Acquired form of angioedema of the head and neck related to a deficiency in c1-inhibitor: a case report with a review of the literature.

Angioedema related to a deficiency in the C1-inhibitor protein is characterized by its lack of response to therapies including antihistamine, steroids, and epinephrine. In the case of laryngeal edema, mortality rate is approximately 30 percent. The first case of the acquired form of angioedema related to a deficiency in C1-inhibitor was published in 1972. In our paper, we present a case of an acquired form of angioedema of the oropharyngeal region secondary to the simultaneous occurrence of two causative factors: neutralization of C1-inhibitor by an autoantibody and the use of an angiotensin convertin enzyme inhibitor.

Allergo-immunologie. 1. Nouveautés dans le traitement des crises aiguës d'angioedème héréditaire [Allergy-immunology. New therapies for acute attacks in hereditary angioedema].

Hereditary angioedema is a disease which develops as a result of a deficiency or dysfonction of C1-inhibitor, a key regulator of the complement, coagulation and contact cascades, resulting among others in excessive release of bradykinin. This disease mortality rate is high in absence of immediate and effective treatment, in particular in presence of acute attacks of the upper respiratory tract (laryngeal edema). Until now only administration of a purified C1-inhibitor extract was effective against these symptoms. This paper aims to synthesise essentials knowledge concerning news drugs, in particular icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2- receptor antagonist whose use should be widened to the treatment of angioedema with ACE-inhibitors intolerance.

Multiples étiologies de l'angioedème [The multiple etiologies of angioedema]

L'angioedème est une affection fréquente, dont les étiologies sont multiples. Les angioedèmes habituellement associés à une urticaire sont en général dus à une libération d'histamine et répondent en principe aux antihistaminiques et à l'adrénaline. Il s'agit des angioedèmes d'origine allergique, des réactions anaphylactoïdes, souvent d'origine médicamenteuse (AINS), des angioedèmes physiques et de l'angioedème récurrent idiopathique. La bradykinine joue certainement un rôle dans la genèse des angioedèmes associés aux inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine et rarement aux antagonistes du récepteur de l'angiotensine II, ainsi que dans celle des rares angioedèmes héréditaires ou liés à un déficit acquis en Ci-inhibiteur. L'urticaire est alors absente et les antihistaminiques ainsi que l'adrénaline sont inefficaces. Angioedema is a frequent disorder with multiple aetiologies. Angioedemas associated with urticaria are usually caused by histamine release and respond to anti-histamines and adrenalin. They include allergic angioedemas, anaphylactoid reactions (mostly drug-induced, e.g. NSAID), physical angioedemas and recurrent idiopathic angioedema. Bradykinin probably plays a causative role in the pathogenesis of ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker related angioedemas, as well as in the pathogenesis of the rare hereditary or acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency angioedemas. Urticaria is then typically absent and anti-histamines, as well as adrenalin, are ineffective

Hypertension. Angio-oedème sous inhibition de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine et de la dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 [Angioedema during ACE and DPP-4 inhibition]

Angioedema is a rare side effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Its cause is probably related to the accumulation of bradykinin and substance P, i.e. two proinflammatory peptides normally inactivated by ACE. Angioedema occurs most of the time at the early phase of treatment, but may also develop during long-term treatment. It might involve the gastro-intestinal tract, leading to abdominal pain, vomiting and/or diarrhea, as well as pancreatitis. Dipeptidyl-ptidase-4 (DPP-4) is another enzyme allowing the degradation of bradykinin and substance P. Co-administering an ACE inhibitor and a DPP-4 inhibitor (as an antidiabetic agent) increases significantly the risk of angioedema.

Recent clinical trials with omapatrilat: new developments.

Omapatrilat belongs to the vasopeptidase inhibitors, ie, drugs that possess the ability to inhibit simultaneously the membrane-bound zinc metalloproteases, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and the neutral endopeptidase EC 3.4.24.11 (NEP). Omapatrilat was targeted to treat patients with hypertension and congestive heart failure. The preclinical and early clinical studies conducted with omapatrilat were very promising. Indeed, omapatrilat appeared to be a very potent antihypertensive agent with very favorable effects on cardiac function in heart failure patients. In contrast to these early studies, the large clinical trials were more disappointing. The results of the OCTAVE trial confirmed the antihypertensive efficacy of omapatrilat, but at the price of an angioedema rate more than threefold higher than that of an ACE inhibitor in the overall population (2.17% vs 0.68%), and close to fourfold higher in the black population. In OVERTURE, a large randomized control trial in heart failure, angioedema was also more common with omapatrilat, but the incidence was much lower (0.8% with omapatrilat vs 0.5% with enalapril). However, omapatrilat was not convincingly superior to the ACE inhibitor. Because angioedema is probably a class side effect of vasopeptidase inhibitors, the higher incidence of this potentially life-threatening complication with omapatrilat has likely stopped the development of this new class of agents. The future of vasopeptidase inhibitors will depend on the ability to improve the risk/benefit ratio either by developing agents that produce less angioedema, or by defining more precisely a high-risk population that could take advantage of dual ACE/NEP inhibition.

Pharmacovigilance update [Pharmacovigilance update]

Main pharmacovigilance signals and alerts issued in 2009 are reviewed. Efalizumab was withdrawn from the market due to increased risks, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and questionable efficacy. New cases of PML are still being reported with rituximab and natalizumab. Rare cases of pure red cell aplasia have been observed with mycophenate. Gastrointestinal perforation, severe skin rashes and various ocular disorders have been reported during erlotinib use. Severe skin rashes have been related to etravirine. Acute renal failure and pancreatitis can occur with exenatide. A link between sitagliptin and pancreatitis is suspected. Raised concerns of causality between insuline glargine and malignant tumors are not supported by strong evidence. Proton pump inhibitors seem to blunt clopidogrel benefit. Aliskiren can cause angioedema.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angio-oedema: a review of the pathophysiology and risk factors.

Angio-oedema (AE) is a known adverse effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) therapy. Over the past several decades, evidence of failure to diagnose this important and potentially fatal reaction is commonly found in the literature. Because this reaction is often seen first in the primary care setting, a review was undertaken to analyse and document the keys to both diagnostic criteria as well as to investigate potential risk factors for ACE-I AE occurrence. A general review of published literature was conducted through Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database, targeting ACE-I-related AE pathomechanism, diagnosis, epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical decision making and treatment. The incidence and severity of AE appears to be on the rise and there is evidence of considerable delay in diagnosis contributing to significant morbidity and mortality for patients. The mechanism of AE due to ACE-I drugs is not fully understood, but some genomic and metabolomic information has been correlated. Additional epidemiologic data and clinical treatment outcome predictors have been evaluated, creating a basis for future work on the development of clinical prediction tools to aid in risk identification and diagnostic differentiation. Accurate recognition of AE by the primary care provider is essential to limit the rising morbidity associated with ACE-I treatment-related AE. Research findings on the phenotypic indicators relevant to this group of patients as well as basic research into the pathomechanism of AE are available, and should be used in the construction of better risk analysis and clinical diagnostic tools for ACE-I AE.