Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in antiretroviral regimens for virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 infection: a randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate have been associated with renal toxicity and reduced bone mineral density. Tenofovir alafenamide is a novel tenofovir prodrug that reduces tenofovir plasma concentrations by 90%, thereby decreasing off-target side-effects. We aimed to assess whether efficacy, safety, and tolerability were non-inferior in patients switched to a regimen containing tenofovir alafenamide versus in those remaining on one containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. METHODS: In this randomised, actively controlled, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited HIV-1-infected adults from Gilead clinical studies at 168 sites in 19 countries. Patients were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 50 mL per min or greater, and were taking one of four tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimens for at least 96 weeks before enrolment. With use of a third-party computer-generated sequence, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive a once-a-day single-tablet containing elvitegravir 150 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg (tenofovir alafenamide group) or to carry on taking one of four previous tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimens (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group) for 96 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by previous treatment regimen in blocks of six. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to the assigned study regimen; outcome assessors were masked until database lock. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least one dose of study drug who had undetectable viral load (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) at week 48. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01815736. FINDINGS: Between April 12, 2013 and April 3, 2014, we enrolled 1443 patients. 959 patients were randomly assigned to the tenofovir alafenamide group and 477 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group. Viral suppression at week 48 was noted in 932 (97%) patients assigned to the tenofovir alafenamide group and in 444 (93%) assigned to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (adjusted difference 4·1%, 95% CI 1·6-6·7), with virological failure noted in ten and six patients, respectively. The number of adverse events was similar between the two groups, but study drug-related adverse events were more common in the tenofovir alafenamide group (204 patients [21%] vs 76 [16%]). Hip and spine bone mineral density and glomerular filtration were each significantly improved in patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group compared with those in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group. INTERPRETATION: Switching to a tenofovir alafenamide-containing regimen from one containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was non-inferior for maintenance of viral suppression and led to improved bone mineral density and renal function. Longer term follow-up is needed to better understand the clinical impact of these changes. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Safety and immunogenicity of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored Ebola vaccine in healthy adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 1/2a study.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing Ebola outbreak led to accelerated efforts to test vaccine candidates. On the basis of a request by WHO, we aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the monovalent, recombinant, chimpanzee adenovirus type-3 vector-based Ebola Zaire vaccine (ChAd3-EBO-Z). METHODS: We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 1/2a trial at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland. Participants (aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned (2:2:1), via two computer-generated randomisation lists for individuals potentially deployed in endemic areas and those not deployed, to receive a single intramuscular dose of high-dose vaccine (5 × 10(10) viral particles), low-dose vaccine (2·5 × 10(10) viral particles), or placebo. Deployed participants were allocated to only the vaccine groups. Group allocation was concealed from non-deployed participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. The safety evaluation was not masked for potentially deployed participants, who were therefore not included in the safety analysis for comparison between the vaccine doses and placebo, but were pooled with the non-deployed group to compare immunogenicity. The main objectives were safety and immunogenicity of ChAd3-EBO-Z. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02289027. FINDINGS: Between Oct 24, 2014, and June 22, 2015, we randomly assigned 120 participants, of whom 18 (15%) were potentially deployed and 102 (85%) were non-deployed, to receive high-dose vaccine (n=49), low-dose vaccine (n=51), or placebo (n=20). Participants were followed up for 6 months. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. We recorded local adverse events in 30 (75%) of 40 participants in the high-dose group, 33 (79%) of 42 participants in the low-dose group, and five (25%) of 20 participants in the placebo group. Fatigue or malaise was the most common systemic adverse event, reported in 25 (62%) participants in the high-dose group, 25 (60%) participants in the low-dose group, and five (25%) participants in the placebo group, followed by headache, reported in 23 (57%), 25 (60%), and three (15%) participants, respectively. Fever occurred 24 h after injection in 12 (30%) participants in the high-dose group and 11 (26%) participants in the low-dose group versus one (5%) participant in the placebo group. Geometric mean concentrations of IgG antibodies against Ebola glycoprotein peaked on day 28 at 51 μg/mL (95% CI 41·1-63·3) in the high-dose group, 44·9 μg/mL (25·8-56·3) in the low-dose group, and 5·2 μg/mL (3·5-7·6) in the placebo group, with respective response rates of 96% (95% CI 85·7-99·5), 96% (86·5-99·5), and 5% (0·1-24·9). Geometric mean concentrations decreased by day 180 to 25·5 μg/mL (95% CI 20·6-31·5) in the high-dose group, 22·1 μg/mL (19·3-28·6) in the low-dose group, and 3·2 μg/mL (2·4-4·9) in the placebo group. 28 (57%) participants given high-dose vaccine and 31 (61%) participants given low-dose vaccine developed glycoprotein-specific CD4 cell responses, and 33 (67%) and 35 (69%), respectively, developed CD8 responses. INTERPRETATION: ChAd3-EBO-Z was safe and well tolerated, although mild to moderate systemic adverse events were common. A single dose was immunogenic in almost all vaccine recipients. Antibody responses were still significantly present at 6 months. There was no significant difference between doses for safety and immunogenicity outcomes. This acceptable safety profile provides a reliable basis to proceed with phase 2 and phase 3 efficacy trials in Africa. FUNDING: Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), through the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.

