Diagnosis by imaging : the case of textbooks of diseases of the nervous system (1850-1920)

Les traités scientifiques ne font que depuis peu d'années l'objet d'études en histoire des sciences. Pourtant, ces traités ont énormément à apporter car ils renseignent sur la manière de raisonner des auteurs, ainsi que sur le développement d'une discipline. Dans ce travail de doctorat, différents traités des maladies du système nerveux ont été dépouillés, notamment le traité de Sémiologie des affections du système nerveux (1914) de Jules Dejerine (1849-1917). Ce traité a été analysé de trois manières différentes. Il a tout d'abord été comparé à une édition précédente publiée sous forme de chapitre (1901), révélant un large remodelage du contenu du traité, suggérant une évolution rapide de la discipline neurologique en l'espace de quelques années. Deuxièmement, l'analyse de la Sémiologie a permis de recréer un réseau de professionnels avec qui Jules Dejerine était en contact et, en parcourant les livres publiés par ces auteurs, il a été possible de décrire de quelle manière ces auteurs se citent mutuellement. Finalement, ces livres contiennent de nombreuses illustrations, qui sont associées à la notion de « preuve » : les auteurs utilisent des images sous forme de dessins, de photographies ou de schémas qui illustrent des patients ou des pièces anatomiques pour « montrer » la maladie ou la lésion. Chaque illustration a un rôle à jouer pour décrire la lésion, montrer la progression de la maladie et elle aide le médecin à poser le diagnostic. Grâce à ces trois axes de recherche, un traité devient un outil de travail dynamique, qui évolue au fil des rééditions, influencé par les critiques et commentaires retrouvés dans d'autres traités et articles, et par les progrès accomplis dans la discipline traitée. Des, passages et certaines images de l'ouvrage circulent également de traité en traité et véhiculent l'autorité de l'auteur de ces passages et images qui en viennent à représenter la maladie. Ce transfert d'images joue également un rôle dans la standardisation du diagnostic et dans l'unification de la neurologie à travers le monde occidental au début du XXe siècle, une période charnière pour l'histoire de la médecine. -- Au début du XXe siècle, la neurologie est une jeune spécialité médicale qui se développe rapidement. Les différents médecins publient des traités, communiquent entre eux et échangent leurs données. Un traité scientifique est un outil de travail dynamique qui évolue avec les rééditions et le développement d'une discipline. Ces ouvrages recèlent toutes sortes d'informations et leur analyse ne fait que depuis peu de temps l'objet d'études en histoire des sciences. Ces traités regorgent notamment d'illustrations qui sont associées à la notion de « preuve » : les auteurs utilisent des images sous forme de dessins, de photographies ou de schémas qui représentent des patients ou des pièces anatomiques afin de « montrer » la maladie ou la lésion. Chaque illustration a un rôle à jouer pour décrire la pathologie, montrer la progression de la maladie et elle aide le médecin à poser le diagnostic. Les auteurs des traités, qui viennent d'Europe et d'Amérique du Nord, se citent mutuellement, permettant au lecteur de recréer leur réseau de professionnels au niveau international. De plus, comme ces auteurs réutilisent les observations et les illustrations des autres, celles-ci circulent de traité en traité et en viennent à représenter la maladie. Ce transfert d'images joue également un rôle dans la standardisation du diagnostic et dans l'unification de la neurologie à travers le monde occidental au début du XXe siècle, une période charnière pour l'histoire de la médecine. -- Until recently, the study of textbooks has been neglected in the history of the sciences. However, textbooks can provide fruitful sources of information regarding the way authors work and the development of a particular discipline. This dissertation reviews editions of a single textbook, the Sémiologie des affections du système nerveux (1914) by Jules Dejerine (1849-1917). This textbook enabled the description of three axes of research. Firstly, by comparing the book to a first edition published as a chapter, one can acknowledge an extensive remodeling of the content of the book, suggesting a vast increase in knowledge over time. Secondly, by looking at the authors that Dejerine quotes repeatedly, it becomes possible to recreate his professional network, to review the works of these authors and to determine how they cross-reference each other. Thirdly, these textbooks contain numerous medical illustrations, which are linked with the concept of "proof;" the authors demonstrate a willingness to "show" the lesion or the pathology by publishing an image. Drawings, schematic representations, radiographies, or photographs of patients or of anatomical preparations all have their own purpose in describing the lesion and the progression of the disease. They assist in the diagnosis of the pathology. By looking at all of these aspects, it is therefore possible to conclude that a neurological textbook is a dynamic object that evolves through re-editions, comments and references found in other textbooks and by the circulations of parts of these books, such as the images. The illustrations also carry the author's authority, since their ongoing use claims that the work by the owner of the image has been endorsed by others. At the same time, it validates the borrowers' arguments. By using medical illustrations from different authors worldwide, the authors are also making a claim to a common language, to a similar way of examining patients, and about how much they depend on medical imagery to prove their points. In that sense, by focusing upon these textbooks, one can affirm that neurology already existed as a worldwide specialty at the turn of the twentieth century. Much more than mere accompaniments to the text, images were of paramount importance to the unification of neurology.

