2 years' review of pediatric emergencies admitted in the resuscitation room of a Swiss university hospital

Introduction: Paediatric resuscitation is an intense, stressful andchallenging process performed in a specific surrounding. In theresuscitation room (RR), a dedicated pediatric team is not alwaysavailable and its composition varies according to local resources. Aregular review of the children admitted in the resuscitation room andthe assessment of various outcome measures are the basis of qualitycontrol (QC). The epidemiology of Potentially Life ThreateningPaediatric (LTP) emergencies admitted in a Swiss university hospitalhas never been reported. The aims of this study were to review theLTP emergency population with regards to origin, patients'demographics, reason for admission and final diagnosis, treatmentmodalities, critical events and outcome.Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectivelycollected data was conducted, including all LTP emergencies admittedover a period of 2 years in the RR of a Swiss university hospitalfunctioning as a tertiary level referral centre. Multiple variablesincluding indication for transfer, mode of pre-hospital transportation,diagnosis and the time spent in RR were assessed. Data assessmenttook place 2 years after the implementation of a quality control (QC)team assessing the pediatric resuscitations occurring within theinstitution on a monthly basis.Results: Out of 60 939 pediatric emergencies treated in LausanneUniversity Medical center over 2 years, a total of 277 LTP emergencies(0.46%) were admitted to the RR, including 160 boys and 117 girls,aged 6 days to 15.95 years (mean 6.69 years, median 5.06). The tablebelow illustrates in more details the identified problems, average age,time in hospital and outcome of both surgical and medical groups ofpatients.Conclusions: With the need for health care quality improvement andfinancial restrictions, an excellent knowledge of the characteristics ofLTP emergencies is unavoidable. A thorough understanding of theresuscitation process and humans resources involved can be achievedwith a systematic review of the cases. A dedicated quality control teamevaluating LTP emergencies in a hospital will identify areas forimprovement. A LTP registry at the national level would be of greatvalue in Switzerland.

Yeast vacuoles fragment in an asymmetrical two-phase process with distinct protein requirements.

Yeast vacuoles fragment and fuse in response to environmental conditions, such as changes in osmotic conditions or nutrient availability. Here we analyze osmotically induced vacuole fragmentation by time-lapse microscopy. Small fragmentation products originate directly from the large central vacuole. This happens by asymmetrical scission rather than by consecutive equal divisions. Fragmentation occurs in two distinct phases. Initially, vacuoles shrink and generate deep invaginations that leave behind tubular structures in their vicinity. Already this invagination requires the dynamin-like GTPase Vps1p and the vacuolar proton gradient. Invaginations are stabilized by phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) produced by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase complex II. Subsequently, vesicles pinch off from the tips of the tubular structures in a polarized manner, directly generating fragmentation products of the final size. This phase depends on the production of phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate and the Fab1 complex. It is accelerated by the PI(3)P- and phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate-binding protein Atg18p. Thus vacuoles fragment in two steps with distinct protein and lipid requirements.

A New Look at Emotional Intelligence: A Dual-Process Framework

In this article, the author provides a framework to guide¦research in emotional intelligence. Studies conducted up¦to the present bear on a conception of emotional intelligence¦as pertaining to the domain of consciousness and¦investigate the construct with a correlational approach.¦As an alternative, the author explores processes underlying¦emotional intelligence, introducing the distinction¦between conscious and automatic processing as a potential¦source of variability in emotionally intelligent¦behavior. Empirical literature is reviewed to support the¦central hypothesis that individual differences in emotional¦intelligence may be best understood by considering¦the way individuals automatically process emotional¦stimuli. Providing directions for research, the author¦encourages the integration of experimental investigation¦of processes underlying emotional intelligence with¦correlational analysis of individual differences and¦fosters the exploration of the automaticity component¦of emotional intelligence.

Low C-reactive protein values at admission predict mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae that require intensive care management.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by S. pneumoniae who require intensive care unit (ICU) management, and to assess the prognostic values of these risk factors at the time of admission. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with CAP caused by S. pneumoniae who were admitted to the 32-bed medico-surgical ICU of a community and referral university hospital between 2002 and 2011. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on variables available at admission. RESULTS: Among the 77 adult patients with severe CAP caused by S. pneumoniae who required ICU management, 12 patients died (observed mortality rate 15.6 %). Univariate analysis indicated that septic shock and low C-reactive protein (CRP) values at admission were associated with an increased risk of death. In a multivariate model, after adjustment for age and gender, septic shock [odds ratio (OR), confidence interval 95 %; 4.96, 1.11-22.25; p = 0.036], and CRP (OR 0.99, 0.98-0.99 p = 0.034) remained significantly associated with death. Finally, we assessed the discriminative ability of CRP to predict mortality by computing its receiver operating characteristic curve. The CRP value cut-off for the best sensitivity and specificity was 169.5 mg/L to predict hospital mortality with an area under the curve of 0.72 (0.55-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality of patients with S. pneumoniae CAP requiring ICU management was much lower than predicted by severity scores. The presence of septic shock and a CRP value at admission <169.5 mg/L predicted a fatal outcome.

Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness.

Given the cost constraints of the European health-care systems, criteria are needed to decide which genetic services to fund from the public budgets, if not all can be covered. To ensure that high-priority services are available equitably within and across the European countries, a shared set of prioritization criteria would be desirable. A decision process following the accountability for reasonableness framework was undertaken, including a multidisciplinary EuroGentest/PPPC-ESHG workshop to develop shared prioritization criteria. Resources are currently too limited to fund all the beneficial genetic testing services available in the next decade. Ethically and economically reflected prioritization criteria are needed. Prioritization should be based on considerations of medical benefit, health need and costs. Medical benefit includes evidence of benefit in terms of clinical benefit, benefit of information for important life decisions, benefit for other people apart from the person tested and the patient-specific likelihood of being affected by the condition tested for. It may be subject to a finite time window. Health need includes the severity of the condition tested for and its progression at the time of testing. Further discussion and better evidence is needed before clearly defined recommendations can be made or a prioritization algorithm proposed. To our knowledge, this is the first time a clinical society has initiated a decision process about health-care prioritization on a European level, following the principles of accountability for reasonableness. We provide points to consider to stimulate this debate across the EU and to serve as a reference for improving patient management.