Exposition au VIH, à l'hépatite B et C au cabinet médical et à l'hôpital. Prévention et prophylaxie postexpositionnelle [Exposure to HIV, hepatitis B and C in office practice and hospital. Prevention and post-exposure prophylaxis]

Suite à un accident exposant à du sang (piqûre; coupure), provenant d'un patient infecté, le risque d'infection par VIH est d'environ 0,3% et par le virus de l'hépatite C (VHC) d'environ 0,5%. Chez les personnes vaccinées avec une réponse immunitaire adéquate (titre d'anticorps HBs >100 mUI/ml), aucune infection professionnelle par hépatite B n'a été reconnue en Suisse. La plupart des infections par VIH et VHB peuvent être prévenues par un traitement d'urgence et une prophylaxie postexpositionnelle (PEP). Il n'y a actuellement aucune prophylaxie postexpositionnelle pour le VHC. En cas de transmission de VHC, un traitement rapide par peginterféron et ribavirine est à envisager. Chaque hôpital et cabinet médical doivent mettre sur pied un système pour assurer une prise en charge optimale et en urgence des blessures par piqûres ou coupures. Lors de blessures accidentelles avec du sang de patients séropositifs pour le VIH et dans des situations complexes, il est recommandé de consulter un médecin du personnel ou un infectiologue expérimenté. The risk of infection after an occupational needle stick injury with blood from an infected source patient is approximately 0.3% for HIV and 0.5% for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In Switzerland no cases of occupational HBV infection have been recorded in fully vaccinated persons with a documented adequate vaccine response (HBsantibody titer >100 mIU/mL). Most occupational HIV und HBV infections can be prevented by appropriate emergency measures and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). No HCV-PEP is currently available. Early therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin should be considered in cases of occupational HCV seroconversion. Every hospital and office practice should establish a system for 24 h/24 h emergency management of occupational needle stick injuries. In the setting of an HIV-seropositive source patient and in complex situations, early consultation with a specialist in occupational medicine or infectious diseases should be considered.

Phylogenetic approach reveals that virus genotype largely determines HIV set-point viral load.

HIV virulence, i.e. the time of progression to AIDS, varies greatly among patients. As for other rapidly evolving pathogens of humans, it is difficult to know if this variance is controlled by the genotype of the host or that of the virus because the transmission chain is usually unknown. We apply the phylogenetic comparative approach (PCA) to estimate the heritability of a trait from one infection to the next, which indicates the control of the virus genotype over this trait. The idea is to use viral RNA sequences obtained from patients infected by HIV-1 subtype B to build a phylogeny, which approximately reflects the transmission chain. Heritability is measured statistically as the propensity for patients close in the phylogeny to exhibit similar infection trait values. The approach reveals that up to half of the variance in set-point viral load, a trait associated with virulence, can be heritable. Our estimate is significant and robust to noise in the phylogeny. We also check for the consistency of our approach by showing that a trait related to drug resistance is almost entirely heritable. Finally, we show the importance of taking into account the transmission chain when estimating correlations between infection traits. The fact that HIV virulence is, at least partially, heritable from one infection to the next has clinical and epidemiological implications. The difference between earlier studies and ours comes from the quality of our dataset and from the power of the PCA, which can be applied to large datasets and accounts for within-host evolution. The PCA opens new perspectives for approaches linking clinical data and evolutionary biology because it can be extended to study other traits or other infectious diseases.

Association of alcohol consumption and HIV surrogate markers in participants of the swiss HIV cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption may affect the course of HIV infection and/or antiretroviral therapy (ART). The authors investigated the association between self-reported alcohol consumption and HIV surrogate markers in both treated and untreated individuals. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Over a 7-year period, the authors analyzed 2 groups of individuals in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: (1) ART-naïve individuals remaining off ART and (2) individuals initiating first ART. For individuals initiating first ART, time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between alcohol consumption, virological failure, and ART interruption. For both groups, trajectories of log-transformed CD4 cell counts were analyzed using linear mixed models with repeated measures. RESULTS: The authors included 2982 individuals initiating first ART and 2085 ART naives. In individuals initiating first ART, 241 (8%) experienced virological failure. Alcohol consumption was not associated with virological failure. ART interruption was noted in 449 (15%) individuals and was more prevalent in severe compared with none/light health risk drinkers [hazard ratio: 2.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.42 to 3.52]. The association remained significant even after adjusting for nonadherence. The authors did not find an association between alcohol consumption and change in CD4 cell count over time in either group. CONCLUSIONS: No effect of alcohol consumption on either virological failure or CD4 cell count in both groups of ART-initiating and ART-naive individuals was found. However, severe drinkers were more likely to interrupt ART. Efforts on ART continuation should be especially implemented in individuals reporting high alcohol consumption.

