On y voit rien. Le recours aux sources de presse pour l'analyse des mobilisations protestataires

Aujourd'hui la PEA est devenue la méthode la plus employée dans le champ des études de mobilisation. Toutefois, il est frappant que les limites, nombreuses, de cette méthode, demeurent peu explorées, malgré une abondante littérature critique. C'est à ces questions des biais propres aux sources de presse dans le cadre de la PEA et aux moyens de les explorer que ce working paper se consacre. Nous commencerons par montrer, en deux temps, comment la question de la systématicité gagne à être explorée à partir d'enquêtes qualitatives, en nous appuyant sur un travail inédit mené naguère auprès du journal Le Monde, dans le cadre d'une recherche collective sur les transformations de l'activisme environnemental en Europe, dont les données seront comparées avec des sources de police, le dépouillement des dépêches de l'Agence France-Presse sur six mois, et surtout une série d'interviews avec des journalistes spécialisés dans l'environnement. L'on revient dans un second temps à la question de la sélectivité des sources en tentant de montrer comment dans toute une série de circonstances et pour toute une série de groupes, les luttes ne sauraient se réduire ni aux événements protestataires ni à un appel à l'Etat ou à l'opinion. L'on espère ainsi proposer des moyens de se garder d'un défaut commun à tout conventionnalisme méthodologique qui, ici comme ailleurs, frappe la recherche, soit la réitération de mesures conventionnelles ayant pour effet de les institutionnaliser en dehors de toute réflexion sur leur pertinence. Protest Events Analysis (PEA) has by no doubts become one the most used method in the field of social movement research. Yet, the numerous biases of that method have not been explored completely, despite a rich litterature. Our paper first proposes a discussion of the systematicity of biases, based on an empirical research on environmental journalists in various French newspapers and Agence France press. Secondly, we deal with the question of selectivity of biases. Finally, we propose some methodological recommendations in order to improve our understanding of social movements and to avoid methodological conventionalism.

Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants.

One of the global targets for non-communicable diseases is to halt, by 2025, the rise in the age-standardised adult prevalence of diabetes at its 2010 levels. We aimed to estimate worldwide trends in diabetes, how likely it is for countries to achieve the global target, and how changes in prevalence, together with population growth and ageing, are affecting the number of adults with diabetes. We pooled data from population-based studies that had collected data on diabetes through measurement of its biomarkers. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate trends in diabetes prevalence-defined as fasting plasma glucose of 7.0 mmol/L or higher, or history of diagnosis with diabetes, or use of insulin or oral hypoglycaemic drugs-in 200 countries and territories in 21 regions, by sex and from 1980 to 2014. We also calculated the posterior probability of meeting the global diabetes target if post-2000 trends continue. We used data from 751 studies including 4,372,000 adults from 146 of the 200 countries we make estimates for. Global age-standardised diabetes prevalence increased from 4.3% (95% credible interval 2.4-7.0) in 1980 to 9.0% (7.2-11.1) in 2014 in men, and from 5.0% (2.9-7.9) to 7.9% (6.4-9.7) in women. The number of adults with diabetes in the world increased from 108 million in 1980 to 422 million in 2014 (28.5% due to the rise in prevalence, 39.7% due to population growth and ageing, and 31.8% due to interaction of these two factors). Age-standardised adult diabetes prevalence in 2014 was lowest in northwestern Europe, and highest in Polynesia and Micronesia, at nearly 25%, followed by Melanesia and the Middle East and north Africa. Between 1980 and 2014 there was little change in age-standardised diabetes prevalence in adult women in continental western Europe, although crude prevalence rose because of ageing of the population. By contrast, age-standardised adult prevalence rose by 15 percentage points in men and women in Polynesia and Micronesia. In 2014, American Samoa had the highest national prevalence of diabetes (>30% in both sexes), with age-standardised adult prevalence also higher than 25% in some other islands in Polynesia and Micronesia. If post-2000 trends continue, the probability of meeting the global target of halting the rise in the prevalence of diabetes by 2025 at the 2010 level worldwide is lower than 1% for men and is 1% for women. Only nine countries for men and 29 countries for women, mostly in western Europe, have a 50% or higher probability of meeting the global target. Since 1980, age-standardised diabetes prevalence in adults has increased, or at best remained unchanged, in every country. Together with population growth and ageing, this rise has led to a near quadrupling of the number of adults with diabetes worldwide. The burden of diabetes, both in terms of prevalence and number of adults affected, has increased faster in low-income and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Wellcome Trust.