Increased clozapine plasma concentrations and side effects induced by smoking cessation in 2 CYP1A2 genotyped patients.

Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic, depends mainly on cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) for its metabolic clearance. CYP1A2 is inducible by smoking, and lower plasma concentrations of clozapine are measured in smokers than in nonsmokers. Case reports have been published on the effects of discontinuing smoking in patients receiving clozapine, which might lead to elevated plasma concentrations and severe side effects. We present 2 cases on the consequences of smoking cessation in patients receiving this drug. In the first patient, smoking cessation resulted, within 2 weeks, in severe sedation and fatigue, with an approximately 3-fold increase of plasma clozapine concentrations. In the second patient, a very high plasma concentration of clozapine (3004 ng/mL) was measured 6 days following a 16-day stay in a general hospital, during which smoking was prohibited. In the latter patient, the replacement of omeprazole, a strong CYP1A2 inducer, by pantoprazole, a weaker CYP1A2 inducer, could have contributed, in addition to smoking cessation, to the observed strong increase of plasma clozapine concentrations. Genotyping of the 2 patients revealed that they were carriers of the AA genotype for the -164C>A polymorphism (CYP1A2*1F) in intron 1 of CYP1A2 gene, which has previously been shown to confer a high inducibility of CYP1A2 by smoking. Thus, at the initiation of clozapine treatment, smoking patients should be informed that, if they decide to stop smoking, they are encouraged to do so but must inform their prescriber beforehand. Also, because of the increased use of no-smoking policies in many hospitals, studies examining the consequences of such policies on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, taking into account different CYP1A2 genotypes, are needed.

ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 polymorphisms: clinical pharmacogenetics of clozapine.

To examine the genetic factors influencing clozapine kinetics in vivo, 75 patients treated with clozapine were genotyped for CYPs and ABCB1 polymorphisms and phenotyped for CYP1A2 and CYP3A activity. CYP1A2 activity and dose-corrected trough steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine correlated significantly (r = -0.61; P = 1 x 10), with no influence of the CYP1A2*1F genotype (P = 0.38). CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (*2/*2 genotype) had 2.3-fold higher (P = 0.036) clozapine concentrations than the extensive metabolizers (non-*2/*2). In patients comedicated with fluvoxamine, a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor, clozapine and norclozapine concentrations correlate with CYP3A activity (r = 0.44, P = 0.075; r = 0.63, P = 0.007, respectively). Carriers of the ABCB1 3435TT genotype had a 1.6-fold higher clozapine plasma concentrations than noncarriers (P = 0.046). In conclusion, this study has shown for the first time a significant in vivo role of CYP2C19 and the P-gp transporter in the pharmacokinetics of clozapine. CYP1A2 is the main CYP isoform involved in clozapine metabolism, with CYP2C19 contributing moderately, and CYP3A4 contributing only in patients with reduced CYP1A2 activity. In addition, ABCB1, but not CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, nor CYP3A7 polymorphisms, influence clozapine pharmacokinetics.

ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 polymorphisms : clinical pharmacogenetics of clozapine

Résumé : Dans le but d'examiner les facteurs génétiques qui influencent la pharmacocinétique de la clozapine in vivo, 75 patients traités avec ce médicament antipsychotique ont été genotypés pour les polymorphismes CYP et ABCB1, et phénotypés pour l'activité de CYP1A2 et CYP3A. L'activité de CYP1A2 et les taux plasmatiques de clozapine en steady-state corrèlent d'une manière significative (r=0.61; p=1x10), sans influence du génotype de CYP1A2*1F (p=0.38). Les métaboliseurs déficients CYP2C19 (génotype *2/*2 genotype) avaient des concentrations de clozapine 2,3 fois (p=0.036) plus élevées que les métaboliseurs rapides (non*2/*2). Chez les patients comédiqués avec la fluvoxamine, un fort inhibiteur de CYP1A2, les concentrations de clozapine et de norclozapine corrèlent significativement avec l'activité de CYP3A (r=0.44, p=0.075; r=0.63, p=0.007, respectivement). Les porteurs du génotype ABC81 3435TT avaient des concentrations plasmatiques de clozapine 1,6 fois plus élevées que ceux qui ne présentaient pas ce génotype (p=0.046). En conclusion, cette étude montre pour la première fois, in vivo, le rôle significatif de CYP2C19 et celui du transporteur P-gp dans la pharmacocinétique de la clozapine. Le CYP1A2 est la forme principale de CYP impliquée dans le métabolisme de clozapine, tandis que le CYP2C19 joue un rôle modéré et que le CYP3A4 n'y contribue que chez les patients qui présentent une activité de CYP1A2 réduite. De plus, le polymorphisme de ABC81, mais pas ceux de CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A5 et CYP3A7, influence la pharmacocinétique de la clozapine. Abstract : To examine the genetic factors influencing clozapine kinetics in vivo, 75 patients treated with clozapine were gcnotyped for CYPs and ABCBI polymorphisms and phenotyped for CYPIA2 and CYP3A activity. CYPIA2 activity and dose-corrected trough stéady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine correlated significantly (r = -0.61; P = 1 x 10 pow(-6), with no influence of the CYPIA2*IF genotype (P = 0.38). CYP2C 19 poor metabolizers (*2/*2 genotype) had 2.3-fold higher (P = 0.036) clozapine concentrations than the extensive metabolizers (non-*2/*2). In patients comedicated with fluvoxamine, a strong CYPlA2 inhibitor, clozapine and norclozapine concentrations correlate with CYP3A activity (r = 0.44, P = 0.075; r = 0.63, P = 0.007, respectively). Carriers of the ABCB1 3435TT genotype had a 1.6-fold higher clozapine plasma concentrations than noncarriers (P = 0.046). In conclusion, this study has shown for the first time a significant in vivo role of CYP2C19 and the P-gp transporter in the pharmacokinetics of clozapine. CYPlA2 is the main CYP isoform involved in clozapine metabolism, with CYP2C19 contributing moderately, and CYP3A4 contributing only in patients with reduced CYPIA2 activity. In addition, ABCBI, but not CYP1B6, CYP1C9, CYP1D6, CYP3A5, nor CYP3A7 polymorphisms, influence clozapine pharmacokinetics.

