Lésions endothéliales des ballons de contre-pulsion intra-aortique [Endothelial lesions caused by intra-aortic counterpulsation balloons]

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most frequently used mechanical circulatory support. Repeated trauma on the aortic wall has been reported as a cause of balloon perforation by endothelial denudation of atheromatous plaque. This study analyses the effect of IABP on the endothelium of the calf aorta. In 12 calves (mean weight: 72 +/- 6 kg) an IABP was inserted by femoral route and left during 6 hours on internal mode with a frequency of 80 cycles/min. The animals were sacrificed after the procedure (n = 4), at postoperative day (POD) 7 (n = 4), and at POD 14 (n = 4). In the aorta facing the balloon, nine transmural samples were taken proximally (n = 3), at mid height (n = 3) and distally (n = 3), for histological analysis of the percentage of aortic surface covered with endothelium. The percentage of aortic surface covered with endothelium at POD 0, 7 and 14 was proximally: 72.5 +/- 27.5%, 83.7 +/- 16.9% and 93.3 +/- 8.9% respectively; at mid-height: 50.8 +/- 30.7%, 65 +/- 25% and 95 +/- 5%; and distally: 31.4 +/- 20.1%, 48.3 +/- 34.4% and 85 +/- 10%. A large portion of the aortic endothelium is abraded after 6 hours of IAB pumping. This effect is more important at the distal level of the aorta. After two weeks, most of the endothelium has regenerated.

The farmer's lung disease : occupational medicine input

Background: Although there has been an abundant literature in recent years about farmer's lung disease, few addressed occupational measures able to maintain the farmer in his work. Nevertheless we know now that most of the farmers can be kept at the workplace by the way of occupational preventive measures. Methods: This matter is discussed from a case report. A farmer affected by the farmer's lung disease was sent to us by his pneumologist, in order to estimate the possibility of maintaining him in his job and to determine relevant changes at his workplace to minimize risk of exposure to dust antigen. This approach required a visit to the workplace by occupational physician and hygienist. Results: The visit of the workplace pointed out different habits and architectural particularities which were potential sources of exposure. The two main proposed measures to reduce the risk, were to wear respiratory masks while working inside the barn, such as preparing hay, feeding the cattle or sweeping the floor, and to build a direct access from the bathroom (shower and toilet) to the outside, allowing to go out of the barn after taking a shower and changing, without risk of being contaminated again. Although upgrading the shower-toilet is not yet completed to date, the already performed modifications led currently to significant clinical improvements, despite the risk of exposure was high since the animals were in the barn for more than two months. Conclusion: The treatment of the farmer's lung disease must be multidisciplinary involving general practitioner, pneumologist, occupational hygienist and occupational physician.