Parent-child agreement and prevalence estimates of diagnoses in childhood: direct interview versus family history method.

Diagnostic information on children is typically elicited from both children and their parents. The aims of the present paper were to: (1) compare prevalence estimates according to maternal reports, paternal reports and direct interviews of children [major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety and attention-deficit and disruptive behavioural disorders]; (2) assess mother-child, father-child and inter-parental agreement for these disorders; (3) determine the association between several child, parent and familial characteristics and the degree of diagnostic agreement or the likelihood of parental reporting; (4) determine the predictive validity of diagnostic information provided by parents and children. Analyses were based on 235 mother-offspring, 189 father-offspring and 128 mother-father pairs. Diagnostic assessment included the Kiddie-schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) (offspring) and the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) (parents and offspring at follow-up) interviews. Parental reports were collected using the Family History - Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC). Analyses revealed: (1) prevalence estimates for internalizing disorders were generally lower according to parental information than according to the K-SADS; (2) mother-child and father-child agreement was poor and within similar ranges; (3) parents with a history of MDD or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) reported these disorders in their children more frequently; (4) in a sub-sample followed-up into adulthood, diagnoses of MDD, separation anxiety and conduct disorder at baseline concurred with the corresponding lifetime diagnosis at age 19 according to the child rather than according to the parents. In conclusion, our findings support large discrepancies of diagnostic information provided by parents and children with generally lower reporting of internalizing disorders by parents, and differential reporting of depression and ADHD by parental disease status. Follow-up data also supports the validity of information provided by adolescent offspring.

Disease identification based on ambulatory drugs dispensation and in-hospital ICD-10 diagnoses: a comparison.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy-based case mix measures are an alternative source of information to the relatively scarce outpatient diagnoses data. But most published tools use national drug nomenclatures and offer no head-to-head comparisons between drugs-related and diagnoses-based categories. The objective of the study was to test the accuracy of drugs-based morbidity groups derived from the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification of drugs by checking them against diagnoses-based groups. METHODS: We compared drugs-based categories with their diagnoses-based analogues using anonymous data on 108,915 individuals insured with one of four companies. They were followed throughout 2005 and 2006 and hospitalized at least once during this period. The agreement between the two approaches was measured by weighted kappa coefficients. The reproducibility of the drugs-based morbidity measure over the 2 years was assessed for all enrollees. RESULTS: Eighty percent used a drug associated with at least one of the 60 morbidity categories derived from drugs dispensation. After accounting for inpatient under-coding, fifteen conditions agreed sufficiently with their diagnoses-based counterparts to be considered alternative strategies to diagnoses. In addition, they exhibited good reproducibility and allowed prevalence estimates in accordance with national estimates. For 22 conditions, drugs-based information identified accurately a subset of the population defined by diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Most categories provide insurers with health status information that could be exploited for healthcare expenditure prediction or ambulatory cost control, especially when ambulatory diagnoses are not available. However, due to insufficient concordance with their diagnoses-based analogues, their use for morbidity indicators is limited.

Refining abacavir hypersensitivity diagnoses using a structured clinical assessment and genetic testing in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the value of a structured clinical assessment and genetic testing for refining the diagnosis of abacavir hypersensitivity reactions (ABC-HSRs) in a routine clinical setting. METHODS: We performed a diagnostic reassessment using a structured patient chart review in individuals who had stopped ABC because of suspected HSR. Two HIV physicians blinded to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing results independently classified these individuals on a scale between 3 (ABC-HSR highly likely) and -3 (ABC-HSR highly unlikely). Scoring was based on symptoms, onset of symptoms and comedication use. Patients were classified as clinically likely (mean score > or =2), uncertain (mean score > or = -1 and < or = 1) and unlikely (mean score < or = -2). HLA typing was performed using sequence-based methods. RESULTS: From 131 reassessed individuals, 27 (21%) were classified as likely, 43 (33%) as unlikely and 61 (47%) as uncertain ABC-HSR. Of the 131 individuals with suspected ABC-HSR, 31% were HLA-B*5701-positive compared with 1% of 140 ABC-tolerant controls (P < 0.001). HLA-B*5701 carriage rate was higher in individuals with likely ABC-HSR compared with those with uncertain or unlikely ABC-HSR (78%, 30% and 5%, respectively, P < 0.001). Only six (7%) HLA-B*5701-negative individuals were classified as likely HSR after reassessment. CONCLUSIONS: HLA-B*5701 carriage is highly predictive of clinically diagnosed ABC-HSR. The high proportion of HLA-B*5701-negative individuals with minor symptoms among individuals with suspected HSR indicates overdiagnosis of ABC-HSR in the era preceding genetic screening. A structured clinical assessment and genetic testing could reduce the rate of inappropriate ABC discontinuation and identify individuals at high risk for ABC-HSR.

