The concept of temporal 'plus' epilepsy.

The concept of temporal 'plus' epilepsy (T+E) is not new, and a number of observations made by means of intracerebral electrodes have illustrated the complexity of neuronal circuits that involve the temporal lobe. The term T+E was used to unify and better individualize these specific forms of multilobar epilepsies, which are characterized by electroclinical features primarily suggestive of temporal lobe epilepsy, MRI findings that are either unremarkable or show signs of hippocampal sclerosis, and intracranial recordings which demonstrate that seizures arise from a complex epileptogenic network including a combination of brain regions located within the temporal lobe and over closed neighbouring structures such as the orbitofrontal cortex, the insulo-opercular region, and the temporo-parieto-occipital junction. We will review here how the term of T+E has emerged, what it means, and which practical consideration it raises.

Aspects opératoires et péri-opératoires de la stimulation cérébrale profonde [Operative and perioperative aspects of deep brain stimulation].

La stimulation cérébrale profonde (SCP) nécessite l'implantation chirurgicale d'un système comprenant électrodes cérébrales et boîtier(s) de stimulation. Les noyaux cérébraux visés par la méthodologie stéréotaxique d'implantation doivent être visualisés au mieux par une imagerie à haute résolution. La procédure chirurgicale d'implantation des électrodes se fait si possible en anesthésie locale pour faire des mesures électro-physiologiques et tester en peropératoire l'effet de la stimulation, afin d'optimiser la position de l'électrode définitive. Dans un deuxième temps, le ou les générateur(s) d'impulsions sont implantés en anesthésie générale. La SCP pour les mouvements anormaux a une très bonne efficacité et un risque de complications graves faible quoique non nul. Les complications liées au matériel sont les plus fréquentes. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires the surgical implantation of a system including brain electrodes and impulsion generator(s). The nuclei targeted by the stereotaxic implantation methodology have to be visualized at best by high resolution imaging. The surgical procedure for implanting the electrodes is performed if possible under local anaesthesia to make electro-physiological measurements and to test intra-operatively the effect of the stimulation, in order to optimize the position of the definitive electrode. In a second step, the impulsion generator(s) are implanted under general anaesthesia. DBS for movement disorders has a very good efficacy and a low albeit non-zero risk of serious complications. Complications related to the material are the most common.

Bilateral deep brain stimulation: the placement of the second electrode is not necessarily less accurate than that of the first one.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recognized as an effective treatment for movement disorders. We recently changed our technique, limiting the number of brain penetrations to three per side. OBJECTIVES: The first aim was to evaluate the electrode precision on both sides of surgery since we implemented this surgical technique. The second aim was to analyse whether or not the electrode placement was improved with microrecording and macrostimulation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operation protocols and MRIs of 30 patients who underwent bilateral DBS. For microrecording and macrostimulation, we used three parallel channels of the 'Ben Gun' centred on the MRI-planned target. Pre- and post-operative MRIs were merged. The distance between the planned target and the centre of the implanted electrode artefact was measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in targeting precision on both sides of surgery. There was more intra-operative adjustment of the second electrode positioning based on microrecording and macrostimulation, which allowed to significantly approach the MRI-planned target on the medial-lateral axis. CONCLUSION: There was more electrode adjustment needed on the second side, possibly in relation with brain shift. We thus suggest performing a single central track with electrophysiological and clinical assessment, with multidirectional exploration on demand for suboptimal clinical responses.

Towards high-quality simultaneous EEG-fMRI at 7T: Detection and reduction of EEG artifacts due to head motion.

The enhanced functional sensitivity offered by ultra-high field imaging may significantly benefit simultaneous EEG-fMRI studies, but the concurrent increases in artifact contamination can strongly compromise EEG data quality. In the present study, we focus on EEG artifacts created by head motion in the static B0 field. A novel approach for motion artifact detection is proposed, based on a simple modification of a commercial EEG cap, in which four electrodes are non-permanently adapted to record only magnetic induction effects. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI data were acquired with this setup, at 7T, from healthy volunteers undergoing a reversing-checkerboard visual stimulation paradigm. Data analysis assisted by the motion sensors revealed that, after gradient artifact correction, EEG signal variance was largely dominated by pulse artifacts (81-93%), but contributions from spontaneous motion (4-13%) were still comparable to or even larger than those of actual neuronal activity (3-9%). Multiple approaches were tested to determine the most effective procedure for denoising EEG data incorporating motion sensor information. Optimal results were obtained by applying an initial pulse artifact correction step (AAS-based), followed by motion artifact correction (based on the motion sensors) and ICA denoising. On average, motion artifact correction (after AAS) yielded a 61% reduction in signal power and a 62% increase in VEP trial-by-trial consistency. Combined with ICA, these improvements rose to a 74% power reduction and an 86% increase in trial consistency. Overall, the improvements achieved were well appreciable at single-subject and single-trial levels, and set an encouraging quality mark for simultaneous EEG-fMRI at ultra-high field.

Lésions induites par les pistolets à impulsion électrique de type Taser [Health Risks Concerning Electronic Control Devices]

Les pistolets à impulsion électrique (PIE) sont de plus en plus fréquemment utilisés en Europe ces dernières années, le modèle le plus connu étant le Taser®. Les connaissances scientifiques concernant les PIE et leurs effets potentiels restent toutefois limitées. Nous avons conduit une revue de littérature afin d'évaluer les implications potentielles de leur utilisation en termes de sécurité, de morbidité et de mortalité. Une exposition unique chez un individu sain peut généralement être considérée comme peu dangereuse. Les sujets à risque de complications sont les individus exposés à de multiples décharges, les personnes sous l'influence de substances psychoactives, ceux qui montrent des signes d'agitation extrême, ou encore les individus présentant des comorbidités médicales. L'éventail des complications pouvant survenir lors de leur exposition est large et inclut les lésions provoquées par les impacts des électrodes, les traumatismes liés à la chute induite par la paralysie transitoire ou des complications cardiovasculaires. Dans ce contexte, les personnes exposées doivent être examinées attentivement, et les éventuelles lésions traumatiques doivent être exclues. The use of electronic control devices (ECD), such as the Taser®, has increased in Europe over the past decade. However, scientific data concerning the potential health impact of ECD usage remains limited. We reviewed the scientific literature in order to evaluate the safety, mortality, and morbidity associated with ECD use. Exposure of a healthy individual to a single ECD electroshock can be considered generally safe. Complications can, however, occur if the patient is subject to multiple electroshocks, if the patient has significant medical comorbidities, or when exposure is associated with drug abuse or agitated delirium. The broad spectrum of potential complications associated with ECD exposure includes direct trauma caused by the ECD electrodes, injuries caused by the transient paralysis-induced fall, and cardiovascular events. An ECD-exposed patient requires careful examination during which traumatic injuries are actively sought out.