Addition of aripiprazole to the clozapine may be useful in reducing anxiety in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

There exist many case reports and studies on the antipsychotic augmentation by aripirazole in partial responders to clozapine, the most seem to be finding a slight difference in the PANSS and CGI scores after the aripirazole addition. The results of our report are compatible with those of other studies but, we have found a considerable antianxiety action in both of the cases. The 5HT1A agonism of aripirazole could be hypothesized as mechanism contributing to this effect.

Bénéfices de l'utilisation de la clozapine en première intention chez de jeunes patients schizophrènes : quelques données à propos de six patients.

Résumé : La clozapine (Leponex®) est un neuroleptique atypique utilisé depuis une quarantaine d'années (synthétisée en 1959) dans le traitement de la schizophrénie résistante. Son utilisation a fait l'objet de controverses importantes en raison de son profil d'effets secondaires, potentiellement fatals (agranulocytose), et a entraîné son retrait de certains pays pendant de nombreuses années, malgré certaines caractéristiques qui en font une molécule très intéressante sur le plan clinique. On peut citer à cet égard une efficacité antipsychotique importante tant sur les symptômes positifs que sur les symptômes négatifs de la maladie, ainsi que l'absence d'effets secondaires extrapyramidaux, tels que ceux entraînés par les neuroleptiques classiques. Depuis la réadmission de la clozapine par la FDA aux Etats-Unis en 1990, suite notamment aux travaux montrant l'amélioration, grâce à cette molécule, des dyskinésies tardives induites par les neuroleptiques classiques, on assiste à un regain d'intérêt marqué pour ses possibilités thérapeutiques. L'indication reste toutefois limitée à l'heure actuelle au traitement de la schizophrénie résistante à d'autres neuroleptiques, donc un traitement en deuxième intention. Sachant que l'évolution de la schizophrénie est influencée, entre autres facteurs, par la durée des manifestations symptomatiques, il nous a semblé intéressant d'évaluer le devenir de jeunes patients schizophrènes mis d'emblée au bénéfice d'un traitement par la clozapine. C'est le sujet de la présente étude. Cette étude a été initialement conçue comme une étude de cohorte, randomisée, en double aveugle, multi-site à l'échelle romande, avec un suivi des patients sur une année. Les difficultés rencontrées, qui ont abouti à une interruption précoce ne permettant le relevé que des observations de six patients, sont détaillées. Après une brève introduction sur la schizophrénie et sur la clozapine, ce travail décrit l'historique de l'étude, ses buts et sa méthodologie. Suit une description des six patients et leur évolution au cours de l'étude. Dans le chapitre IV, les résultats sont analysés et discutés dans une perspective descriptive. Précédant la bibliographie et les annexes, la conclusion fournit l'opportunité de discuter les apports et les limites de ce travail, en le resituant dans le contexte international actuel de regain d'intérêt pour l'utilisation de la clozapine dans le traitement de la schizophrénie.

Risperidone versus clozapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia: a randomized double-blind study. The Risperidone Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of risperidone and clozapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenic patients. METHOD: In a controlled double-blind, multicenter study, 86 inpatients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-III-R), who were resistant to or intolerant of conventional neuroleptics, were randomly assigned to receive risperidone or clozapine for 8 weeks after a 7-day washout period. After a 1-week dose-titration phase, doses were fixed at 6 mg/day of risperidone and 300 mg/day of clozapine for 1 week and then adjusted according to each patient's response. The final mean doses were 6.4 mg/day of risperidone and 291.2 mg/day of clozapine. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated with several well-known rating scales. RESULTS: Both risperidone and clozapine significantly reduced the severity of psychotic symptoms (scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale) from baseline, with no significant between-group differences. At endpoint, 67% of the risperidone group and 65% of the clozapine group were clinically improved (reduction of 20% or more in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score). Risperidone appeared to have a faster onset of action. In both groups extrapyramidal symptoms and other adverse events were few, and their severity was generally mild. Neither group showed evidence of a relation between drug plasma concentrations and clinical effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was well tolerated and as effective as medium doses of clozapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia who had been resistant to or intolerant of conventional neuroleptics.