New diagnoses of dementia among older patients admitted to postacute care

Introduction : bien que la prévalence des syndromes démentiels soit élevée chez les personnes âgées hospitalisées et qu'une proportion non négligeable échappe au diagnostic, la littérature ne fournit que peu de données chez les patients admis en milieu de réadaptation post-aigu. L'objectif principal de ce travail était de déterminer la prévalence des démences, ainsi que la proportion de démences non diagnostiquées dans une population admise dans un centre de réadaptation gériatrique. Ensuite, nous nous sommes intéressés à identifier les caractéristiques des patients associées à une démence non-détectée. Méthode : nous avons utilisé les données de tous les patients âgés de 70 ans et plus admis durant 3 ans dans l'unité de réadaptation du service de gériatrie et réadaptation gériatrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vtudois, en excluant les patients décédés pendant l'hospitalisation. Lors de l'admission, des données sociodémographiques, médicales, ainsi que des données concernant le status fonctionnel et mental sont récoltées systématiquement. Par ailleurs, les dossiers des patients ont été examinés pour en extraire les informations quant aux performances cognitive (mini-Mental State Exam, MMSE) et au diagnostic de sortie. Résultats : un diagnostic de démence figurait dans la lettre de sortie de 425 des 1764 patients (24.1%), plus de la moitié présentant une démence de type Alzheimer. Pour 301 de ces 425 patients (70.8%), la démence avait été diagnostiquée durant le séjour de réadaptation. La proportion de démences non-détectées auparavant était plus élevée chez les patients provenant des services de chirurgie/orthopédie que de médecine interne (74.8% vs 65.8%, p=.42). Les patients non diagnostiqués comme déments étaient plus âgés, vivaient plus souvent seuls et avaient de meilleures performances fonctionnelles et cognitives que ceux chez qui le diagnostic avait été posé auparavant. Notamment, un tiers d'entre eux avait un score normal au MMSE. Une analyse multi-variée a mis en évidence deux facteurs prédisposant à la non-détection : l'âge (Odds Ratio (OR) : 2.4 pour le groupe d'âge 85 ans et plus par rapport aux plus jeunes, 96%CI : 1.5-4.0, p=.001) et le score au MMSE (OR : 5.9 lors d'un MMSE normal à l'admission, 96%CI : 2.7-12.7, p<.001) Conclusion et perspectives : cette étude montre qu'environ un quart des patients admis en réadaptation gériatrique souffre de démence, et que cette pathologie n'est pas reconnue chez les trois-quarts d'entre eux. Ces résultats soulignent la nécessité d'un dépistage systématique des troubles cognitifs chez les patients âgés. En effet, en l'absence de détection, ces patients ne peuvent bénéficier d'une prise en charge approprié, incluant non seulement des mesures médicales et pharmacologiques, mais surtout l'information du patient et des proches, dans le but de maintenir une qualité de vie acceptable du patient ainsi que de prévenir l'épuisement des proches et des.soignants. Cette étude incite aussi à être attentif aux signes évocateurs de troubles cognitifs lors de l'interprétation du test MMSE, car un score dans les limites de la norme ne permet pas d'exclure une démence.

