A model of gender prejudice, power, and discrimination: How hierarchy-enhancing factors predominate over hierarchy-attenuating factors

Gender inequalities remain an issue in our society and particularly in the workplace. Several factors can explain this gender difference in top-level managerial positions such as career ambitions but also biases against women. In our chapter, we propose a model explaining why gender inequalities and particularly discrimination against women is still present in our societies despite social norms and existing legislation on gender equality. To this purpose, we review research on discrimination through two different approaches, (a) a prejudice approach through the justification-suppression model developed by Crandall and Eshleman (2003) and (b) a power approach through the social dominance theory (Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). In our work, we integrate these two approaches and propose a model of gender prejudice, power and discrimination. The integration of these two approaches contributes to a better understanding of how discrimination against women is formed and maintained over time.

Prévention dans les entreprises: plus facile à dire qu'à faire

Les problèmes de santé liés au travail sont en augmentation. Des stratégies d'entreprise intégrant la santé au travail doivent être mises en place. Les rapports entre activité professionnelle et santé restent cependant complexes.

Health care workers' influenza vaccination: motivations and mandatory mask policy

BACKGROUND: Vaccination of health care workers (HCW) against seasonal influenza (SI) is recommended but vaccination rate rarely reach >30%. Vaccination coverage against 2009 pandemic influenza (PI) was 52% in our hospital, whilst a new policy requiring unvaccinated HCW to wear a mask during patient care duties was enforced. AIMS: To investigate the determinants of this higher vaccination acceptance for PI and to look for an association with the new mask-wearing policy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, involving HCW of three critical departments of a 1023-bed, tertiary-care university hospital in Switzerland. Self-reported 2009-10 SI and 2009 PI vaccination statuses, reasons and demographic data were collected through a literature-based questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, uni- and multivariate analyses were then performed. RESULTS: There were 472 respondents with a response rate of 54%. Self-reported vaccination acceptance was 64% for PI and 53% for SI. PI vaccination acceptance was associated with being vaccinated against SI (OR 9.5; 95% CI 5.5-16.4), being a physician (OR 7.7; 95% CI 3.1-19.1) and feeling uncomfortable wearing a mask (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.8). Main motives for refusing vaccination were: preference for wearing a surgical mask (80% for PI, not applicable for SI) and concerns about vaccine safety (64%, 50%) and efficacy (44%, 35%). CONCLUSIONS: The new mask-wearing policy was a motivation for vaccination but also offered an alternative to non-compliant HCW. Concerns about vaccine safety and efficiency and self-interest of health care workers are still main determinants for influenza vaccination acceptance. Better incentives are needed to encourage vaccination amongst non-physician HCW.

7

This paper discusses the issues involved in ICT from an ethico-political perspective, which states that an innovation is fully justifiable when it contributes to the empowerment, equality, and autonomy of the agent targeted. With this criterion in mind, discussing the foreseeable impacts of ubicomp-ICT, it focuses on the dangers linked to the enhanced asymmetry in the distribution of power within the organization which it is likely to bring about. If left to "laissez-faire", it is finally suggested, it might even be seen as a threat to democracy.

Un "fil rouge" pour prévenir la violence au travail : propositions de mesures prioritaires dans le contexte suisse

Une première étude menée par les auteures de cet article dans le cadre de l'Unité de médecine des violences du Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois et de l'Institut universitaire romand de santé au travail avait montré que les conséquences à long terme d'une agression physique au travail pouvaient être sérieuses et le soutien de l'employeur était primordial pour surmonter les conséquences d'un tel événement. Une étude complémentaire, dont les résultats sont présentés ici, avait pour but de formuler des propositions concrètes de mesures de prévention de la violence physique au travail dans le contexte suisse. Les résultats sont présentés dans un «fil rouge» qui se présente sous forme de check-lists de recommandations concrètes. Ce travail s'appuie sur l'analyse et la synthèse d'une abondante documentation, ainsi que sur des entretiens auprès de personnes-ressource et des témoignages de victimes d'agressions physiques au travail. En conclusion, il apparaît que les mesures existantes en Suisse sont encore trop souvent partielles et fragmentées, et se limitent souvent à des offres de formation ou d'information ponctuelles. Alors même que les organisations sont de plus en plus confrontées aux agressions envers le personnel, il y a lieu de les sensibiliser à la nécessité d'instaurer de véritables dispositifs de prévention inscrits dans la durée et s'appuyant sur des modèles éprouvés, opérant aux trois niveaux de prévention primaire, secondaire et tertiaire.