and comatose patients. Importantly, accurate decoding was largely independent of patients' chance of survival. However, the progression of auditory discrimination between the first and second recordings was informative of a patient's chance of survival. A deterioration of auditory discrimination was observed in all non-survivors (equivalent to 100% positive predictive value for survivors). We show, for the first time, evidence of intact auditory processing even in comatose patients who do not survive and that progression of sound discrimination over time is informative of a patient's chance of survival. Tracking auditory discrimination in comatose patients could provide new insight to the chance of awakening in a quantitative and automatic fashion during early stages of coma.

Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years.

BACKGROUND: Age and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission are considered important predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury. We investigated the predictive value of the GCS in a large group of patients whose computerised multimodal bedside monitoring data had been collected over the previous 10 years. METHODS: Data from 358 subjects with head injury, collected between 1992 and 2001, were analysed retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to year of admission. Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) were determined at six months. Spearman's correlation coefficients between GCS and GOS scores were calculated for each year. RESULTS: On average 34 (SD: 7) patients were monitored every year. We found a significant correlation between the GCS and GOS for the first five years (overall 1992-1996: r = 0.41; p<0.00001; n = 183) and consistent lack of correlations from 1997 onwards (overall 1997-2001: r = 0.091; p = 0.226; n = 175). In contrast, correlations between age and GOS were in both time periods significant and similar (r = -0.24 v r = -0.24; p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The admission GCS lost its predictive value for outcome in this group of patients from 1997 onwards. The predictive value of the GCS should be carefully reconsidered when building prognostic models incorporating multimodality monitoring after head injury.

Automated auditory mismatch negativity paradigm improves coma prognostic accuracy after cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermia.

PURPOSE: EEG and somatosensory evoked potential are highly predictive of poor outcome after cardiac arrest; their accuracy for good recovery is however low. We evaluated whether addition of an automated mismatch negativity-based auditory discrimination paradigm (ADP) to EEG and somatosensory evoked potential improves prediction of awakening. METHODS: EEG and ADP were prospectively recorded in 30 adults during therapeutic hypothermia and in normothermia. We studied the progression of auditory discrimination on single-trial multivariate analyses from therapeutic hypothermia to normothermia, and its correlation to outcome at 3 months, assessed with cerebral performance categories. RESULTS: At 3 months, 18 of 30 patients (60%) survived; 5 had severe neurologic impairment (cerebral performance categories = 3) and 13 had good recovery (cerebral performance categories = 1-2). All 10 subjects showing improvements of auditory discrimination from therapeutic hypothermia to normothermia regained consciousness: ADP was 100% predictive for awakening. The addition of ADP significantly improved mortality prediction (area under the curve, 0.77 for standard model including clinical examination, EEG, somatosensory evoked potential, versus 0.86 after adding ADP, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This automated ADP significantly improves early coma prognostic accuracy after cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermia. The progression of auditory discrimination is strongly predictive of favorable recovery and appears complementary to existing prognosticators of poor outcome. Before routine implementation, validation on larger cohorts is warranted.

Adrenal crisis presenting as hypoglycemic coma.

An 18-month-old male infant presented with hypoglycemic coma and clinical signs of bronchopneumonia. He was suspected of suffering from septic shock. The patient progressed to irreversible multiple organ failure before the diagnosis of adrenal crisis was established. Plasma levels of ACTH and cortisol remained undetectable. Renin and aldosterone were normal. An autopsy failed to demonstrate any adrenal gland cortical tissue. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated the presence of all pituitary hormones except ACTH, establishing the diagnosis of isolated ACTH deficiency. Intensive care clinicians should consider adrenal crisis in non-diabetic children with hypoglycemia and rapid circulatory deterioration.

Automated quantitative pupillometry for the prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Sedation and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) delay neurological responses and might reduce the accuracy of clinical examination to predict outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). We examined the accuracy of quantitative pupillary light reactivity (PLR), using an automated infrared pupillometry, to predict outcome of post-CA coma in comparison to standard PLR, EEG, and somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP). METHODS: We prospectively studied over a 1-year period (June 2012-June 2013) 50 consecutive comatose CA patients treated with TH (33 °C, 24 h). Quantitative PLR (expressed as the % of pupillary response to a calibrated light stimulus) and standard PLR were measured at day 1 (TH and sedation; on average 16 h after CA) and day 2 (normothermia, off sedation: on average 46 h after CA). Neurological outcome was assessed at 90 days with Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC), dichotomized as good (CPC 1-2) versus poor (CPC 3-5). Predictive performance was analyzed using area under the ROC curves (AUC). RESULTS: Patients with good outcome [n = 23 (46 %)] had higher quantitative PLR than those with poor outcome [n = 27; 16 (range 9-23) vs. 10 (1-30) % at day 1, and 20 (13-39) vs. 11 (1-55) % at day 2, both p < 0.001]. Best cut-off for outcome prediction of quantitative PLR was <13 %. The AUC to predict poor outcome was higher for quantitative than for standard PLR at both time points (day 1, 0.79 vs. 0.56, p = 0.005; day 2, 0.81 vs. 0.64, p = 0.006). Prognostic accuracy of quantitative PLR was comparable to that of EEG and SSEP (0.81 vs. 0.80 and 0.73, respectively, both p > 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative PLR is more accurate than standard PLR in predicting outcome of post-anoxic coma, irrespective of temperature and sedation, and has comparable prognostic accuracy than EEG and SSEP.

