Quality of life after pulmonary embolism: Prospective validation of the German version of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire (PEmb-QoL) is a 40-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with pulmonary embolism. It covers six 6 dimensions: frequency of complaints, limitations in activities of daily living, work-related problems, social limitations, intensity of complaints, and emotional complaints. Originally developed in Dutch and English, we prospectively validated a German version of the PEmb-QoL. METHODS: A forward-backward translation of the English version of the PEmb-QoL into German was performed. German-speaking consecutive adult patients aged ≥18 years with an acute, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism discharged from a Swiss university hospital (01/2011-06/2013) were recruited telephonically. Established psychometric tests and criteria were used to evaluate the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the German PEmb-QoL questionnaire. To assess the underlying dimensions, an exploratory factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients were enrolled in the study. The German version of the PEmb-QoL showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.72 to 0.96), item-total (0.53-0.95) and inter-item correlations (>0.4), and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients 0.59-0.89) for the dimension scores. A moderate correlation of the PEmb-QoL with SF-36 dimension and summary scores (0.21-0.83) indicated convergent validity, while low correlations of PEmb-QoL dimensions with clinical characteristics (-0.16-0.37) supported discriminant validity. The exploratory factor analysis suggested four underlying dimensions: limitations in daily activities, symptoms, work-related problems, and emotional complaints. CONCLUSION: The German version of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable disease-specific measure for quality of life in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Assessment of subjective and hemodynamic tolerance of different high- and low-flux dialysis membranes in patients undergoing chronic intermittent hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial.

Clinical experience and experimental data suggest that intradialytic hemodynamic profiles could be influenced by the characteristics of the dialysis membranes. Even within the worldwide used polysulfone family, intolerance to specific membranes was occasionally evoked. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamically some of the commonly used polysulfone dialyzers in Switzerland. We performed an open-label, randomized, cross-over trial, including 25 hemodialysis patients. Four polysulfone dialyzers, A (Revaclear high-flux, Gambro, Stockholm, Sweden), B (Helixone high-flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta high-flux, BBraun, Melsungen, Germany), and D (Helixone low-flux, Fresenius, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany), were compared. The hemodynamic profile was assessed and patients were asked to provide tolerance feedback. The mean score (±SD) subjectively assigned to dialysis quality on a 1-10 scale was A 8.4 ± 1.3, B 8.6 ± 1.3, C 8.5 ± 1.6, D 8.5 ± 1.5. Kt/V was A 1.58 ± 0.30, B 1.67 ± 0.33, C 1.62 ± 0.32, D 1.45 ± 0.31. The low- compared with the high-flux membranes, correlated to higher systolic (128.1 ± 13.1 vs. 125.6 ± 12.1 mmHg, P < 0.01) and diastolic (76.8 ± 8.7 vs. 75.3 ± 9.0 mmHg; P < 0.05) pressures, higher peripheral resistance (1.44 ± 0.19 vs. 1.40 ± 0.18 s × mmHg/mL; P < 0.05) and lower cardiac output (3.76 ± 0.62 vs. 3.82 ± 0.59 L/min; P < 0.05). Hypotension events (decrease in systolic blood pressure by >20 mmHg) were 70 with A, 87 with B, 73 with C, and 75 with D (P < 0.01 B vs. A, 0.05 B vs. C and 0.07 B vs. D). The low-flux membrane correlated to higher blood pressure levels compared with the high-flux ones. The Helixone high-flux membrane ensured the best efficiency. Unfortunately, the very same dialyzer correlated to a higher incidence of hypotensive episodes.

Impact of case management on frequent users' quality of life : a randomized, controlled trial (FM 286)

Introduction: Frequent emergency department (ED) users are often vulnerable patients with many risk factors affecting their quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to examine to what extent a case management intervention improved frequent ED users' QoL. Methods: Data were part of a randomized, controlled trial designed to improve frequent ED users' QoL at the Lausanne University Hospital. A total of 194 frequent ED users (≥ 5 attendances during the previous 12 months; ≥ 18 years of age) were randomly assigned to the control or the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group received a case management intervention (i.e. counseling and assistance concerning social determinants of health, substance-use disorders, and access to the health-care system). QoL was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline and twelve months later. Four dimensions of QoL were retained: physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment, with scores ranging from 0 (low QoL) to 100 (high QoL).

