21

Current applications of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging offer a wide spectrum of indications in the setting of acute cardiac care. In particular, CMR is helpful for the differential diagnosis of chest pain by detection of myocarditis and pericarditis. Also, takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute aortic diseases can be evaluated by CMR and are important differential diagnoses in patients with acute chest pain. In patients with restricted windows for echocardiography, CMR is the method of choice to evaluate complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In AMI, CMR allows for a unique characterization of myocardial damage by quantifying necrosis, microvascular obstruction, oedema (=area at risk), and haemorrhage. These capabilities will help us to understand better the pathophysiological events during infarction and will also allow to assess new treatment strategies in AMI. To what extent the information on tissue damage will guide patient management is not yet clear and further research in this field is warranted. In the near future, CMR will certainly become more routine in acute cardiac care units, as manufacturers are now focusing strongly on this aspect of user-friendliness. Finally, in the next decade or so, MRI of other nuclei such as fluorine and carbon might become a clinical reality, which would allow for metabolic and targeted molecular imaging with excellent sensitivity and specificity

Le point sur l'ergométrie en 2012 dans le diagnostic de la maladie coronarienne.

Background In patients presenting with acute cardiac symptoms, abnormal ECG and raised troponin, myocarditis may be suspected after normal angiography. Aims To analyse cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings in patients with a provisional diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in whom acute myocarditis was subsequently considered more likely. Methods and results 79 patients referred for CMR following an admission with presumed ACS and raised serum troponin in whom no culprit lesion was detected were studied. 13% had unrecognised myocardial infarction and 6% takotsubo cardiomyopathy. The remainder (81%) were diagnosed with myocarditis. Mean age was 45615 years and 70% were male. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was 58610%; myocardial oedema was detected in 58%. A myocarditic pattern of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was detected in 92%. Abnormalities were detected more frequently in scans performed within 2 weeks of symptom onset: oedema in 81% vs 11% (p<0.0005), and LGE in 100% vs 76% (p<0.005). In 20 patients with both an acute (<2 weeks) and convalescent scan (>3 weeks), oedema decreased from 84% to 39% (p<0.01) and LGE from 5.6 to 3.0 segments (p¼0.005). Three patients presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia, another died suddenly 4 days after admission and one resuscitated 7 weeks following presentation. All 5 patients had preserved EF. Conclusions Our study emphasises the importance of access to CMR for heart attack centres. If myocarditis is suspected, CMR scanning should be performed within 14 days. Myocarditis should not be regarded as benign, even when EF is preserved.

Diagnostic contribution of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with acute coronary syndrome and culprit-free angiograms.

BACKGROUND: In spite of robust knowledge about underlying ischemic myocardial damage, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with culprit-free angiograms raise diagnostic concerns. The present study aimed to evaluate the additional value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) over commonly available non-CMR standard tests, for the differentiation of myocardial injury in patients with ACS and non-obstructed coronary arteries. MATERIAL/METHODS: Patients with ACS, elevated hs-TnT, and a culprit-free angiogram were prospectively enrolled into the study between January 2009 and July 2013. After initial evaluation with standard tests (ECG, echocardiography, hs-TnT) and provisional exclusion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in coronary angiogram, patients were referred for CMR with the suspicion of myocarditis or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC). According to the result of CMR, patients were reclassified as having myocarditis, AMI, TTC, or non-injured myocardium as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS: Out of 5110 patients admitted with ACS, 75 had normal coronary angiograms and entered the study; 69 of them (92%) were suspected for myocarditis and 6 (8%) for TTC. After CMR, 49 patients were finally diagnosed with myocarditis (65%), 3 with TTC (4%), 7 with AMI (9%), and 16 (21%) with non-injured myocardium. The provisional diagnosis was changed or excluded in 23 patients (31%), with a 9% rate of unrecognized AMI. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that the evaluation of patients with ACS and culprit-free angiogram should be complemented by a CMR examination, if available, because the initial work-up with non-CMR tests leads to a significant proportion of misdiagnosed AMI.

Troponine : les faux positifs

Introduction: La troponine est un marqueur biologique bien reconnupour sa cardiospécificité et la détection précoce de la nécrosemyocardique. Le dosage de la troponine fait partie de la stratificationdu syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) et est fréquemment utilisé dans lebilan initial lors de douleurs thoraciques. Cependant, d'autrespathologies sont également associées à une élévation de la troponine.Le but de ce travail est de décrire les diagnostics retenus chez despatients admis aux urgences avec une douleur thoracique et uneélévation de la troponine.Méthode: Durant une période de 18 mois (de novembre 2008 à mai2010), 1242 patients admis aux urgences avec une douleur thoraciqueont eu un dosage de la troponine positive (>= 0,1 microg/l). Undiagnostic de SCA a été posé chez 709 patients (57%). Chez les533 autres patients (43%) un autre diagnostic a été retenu.Résultats: Les 533 patients (295 hommes, âge moyen 71 ± 19 anset 238 femmes, 77 ±16 ans) présentaient une valeur de troponinemoyenne (TM) à 1,12 ± 4 microg/l. Parmi ce collectif, 192 patients(36%) avaient un diagnostic d'insuffisance cardiaque (TM 1,18microg/l), 118 patients (22%) un diagnostic autre (anémie, AVC, chutesans traumatisme) (TM 1,65 microg/l), 46 patients (8%) présentaientune pneumonie (TM 0,95 microg /l), 45 patients (8%) une arythmiecardiaque sans signes de décompensation cardiaque (TM 0,42 microg/l), 35 patients (6,5%) un traumatisme (TM 0,52 microg /l), 25 patients(4,7%) une insuffisance rénale sévère (TM 0,74 microg /l), 23 patients(4%) une insuffisance respiratoire (BPCO, fibrose pulmonaire, autrespneumopathies) (TM 1,63 microg /l), 23 patients (4,3%) un contexteinfectieux (choc septique, bactériémie) (TM 0,96 microg /l), 18 patients(3%) une embolie pulmonaire (TM 0,30 microg /l) et 8 patients (1,5%)un Takotsubo ou angor de prinzmétal (TM 1,73 microg /l).A signaler que la TM pour les 709 patients présentant un diagnostic deSCA était de 3,61 microg /l.Conclusion: Ce travail montre que près de 50% des patients arrivantaux urgences avec une douleur thoracique et une troponine positive ontun diagnostic autre qu'un SCA.