Prognostic value of continuous eeg monitoring during therapeutic hypothermia in patients with coma after cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION: Continuous EEG (cEEG) is increasingly used to monitor brain function in neuro-ICU patients. However, its value in patients with coma after cardiac arrest (CA), particularly in the setting of therapeutic hypothermia (TH), is only beginning to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to examine whether cEEG performed during TH may predict outcome. METHODS: From April 2009 to April 2010, we prospectively studied 34 consecutive comatose patients treated with TH after CA who were monitored with cEEG, initiated during hypothermia and maintained after rewarming. EEG background reactivity to painful stimulation was tested. We analyzed the association between cEEG findings and neurologic outcome, assessed at 2 months with the Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC). RESULTS: Continuous EEG recording was started 12 ± 6 hours after CA and lasted 30 ± 11 hours. Nonreactive cEEG background (12 of 15 (75%) among nonsurvivors versus none of 19 (0) survivors; P < 0.001) and prolonged discontinuous "burst-suppression" activity (11 of 15 (73%) versus none of 19; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality. EEG seizures with absent background reactivity also differed significantly (seven of 15 (47%) versus none of 12 (0); P = 0.001). In patients with nonreactive background or seizures/epileptiform discharges on cEEG, no improvement was seen after TH. Nonreactive cEEG background during TH had a positive predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74 to 100%) and a false-positive rate of 0 (95% CI, 0 to 18%) for mortality. All survivors had cEEG background reactivity, and the majority of them (14 (74%) of 19) had a favorable outcome (CPC 1 or 2). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous EEG monitoring showing a nonreactive or discontinuous background during TH is strongly associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with coma after CA. These data warrant larger studies to confirm the value of continuous EEG monitoring in predicting prognosis after CA and TH.

Glasgow Coma Score für den Patienten mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma [Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury].

Even 30 years after its first publication the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is still used worldwide to describe and assess coma. The GCS consists of three components, the ocular, motor and verbal response to standardized stimulation, and is used as a severity of illness indicator for coma of various origins. The GCS facilitates information transfer and monitoring changes in coma. In addition, it is used as a triage tool in patients with traumatic brain injury. Its prognostic value regarding the outcome after a traumatic brain injury still lacks evidence. One of the main problems is the evaluation of the GCS in sedated, paralysed and/or intubated patients. A multitude of pseudoscores exists but a universal definition has yet to be defined.

Contemporary approach to neurologic prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest.

Coma after cardiac arrest (CA) is an important cause of admission to the ICU. Prognosis of post-CA coma has significantly improved over the past decade, particularly because of aggressive postresuscitation care and the use of therapeutic targeted temperature management (TTM). TTM and sedatives used to maintain controlled cooling might delay neurologic reflexes and reduce the accuracy of clinical examination. In the early ICU phase, patients' good recovery may often be indistinguishable (based on neurologic examination alone) from patients who eventually will have a poor prognosis. Prognostication of post-CA coma, therefore, has evolved toward a multimodal approach that combines neurologic examination with EEG and evoked potentials. Blood biomarkers (eg, neuron-specific enolase [NSE] and soluble 100-β protein) are useful complements for coma prognostication; however, results vary among commercial laboratory assays, and applying one single cutoff level (eg, > 33 μg/L for NSE) for poor prognostication is not recommended. Neuroimaging, mainly diffusion MRI, is emerging as a promising tool for prognostication, but its precise role needs further study before it can be widely used. This multimodal approach might reduce false-positive rates of poor prognosis, thereby providing optimal prognostication of comatose CA survivors. The aim of this review is to summarize studies and the principal tools presently available for outcome prediction and to describe a practical approach to the multimodal prognostication of coma after CA, with a particular focus on neuromonitoring tools. We also propose an algorithm for the optimal use of such multimodal tools during the early ICU phase of post-CA coma.