Mercury analysis in hair: comparability and quality assessment within the transnational COPHES/DEMOCOPHES project

Human biomonitoring (HBM) is an effective tool for assessing actual exposure to chemicals that takes into account all routes of intake. Although hair analysis is considered to be an optimal biomarker for assessing mercury exposure, the lack of harmonization as regards sampling and analytical procedures has often limited the comparison of data at national and international level. The European-funded projects COPHES and DEMOCOPHES developed and tested a harmonized European approach to Human Biomonitoring in response to the European Environment and Health Action Plan. Herein we describe the quality assurance program (QAP) for assessing mercury levels in hair samples from more than 1800 mother-child pairs recruited in 17 European countries. To ensure the comparability of the results, standard operating procedures (SOPs) for sampling and for mercury analysis were drafted and distributed to participating laboratories. Training sessions were organized for field workers and four external quality-assessment exercises (ICI/EQUAS), followed by the corresponding web conferences, were organized between March 2011 and February 2012. ICI/EQUAS used native hair samples at two mercury concentration ranges (0.20-0.71 and 0.80-1.63) per exercise. The results revealed relative standard deviations of 7.87-13.55% and 4.04-11.31% for the low and high mercury concentration ranges, respectively. A total of 16 out of 18 participating laboratories the QAP requirements and were allowed to analyze samples from the DEMOCOPHES pilot study. Web conferences after each ICI/EQUAS revealed this to be a new and effective tool for improving analytical performance and increasing capacity building. The procedure developed and tested in COPHES/DEMOCOPHES would be optimal for application on a global scale as regards implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury.

Image quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers.

Evaluation of image quality (IQ) in Computed Tomography (CT) is important to ensure that diagnostic questions are correctly answered, whilst keeping radiation dose to the patient as low as is reasonably possible. The assessment of individual aspects of IQ is already a key component of routine quality control of medical x-ray devices. These values together with standard dose indicators can be used to give rise to 'figures of merit' (FOM) to characterise the dose efficiency of the CT scanners operating in certain modes. The demand for clinically relevant IQ characterisation has naturally increased with the development of CT technology (detectors efficiency, image reconstruction and processing), resulting in the adaptation and evolution of assessment methods. The purpose of this review is to present the spectrum of various methods that have been used to characterise image quality in CT: from objective measurements of physical parameters to clinically task-based approaches (i.e. model observer (MO) approach) including pure human observer approach. When combined together with a dose indicator, a generalised dose efficiency index can be explored in a framework of system and patient dose optimisation. We will focus on the IQ methodologies that are required for dealing with standard reconstruction, but also for iterative reconstruction algorithms. With this concept the previously used FOM will be presented with a proposal to update them in order to make them relevant and up to date with technological progress. The MO that objectively assesses IQ for clinically relevant tasks represents the most promising method in terms of radiologist sensitivity performance and therefore of most relevance in the clinical environment.

PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED) is crucial. As emergency physicians fear missing this potential life-threatening condition, PE tends to be over-investigated, exposing patients to unnecessary risks and uncertain benefit in terms of outcome. The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) is an eight-item block of clinical criteria that can identify patients who can safely be discharged from the ED without further investigation for PE. The endorsement of this rule could markedly reduce the number of irradiative imaging studies, ED length of stay, and rate of adverse events resulting from both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Several retrospective and prospective studies have shown the safety and benefits of the PERC rule for PE diagnosis in low-risk patients, but the validity of this rule is still controversial. We hypothesize that in European patients with a low gestalt clinical probability and who are PERC-negative, PE can be safely ruled out and the patient discharged without further testing. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a controlled, cluster randomized trial, in 15 centers in France. Each center will be randomized for the sequence of intervention periods: a 6-month intervention period (PERC-based strategy) followed by a 6-month control period (usual care), or in reverse order, with 2 months of "wash-out" between the 2 periods. Adult patients presenting to the ED with a suspicion of PE and a low pre test probability estimated by clinical gestalt will be eligible. The primary outcome is the percentage of failure resulting from the diagnostic strategy, defined as diagnosed venous thromboembolic events at 3-month follow-up, among patients for whom PE has been initially ruled out. DISCUSSION: The PERC rule has the potential to decrease the number of irradiative imaging studies in the ED, and is reported to be safe. However, no randomized study has ever validated the safety of PERC. Furthermore, some studies have challenged the safety of a PERC-based strategy to rule-out PE, especially in Europe where the prevalence of PE diagnosed in the ED is high. The PROPER study should provide high-quality evidence to settle this issue. If it confirms the safety of the PERC rule, physicians will be able to reduce the number of investigations, associated subsequent adverse events, costs, and ED length of stay for patients with a low clinical probability of PE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02375919 .

Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer.

PURPOSE: Iterative algorithms introduce new challenges in the field of image quality assessment. The purpose of this study is to use a mathematical model to evaluate objectively the low contrast detectability in CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A QRM 401 phantom containing 5 and 8 mm diameter spheres with a contrast level of 10 and 20 HU was used. The images were acquired at 120 kV with CTDIvol equal to 5, 10, 15, 20 mGy and reconstructed using the filtered back-projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction 50% (ASIR 50%) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms. The model observer used is the Channelized Hotelling Observer (CHO). The channels are dense difference of Gaussian channels (D-DOG). The CHO performances were compared to the outcomes of six human observers having performed four alternative forced choice (4-AFC) tests. RESULTS: For the same CTDIvol level and according to CHO model, the MBIR algorithm gives the higher detectability index. The outcomes of human observers and results of CHO are highly correlated whatever the dose levels, the signals considered and the algorithms used when some noise is added to the CHO model. The Pearson coefficient between the human observers and the CHO is 0.93 for FBP and 0.98 for MBIR. CONCLUSION: The human observers' performances can be predicted by the CHO model. This opens the way for proposing, in parallel to the standard dose report, the level of low contrast detectability expected. The introduction of iterative reconstruction requires such an approach to ensure that dose reduction does not impair diagnostics.

Anthropomorphic model observer performance in three-dimensional detection task for low-contrast computed tomography.

X-ray medical imaging is increasingly becoming three-dimensional (3-D). The dose to the population and its management are of special concern in computed tomography (CT). Task-based methods with model observers to assess the dose-image quality trade-off are promising tools, but they still need to be validated for real volumetric images. The purpose of the present work is to evaluate anthropomorphic model observers in 3-D detection tasks for low-contrast CT images. We scanned a low-contrast phantom containing four types of signals at three dose levels and used two reconstruction algorithms. We implemented a multislice model observer based on the channelized Hotelling observer (msCHO) with anthropomorphic channels and investigated different internal noise methods. We found a good correlation for all tested model observers. These results suggest that the msCHO can be used as a relevant task-based method to evaluate low-contrast detection for CT and optimize scan protocols to lower dose in an efficient way.

Passion for Ski Mountaineering and Relationship Quality: The Mediating Role of Team Cohesion

Vallerand and colleagues (2003) developed a dualistic model of passion, wherein two types of passion are proposed: harmonious and obsessive passions that predict adaptive and less adaptive interpersonal outcomes, respectively. The present study examined the mediating role of team cohesion between passion and relationship satisfaction and interpersonal conflict with teammates. We hypothesized that harmonious and obsessive passions would be positively and negatively related to team cohesion, respectively, which, in turn should be associated with high relationship satisfaction and low interpersonal conflict with teammates. Ski mountaineers (N = 559) participating in the "Patrouille des Glaciers" completed an initial questionnaire assessing harmonious and obsessive passions for ski mountaineering and team cohesion before the race. After the race, a second questionnaire was completed and assessed participants' relationship quality with teammates and team conflict during the race. Results from path analyses supported the hypothesized model. Future research directions are discussed in light of the dualistic model of passion and team cohesion literature.

