Auguste Ott on Commercial Crises and Distributive Justice: An Early Input-Output Scheme

In 1851 the French Social economist Auguste Ott discussed the problem of gluts and commercial crises, together with the issue of distributive justice between workers in co-operative societies. He did so by means of a 'simple reproduction scheme' sharing some features with modern intersectoral transactions tables, in particular in terms of their graphical representation. This paper presents Ott's theory of crises (which was based on the disappointment of expectations) and the context of his model, and discusses its peculiarities, supplying a new piece for the reconstruction of the prehistory of input-output analysis.

Students support demographically-based quotas with distributive justice rules favoring their selection at university

We manipulate distributive justice rules of demographic quotas in university selection. Results show that quotas involving students' need are preferred over equity and authority ranking quotas. International students also differentiate more between quotas than locals, preferring those advantaging them. This suggests that universities should consider students' need in their selection.

Dealing with clients' diversity in test situations: Client categorisations in psychologists' accounts of their practices

Reducing a test administration to standardised procedures reflects the test designers' standpoint. However, from the practitioners' standpoint, each client is unique. How do psychologists deal with both standardised test administration and clients' diversity? To answer this question, we interviewed 17 psychologists working in three public services for children and adolescents about their assessment practices. We analysed the numerous "client categorisations" they produced in their accounts. We found that they had shared perceptions about their clients' diversity, and reported various non-standard practices that complemented standardised test administration, but also differed from them or were even forbidden. They seem to experience a dilemma between: (a) prescribed and situated practices; (b) scientific and situated reliability; (c) commutative and distributive justice. For practitioners, dealing with clients' diversity this is a practical problem, halfway between a problem-solving task and a moral dilemma.

Do resources, justice administration practices and federalism have an impact on registered and sentenced crime prevalence ?

This contribution, based on a statistical approach, undertakes to link data on resources (personnel and financial means) and the working of the administration of penal justice (prosecution, sentencing) taking into account the nationality of those prosecuted. In order to be able to distinguish prosecution and sentencing practices of judicial authorities and possible processes of discrimination, diverse sources have been used such as data from court administrations, public finances and police forces, collected by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office and the Swiss Federal administration of finances. The authors discuss discrimination in prosecution and sentencing between Swiss residents and foreigners taking into account localization and resources regarding personnel and public finances.

What Kind of Justice Today ? Expectations Of 'Good Justice', Convergences And Divergences Between Managerial And Judicial Actors And How They Fit Within Management-Oriented Values

This research aims toward a better understanding of the organizational culture(s) of the judiciary in Switzerland by analysing what 'good justice' means nowadays in this country. It seeks to clarify whether, and to what extent, expectations of 'good justice' of judicial actors (judges without managerial experience) and of managerial actors (court managers) are similar and to describe possible managerial implications that may result from this. As judges are at the heart of the judicial organization and exert a strong influence on other groups of actors (Sullivan, Warren et al. 1994), the congruence of their expectations with those of court managers will be at the centre of the analysis. Additionally, referring to the conceptual worlds of Boltanski and Thévenaut (1991), we analyze how closely these expectations are to management-oriented values. We found that almost half of expectations are common to the two groups examined and the main quoted ones are compatible to new public management (NPM) concepts. On the other hand, those expectations shared exclusively by judges relate to the human side of justice, whereas those specific to court managers focus on the way justice functions.

Allocation d'organes et exigences de justice

(Résumé de l'ouvrage) Die Verteilung knapper menschlicher Organe wirft schwierige Fragen der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit und der Organisation auf. Rein medizinische Aussagen etwa über die Überlebenschance eines Organs in einem bestimmten Empfänger sind vorausgesetzt, bestimmen aber nie allein die Entscheidung. Effizienzüberlegungen sprechen zwar häufig für die primäre Berücksichtigung des Empfängers mit der grössten Lebenserwartung. Schon der Einbezug qualitativer Kriterien für die Überlebensphase kompliziert die Materie, erst recht aber die Berücksichtigung auch der Wartezeit als Element der Gleichbehandlung, der Dringlichkeit für den Empfänger oder gar von Marktkriterien. Auch die Frage einer Priorität für den seinerseits Spendewilligen wird kontrovers diskutiert. Und selbst dann, wenn man sich über die Gewichtung der unterschiedlichen Kriterien von Verteilungsgerechtigkeit einig wäre, bliebe immer noch die optimale organisatorische Durchsetzung dieser Entscheidung zu klären: soll man zum Beispiel mit regionalen, nationalen oder übernationalen Pools arbeiten? Die zweite Tagung im Tagungszyklus zu Grundsatzfragen der Transplantationsmedizin erörterte Themen rund um die Allokationproblematik bei Organen. Referenten aus verschiedenen Ländern, Sprachregionen und Disziplinen sprachen über medizinische, ethische, juristische, aber auch ökonomische Aspekte der Verteilung von Organen.