Furosemide stimulation of parathormone in humans: role of the calcium-sensing receptor and the renin-angiotensin system

Les interactions entre les systèmes de régulation du sodium et du calcium sont encore mal comprises et leur importance clinique mérite d'être étudiée plus en détail. Les études chez l'animal ont montré qu'il existe des relations entre le taux plasmatique d'hormone parathyroïdienne (PTH) et l'aldostérone ou l'activité de la rénine. Par ailleurs, il a été démontré chez l'animal et chez l'homme que le taux sanguin de PTH augmente rapidement après une injection de furosémide, un diurétique de l'anse ce qui fait penser qu'il existe un lien entre l'effet du furosémide sur le rein et la sécrétion de PTH. Toutefois, à ce jour, le(s) mécanisme(s) impliqués dans ce lien reste(nt) encore inconnu(s). Des résultats plus récents suggèrent que l'effet du furosemide est amoindri par l'administration préalable d'un calcimimétique agissant au niveau du récepteur sensible au calcium (calcium sensing receptor). Pour explorer chez l'homme, les mécanismes possibles du lien entre PTH et effet du furosemide sur le rein, nous avons planifié une étude randomisée croisée contre placebo réalisée chez 18 volontaires sains masculins. Le but principal était d'investiguer le rôle du système rénine-angiotensine et des calcium sensing receptors. L'étude s'est donc réalisée en 2 phases pour chaque sujet. Les participants ont ainsi reçu soit du cinacalcet (60mg) soit un placebo dans une première phase et le placebo ou du cinacalcet dans la 2° phase. Dans chaque phase d'évaluation, une injection de 20 mg de furosemide a été administrée par voie intraveineuse à l'équilibre soit 3 heures après la prise du placebo ou du cinacalcet. Des échantillons de plasma ont été prélevés toutes les 15 minutes pendant 1 heure puis toutes les heures pour le dosage de PTH intacte, calcium, sodium, potassium, magnésium, phosphate, activité de la rénine plasmatique et aldostérone jusqu'à 6h après l'injection de furosémide. L'excrétion urinaire de ces mêmes électrolytes a été mesurée aux mêmes intervalles.

Nouveautés et perspectives dans la prise en charge des cancers colorectaux et gastriques avancés [News and perspectives in the treatment of advanced gastric and colorectal cancers].

Colorectal and gastric cancers are the fourth and third leading causes of cancer death world-wide. Unfortunately, gastric cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage after becoming metastatic in distant sites, so that palliative therapy is the mainstay of treatment. Major progress in the understanding of the biology, the development of valid biomarkers and molecular targeted drugs have improved the treatment options and prognosis of both cancers significantly in the last years. Here, we review the current standards of care for patients with advanced and metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer and outline the perspectives for the future.

International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines are essential in implementing and maintaining nationwide stage-specific diagnostic and therapeutic standards. In 2011, the first German expert consensus guideline defined the evidence for diagnosis and treatment of early and locally advanced esophagogastric cancers. Here, we compare this guideline with other national guidelines as well as current literature. METHODS: The German S3-guideline used an approved development process with de novo literature research, international guideline adaptation, or good clinical practice. Other recent evidence-based national guidelines and current references were compared with German recommendations. RESULTS: In the German S3 and other Western guidelines, adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) are classified according to formerly defined AEG I-III subgroups due to the high surgical impact. To stage local disease, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen and endosonography are reinforced. In contrast, laparoscopy is optional for staging. Mucosal cancers (T1a) should be endoscopically resected "en-bloc" to allow complete histological evaluation of lateral and basal margins. For locally advanced cancers of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (≥T3N+), preferred treatment is preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative radiochemotherapy is an evidence-based alternative for large AEG type I-II tumors (≥T3N+). Additionally, some experts recommend treating T2 tumors with a similar approach, mainly because pretherapeutic staging is often considered to be unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: The German S3 guideline represents an up-to-date European position with regard to diagnosis, staging, and treatment recommendations for patients with locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. Effects of perioperative chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy are still to be investigated for adenocarcinoma of the cardia and the lower esophagus.

European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukemias.

BACKGROUND: Current cancer mortality statistics are important for public health decision making and resource allocation. Age standardized rates and numbers of deaths are predicted for 2016 in the European Union. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Population and death certification data for stomach, colorectum, pancreas, lung, breast, uterus, prostate, leukemia and total cancers were obtained from the World Health Organisation database and Eurostat. Figures were derived for the EU, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the UK. Projected numbers of deaths by age group were obtained for 2016 by linear regression on estimated numbers of deaths over the most recent time period identified by a joinpoint regression model. RESULTS: Projected total cancer mortality trends for 2016 in the EU are favourable in both sexes with rates of 133.5/100,000 men and 85.2/100,000 women (8% and 3% falls since 2011, due to population ageing) corresponding to 753,600 and 605,900 deaths in men and women for a total number of 1,359,500 projected cancer deaths (+3% compared to 2011). In men lung, colorectal and prostate cancer fell 11%, 5% and 8% since 2011. Breast and colorectal cancer trends in women are favourable (8% and 7% falls, respectively), but lung and Pancreatic cancer rates rose 5% and 4% since 2011 reaching rates of 14.4 and 5.6/100,000 women. Leukemia shows favourable projected mortality for both sexes and all age groups with stronger falls in the younger age groups, rates are 4.0/100,000 men and 2.5/100,000 women, with respectively falls of 14% and 12%. CONCLUSION: The 2016 predictions for EU cancer mortality confirm the favourable trends in rates particularly for men. Lung cancer is likely to remain the leading site for female cancer rates. Continuing falls in mortality, larger in children and young adults, are predicted in leukemia, essentially due to advancements in management and therapy, and their subsequent adoption across Europe.