Role of Munc18c in SNARE-mediated exocytosis

Background: The SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor Attachment protein Receptors) and SM (Sec1/Munc18) family of proteins form the core machinery that drives the fusion of vesicles in different membrane trafficking steps. They are highly conserved, implying a similar mode of binding and function. In vertebrates, Munc18a is essential for neuronal exocytosis. It binds to its partner syntaxin1a (Syx1a) at both its N-peptide and closed conformation, and thereby inhibits SNARE complex formation in vitro. By contrast, its close homolog Munc18c is thought to interact with only the N-peptide of its partner Syx4. Moreover, different effects of Munc18c on SNARE complex formation have been reported, suggesting that the two Munc18/Syx pairs act differently. Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the mechanism of action of Munc18c indeed deviates from that of Munc18a by using sensitive biochemical and biophysical methods. Results: I found that Munc18c does have a similar binding mode as Munc18a and interacts tightly with Syx4 at both the N-peptide and closed conformation. Moreover, I established, through a novel assay, that Munc18c inhibits SNARE complex assembly, with both the binding sites contributing to inhibition, similar to Munc18a. However, there were several subtle differences between the two Munc18/Syx pairs. Munc18a exerted stronger inhibition than Munc18c. Also their respective Syx partners were found to differ in the rate of binding to SNAP25, suggesting that the equilibrium of their open and closed conformations is different. Moreover, Munc18a was found to interact with Syx 1, 2, 3 but not 4, while Munc18c bound to Syx 2, 4 and 1 but not 3. By comparing the kinetics of interaction of Syx with either Munc18 or SNAP25, I found that the block of SNARE complex assembly by Munc18 is effective on a shorter time scale, but SNAP25 eventually binds to Syx resulting in SNARE complex formation. Nevertheless, these findings do not explain how Syx can escape the tight grip of Munc18, suggesting that other proteins or mechanisms are needed for this step. I also discovered that Munc18 is able to bind on the surface of the SNARE core complex; however, this observation needs to be tested more rigorously. Conclusion: Munc18c was found to be similar to Munc18a in its mode of binding to Syx and inhibition of SNARE complex assembly. However, differences in kinetics and interaction specificities were observed between the different Munc18/Syx pairs. -- Contexte : Les familles des protéines SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor At- tachment protein Receptors) et SM (Sec1/Munc18) forment le coeur de la machinerie chargée de la fusion vésiculaire au cours des différentes étapes du trafic intracellulaire. Elles sont très conservées, suggérant un mode d'interaction et des fonctions semblables. Chez les Verté- brés, Munc18a est essentielle à l'exocytose neuronale. Elle se lie à sa partenaire d'interaction syntaxin1a (Syx1a) à la fois via un peptide N-terminal et la conformation fermée de celle-ci, inhibant ainsi la formation du complexe SNARE in vitro. Son homologue proche Munc18c au contraire, est supposée interagir seulement avec le peptide N-terminal de sa partenaire Syx4. En outre, différents effets de Munc18c sur la formation du complexe SNARE ont été décrits, suggérant que les deux paires Munc18/Syx fonctionnent différemment. Objectif : Le but de cette étude est de tester si les mécanismes de fonctionnement de Munc18c diffèrent vraiment de ceux de Munc18a par le biais de méthodes biochimiques et biophysiques très précises. Résultats : J'ai pu démontrer que Munc18c se comporte en effet de façon semblable à Munc18a, et interagit étroitement avec Syx4 à ses deux sites de liaison. J'ai pu de surcroît montrer par une nouvelle méthode que Munc18c inhibe l'assemblage du complexe SNARE en impliquant ces deux sites de liaison, comme le fait Munc18a. il existe cependant de subtiles différences entre les deux paires Munc18/Syx : Munc18a exerce une inhibition plus forte que Munc18c ; leurs Syx partenaires diffèrent également dans leur degré de liaison à SNAP25, ce qui suggère un équilibre different de leurs conformations ouverte et fermée. De plus, Munc18a interagit avec Syx 1, 2 et 3 mais pas Syx 4, alors que Munc18c se lie à Syx 2, 4 et 1 mais pas Syx 3. En comparant les cinétiques d'interaction de Syx avec Munc18 ou SNAP25, j'ai découvert que le blocage par Munc18 de l'assemblage du complexe SNARE est effectif de façon brève, bien que SNAP25 finisse par se lier à Syx et aboutir ainsi à la formation du complexe SNARE. Ces découvertes n'expliquent cependant pas comment Syx parvient à échapper à la solide emprise de Munc18, et suggèrent ainsi l'intervention nécessaire d'autres protéines ou mécanismes à cette étape. J'ai également découvert que Munc18 peut se lier à la surface de la partie centrale du complexe SNARE - cette observation reste à être testée de façon plus stringente. Conclusion : Il a pu être établi que Munc18c est semblable à Munc18a quant à son mode de liaison à Syx et d'inhibition de l'assemblage du complexe SNARE. Des différences de cinétique et de spécificité d'interaction entre les diverses paires Munc18/Syx ont cependant été identifiées.

La fureur divine et son détournement en Nb 25

The story Numbers of 25 which reports the incident of Baal Peor is one among several texts in the book of Numbers focusing on divine wrath, its cause and its consequences. The present article offers a detailed analysis of the account which is difficult to understand because of certain jumps in the plot and because of its allusive style. Scholars mostly agree with the idea that the story grew in two or three stages. A lot of commentators believe that the original story contains only the apostasy of Peor caused by the Moabites (vv. 1-5). A subsequent story would focus on Pinchas' action against Zimri and Kospi, and a third layer is linked to the story of the war between Israel and Midian (Numbers 31). The problem of this theory however is that it seems impossible to reconstruct an original story about the matter of Peor; one does not find a satisfying end within vv. 1-5. Furthermore, v. 5, which belongs to the first, "Moabite", section, is already linked to the theme of Midian which dominates the second and the third passage. Moreover, the assemblage of different themes and motifs seem having been done with care: Regarding the two abuses of Israel reported in the story--idolatry and intermarriage--, they often go together in late polemical Deuteronomistic and post-Deuteronomistic layers (Ezra-Nehemiah). The double focus on Midian and Moab could both be polemically directed against certain Moses traditions found in the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy (concerning Moses' marriage with a Midianite women on the one hand and his stay and death and burial in Moab - in the vicinity of Beth Peor - on the other hand). As in several ANE traditions also in the Hebrew Bible the motif of "divine wrath" serves to interpret fatal historical events; in Num 25 as in other Biblical stories however it is doubtful whether the alleged incident (the plague) really have taken place and the story's plot is anchored in ancient Israel's history.