Identification and removal of low-complexity sites in allele-specific analysis of ChIP-seq data.

MOTIVATION: High-throughput sequencing technologies enable the genome-wide analysis of the impact of genetic variation on molecular phenotypes at unprecedented resolution. However, although powerful, these technologies can also introduce unexpected artifacts. Results: We investigated the impact of library amplification bias on the identification of allele-specific (AS) molecular events from high-throughput sequencing data derived from chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (ChIP-seq). Putative AS DNA binding activity for RNA polymerase II was determined using ChIP-seq data derived from lymphoblastoid cell lines of two parent-daughter trios. We found that, at high-sequencing depth, many significant AS binding sites suffered from an amplification bias, as evidenced by a larger number of clonal reads representing one of the two alleles. To alleviate this bias, we devised an amplification bias detection strategy, which filters out sites with low read complexity and sites featuring a significant excess of clonal reads. This method will be useful for AS analyses involving ChIP-seq and other functional sequencing assays.

Steady-state equilibrium phase inversion recovery ON-resonant water suppression (IRON) MR angiography in conjunction with superparamagnetic nanoparticles. A robust technique for imaging within a wide range of contrast agent dosages.

PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of inversion recovery ON-resonant water suppression (IRON) in conjunction with P904 (superparamagnetic nanoparticles which consisting of a maghemite core coated with a low-molecular-weight amino-alcohol derivative of glucose) to perform steady-state equilibrium phase MR angiography (MRA) over a wide dose range. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were approved by the institutional animal care committee. Rabbits (n = 12) were imaged at baseline and serially after the administration of 10 incremental dosages of 0.57-5.7 mgFe/Kg P904. Conventional T1-weighted and IRON MRA were obtained on a clinical 1.5 Tesla (T) scanner to image the thoracic and abdominal aorta, and peripheral vessels. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and vessel sharpness were quantified. RESULTS: Using IRON MRA, CNR and vessel sharpness progressively increased with incremental dosages of the contrast agent P904, exhibiting constantly higher contrast values than T1 -weighted MRA over a very wide range of contrast agent doses (CNR of 18.8 ± 5.6 for IRON versus 11.1 ± 2.8 for T1 -weighted MRA at 1.71 mgFe/kg, P = 0.02 and 19.8 ± 5.9 for IRON versus -0.8 ± 1.4 for T1-weighted MRA at 3.99 mgFe/kg, P = 0.0002). Similar results were obtained for vessel sharpness in peripheral vessels, (Vessel sharpness of 46.76 ± 6.48% for IRON versus 33.20 ± 3.53% for T1-weighted MRA at 1.71 mgFe/Kg, P = 0.002, and of 48.66 ± 5.50% for IRON versus 19.00 ± 7.41% for T1-weighted MRA at 3.99 mgFe/Kg, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that quantitative CNR and vessel sharpness after the injection of P904 are consistently higher for IRON MRA when compared with conventional T1-weighted MRA. These findings apply for a wide range of contrast agent dosages.

Endoscopic Approach and Management of Parasellar Lesions

The parasellar region is the location of a wide variety of inflammatory and benign or malignant lesions. A pathological diagnostic strategy may be difficult to establish relying solely on imaging data. Percutaneous biopsy through the foramen ovale using the Hartel technique has been developed for decision-making process. It is an accurate diagnostic tool allowing pathological diagnosis to determine the best treatment strategy. However, in some cases, this procedure may fail or may be inappropriate particularly for anterior parasellar lesions. Over these past decades, endoscopy has been widely developed and promoted in many indications. It represents an interesting alternative approach to parasellar lesions with low morbidity when compared to the classic microscopic sub-temporal extradural approach with or without orbito-zygomatic removal. In this chapter, we describe our experience with the endoscopic approach to parasellar lesions. We propose a complete overview of surgical anatomy and describe methods and results of the technique. We also suggest a model of a decision-making tree for the diagnosis and treatment of parasellar lesions.