"Role of long non-coing RNAs in the stressed heart". Wisper : a novel cardiac fibroblast-enriched IncRNA that modulate fibrosis in the failing heart

LncRNAs are transcripts greater than 200 nucleotides in length with no apparent coding potential. They exert important regulatory functions in the genome. Their role in cardiac fibrosis is however unexplored. To identify IncRNAs that could modulate cardiac fibrosis, we profiled the long non-coding transcriptome in the infarcted mouse heart, and identified 1500 novel IncRNAs. These IncRNAs have unique characteristics such as high tissue and cell type specificity. Their expression is highly correlated with parameters of cardiac dimensions and function. The majority of these novel IncRNAs are conserved in human. Importantly, human IncRNAs appear to be differentially expressed in heart disease. Using a computational pipeline, we identified a super-enhancer-associated IncRNA, which is dynamically expressed after myocardial infarction. We named this particular transcript Wisper for «Wisp2 super-enhancer- derived IncRNA ». Interestingly, Wisper expression is overexpressed in cardiac fibroblasts as compared to cardiomyocytes or to fibroblasts isolated from other organs than the heart. The importance of Wisper in the biology of fibroblasts was demonstrated in knockdown experiments. Differentiation of cardiac fibroblast into myofibroblasts in vitro is significantly impaired upon Wisper knockdown. Wisper downregulation in cardiac fibroblasts results in a dramatic reduction of fibrotic gene expression, a diminished cell proliferation and an increase in apoptotic cell death. In vivo, depletion of Wisper during the acute phase of the response to infarction is detrimental via increasing the risk of cardiac rupture. On the other hand, Wisper knockdown following infarction in a prevention study reduces fibrosis and preserves cardiac function. Since WISPER is detectable in the human heart, where it is associated with severe cardiac fibrosis, these data suggest that Wisper could represent a novel therapeutic target for limiting the extent of the fibrotic response in the heart. -- Les long ARN non-codants (IncRNAs) sont des ARN de plus de 200 nucléotides qui ne codent pas pour des protéines. Ils exercent d'importantes fonctions dans le génome. Par contre, leur importance dans le développement de la fibrose cardiaque n'a pas été étudiée. Pour identifier des IncRNAs jouant un rôle dans ce processus, le transcriptome non-codant a été étudié dans le coeur de'souris après un infarctus du myocarde. Nous avons découverts 1500 nouveaux IncRNAs. Ces transcrits ont d'uniques caractéristiques. En particulier ils sont extrêmement spécifiques de sous-populations de cellules cardiaques. Par ailleurs, leur expression est remarquablement corrélée avec les paramètres définissant les dimensions du coeur et la fonction cardiaque. La majorité de ces IncRNAs sont conservés chez l'humain. Certains sont modulés dans des pathologies cardiaques. En utilisant une approche bioinformatique, nous avons identifié un IncRNA qui est associé à des séquences amplificatrices et qui est particulièrement enrichi dans les fibroblastes cardiaques. Ce transcrit a été nommé Wisper pour «Wisp2 super-enhancer-derived IncRNA ». L'importance de Wisper dans la biologie des fibroblastes cardiaques est démontrée dans des expériences de déplétion. En l'absence de Wisper, l'expression de protéines impliquées dans le développement de la fibrose est dramatiquement réduite dans les fibroblastes cardiaques. Ceux-ci montrent une prolifération réduite. Le niveau d'apoptose est largement augmenté. In vivo, la déplétion de Wisper pendant la phase aiguë de l'infarctus rehausse le risque de rupture cardiaque. Au contraire, la réduction de l'expression de Wisper pendant la phase chronique diminue la fibrose cardiaque et améliore la fonction du coeur. Puisque Wisper est exprimé dans le coeur humain, ce transcrit représente une nouvelle cible thérapeutique pour limiter la réponse fibrotique dans le coeur.