Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers such as infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Patients and methods: The outcome of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker treatment was analyzed retrospectively in 59 patients with ankylosing spondylitis who were being treated in our clinic during last nine years. The patients' Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 and ASAS 40 response rates, adverse drugs effects, and treatment compliance were evaluated. Results: ASAS 20 response was achieved by 89.8% of the patients in the third month, and by 93.2% in the sixth month. ASAS 40 response was achieved by 61% of the patients in the third and sixth month. No statistically significant difference was detected between the three tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers with regards to the ASAS 40 response rates. Mild infections, observed in 31 of the patients, were the most common side effects. Serious side effect was observed in only one patient. The number of patients who withdrew from the treatment for various reasons was six.

Protease inhibitors to treat hepatitis C in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: high efficacy but low treatment uptake.

OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have become the standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We aimed to assess treatment uptake and efficacy in routine clinical settings among HIV/HCV coinfected patients after the introduction of the first generation DAAs. METHODS: Data on all Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) participants starting HCV protease inhibitor (PI) treatment between September 2011 and August 2013 were collected prospectively. The uptake and efficacy of HCV therapy were compared with those in the time period before the availability of PIs. RESULTS: Upon approval of PI treatment in Switzerland in September 2011, 516 SHCS participants had chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. Of these, 57 (11%) started HCV treatment during the following 2 years with either telaprevir, faldaprevir or boceprevir. Twenty-seven (47%) patients were treatment-naïve, nine (16%) were patients with relapse and 21 (37%) were partial or null responders. Twenty-nine (57%) had advanced fibrosis and 15 (29%) had cirrhosis. End-of-treatment virological response was 84% in treatment-naïve patients, 88% in patients with relapse and 62% in previous nonresponders. Sustained virological response was 78%, 86% and 40% in treatment-naïve patients, patients with relapse and nonresponders, respectively. Treatment uptake was similar before (3.8 per 100 patient-years) and after (6.1 per 100 patient-years) the introduction of PIs, while treatment efficacy increased considerably after the introduction of PIs. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of PI-based HCV treatment in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients improved virological response rates, while treatment uptake remained low. Therefore, the introduction of PIs into the clinical routine was beneficial at the individual level, but had only a modest effect on the burden of HCV infection at the population level.

Challenges in the Discovery of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) Inhibitors.

Since the discovery of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) as an attractive target for anticancer therapy in 2003, the search for inhibitors has been intensely pursued both in academia and in pharmaceutical companies. Many novel IDO1 inhibitor scaffolds have been described, and a few potent compounds have entered clinical trials. However, a significant number of the reported compounds contain problematic functional groups, suggesting that enzyme inhibition could be the result of undesirable side reactions instead of selective binding to IDO1. Here, we describe issues in the employed experimental protocols, review and classify reported IDO1 inhibitors, and suggest different approaches for confirming viable inhibitor scaffolds.