Recovery of biological motion perception and network plasticity after cerebellar tumor removal.

Visual perception of body motion is vital for everyday activities such as social interaction, motor learning or car driving. Tumors to the left lateral cerebellum impair visual perception of body motion. However, compensatory potential after cerebellar damage and underlying neural mechanisms remain unknown. In the present study, visual sensitivity to point-light body motion was psychophysically assessed in patient SL with dysplastic gangliocytoma (Lhermitte-Duclos disease) to the left cerebellum before and after neurosurgery, and in a group of healthy matched controls. Brain activity during processing of body motion was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Alterations in underlying cerebro-cerebellar circuitry were studied by psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. Visual sensitivity to body motion in patient SL before neurosurgery was substantially lower than in controls, with significant improvement after neurosurgery. Functional MRI in patient SL revealed a similar pattern of cerebellar activation during biological motion processing as in healthy participants, but located more medially, in the left cerebellar lobules III and IX. As in normalcy, PPI analysis showed cerebellar communication with a region in the superior temporal sulcus, but located more anteriorly. The findings demonstrate a potential for recovery of visual body motion processing after cerebellar damage, likely mediated by topographic shifts within the corresponding cerebro-cerebellar circuitry induced by cerebellar reorganization. The outcome is of importance for further understanding of cerebellar plasticity and neural circuits underpinning visual social cognition.

Développement d'un outil de gestion graduée des risques spécifique au cas des nanomatériaux : rapport d'appui scientifique et technique

L' évaluation quantitative des dangers et des expositions aux nanomatériaux se heurte à de nombreuses incertitudes qui ne seront levées qu'à mesure de la progression des connaissances scientifiques de leurs propriétés. L' une des conséquences de ces incertitudes est que les valeurs limites d'exposition professionnelle définies actuellement pour les poussières ne sont pas nécessairement pertinentes aux nanomatériaux. En l'absence de référentiel quantitatif et, à la demande de la DGS pour éclairer les réflexions de l' AFNOR et de l'ISO sur le sujet, une démarche de gestion graduée des risques (control banding) a été élaborée au sein de l' Anses. Ce développement a été réalisé à l'aide d'un groupe d'experts rapporteurs rattaché au Comité d'experts spécialisés évaluation des risques liés aux agents physiques, aux nouvelles technologies et aux grands aménagements. La mise en oeuvre de la démarche de gestion graduée des risques proposée repose sur quatre grandes étapes: 1. Le recueil des informations. Cette étape consiste à réunir les informations disponibles sur les dangers du nanomatériau manufacturé considéré ; ainsi que sur l'exposition potentielle des personnes aux postes de travail (observation sur le terrain, mesures, etc.). 2. L'attribution d'une bande de danger. Le danger potentiel du nanomatériau manufacturé présent, qu'il soit brut où incorporé dans une matrice (liquide ou solide) est évalué dans cette étape. La bande danger attribuée tient compte de la dangerosité du produit bulk ou de sa substance analogue à l'échelle non-nanométrique, de la bio-persistance du matériau (pour les matériaux fibreux), de sa solubilité et de son éventuelle réactivité. 3. Attribution d'une bande d'exposition. La bande d'exposition du nanomatériau manufacturé considéré ou du produit en contenant est définie par le niveau de potentiel d'émission du produit. Elle tient compte de sa forme physique (solide, liquide, poudre aérosol), de sa pulvérulence et de sa volatilité. Le nombre de travailleurs, la fréquence, la durée d'exposition ainsi que la quantité mise en oeuvre ne sont pas pris en compte, contrairement à une évaluation classique des risques chimiques. 4. Obtention d'une bande de maîtrise des risques. Le croisement des bandes de dangers et d'exposition préalablement attribuées permet de défi nir le niveau de maîtrise du risque. Il fait correspondre les moyens techniques et organisationnels à mettre en oeuvre pour maintenir le risque au niveau le plus faible possible. Un plan d'action est ensuite défi ni pour garantir l'effi cacité de la prévention recommandée par le niveau de maîtrise déterminé. Il tient compte des mesures de prévention déjà existantes et les renforce si nécessaire. Si les mesures indiquées par le niveau de maîtrise de risque ne sont pas réalisables, par exemple, pour des raisons techniques ou budgétaires, une évaluation de risque approfondie devra être réalisée par un expert. La gestion graduée des risques est une méthode alternative pour réaliser une évaluation qualitative de risques et mettre en place des moyens de prévention sans recourir à une évaluation quantitative des risques. Son utilisation semble particulièrement adaptée au contexte des nanomatériaux manufacturés, pour lequel les choix de valeurs de référence (Valeurs limites d'exposition en milieu professionnel) et des techniques de mesurage appropriées souffrent d'une grande incertitude. La démarche proposée repose sur des critères simples, accessibles dans la littérature scientifi que ou via les données techniques relatives aux produits utilisés. Pour autant, sa mise en oeuvre requiert des compétences minimales dans les domaines de la prévention des risques chimiques (chimie, toxicologie, etc.), des nanosciences et des nanotechnologies.

