Quelle prise en charge pour une suspicion de thrombose veineuse profonde des membres inférieurs [Suspicion of lower limb deep vein thrombosis: update on diagnosis and treatment].

Si l'examen clinique revêt une importance essentielle en lymphologie et exige des praticiens expérimentés, la lymphoscintigraphie et plus récemment la lympho-fluoroscopie au vert d'indocyanine constituent des moyens d'investigation précieux dans la prévention, le diagnostic et le traitement des pathologies vasculaires lymphatiques. L'intérêt de la lymphoscintigraphie réside dans l'analyse qualitative et quantitative de la migration des macromolécules par les vaisseaux lymphatiques et l'évaluation du secteur lymphatique profond. La lympho-fluoroscopie se distingue de la lymphoscintigraphie par l'obtention d'une cartographie détaillée des vaisseaux lymphatiques superficiels et d'images dynamiques en temps réel. Elle apporte à l'angiologue et au physiothérapeute des informations irremplaçables sur leur contractilité et la présence de dérivations compensatoires à privilégier lors du drainage lymphatique manuel. Venous thromboembolism is a frequent disease with an annual incidence of 0.75-2.69/1000 reaching 2-7/1000 > 70 years. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism are two manifestations of the same underlying disease. Most frequent localization of DVT is at lower limbs. The diagnostic workup begins with an estimation of DVT risk, a judicious use of D-Dimers, and compression venous ultrasound depending on DVT probability. The development of direct oral anticoagulants and recent data on interventional DVT treatment, in selected cases, have widened the therapeutic spectrum of DVT. The present article aims at informing the primary care physician of the optimized workup of patients with lower limb suspicion of DVT.

A prognostic score to identify low-risk outpatients with acute deep vein thrombosis in the upper extremity.

BACKGROUND: No studies have identified which patients with upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are at low risk for adverse events within the first week of therapy. METHODS: We used data from Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica to explore in patients with upper-extremity DVT a prognostic score that correctly identified patients with lower limb DVT at low risk for pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, or death within the first week. RESULTS: As of December 2014, 1135 outpatients with upper-extremity DVT were recruited. Of these, 515 (45%) were treated at home. During the first week, three patients (0.26%) experienced pulmonary embolism, two (0.18%) had major bleeding, and four (0.35%) died. We assigned 1 point to patients with chronic heart failure, creatinine clearance levels 30-60 mL min(-1) , recent bleeding, abnormal platelet count, recent immobility, or cancer without metastases; 2 points to those with metastatic cancer; and 3 points to those with creatinine clearance levels < 30 mL min(-1) . Overall, 759 (67%) patients scored ≤ 1 point and were considered to be at low risk. The rate of the composite outcome within the first week was 0.26% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004-0.87) in patients at low risk and 1.86% (95% CI 0.81-3.68) in the remaining patients. C-statistics was 0.73 (95% CI 0.57-0.88). Net reclassification improvement was 22%, and integrated discrimination improvement was 0.0055. CONCLUSIONS: Using six easily available variables, we identified outpatients with upper-extremity DVT at low risk for adverse events within the first week. These data may help to safely treat more patients at home.