Violence in primary care: prevalence and follow-up of victims.

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence among Swiss natives and foreigners. In a follow-up study, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for the positive patients. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of violence by use of a questionnaire in an interview, in an academic general internal medicine clinic in Switzerland. In a follow-up, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for positive patients. The participants were 38 residents and 446 consecutive patients. Questionnaires were presented in the principal language spoken by our patients. They addressed sociodemographics, present and past violence, the security or lack of security felt by victims of violence, and the patients' own violence. Between 3 and 6 months after the first interview, we did a follow-up of all patients who had reported domestic violence in the last year. RESULTS: Of the 366 patients included in the study, 36 (9.8%) reported being victims of physical violence during the last year (physicians identified only 4 patients out of the 36), and 34/366 (9.3%) reported being victims of psychological violence. Domestic violence was responsible for 67.3% of the cases, and community violence for 21.8%. In 10.9% of the cases, both forms of violence were found. Of 29 patients who reported being victims of domestic violence, 22 were found in the follow-up. The frequency of violence had diminished (4/22) or the violence had ceased (17/22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of violence is high; domestic violence is more frequent than community violence. There was no statistically significant difference between the Swiss and foreign patients' responses related to the rates of violence. Patients in a currently violent relationship stated that participating in the study helped them and that the violence decreased or ceased a few months later.

Sens et non-sens de la violence : nouvelles expressions, nouvelles approches.

Retrouver le sens de la violence est une démarche certes essentielle, mais non suffisante. Il s'agit aussi d'aller au-delà du sens et de revoir sans cesse les réponses aux expressions nouvelles et inattendues des phénomènes violents, individuels ou collectifs. Cherchant à dépasser une dramatisation de la problématique de la violence des jeunes, ce livre offre des perspectives de réflexion et d'action utiles aux professionnels de la santé mentale des enfants et des adolescents, et plus largement à tous les partenaires du réseau social, éducatif et scolaire. 1. Définition et sources de la violence : Infamies d'enfance. - Agressivité, haine et destructivité: les racines de la violence. - L'enfance des patients adultes diagnostiqués de "paraphilie". - La violence, ses sources pulsionnelles et sa genèse psychique. 2. Formes de violence : Réalités et énigmes de la sexualité infantile déviante. - Les parents battus. - Le harcèlement entre jeunes du même âge. L'arrière-plan familial des jeunes impliqués. - Comportements psychopathiques et réactivité traumatique. - La transgression dans les camps d'extermination nazis. Perdre son âme. Sauver la vie. 3. Psychopathologie. 4. Traitements : De la consommation de substances à la dépendance: un modèle intégratif. - Agressivité et transfert dans le quotidien psychothérapeutique. - Expériences d'interventions au niveau des cellules d'urgences médico-psychologiques. - Sens et non-sens de la violence. - Violences et soins à l'adolescence. - Evacuation et représentation de la violence chez l'enfant psychotique. - La violence pulsionnelle et ses répercussions transférentielles. - Dystraitance. Un accompagnement institutionnel.

Validity of the FACIT-Sp to assess spiritual well-being in elderly patients

Among instruments measuring spiritual well-being, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp-12) is the most widely used instrument in research. It has been validated in patients suffering from cancer or HIV/AIDS, but has rarely been used in elderly patients. The objectives of this study were to determine the psychometric properties and suitability of the FACIT-Spto assess spiritual well-being in hospitalized elderly patients. This cross-sectional study uses a mixed method approach. Subjects were patients (N = 208), aged 65 years and older, consecutively admitted in post-acute rehabilitation. Psychometric properties of the FACITSp were investigated. The internal structure of the FACIT-Sp (factor structure and internal consistency) was assessed. Convergent validity of the FACIT-Sp was assessed using the Spiritual Distress Assessment Tool (SDAT), the question "Are you at peace?" and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Predictive validity was assessed using length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination. Understanding and interpretation of FACIT-Sp items were consecutively assessed in a sub-sample of 135 patients. Results show that FACIT-Sp scores ranged from 7 to 46 (mean 29.6 ± 7.8); 23.1% of the patients had high spiritual well-being. Cronbach's α was g ood ( 0.85). Item-to-total correlations were all significant (0.34 to 0.73). Principal component analyses performed with 2 or 3 factors were only moderately consistent with previous work. FACIT-Sp correlated with SDAT, "Are you at peace?" and GDS (Rho = −0.45, P < 0.001; 0.51, P < 0.001 and −0.38, P < 0.001). No association was found with LOS or discharge destination. Spontaneous comments about one or more FACIT-Sp items were made by 97/135 (71.9%). Specifically, items that address purpose and meaning in life were frequently found difficult to answer. Analyses suggest that the FACIT-Sp may underestimate spiritual well-being in older patients. In conclusion, despite having acceptable psychometric properties, the FACIT-Sp presents limitations for measurement of spiritual well-being in hospitalized elderly patients.