Transfer insensitive labeling technique (TILT): application to multislice functional perfusion imaging.

Cerebral blood flow can be studied in a multislice mode with a recently proposed perfusion sequence using inversion of water spins as an endogenous tracer without magnetization transfer artifacts. The magnetization transfer insensitive labeling technique (TILT) has been used for mapping blood flow changes at a microvascular level under motor activation in a multislice mode. In TILT, perfusion mapping is achieved by subtraction of a perfusion-sensitized image from a control image. Perfusion weighting is accomplished by proximal blood labeling using two 90 degrees radiofrequency excitation pulses. For control preparation the labeling pulses are modified such that they have no net effect on blood water magnetization. The percentage of blood flow change, as well as its spatial extent, has been studied in single and multislice modes with varying delays between labeling and imaging. The average perfusion signal change due to activation was 36.9 +/- 9.1% in the single-slice experiments and 38.1 +/- 7.9% in the multislice experiments. The volume of activated brain areas amounted to 1.51 +/- 0.95 cm3 in the contralateral primary motor (M1) area, 0.90 +/- 0.72 cc in the ipsilateral M1 area, 1.27 +/- 0.39 cm3 in the contralateral and 1.42 +/- 0.75 cm3 in the ipsilateral premotor areas, and 0.71 +/- 0.19 cm3 in the supplementary motor area.

A new technique for simultaneous validation of two manual nonmercury auscultatory sphygmomanometers (A&D UM-101 and Accoson Greenlight 300) based on the International protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Auscultatory nonmercury manual devices seem good alternatives for the mercury sphygmomanometers in the clinic and for research settings, but individual internal validation of each device is time-consuming. The aim of this study was to validate a new technique capable of testing two devices simultaneously, based on the International protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. METHODS: The concept of the new technique is to measure blood pressure alternatively by two observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer and by two observers using the A&D UM-101 and Accoson Greenlight 300 devices, connected by Y-tube to obtain simultaneous readings with both nonmercury devices. Thirty-three participants were enrolled (mean age 47.2±14.0 years). Nine sequential blood pressure measurements were performed for each participant. RESULTS: Both devices passed phase 1 using 15 participants. In phase 2.1 (n=33), on a maximum of 99 measurements, the Accoson device produced 81/95/99 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 87/98/99 for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The A&D device produced 86/96/99 for SBP and 94/99/99 for DBP. In phase 2.2 (n=33), 30 participants had at least 2 out of 3 SBP obtained with Accoson device within 5 mmHg of the mercury device, as compared with 29 of 33 participants with the A&D device. For DBP, this was 33 of 33 participants for both devices. CONCLUSION: Both the nonmercury devices passed the International protocol. The new technique of simultaneous device testing using a Y-tube represents a time saving application of the International protocol.