Iterative reconstruction in CT : using mathematical model observers to determine low dose images' trustworthiness

La tomodensitométrie (TDM) est une technique d'imagerie pour laquelle l'intérêt n'a cessé de croitre depuis son apparition au début des années 70. De nos jours, l'utilisation de cette technique est devenue incontournable, grâce entre autres à sa capacité à produire des images diagnostiques de haute qualité. Toutefois, et en dépit d'un bénéfice indiscutable sur la prise en charge des patients, l'augmentation importante du nombre d'examens TDM pratiqués soulève des questions sur l'effet potentiellement dangereux des rayonnements ionisants sur la population. Parmi ces effets néfastes, l'induction de cancers liés à l'exposition aux rayonnements ionisants reste l'un des risques majeurs. Afin que le rapport bénéfice-risques reste favorable au patient il est donc nécessaire de s'assurer que la dose délivrée permette de formuler le bon diagnostic tout en évitant d'avoir recours à des images dont la qualité est inutilement élevée. Ce processus d'optimisation, qui est une préoccupation importante pour les patients adultes, doit même devenir une priorité lorsque l'on examine des enfants ou des adolescents, en particulier lors d'études de suivi requérant plusieurs examens tout au long de leur vie. Enfants et jeunes adultes sont en effet beaucoup plus sensibles aux radiations du fait de leur métabolisme plus rapide que celui des adultes. De plus, les probabilités des évènements auxquels ils s'exposent sont également plus grandes du fait de leur plus longue espérance de vie. L'introduction des algorithmes de reconstruction itératifs, conçus pour réduire l'exposition des patients, est certainement l'une des plus grandes avancées en TDM, mais elle s'accompagne de certaines difficultés en ce qui concerne l'évaluation de la qualité des images produites. Le but de ce travail est de mettre en place une stratégie pour investiguer le potentiel des algorithmes itératifs vis-à-vis de la réduction de dose sans pour autant compromettre la qualité du diagnostic. La difficulté de cette tâche réside principalement dans le fait de disposer d'une méthode visant à évaluer la qualité d'image de façon pertinente d'un point de vue clinique. La première étape a consisté à caractériser la qualité d'image lors d'examen musculo-squelettique. Ce travail a été réalisé en étroite collaboration avec des radiologues pour s'assurer un choix pertinent de critères de qualité d'image. Une attention particulière a été portée au bruit et à la résolution des images reconstruites à l'aide d'algorithmes itératifs. L'analyse de ces paramètres a permis aux radiologues d'adapter leurs protocoles grâce à une possible estimation de la perte de qualité d'image liée à la réduction de dose. Notre travail nous a également permis d'investiguer la diminution de la détectabilité à bas contraste associée à une diminution de la dose ; difficulté majeure lorsque l'on pratique un examen dans la région abdominale. Sachant que des alternatives à la façon standard de caractériser la qualité d'image (métriques de l'espace Fourier) devaient être utilisées, nous nous sommes appuyés sur l'utilisation de modèles d'observateurs mathématiques. Nos paramètres expérimentaux ont ensuite permis de déterminer le type de modèle à utiliser. Les modèles idéaux ont été utilisés pour caractériser la qualité d'image lorsque des paramètres purement physiques concernant la détectabilité du signal devaient être estimés alors que les modèles anthropomorphes ont été utilisés dans des contextes cliniques où les résultats devaient être comparés à ceux d'observateurs humain, tirant profit des propriétés de ce type de modèles. Cette étude a confirmé que l'utilisation de modèles d'observateurs permettait d'évaluer la qualité d'image en utilisant une approche basée sur la tâche à effectuer, permettant ainsi d'établir un lien entre les physiciens médicaux et les radiologues. Nous avons également montré que les reconstructions itératives ont le potentiel de réduire la dose sans altérer la qualité du diagnostic. Parmi les différentes reconstructions itératives, celles de type « model-based » sont celles qui offrent le plus grand potentiel d'optimisation, puisque les images produites grâce à cette modalité conduisent à un diagnostic exact même lors d'acquisitions à très basse dose. Ce travail a également permis de clarifier le rôle du physicien médical en TDM: Les métriques standards restent utiles pour évaluer la conformité d'un appareil aux requis légaux, mais l'utilisation de modèles d'observateurs est inévitable pour optimiser les protocoles d'imagerie. -- Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging technique in which interest has been quickly growing since it began to be used in the 1970s. Today, it has become an extensively used modality because of its ability to produce accurate diagnostic images. However, even if a direct benefit to patient healthcare is attributed to CT, the dramatic increase in the number of CT examinations performed has raised concerns about the potential negative effects of ionising radiation on the population. Among those negative effects, one of the major risks remaining is the development of cancers associated with exposure to diagnostic X-ray procedures. In order to ensure that the benefits-risk ratio still remains in favour of the patient, it is necessary to make sure that the delivered dose leads to the proper diagnosis without producing unnecessarily high-quality images. This optimisation scheme is already an important concern for adult patients, but it must become an even greater priority when examinations are performed on children or young adults, in particular with follow-up studies which require several CT procedures over the patient's life. Indeed, children and young adults are more sensitive to radiation due to their faster metabolism. In addition, harmful consequences have a higher probability to occur because of a younger patient's longer life expectancy. The recent introduction of iterative reconstruction algorithms, which were designed to substantially reduce dose, is certainly a major achievement in CT evolution, but it has also created difficulties in the quality assessment of the images produced using those algorithms. The goal of the present work was to propose a strategy to investigate the potential of iterative reconstructions to reduce dose without compromising the ability to answer the diagnostic questions. The major difficulty entails disposing a clinically relevant way to estimate image quality. To ensure the choice of pertinent image quality criteria this work was continuously performed in close collaboration with radiologists. The work began by tackling the way to characterise image quality when dealing with musculo-skeletal examinations. We focused, in particular, on image noise and spatial resolution behaviours when iterative image reconstruction was used. The analyses of the physical parameters allowed radiologists to adapt their image acquisition and reconstruction protocols while knowing what loss of image quality to expect. This work also dealt with the loss of low-contrast detectability associated with dose reduction, something which is a major concern when dealing with patient dose reduction in abdominal investigations. Knowing that alternative ways had to be used to assess image quality rather than classical Fourier-space metrics, we focused on the use of mathematical model observers. Our experimental parameters determined the type of model to use. Ideal model observers were applied to characterise image quality when purely objective results about the signal detectability were researched, whereas anthropomorphic model observers were used in a more clinical context, when the results had to be compared with the eye of a radiologist thus taking advantage of their incorporation of human visual system elements. This work confirmed that the use of model observers makes it possible to assess image quality using a task-based approach, which, in turn, establishes a bridge between medical physicists and radiologists. It also demonstrated that statistical iterative reconstructions have the potential to reduce the delivered dose without impairing the quality of the diagnosis. Among the different types of iterative reconstructions, model-based ones offer the greatest potential, since images produced using this modality can still lead to an accurate diagnosis even when acquired at very low dose. This work has clarified the role of medical physicists when dealing with CT imaging. The use of the standard metrics used in the field of CT imaging remains quite important when dealing with the assessment of unit compliance to legal requirements, but the use of a model observer is the way to go when dealing with the optimisation of the imaging protocols.