Nonresponse to clozapine and ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity: clinical data and analysis of CYP1A2 gene.

Clozapine (CLO), an atypical antipsychotic, depends mainly on cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) for its metabolic clearance. Four patients treated with CLO, who were smokers, were nonresponders and had low plasma levels while receiving usual doses. Their plasma levels to dose ratios of CLO (median; range, 0.34; 0.22 to 0.40 ng x day/mL x mg) were significantly lower than ratios calculated from another study with 29 patients (0.75; 0.22 to 2.83 ng x day/mL x mg; P < 0.01). These patients were confirmed as being CYP1A2 ultrarapid metabolizers by the caffeine phenotyping test (median systemic caffeine plasma clearance; range, 3.85; 3.33 to 4.17 mL/min/kg) when compared with previous studies (0.3 to 3.33 mL/min/kg). The sequencing of the entire CYP1A2 gene from genomic DNA of these patients suggests that the -164C > A mutation (CYP1A2*1F) in intron 1, which confers a high inducibility of CYP1A2 in smokers, is the most likely explanation for their ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity. A marked (2 patients) or a moderate (2 patients) improvement of the clinical state of the patients occurred after the increase of CLO blood levels above the therapeutic threshold by the increase of CLO doses to very high values (ie, up to 1400 mg/d) or by the introduction of fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, at low dosage (50 to 100 mg/d). Due to the high frequency of smokers among patients with schizophrenia and to the high frequency of the -164C > A polymorphism, CYP1A2 genotyping could have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with CLO.

Can Valproic Acid be an Inducer of Clozapine Metabolism?

Introduction: Prior clozapine studies indicated no effects, mild inhibition or induction of valproic acid (VPA) on clozapine metabolism. The hypotheses that (i) VPA is a net inducer of clozapine metabolism, and (ii) smoking modifies this inductive effect were tested in a therapeutic drug monitoring study. Methods: After excluding strong inhibitors and inducers, 353 steady-state total clozapine (clozapine plus norclozapine) concentrations provided by 151 patients were analyzed using a random intercept linear model. Results: VPA appeared to be an inducer of clozapine metabolism since total plasma clozapine concentrations in subjects taking VPA were significantly lower (27% lower; 95% confidence interval, 14-39%) after controlling for confounding variables including smoking (35% lower, 28-56%). Discussion: Prospective studies are needed to definitively establish that VPA may (i) be an inducer of clozapine metabolism when induction prevails over competitive inhibition, and (ii) be an inducer even in smokers who are under the influence of smoking inductive effects on clozapine metabolism.

Tobacco and cannabis smoking cessation can lead to intoxication with clozapine or olanzapine

Plasma levels of clozapine and olanzapine are lower in smokers than in nonsmokers, which is mainly due to induction of cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) by some smoke constituents. Smoking cessation in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs that are CYP1A2 substrates may result in increased plasma levels of the drug and, consequently, in adverse drug effects. Two cases of patients who smoked tobacco and cannabis are reported. The first patient, who was receiving clozapine treatment, developed confusion after tobacco and cannabis smoking cessation, which was related to increased clozapine plasma levels. The second patient, who was receiving olanzapine treatment, showed important extrapyramidal motor symptoms after reducing his tobacco consumption. The clinical implication of these observations is that smoking patients treated with CYP1A2 substrate antipsychotics should regularly be monitored with regard to their smoking consumption in order to adjust doses in cases of a reduction or increase in smoking.

The P450 oxidoreductase genotype is associated with CYP3A activity in vivo as measured by the midazolam phenotyping test.

CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 are hepatic enzymes that metabolize about 50% of drugs on the market, with a large overlap in their specificities. We investigated the genetic bases that contribute to the variation of CYP3A activity. We phenotyped 251 individuals from two independent studies (182 patients treated with methadone and 69 patients with clozapine) for CYP3A activity using the midazolam phenotyping test and genotyped them for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A7 genetic variants, including the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4646437C>T in intron 7 of CYP3A4. Owing to the fact that CYP enzymes require electron transfer through the P450 oxidoreductase (POR), and functional impairment has been shown for the POR*28 SNP, this polymorphism was also analysed. We show that CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 genotypes, including the SNP rs4646437C>T, do not reflect the inter-individual variability of CYP3A activity (P>0.1). In contrast, POR*28 TT genotype presents a 1.6-fold increase in CYP3A activity compared with POR*28C carriers (n = 182, P = 0.004). This finding was replicated in the second independent dataset (n = 69, P = 0.04). The SNP POR*28 seems to be a better genetic marker of the variability of total CYP3A activity in vivo than CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 genetic variants.