New diagnoses of dementia among older patients admitted to postacute care.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of dementia and the proportion of undiagnosed dementia in elderly patients admitted to postacute care, and to identify patients' characteristics associated with undiagnosed dementia. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Academic postacute rehabilitation facility in Lausanne, Switzerland. Participants: Patients (N = 1764) aged 70 years and older. Measurements: Data on socio-demographic, medical, functional, and affective status were collected upon admission. Data on cognitive performance (Mini-Mental State Exam [MMSE]), and cognition-related discharge diagnoses were abstracted through a structured review of discharge summaries. Results: Overall, 24.1% (425/1764) patients had a diagnosis of dementia, most frequently secondary to Alzheimer's disease (260/425, 61.2%). Among dementia cases, 70.8% (301/425) were newly diagnosed during postacute stay. This proportion was lower among patients referred from internal medicine than from orthopedic/surgery services (65.8% versus 74.8%, P = .042). Compared to patients with already diagnosed dementia, those newly diagnosed were older, lived alone more frequently, and had better functional status and MMSE score at admission (all P < .05). In multivariate analysis, previously undetected dementia remained associated with older age (OR = 2.4 for age 85 years and older, 95% CI 1.5-4.0, P = .001) and normal MMSE at admission (OR = 5.9, 95% CI 2.7-12.7, P < .001). Conclusion: Dementia was present in almost a fourth of elderly patients referred to postacute care, but was diagnosed in less than a third before admission. Oldest old patients appear especially at risk for underrecognition. These results emphasize the high diagnostic yield of systematic cognitive assessment in the postacute care setting to improve these patients' management and quality of life.

Diagnostics VIH tardifs en 2009 en Suisse: motivation a un dépistage systématique du VIH [Late diagnoses of HIV infection in 2009 in Switzerland: towards a universal HIV testing?]

Individuals who are unaware of their HIV infection constitute a fragile and a critical population both from a personal and from a community-based point of view: if the infection is diagnosed too late, the outcome can be complicated by AIDS-defining diseases, whose prognosis may remain unfavourable even after the initiation of a potent antiretroviral therapy. These patients contribute to the virus spreading into the community, owing to a high viral load. It is now necessary to recognise the limits of a risk behaviour and disease-driven HIV screening policy. Since 2006, the American guidelines recommend a routine HIV testing for all patients age 13 to 64 years unless they specifically refuse the test (opt-out). In Switzerland, the recommendations remain so far risk-centred.

Diagnostic interview for genetic studies (DIGS): inter-rater and test-retest reliability of alcohol and drug diagnoses

The semi-structured diagnostic interview for genetic studies (DIGS) was developed to assess major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum manifestations in genetic studies. Our research group developed a French version of the DIGS and tested its inter-rater and test-retest reliability in psychiatric patients. In this article, we present estimates of the reliability of substance use and antisocial personality disorders. High kappa coefficients for inter-rater reliability were found for drug and alcohol as well as antisocial personality diagnoses and slightly lower kappas for test-retest reliability. Combined with evidence of the reliability of major mood and psychotic disorders, these findings support the suitability of the DIGS for studies of familial aggregation and comorbidity of psychiatric disorders including substance use and antisocial personality disorders.

The validity of clinical diagnoses of dementia in a group of consecutively autopsied memory clinic patients.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies show that up to 10% of individuals aged 65 years and older suffer from dementia, most commonly from dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DAT) (1). Clinicopathological studies are critical to our understanding of this disease and improving the accuracy of clinical diagnoses. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to examine the validity of clinical diagnoses of DAT, to determine the prevalence of different forms of dementia in this sample, and to investigate the relationship between age at death and polymorbidity. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Clinical data were available from 221 patients who had been examined at the Basel Memory Clinic between 1986 and 1996. From this population, 34% (75 patients) were autopsied in the Department of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, and neuropathological examinations were additionally performed on 62 (83%) of these patients. Clinical and neuropathological data were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: 67.8% of the neuropathologically examined patients received a definitive diagnosis of AD (Alzheimer's disease), vascular dementia (VaD) or mixed dementia (AD and VaD). AD alone or with other histopathological hallmarks of dementia was the most prevalent neuropathological diagnosis (63%). VaD was deemed the only cause of dementia in only 4.8% of patients. The sensitivity for DAT was 75.9%, the specificity 60.6%. Increasing age was associated with an increasing number of clinical and neuropathological diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnoses of DAT found in our study are similar to previous reports (2-5). Older patients had more etiologies of their dementia than younger patients. This study reaffirms the need for internationally accepted criteria for clinical and neuropathological diagnoses, as well as further clinical-neuropathological investigations to further refine the clinical diagnostic process.