Psychosocial Quality-of-Life, Lifestyle and Adiposity: A Longitudinal Study in Pre-schoolers (Ballabeina Study).

PURPOSE: In obesity prevention, understanding psychosocial influences in early life is pivotal. Reviews reported contradictory results and a lack of longitudinal studies focusing on underlying lifestyle factors. This study tested whether psychosocial Quality-Of-Life (QOL) was associated with pre-schoolers' lifestyle and adiposity changes over one school year and whether lifestyle moderated the latter. It was hypothesised that QOL might not impact adiposity in everybody but that this might depend on preceding lifestyle. METHOD: Longitudinal data from 291 Swiss pre-schoolers (initially 3.9-6.3 years) was available. The following measures were used in longitudinal regressions: psychosocial QOL by PedsQL, adiposity (BMI z-score, waist, fat%), diet (food frequency), sedentary time and accelerometer-based activity. RESULTS: Concerning lifestyle, low psychosocial QOL was only related to unfavourable changes in diet (less fruit β = 0.21 and more fat intake β = -0.28) and lower physical activity (β = 0.21). Longitudinal QOL-adiposity relations appeared only after moderation by lifestyle factors (beta-range 0.13-0.67). Low psychosocial QOL was associated with increased adiposity in children with an unhealthy diet intake or high sedentary time. By contrast, low psychosocial QOL was associated with decreasing adiposity in high fruit consumers or more physically active pre-schoolers. CONCLUSION: Results emphasise the need for testing moderation in the QOL-adiposity relation. An unhealthy diet can be a vulnerability factor and high physical activity a protective factor in QOL-related adiposity. Consequently, QOL and lifestyle should be targeted concurrently in multi-factorial obesity prevention. The environment should be an 'activity encouraging, healthy food zone' that minimises opportunities for stress-induced eating. In addition, appropriate stress coping skills should be acquired.