Exploring the relative DNA contribution of first and second object's users on mock touch DNA mixtures

Contact stains recovered at break-in crime scenes are frequently characterized by mixtures of DNA from several persons. Broad knowledge on the relative contribution of DNA left behind by different users overtime is of paramount importance. Such information might help crime investigators to robustly evaluate the possibility of detecting a specific (or known) individual's DNA profile based on the type and history of an object. To address this issue, a contact stain simulation-based protocol was designed. Fourteen volunteers either acting as first or second object's users were recruited. The first user was required to regularly handle/wear 9 different items during an 8-10-day period, whilst the second user for 5, 30 and 120 min, in three independent simulation sessions producing a total of 231 stains. Subsequently, the relative DNA profile contribution of each individual pair was investigated. Preliminary results showed a progressive increase of the percentage contribution of the second user compared to the first. Interestingly, the second user generally became the major DNA contributor when most objects were handled/worn for 120 min, Furthermore, the observation of unexpected additional alleles will then prompt the investigation of indirect DNA transfer events.

Spinal cord injury affects the interplay between visual and sensorimotor representations of the body.

The brain integrates multiple sensory inputs, including somatosensory and visual inputs, to produce a representation of the body. Spinal cord injury (SCI) interrupts the communication between brain and body and the effects of this deafferentation on body representation are poorly understood. We investigated whether the relative weight of somatosensory and visual frames of reference for body representation is altered in individuals with incomplete or complete SCI (affecting lower limbs' somatosensation), with respect to controls. To study the influence of afferent somatosensory information on body representation, participants verbally judged the laterality of rotated images of feet, hands, and whole-bodies (mental rotation task) in two different postures (participants' body parts were hidden from view). We found that (i) complete SCI disrupts the influence of postural changes on the representation of the deafferented body parts (feet, but not hands) and (ii) regardless of posture, whole-body representation progressively deteriorates proportionally to SCI completeness. These results demonstrate that the cortical representation of the body is dynamic, responsive, and adaptable to contingent conditions, in that the role of somatosensation is altered and partially compensated with a change in the relative weight of somatosensory versus visual bodily representations.

Investigating the functions of subregions within anterior hippocampus.

Previous functional MRI (fMRI) studies have associated anterior hippocampus with imagining and recalling scenes, imagining the future, recalling autobiographical memories and visual scene perception. We have observed that this typically involves the medial rather than the lateral portion of the anterior hippocampus. Here, we investigated which specific structures of the hippocampus underpin this observation. We had participants imagine novel scenes during fMRI scanning, as well as recall previously learned scenes from two different time periods (one week and 30 min prior to scanning), with analogous single object conditions as baselines. Using an extended segmentation protocol focussing on anterior hippocampus, we first investigated which substructures of the hippocampus respond to scenes, and found both imagination and recall of scenes to be associated with activity in presubiculum/parasubiculum, a region associated with spatial representation in rodents. Next, we compared imagining novel scenes to recall from one week or 30 min before scanning. We expected a strong response to imagining novel scenes and 1-week recall, as both involve constructing scene representations from elements stored across cortex. By contrast, we expected a weaker response to 30-min recall, as representations of these scenes had already been constructed but not yet consolidated. Both imagination and 1-week recall of scenes engaged anterior hippocampal structures (anterior subiculum and uncus respectively), indicating possible roles in scene construction. By contrast, 30-min recall of scenes elicited significantly less activation of anterior hippocampus but did engage posterior CA3. Together, these results elucidate the functions of different parts of the anterior hippocampus, a key brain area about which little is definitely known.

Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context : New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range

Humans like some colours and dislike others, but which particular colours and why remains to be understood. Empirical studies on colour preferences generally targeted most preferred colours, but rarely least preferred (disliked) colours. In addition, findings are often based on general colour preferences leaving open the question whether results generalise to specific objects. Here, 88 participants selected the colours they preferred most and least for three context conditions (general, interior walls, t-shirt) using a high-precision colour picker. Participants also indicated whether they associated their colour choice to a valenced object or concept. The chosen colours varied widely between individuals and contexts and so did the reasons for their choices. Consistent patterns also emerged, as most preferred colours in general were more chromatic, while for walls they were lighter and for t-shirts they were darker and less chromatic compared to least preferred colours. This meant that general colour preferences could not explain object specific colour preferences. Measures of the selection process further revealed that, compared to most preferred colours, least preferred colours were chosen more quickly and were less often linked to valenced objects or concepts. The high intra- and inter-individual variability in this and previous reports furthers our understanding that colour preferences are determined by subjective experiences and that most and least preferred colours are not processed equally.