Modulation of TCR avidity of primary HIV-1-specific CD8 T-cell responses by early and potent antiviral therapy responses

Background: CD8 T-cells play a critical role in antiviral immunity. However, mechanisms of virus control and immune correlates of protection are still not fully understood. Among other factors, TCR avidity (antigen sensitivity) is thought to play a critical role. Whereas there is a large consensus that high TCR avidity T-cell responses are correlated to higher efficacy against cancer and acute viral infections, it may be not the case in chronic persistent viral infections. Methods: TCR avidity (measured by the effect concentration 50% [EC50]) of HIV-1-specific CD8 T-cell responses directed against optimal epitopes was investigated in different cohorts of HIV-1- infected subjects (n¼114) including early acute and chronic (progressive and non-progressive) HIV-1-infection. Overall, TCR avidity was investigated in 245 HIV-1-specific CD8 T-cell responses. The relationships between TCR avidity, T-cell differentiation and functional profile including cytokine secretion, proliferation and cytotoxic potential (determined by polychromatic flow cytometry) were analyzed. Results: HIV-1-specific CD8 T-cell responses from patients with acute infection had significantly lower TCR avidity as compared to patients with chronic (progressive or non-progressive) HIVinfection (P¼0.03 and 0.003, respectively). These differences remained significant when the analyses were restricted to common epitopes (same epitopes restricted by the same class I HLA). Interestingly, some patients treated during acute infection underwent spontaneous treatment interruption. Re-exposure to high viral load induced two major effects: a) the increase in TCR avidity of pre-existing high avidity (EC50<0.01) T-cell responses (P<0.02) and b) the generation of new T-cell responses with higher TCR avidity as compared to the average pre-existing T-cell responses. Conclusion: These results suggest that high TCR avidity T-cell responses are selected during the course of HIV-1 infection and that one of the potential driving mechanisms is continuous exposure to HIV-1 antigens. These results advance our understanding of the relationship between TCR avidity and Ag exposure of antiviral memory CD8 T-cells.

The effect of antiretroviral treatment of different durations in primary HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: To compare immunological, virological and clinical outcomes in persons initiating combination antiretroviral therapy (cART of different durations within 6 months of seroconversion (early treated) with those who deferred therapy (deferred group). DESIGN: CD4 cell and HIV-RNA measurements for 'early treated' individuals following treatment cessation were compared with the corresponding ART-free period for the 'deferred' group using piecewise linear mixed models. Individuals identified during primary HIV infection were included if they seroconverted from 1st January 1996 and were at least 15 years of age at seroconversion. Those with at least 2 CD4 less than 350 cells/microl or AIDS within the first 6 months following seroconversion were excluded. RESULTS: Of 348 'early treated' patients, 147 stopped cART following treatment for at least 6 (n = 38), more than 6-12 (n = 40) or more than 12 months (n = 69). CD4 cell loss was steeper for the first 6 months following cART cessation, but subsequent loss rate was similar to the 'deferred' group (n = 675, P = 0.26). Although those treated for more than 12 months appeared to maintain higher CD4 cell counts following cART cessation, those treated for 12 months or less had CD4 cell counts 6 months after cessation comparable to those in the 'deferred' group. There was no difference in HIV-RNA set points between the 'early' and 'deferred' groups (P = 0.57). AIDS rates were similar but death rates, mainly due to non-AIDS causes, were higher in the 'deferred' group (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Transient cART, initiated within 6 months of seroconversion, seems to have no effect on viral load set point and limited beneficial effect on CD4 cell levels in individuals treated for more than 12 months. Its long-term effects remain inconclusive and need further investigation.

Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens : experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study

Rapport de SynthèseLa thérapie antirétrovirale a progressée de manière significative depuis te début de l'épidémie du syndrome d'immunodéficience acquise (SIDA). Durant les 20 dernières années, plusieurs combinaisons de traitements ont été utilisées avec succès menant à une réduction de la mortalité associée. Par contre, le traitement a aussi engendré des cas de résistances multiples avec comme résultat, le besoin d'utiliser plusieurs molécules en combinaison, et une augmentation des cas de toxicité. Une stratégie souvent employée fût la combinaison de deux molécules inhibitrices de la protéase en même temps en combinaison avec une troisième molécule, le ritonavir. (DBPI).La cohorte Suisse sur le VIH existe depuis 1987 et permet d'étudier de façon longitudinale les patients qui y sont inscrits. Pour ce travail de thèse, nous avons étudié les patients inscrits à la cohorte suisse de 1996 à 2007 qui ont reçu une combinaison DBPI.Pendant la période étudiée, un total de 405 patients ont reçu un traitement DBPI, dont 295 patients ont reçu le DBPI pour plus de 6 mois. La durée médiane du traitement était de 2.2 ans. Sur les 287 patients qui étaient en échec viral au début du traitement (défini comme HIV RNA>400 copies/ml), 64.1% ont réussi à supprimer la virémie et 54.4% ont eu une suppression dans les 24 semaines qui ont suivi le début de la thérapie. Les patients avaient reçu en moyenne 6 combinaisons de traitement différentes avant le début de la thérapie DBPi. Pour les patients qui ont arrêté le traitement DBPI, la cause principale de l'arrêt était due au souhait du patient (48.3%), à l'échec virologique (22.5%) et à la toxicité (15.8%). Les patients ayant reçu le traitement après 1999, ou ayant été traités avec une combinaison de Lopinavir-ritonvir/saquinavir ou lopinavir-ritonavir/atazanavir arrivaient à supprimer leur virémie plus souvent que ceux qui avaient reçu d'autres combinaisons.Cette étude constitue la plus grande étude publiée sur le sujet de l'utilisation des DBPI pour les patients à résistances multiples. Malgré le fait que c'est une étude observationnelle, nous pouvons attester que le taux de succès était de 64.4%, le taux de toxicité était relativement bas (15.8%) et que la plus part des patients ont toléré ces combinaisons, malgré le taux élevé d'effets secondaires souvent rapportés. En somme, cette approche pourrait être envisagée dans des situations ou les nouveaux traitements tels que les inhibiteurs de l'intégrase et du CCR5 ne sont pas encore disponibles.